How to build a resilient public health workforce.
2024-04-23 00:48:09
Wellness isn’t just about mindfulness, exercise, or the right skin routine. Science, politics, media, culture, tech — everything around us — interact to shape our health. On America Dissected, Dr. Abdul El-Sayed cuts into what really makes us sick — be it racism, corporate greed, or snake oil influencers — and what it'll take to heal it. From for-profit healthcare to ineffective sunscreens, America Dissected cuts deeper into the state of health in America. New episodes every Tuesday. Want to know where to start? Here are some fan-favorite episodes to search: Cannabis Capitalism with David Jernigan Weight Weight Don’t Tell me with Harriett Brown Black Scientists Matter with Dr. Kizzmekia Corbett.
Book bans are on the rise and it's on us to fight back. Luckily, the crooked store is doing a flash sale on all. free the books, merch free the books, tees, sweatshirts and magnets are 30% off, But the sale won't last long. So make like a conservative who found out about a book with a gay character and jump on it. Head to crooked comm slash store to shop before the sale ends.
America dissected is brought to you by the DeBeaumont Foundation. If you're in public health, understanding policy is part of the job. sharpen your skills and expand your knowledge with strategic skills for public health practice. policy engagement. a New book from the DeBeaumont Foundation and APHA press policy engagement Demystifies the policymaking process and gives readers the tools and confidence They need to pursue bold change.
to learn more and get your copy, visit DeBeaumont org.
A new Colorado law extends privacy rights to data from brainwaves. Senator Bernie Sanders proposes a long, kovat moonshot. Congress faces a deadline to end or extend pandemic era telehealth policies. This is America dissected. I'm your host.
Dr. Abdul. I'll say it.
To say that it's been a rough couple years for public health folks, that'd be an understate. It's been the worst couple of years in living memory. as much as the rest of the country has moved on from the pandemic, We're stuck in a bit of a we'll call it suspended animation. on the one hand, as much as the pandemic era of kovat, 19 has been declared over the virus SARS, kovat. Ooh is still here.
that's true both as a seasonal virus that continues to make thousands of people sick every single day and as a persistent illness for millions of people living with long kovat. and That means that while the rest of the weight of the pandemic has subsided, it still occupies a weighty liminal space. But here's the rub. public health challenges don't wait for each other. There's no complex gating procedure.
that virus is engaging to make sure that we've had sufficient time to recover. They don't wait. on the heels of kovat came mpox, and now we're all girding ourselves for measles. and there's this whole cows infecting people with bird flu. and Yet, where you'd think that the experience of a world as we know it, ending pandemic might have forced a broader Conversation about the value of public health and the importance of consistent, uninterrupted investment in it.
The effect has been just the opposite. The pandemic has become a touchstone of collective, unresolved trauma, the very mention of which elicits a fight-or-flight response That leaves us avoiding the subject at all costs. So, rather than a sober look at what we ought to do to protect ourselves from the next one, We all but refuse to talk about it. Meanwhile, those of us sitting in the bowels of America's public health departments are dealing with the double pathology of PTSD from the pandemic and anxiety over whether we'll have the resources we need to fight the next one. and Can we all agree that the combination of trauma and anxiety probably aren't the optimal mind space for performance?
Public health professionals are people too, after all, But there's another part here that's worth thinking about. there's no doubt the public health pros are book smart. After all, we spend a lot of time learning about that space where biology and statistics, sociology and psychology meet. But book smarts are only half the battle. making things work under challenging resource, limited and implicitly political circumstances Requires a level of street smarts, too, and that's where our public health workforce needs some work.
Knowing the right policy is great. But knowing how to get the right policy implemented That's more about understanding public communication, movement, organizing, political lobbying and the interplay between all of them. It's pretty important to secure our funding too. and that mismatch between the skills we have and the skills we need Contributes to the burnout and frustration that so many in public health are feeling right now. Too often we're preparing future public health professionals for the cookie-cutter, inside-the-box version of public health, But the real thing is anything but that, and that Delta between the two only makes the anxiety worse.
I had no idea what I was getting into really isn't a position of strength. Our guest today is a friend of the pod who spent a lot of time thinking about these issues. Dr. Brian Kastrucci is the president and CEO of the double, my foundation, one of our sponsors and co-author of the new book building strategic Skills for public health, a primer for public health professionals. He joined me to talk about what a grittier, more street, smart public health should look like and how we train our future leaders to Embrace strategy and substance.
Here's my conversation with dr. Brian Kastrucci.
