Andrew Greenberg, GVC | Evolution of the M&A Market: A Journey from Information Asymmetry to Al-Enhanced Efficiency

2023-10-18 00:46:45

Private equity insights for and with top business builders, including investors, operators, executives and industry thought leaders. The Karma School of Business Podcast goes behind the scenes of PE, talking about business best practices and real-time industry trends. You'll learn from leading professionals and visionary business executives who will help you take action and enhance your life, whether you’re at a PE firm, a portco or a private or public company. BluWave Founder & CEO Sean Mooney hosts the Private Equity Karma School of Business Podcast. BluWave is the business builders’ network for private equity grade due diligence and value creation needs. To learn more, visit: https://bit.ly/3oPBjs8

2Speaker 2
00:10.16 – 00:34.30

Welcome to the Karma School of Business, a podcast about the private equity industry, business best practices and real-time trends. In this episode, we have a wonderful conversation with my friend Andy Greenberg, CEO of Greenberg Variations Capital. This episode is brought to you today by Blue Wave. I'm Sean Mooney, Blue Wave's founder and CEO. Blue Wave is the go-to expert of those with expertise.

00:34.82 – 00:49.64

Blue Wave connects proactive business builders, including more than 500 of the world's leading private equity firms and thousands of leading companies to the very best professional service providers for their critical variable, on-point and on-time business needs, enjoy.

00:54.84 – 01:04.06

I am very excited to be here with my friend Andy Greenberg, CEO of Greenberg Variations Capital. Andy, great to be here with you today.

1Speaker 1
01:04.88 – 01:07.54

Great to be here with you, Sean, looking forward to it.

2Speaker 2
01:08.18 – 01:19.56

Yeah, so, as listeners might surmise, Andy and I have known each other a little bit. So if we get a little casual, forgive us in advance, but we're going to have a great conversation here.

01:22.26 – 01:44.12

We're going to talk about most of the time about how the face of the M&A markets have changed quite a bit over time. And then we'll talk about some other fun stuff. So maybe to jump right in. Andy, I would love to get a little bit more on your origin story. Can you tell us a little bit kind of your life story? How you came up in the world? Finance, entrepreneurship, where you are today, all those types of things?

1Speaker 1
01:45.12 – 02:21.30

Sure, as you know, my career took an early kind of crazy detour. I grew up here in suburban Philadelphia, where I live and have spent most of my career. I went to College of Brown Law School at Harvard and was always a pretty business-minded law student, interested in venture capital and finance. But I was, like, a year into law practice with the firm that is now Fagery Drinker. And through a fluky series of events, I got involved in a political campaign.

02:22.18 – 02:50.94

A guy named Bob Casey Sr. was running for governor of Pennsylvania. He got elected, and at age 26, I was part of a small coterie of young people around the governor. So, you know, I went from being beaten on to check on post-defective statements with the SEC to working in Harrisburg. And I worked in what was then the Department of Commerce.

02:51.16 – 03:10.24

It's now called Community and Economic Development. And after a few years, at age 30, I became the secretary of the department, so I had an early, heady experience in politics and governance. Wow.

2Speaker 2
03:10.40 – 03:21.78

So, secretary of Commerce at the age of 30, and that is something that I didn't. I never knew about you before. We did this podcast here, so tell me, what was it? What do you even do as Secretary of Commerce in the state?

1Speaker 1
03:22.42 – 04:04.64

Two things first, manage a series of grant and loan programs that fund business development and infrastructure, encourage businesses to locate or expand in the state. And that world has changed over the past 25, 30 years, just as government spending has shifted and interest rates have come down. But going back to the 80s and 90s, that was really the heyday of state industrial development. The other responsibility was acting as spokesperson for the business community on economic issues.

04:05.44 – 04:51.62

And there I picked up a discipline that I think has been helpful as an investment banker. Bob Casey Sr. a wonderful guy, a true new deal Democrat. So, on every issue of interest to business, labor issues, government regulation, taxes, he could pretty reliably be expected to line up on the side opposite the business community. So as a young guy, I had to learn how to maintain my credibility with that constituency without giving up the guy in the big office. And a lot of, you know, you can kind of relate to it. The balance that we all need to have as deal makers.

2Speaker 2
04:52.28 – 05:13.76

Yeah, you're playing, I'm sure, multidimensional chess, and, you know, with pretty high stakes. And a lot of probably sophisticated. People have been in that game for a long time. And when I think back to when I was 30, I don't think I was. I was barely trusted to even anecdotally negotiate a term sheet. So in your work?

1Speaker 1
05:14.84 – 05:40.18

Well, yeah, for sure. And you know, in 1995 I left, and you know, as I said to you before, we were taping. I think we all have decisions in our careers that we value and ones we regret. One of the best decisions I made was getting out of government. I sold that stock at a five year high.