Can you introduce yourself with the tape? Brian Kastrucci, president and CEO of the double, my foundation, Brian?
You guys have written a new book. you, along with Michael Frazier, a renewed new book really focused on.
Practical strategies for public health professionals. Can you tell us a little bit about what motivated you to write this book?
Absolutely, when you think about the scientists in public health, we are great scientists. We know Great depth, whether it's maternal, child health or epidemiology. We have really really great depth in our field. But you also need to be able to to do a whole bunch of other things to deliver that message to other people. So a scientist who can do science just amongst themselves, in a room, doesn't change the world.
Right. It's like the tree that falls in the forest, doesn't make a sound. So you have to be able to do a whole bunch of other things. you have to be able to Know how to communicate effectively, how to change systems, a whole bunch of skills that we are calling strategic skills. So think about a T, that Vertical part of the T.
That's the depth of our training. but that horizontal bar, That's how you really get that message out to a whole bunch of people, and that's why this was important.
yeah, I really appreciated it, because I think you guys are spot-on on the Fundamental analysis that leads to a need for this kind of book. you know, one of the Frustrating parts of this is that when you think about public health? We think a lot about the health part, but we don't think enough about the public part, and There is something about the way that we engage in the public space That, frankly, up until the pandemic, We just didn't have to actually come to terms with, and I think the pandemic threw us out there. It's almost like you throw an actor on stage and they don't know the lines. They don't really get the plot of the the play, And we kind of felt like that, and I think this intervention on The education of public health professionals, I think, is about reinserting that public piece back into public health.
I want to ask you, though, you know, we have really great public health training programs, and, As I was reading through your book, It became really clear that so much of what you are talking about are just practical skills that have to do with leadership and communication and workforce development that we don't actually teach or learn in academic public health spaces, and It just struck me as being such a gap in How we train, and it also struck me as being a byproduct of the fact that so much of the public health Infrastructure has been built out as almost an academic and exercise, as if you know doing the science and interpreting science was just it. That's like what we do Versus having to go out and be and do in the world, change public policy and, and ideally, make people healthier. What you know as you think about this book and the need for the book, What does that tell you about the way we should be thinking about public health? curricula writ large and the way we train?
Trainees in public health more generally. I was trained in amazingly good schools of public health And I appreciate that training and it gave me a lot of amazing skills. But where I learned how to be thoughtful, how to be strategic, was actually when I worked at the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. It's a whole bunch of skills that you get on the job that we're not getting in school, and I think this is a real moment to reflect on public health education. Do we want to be knowledgeable or do we want to be impactful?
And if you want to be knowledgeable and know a lot of numbers, yeah, that's great. But the first four Letters and numbers is numb, and if you just get up there and start throwing data on a wall, No one's gonna really care what you're saying, how you package it, how you help people with change, How you really think through a system? This is what we're supposed to be doing. I mean, no one, no one got into public health to figure out an odds ratio. We didn't get into public health just to do a case control study.
We got into public health to change the world. We got into public health to figure out how to make people who otherwise aren't healthier, and we realize that it's wrong, That everyone can't achieve their optimal health in this country, in the richest country in the world. How is that even possible? So that's what drew us to this field, but then we're trained in This wonderful skill set, but not really taught how to apply it, how to Seed movements, how to lead people, how to be humble in leadership, how to pair Community and science. and and really have, do I you know, the pendulum swings?
We're all about science. now We're all about community. What we need is We need the community to be the peanut butter and the science to be the chocolate. We need to put it together and eat the Reese's. either one on their own is okay, but not as good as a Reese's, and that's that's how we have to change our thinking working with community and Bringing their skills to the table.
we bring our skills to the table, and when we work together, Then we're unstoppable, but as long as we stay in our silos, we're gonna continue to be ineffective. Yeah, Brian.
I really appreciate that that point and also that you are One of the only public health professionals that I could have on my podcast Who's encouraging us to eat Reese's, which thank you, because they're delicious and you gotta have a little bit of joy in your life. you know the this point that you're making about this divorce between community driven versus evidence based. you would think that in a in in sort of a practical public health educational space, we would do both, and I worry that you we've gotten very theoretical about what public health is and does and It's almost like, because we're so top-heavy as a practice, so much of the discourse is dominated by the academic space That we think that the theory is the practice and it's. it's just not It. how do we create a space where we have a little bit more?
We can wait. what is taught and engaged with was a little bit more attention to public health practice Rather than public health theory, and I say this as somebody who started my career, You know, in the Academy, and I deeply appreciate the elegance of a beautiful study. I also know that the world is not the elegantly designed study by definition. We do a whole lot of things to try and pull our study out of right, the the sullying aspects of the world To make it elegant and beautiful, but then you also have to apply it back into the real world, And I worry that that is the place where We have fallen on our face pretty profoundly. What is the conversation?
You feel like we need to be having? amongst ourselves or in this space to bring our?
Our theoretical work back to real life and maybe sometimes even turn the volume down on some of the theory people.
Yeah, I was never big on theory. I'm an action guy and You know, I look at folks who say we need to study Housing. housing is a crisis and we need research. I don't think you need much more research to know the way you solve a housing crisis as you get people homes, And the way you solve a hunger crisis is you get people food. that doesn't need research.
Instead of what we need, which is political will that's really hard to generate. We go back to the research, say, okay, let's study it, right? I mean, how does every legislative initiative that they really don't want to deal with but they want to do something? they put in a study committee or they create a panel or a coalition and Study it for a while and then nothing happens because we forget. I Think we're at a moment where we have to rethink a lot of public health, The post pandemic.
we need to ask, you know, what is the continued role of the Health Department? What is the continued role of advocates? What is the continued role of public health education? I don't think it's the same as it was before. there are far too many Public health programs that aren't teaching enough communication.
They aren't teaching change management, They aren't teaching data interpretation, right. we need a DRPH not an epidemiology, but a DRPH in social change, and that's going to be a bit of a change, because How we do that? given currency requirements, all the things that one has to do to to get a doctoral degree, A PhD or even get an MPH, to have to write the dissertation or the capstone, Let's make sure that the capstone is community based. Let's talk about real change, not just discovering knowledge. Right.
That's a very noble pursuit. We could take all the knowledge and put it in a library and we go there and go Knowledge. knowledge is good, but knowledge applied to problems. That's the game changer. That's what gets people, you know, I mean, I don't want you to study.
You know how to transplant a heart, with never the goal to actually put a heart in someone different Like. that's the. the beauty of it is making change in people's lives. I mean, this is what makes public health The most important career there is. it's that you get to change Not one person's life, but the lives of entire communities and populations if we're doing it, right.
I mean my daughter, Chloe, when someone says what's what's the difference between your dad as a doctor and the pediatrician? and She'll say well, my pediatrician helps one person at a time. My dad helps everyone all the time, and That's what the power of public health is, but we've we've kind of shackled our own power right, we've Minimized it to doing studies or doing Program instead of really getting in and doing policy and advocacy.
I really appreciate a couple of the the points you made there, that the analogy of heart surgery, I think is really Important because I've studied both public health and medicine and medicine There's always this end outcome where you are going to be with a patient and all of your training. while there is a lot of theory involved, all of your training is still wedded to that question of a Patient, physician interaction and how you're going to engage in that moment. And so there's a set of Practical skills, not just technical skills or knowledge, but practical skills that you cannot graduate medical school without at least having learned about. I mean some people are better at it than others, like anything, But but at least you will have had time to practice it. Whereas it feels like in public health, too often Everything is studied in theory and then folks roll off the truck into the real world and they're like, I'm sorry, this is just not what I signed up for and you're like, but it is actually what you signed up for.
the problem is that we trained you for something very different, and You know, it's interesting when I think about Department design. So I've been in this, this sort of second rebuild job of a public health department, and It's interesting, because the way that people think about a department in the way that we're taught to think about it. You do a community health assessment. Then you identify the challenges that need to be addressed. Then you work with the community to suss out What their needs are.
then you take that to the literature. you look at evidence-based interventions And then you start to apply the evidence-based interventions, but that's all theoretical right, that there is nothing that is Engaged with which with okay. So how do you advocate for resources for yourself? What are the kinds of things that elected officials, who are your bosses, are interested in you delivering? How do you make sure that you are a go-between between those, those elected officials in the community?
How do you engage with funders to have a conversation about what their goals are and what your goals are? How do you design a program so it actually gets ruled out in the community that you're engaged in? and these are things that you know Folks don't teach us in public health, and I think your book does a really great job with.
It's the basic with them. what's in it for me? we believe that public health is a universal good, and So everyone should do public health and support public health, because we're a universal good. We help poor and vulnerable communities. Yeah, but what if I don't care about poor and vulnerable communities?
What if I'm living in a rich neighborhood? What if I'm a business owner? Well, great, you go. help poor and vulnerable communities. I don't have any value there.
It's like a whole. We just we misbranded public health almost from the get-go, Because we talked about public health serving Poor and vulnerable communities and unfortunately those communities don't have a lot of political power. We didn't brand public health to help every person, in every County, in Every corner of this country. that public health touches you every day. So if you are a rich person in a rich County and you own a business, guess what?
Public health is helping your employees. It's helping the community. It's helping the people who are buying your product. It's the foundation of your house, and it's something we don't think a whole lot about. But when it's cracked, everything else is in jeopardy.
You.
America dissected is brought to you by the farm manipulation podcast. last year, the Food and Drug Administration gave a stamp of its approval to 55 prescription drugs, but how many of these drugs actually improved how patients feel, function and survive? Pharmaceutical companies spend enormous resources to convince the FDA to approve mediocre, unsafe or unnecessary drugs. Check out the farmed out project, their podcast farm manipulation and their latest report. What needs to change at the FDA, protecting and advancing public health?
farmed out is a rational prescribing project at Georgetown University Medical Center and their show. farm manipulation explores the ways industry markets drugs and diseases to consumers and the health care providers. Join host dr. Adrian few Berman for her evidence-based, edgy and entertaining approach to health and medicine. Each episode features an interview with different experts and provides resources to learn more about how the pharmaceutical and medical device industries manufacture both medical knowledge and medical products.
Previous topics include drugs for Alzheimer's disease and drugs for weight loss. this season for manipulation will cover opioids, menopause and how the FDA can Improve. you can read their latest report on their website and you can find farmed outs farm manipulation podcast anywhere. You get your podcasts. Marguerite Casey Foundation is proud to partner with nation swell to present doppelganger a trip into the mirror world, a Marguerite Casey Foundation book club event designed to make sense of the vertigo inducing post pandemic shadow world that feels all too familiar.
Join, the MCF book club for an in-person event in New York City on Wednesday, April 24th for a conversation with author Naomi Klein, scholar, author, activist and 2020 Marguerite Casey Foundation, Freedom Scholar Keanu Yamada Taylor, as well as filmmaker, writer and activist Astra Taylor and dr Carmen Rojas, president and CEO of Marguerite Casey Foundation, as they make sense of this parallel social universe and chart a path towards shared Purpose and power. RSVP today to save your seat for this free event at Casey grants comm slash book club. That's C a s e y g r a n t s dot-com slash book club, And if you won't be able to join the club in New York City, please consider sharing with your networks.
I want to ask you as you think about the fundamental skills you talk a lot about workforce, both from a Motivational standpoint and also the whole implicit value of the book is about about building out the workforce. If you, if you had to think through the three most important and, unfortunately, most efficient Practical skills strategic skills for public health. What would they be?
We got to start with communication. We have to. If I asked you to draw a hamburger right now and hold it up, It would look like a hamburger almost. I've done this. and if, speaking events throughout the country, There's not one single person who can't draw a hamburger And have someone else see it and be like, yeah, it's a hamburger.
So then I ask all these public health leaders, people who've been in public health for decades. Okay, now, drop public health and Silence, no one can do it. Even if one someone tries, it won't look like someone else's drawing a public health. and yet we expect elected officials and laypeople to be able to Understand public health when we can't communicate it in a very succinct way. So so that's one.
You made an earlier point that I just think is worth reiterating, which is We assume we commit what's called in philosophy the hermeneutical fallacy, Which is the assumption that the thing that someone else values is the same thing you value, and vice versa. so we assume that when we make arguments on public health grounds, that those are self-evidently more important than other arguments, and We fail then to communicate at core Why our value matters, because we assume that it's taken for granted that this is just. this is just something we share in common, and That in and of itself, I think, is so core to our failure to communicate. and it's interesting. Obviously, I spent some time in politics and the thing that you're always doing is two things.
You are always always Communicating values and you're always introducing yourself. And that's the thing we don't do. We don't introduce ourselves and we forget to communicate our values, And so on. so many. unlike the foundation of communication, we fail.
I 100% agree with you. We have to train that skill. I actually think that's what makes you effective. Is that you spend time in politics? and So you learned hey, this is how I have to work with people.
This is how you know, I please. I say all the time. I use your line that we are linguistic absolutists And if we're not saying the right language, then you're not showing that you're part of our group and therefore we're gonna shun you. and and I think that's One of the second skills is it's super important for public health. in the ten essential services of public health, It is the center, and that's justice, equity, diversity and inclusion.
but.
How we do it? I? Think it's really important, and I do. I think we've trained public health how to say words. What does your health department do?
It does equity. Well, what do you mean? Well, I mean we do equity. No. No, can you Actually break it down to me.
No, I can't do that Right. in our wind survey, only three quarters of the public health workforce felt fighting racism was their job, And I think that's too low. I think it should be much higher, but how do we do it? not in San Francisco or in New York City? But how do we do it in Tuscaloosa, Alabama, right?
How do we do it in Macon, Georgia? how do we do it in Florida? and I believe it was Alabama that recently outlawed DEI in schools and and other government functions, so We have to, and Robert Wood Johnson Foundation's done a really great job of this with some of their new messaging. How do you talk to people? About health equity without ever saying the words health equity?
Yeah,
without actually saying things that will trigger people like equity, for.
finance people means the proportion of something that you own. we're not even talking using the same words for the same meanings, and We like to do this. to your point about a link, Linguistic absolutism. is we like to do this? because we are more interested often in communicating to our tribe that we're in, Rather than we are communicating to the people we're trying to build and bring into our coalition, And so we use words that are, by their own nature, exclusive, and then we think we're doing this to to, To build a sort of level of inclusion, and it, like you, can't make it make sense.
It's ideals over impact, and I mean I've worked with, or even more so, like identity over impact, right?
Professional. I speak a certain language, I'm trained a certain way and I'm gonna use my words because they're my words to tell everybody else who's like me that I'm like Them, rather than actually communicating to people who don't know the definitions of those words.
Yeah, I've had a great opportunity to work with a lot of different political leaders throughout The pandemic, and I didn't necessarily agree with everything They believed politically, But what we both really cared about was getting people vaccinated and, in that sense, getting conservatives vaccinated. And so we found common ground and we work together. It's, it's all the the wonder of making that McCain Biden relationship what it once was, And that relationship just doesn't happen anymore. Hmm, and that hurts our country. It hurts our health.
So lastly, the third Strategic skill that I think is super important is policy engagement, and we've been working with the the Lerner Center at Johns Hopkins under the leadership of Shelly Hearn, to bring more of an advocacy focus to public health, because we we both know that every conversation about health in this country Devolves into a conversation of pills and procedures instead of policies and partnerships, Because ultimately we love a good band-aid in our culture. So like let's feed someone tonight, Right, because that's going to feed them for the rest of their lives. We need to feed, we need to feed people Routinely. you need to change the system and, and honestly, the only way that you can get at the social determinants of health Is by doing policy change and policy engagement and That that may be the space for for public health practitioners in a governmental setting. But it also may.
it may need to be other people. I am, I am floored by the work of Katherine Patterson and Katrina Forrest in the city health project. They are out there with a policy package of 12 policies, Working with governors, working with municipal staff, passing policies. Mm-hmm. They reward the cities with a medal.
I'm super excited. I think it's week after. next, during Public Health Week, I get to go to San Antonio and give a medal to my close friend and Health Commissioner Claude Jacob, and.
Mayor Nuremberg, who has over his tenure as mayor, Become an awesome health policy, one Mm-hmm, right, and he had the bravery and the courage to be the first city in Texas to pass Tobacco 21, and what was really important about that is, remember. This is the city of San Antonio, which is in Bexar County. So at one point, on one side of the street, you had to be 21 to buy cigarettes, But on the other side of the street, you only need to be 18. Imagine the political pressure that the mayor was under. But he believes in health and he believes that the prescription for better health is policy, Because, while I like physicians, the impact that a county commissioner can have on one's health is far greater than that of a physician.
and I want to. I want to highlight a couple words that you use, which are bravery and courage, and I I Believe that these can be taught, and I also believe that we're actively not teaching them. and and I think that the challenge that we face, and that a lot of the content about, about leadership that you write on, is that advocacy and policy change require you to come up against power and they require you to question a status quo and Potentially take risks, because anytime you come up against power, you take risks. We say a lot about speaking truth to power. The thing about it, though.
It's it's one thing to speak truth to power, It's another, entirely to confront power and force power to change, and that's those are two different things. It's easy these days to speak truth, right. people have been able to. power has learned how to tune you out. what you need to be able to do is actually come up right against it and face the risks of engaging with it to force it to change.
and Unfortunately, I think in public health we tend to be, Unfortunately, like it's, like part of the culture to be a rule follower that we tend to select against people who are willing to do this and To engage with power in this particular way. I want to ask you. What does it mean for us to select a different or select against people who are more interested in following rules and and select for people who are more interested in changing them, and How do we start rebranding ourselves to Inspire folks like that to come into this field?
Well, I think we also have to expand what the field means, right if it's just governmental public health. As someone who was a disruptor in governmental public health, You kind of did that for a couple years and they got tired of you and they moved you on Right, and then you went to the next health department. I had a really really good friend. explain the way that health department work. where health departments work is they kind of grow in Into this thick batch and then you need a fireball that comes through every so often to create space for it to grow.
And so we need to think about the complete ecosystem of public health. there is a place for the governmental public health practitioner, but there is an equal place for the Advocate and the disruptor, and we need to feed the ecosystem so that we can have all things. I mean where I am. I can be more disruptive, and that's that's acceptable. But if the health official of a state is going to only be as disruptive as their governor would Will tolerate and in some places that's a lot, in some places That's very little.
but then they have to be skilled in how you work. that broader Ecosystem. Mmm, right if you want it, if you want to get invited to talk to the to the legislature. You know that may be telling your state health official. I would like to address the legislature about women's health, or it's finding someone who knows the legislator who can get you the invitation.
but we have to be able to work all aspects of the ecosystem and we're not just training people from for Working in a health department. The health department alone is not going to deliver what we need in public health any longer. They are a critical piece. They are a backbone piece, But if I was just a backbone, I wouldn't be much of a skeleton. So we need all the other complementary bones to make a full skeleton that can stand up to the power, as as you mentioned.
yeah, I really appreciate that point, and you know what you can do versus what you can say, and Those differ depending upon where you sit, but the other side of it is also We need to work in concert and I think, unfortunately, we have sort of lacked that ability to bring a coherent scientific analysis to the Public activism piece of things right, because oftentimes you end up having activism but that activism might not be as moored in a lot of the science that that drives public health. and Then vice versa, you end up having, you know, government actors who are moored in the science but are not willing to rock the boat because of exactly the political circumstances that you that you Named and so really does take all of us working in concert to know who can play what part and what needs to be said. I mean, I've had conversations in previous roles where I sat down with activists and be like This is what you need to say to get to create the space for me to move. I can have this conversation inside and there's things that I can I can say outside, But there are things that you can say out loud to create the circumstances that can move a conversation, right? And it's public health folks working together around a certain goal, Understanding that not everybody's gonna be a trumpet, not everybody's gonna be a cello, right?
but you can make beautiful music when you have a trumpet in a cello and and and you got to understand you play different parts a.
Thousand percent. and actually it reminds me during the pandemic, Bill Fahey, you know, Mount Rushmore Post Public Health Bill Fahey said that Redfield CDC director Redfield should resign in protest. and and I I always hate a good resignation in protest, because then you're losing the people who are on the inside who can Make change and work if working together and in concert with activists to then make the space. But when you resign in protest, trust me, they're gonna find someone worse than you, More aligns with their goals to replace you. So I spent.
You know, I'm getting old now, So it's the percentages are changing, but I spent a good chunk of my career in Governmental public health and I felt that I did really good work. They're trying to move things incrementally when activists and Others outside that system. We're helping by creating the space to make those changes, whether it was legislative or regulatory. Now, I'm on the other side. I'm on the private space, in in the philanthropy, And I have resources to try to make change, try to bring data to different people.
I mean, that's, that's why we do the public health workforce interest in need survey. It's, it is a Diagnosis of what's wrong with your workforce, where they need help, where they're excelling, so that Leaders in the workforce can then make the appropriate tweaks and changes. So again, it's it's a synergy, and if we're working together, I mean con we're taking on wicked problems. We're taking on problems that we we know how to solve. The issue is we don't have the political will to solve them.
So we're going against power. We're going against trench power. We're going against colonial determinants of health, a political determinants of health, of every determinant that you can think of, and we're not gonna win Unless we are on point. Yeah, and I think that's coming out of the pandemic. if there's one thing that the strategic skills book is trying to say to everybody is We can't be just scientists.
We have to be better than that. We can't say that we are tired or that we're overworked because we're trying to do things and fight power that is entrenched and Generational. and if you want that kind of change, you got to be on point.
Now, I really appreciate that point, because I think you're also making an argument to The activist community here, which is you got to also be strategic, And I worry that the incentives of social media have also corrupted activism in a certain way. we're a lot more interested in tearing down than we are in building up, and it's you're always going to get a Microflame going on social media by calling out, rather than thinking bigger picture, about how you architect A real movement and I do think that you know, because social media is so performative We will trade a small, or what's seen as a small, victory over a broader architectural win, I mean you think about, you know, the kinds of work that folks were able to build in activist circles before the social media era, and this was all about trying to build a community, a Movement around a goal, and I worry that in public health, you know a lot of times what public health activism looks like is calling out a one, an individual leader, rather than Trying to create a movement around a particular set of goals, Just like right. we need folks on the inside, in public health departments and agencies, to be able to respond to that movement and Translate that movement into real policy change and it takes both sides doing their job Well, and unfortunately, I think on the practitioner side, There is a failure to think strategically about how to engage people on the outside and on the outside. There's a failure to think strategically about how to empower people on the inside, and you need both of those things Happening to create an architect real change.
I'll give you a perfect example. The we know from the Edelman Trust Index that people really don't trust media and people really don't trust government, But they trust their employers. Hmm. Why didn't we have a network of employers ready to send out? pro-vaccination messages to their staff?
Because we've never made that partnership. Yeah, because we are too busy. often, you know finger-wagging To hear this is how we can work together, you know public health never wins when we're wagging our finger and We have to find a way to make partnerships with people We never thought we'd speak to, let alone partner with. that's when you know You're working and you're really making change is when you are so uncomfortable. and again, through the pandemic.
I worked with folks. I never thought I'd work with folks who I still work with now and I learned a lot. I learned hearing what they had to say, some things. they said I was like, I just simply don't agree with this and that's okay. But then there are other things like wow.
Okay, that's a different perspective on things. perfect example. We said the lab leak theory Was a right-wing conspiracy and we took people off of Twitter for spreading conspiracy. But then we came back around. we're like, well, maybe that's a plausible hypothesis.
Wait a second. in One breath. you're saying I'm a right-wing conspiracy theorist. now, this is a plausible hypothesis. this seems inconsistent and That's unfair, and we did that.
like misinformation is Prevalent, but I think we have to do some introspection to figure out how much we Kind of tilled the soil where misinformation grew. Hmm, like public health. Yes, Joe Rogan is scary and we can say he says a lot of crazy stuff, but you know, we weren't always consistent. We changed our message sometimes and this is a time to reflect on that not be public health apologists, but to be improving our practice so that we never have to experience the ridicule and Undermining that happened throughout Kovac. Yeah.
No, I.
Appreciate that point. There's a great MLK quote, which is if you feel comfortable in your coalition, your coalition is too small, and I think we would do really well to think a little bit about that.
Because I think we we are really comfortable in our small coalition and we are missing out opportunities to build toward our goal.
If public health is a great church, If you come to the Church of Public Health and we all say the same thing and we all read from the same hymnal, It's a great place to be, but then somebody walks past the church doors and instead of embracing them and reaching out to them, We shut the door. Hmm. We may be great preachers, but we're no, we're no missionary. hmm, and that's our problem is how do we bring people to our understanding? because when I sit with people and I Explain how public health helps them, They're like, where do you sign me up?
Well, I've never heard of this public health thing. Yeah, you have, it's just never put you in this way. Yeah, public health helps people have better lives, build stronger communities and build strong economies. and You put that third point in to appeal to those that the first two points don't engage. Right, but we never did that, like we have to have messaging that.
Crosses political lines. if you care about individual health, I got you. care about community health. I got you care about business. now I got you.
now. public health is all those things, and now I want to talk to you more about it, because I understand how It benefits me and and we just we can't just be the silent warriors who are there Crusading in the shadows and are keeping you safe, because that that is not a winning strategy. No one, no one funds what's in the strip, in the shadows They don't know about, and so we have to be a little less humble and a little more clear about what public health does. and I, In my perfect world, there is never a public health practitioner at a political hearing championing more funding for public health. It's the superintendent, it's the business leader.
It's the clergy. It's the religious leader. I want them talking about public health, not us. That's when we win, when we become ubiquitous, Not when we continue to say we don't have enough money. We don't have enough.
this we get. people have to understand our value, and That's that's our business now going forward, because we closed businesses that never opened again. We maybe did harm to people who didn't know who we were or who elected us, and then they figured out no one elected us. We have to really build these partnerships and they got to start right now, before the next pandemic. We got to get more people swiping right on public health.
But right now I don't blame all of them, not because again we shut down businesses and we never met them before. We didn't call them and say there's a respiratory virus out of containment. buckle up buttercup. That's gonna get bad. And here's myself.
and when you're up at 2 in the morning and you're worried about this virus, You call me because I'm up at the same time. Imagine how powerful that would have been. but in most places we didn't do it. No, and and that's the thing. Is that I think we?
fail to recognize the strategies about how we engage with our Communities to build toward a goal, and that implies building stronger, bigger coalitions, and I really appreciate You and your co-author, Michael Frazier, for highlighting that in the book is building strategic skills for better health, a Primer for public health professionals, and our guest, of course, is Brian Castrucci, President, CEO of the DeBeaumont Foundation. Brian, really appreciate your passion, your insight. And, of course, your strategic thinking. Thank you. Thank you.
As usual. here's what I'm watching right now. Imagine this scenario in 20 years. someone creates a product based on research that's still in its nascent stages today. That can predict behavior based on brainwaves, but it's not perfect.
No tool ever is. Imagine they form a company trying to sell that technology to police departments as a tool to predict who's going to commit crime. Imagine that tool is used to apprehend people based simply on their brainwaves, Even though they've done nothing wrong. And that's just one example of the kind of fresh hell brainwave data could create. You could imagine folks using AI driven algorithms to track brainwaves to identify what kinds of ads would be best suited to get you to Buy something, or employers using that data and employment decisions, if you'd rather not live in that dystopia.
I agree with you. so does the state of Colorado, it turns out. Colorado became the first state to pass a law extending privacy rights to data generated by neurotechnologies that collect and analyze brainwaves. I hope that other states, and maybe, just maybe, the federal government too, will start to take privacy concerns of this type seriously, because Consumer data protection is bad enough as it is, and I'd rather nip this in the bud while it's still early Last week, senator Bernie Sanders, chair of the Senate Committee on health, education, labor and pensions or help, Announced a new effort to take on long kovat, his moonshot for long kovat calls on the federal government to invest ten billion dollars over Ten years to support new NIH based research into the causes, consequences and treatments of long kovat. The effort highlights the fact that upwards of three in ten American adults said they'd had symptoms lasting longer than three months, and about ten Percent said they still experience those symptoms.
today, Considering the fact that kovat approached nearly full penetration. We're talking about upwards of 35 million people who are still suffering kovat symptoms. as I talked about earlier today, the political economy of kovat means that there's no incentive to continue to talk about it. for most politicians, Republicans have basically denied that a pandemic ever happened, while Democrats want to take credit for ending it. But it turns out that neither want to talk about it anymore.
And in that context, calling for a moonshot to address a condition still affecting one in ten adults is both courageous and good policy. While we're learning a lot more about long kovat, which we think has to do with a prolonged immune response to the infection, It can't come fast enough for millions of people whose symptoms can range from mild brain fog to debilitating pain and fatigue. Finally, one of the silver linings to come out of the pandemic was a change in policies regulating telehealth or the use of modern Internet tools to provide health care remotely in the midst of shutdowns. This was a lifeline for millions needing health care, Particularly in the area of mental health. But these changes still aren't permanent and now Congress is under a deadline to make final decisions about them.
What often goes unsaid in conversations about telehealth is that it's about a lot more than ease and convenience. Telehealth has unlocked health care access for millions of people who just went without it in the past. It's particularly critical for rural Americans, where the combination of poverty, Inadequate Medicaid reimbursement and broad distances have led to hospital shutdowns and limited health care access. The boon in telehealth has been a lifeline for these folks and so many others. Ending that could have major consequences for these communities, and I hope Congress does the right thing here.
That's it for today. on your way out. Don't forget to rate and review the show. It really does go a long way, And if you love the show and want to rep us, do drop by the crooked store for some America dissected merch. Don't forget to follow us at crooked media and me at Abdul.
I'll say it. No dash on Instagram, tik-tok and Twitter.
America dissected is a product of crooked media. Our producer is Austin Fisher. Our associate producers are Tara Terpstra and Emily Frank. Charlotte Landis mixes and masters the show production support from Ari Schwartz. Our theme song is by Taka Yasuzawa and Alex Rivera.
Our executive producers are Lou Duran, Sarah Geismar and me. Dr. Abdul. I'll say it your host. Thanks for listening.
This show is for general information and entertainment purposes only. It's not intended to provide specific health care or medical advice and should not be construed as providing health care medical advice. Please consult your physician with any questions related to your own health. the views expressed in this podcast reflect those of the host and his guests and not necessarily present the views and opinions of Wayne County, Michigan, or its Department of Health, Human and Veteran Services.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os