05:40.90 – 06:04.18

You know, I did not want to continue. I had an opportunity to get into investment banking with Brown Brothers. Harriman. I was based in Philadelphia, but I spent a lot of time with the people in New York. And, you know, you said you didn't know about the political background. I think it's only in recent years that I started talking about it more, because early on it was.

06:04.18 – 06:28.42

It was such a jarring disconnect, you know, I mean, I was a mid-level banker, learning how to do DCF analysis from younger colleagues. So having had this experience in government, it was it was like I had I was a child actor who had been in a successful TV show.

06:28.78 – 06:47.86

And now I was expected to be in a Broadway play and I never had acting lessons, so it wasn't. It wasn't really helpful to talk to people about the whole political thing, you know, until I backfilled and, you know, developed some some skills in finance.

2Speaker 2
06:48.40 – 06:57.90

And Andy, not to age you and not to age me. But what point in time was this? So you're going from politics into investment banking around what time?

1Speaker 1
06:57.90 – 06:59.74

Mid 90s, Mid 90s, 1995..

2Speaker 2
07:00.36 – 07:19.68

OK, so we're very much in that same kind of vintage of, like, entering into investment banking. And I think that's a really good kind of segue. As we talk about kind of this changing face of M&A, what did, what did M&A look like in in the mid 90s and thereabouts?

1Speaker 1
07:21.62 – 07:28.00

Well, this will be the part of the program where you and I get to establish ourselves as true old farts.

07:29.60 – 08:04.28

But, you know, from the perspective, yeah, I'm a little older than you. But you know, from the perspective of people who are getting into the field now. Or in the past 10 years, it was much more pick and shovel work. You know, the market was less efficient, you know, from the perspective of bankers, people kind of had their relationships. There were not, there were not processes where hundreds of books were being sent out, in part because we didn't send stuff electronically.

08:04.88 – 08:21.84

Right, you know, we did it by Fedex, and clients didn't. They don't, they don't want to pay for analysts to print and mail out 300 books. So it everything took longer.

08:22.36 – 08:37.34

The world is making the transition from Lotus one, two, three. You know, you and I are just too young to remember visicalc, right? But, but Excel was just getting the upper hand over Lotus.

08:37.58 – 09:01.52

And as you and I have discussed, everything was was labor, you know? Assembling a peer group was not something done effortlessly and quickly. You had to put in parameters and wait for a download if you were getting together. Information on publicly traded comps again, no download. Depending on where you work, you were.

09:01.52 – 09:22.00

You were sweet, talking the librarian to get Edgar filings for you, and then you had to go through them. So people in our age bracket like to think that there was a lot of learning in going through those steps. But there's no doubt that it just took more effort than the same tasks.

2Speaker 2
09:22.86 – 09:50.60

Oh, 100 percent. I think the reason why I was one of the more kind of sought after financial analysts and kind of the mid to late 90s was because I was really good at binding books. And so to paint a picture of people. We had, you know, you had printers in your offices and you would print them up. And then we all had mail rooms where there were people who were there. Ostensibly to kind of bind these books together. That would then go into Fedex.

09:51.16 – 10:11.08

But inevitably, you wouldn't get your comments until midnight, and then you'd have to redo all the books because then the graphic artists were gone. And then at 3 a.m you would start printing these things, and then at 5 a.m you would start binding them. If you couldn't, you know if the meeting was in New York that next day, and so I was really good at binding books.

10:11.26 – 10:24.66

And so I got. I think I was sought after, not because of anything I do about wattage or analytical skills, et cetera. It's just I got fewer paper cuts than others and print well and so, but that was the 90s, you know?

1Speaker 1
10:26.86 – 10:30.30

And you were working in downtown in Manhattan.

2Speaker 2
10:30.78 – 10:43.38

Yeah, we're in midtown. So I was, I was. I was in Houlihan Loki's financial restructuring group. And so luckily, a lot of our meetings were were in New York. Which meant that I could work all night, every night because we didn't have to get it.

1Speaker 1
10:43.38 – 10:52.34

So you, you, you probably had a hierarchy of Fedex pickup times where you do it like you're building the box on the corner.

2Speaker 2
10:52.92 – 11:10.62

A hundred percent, and you take a car service to the later one. And if that didn't work, we actually. We had a service that would pick up a plane that was on call to actually pick up the decks at any time. And then there would be like a five thousand dollar delivery fee to fly it somewhere.

11:12.16 – 11:34.46

It was like the good old times. And and everyone, I think, as we, I don't know about you, but as we as we think about these times, everyone thinks. It was so much easier back then. It wasn't just because there's so much more asymmetry in efficiency and information gathering, et cetera. So it's still really hard because it was just so much harder to do things, you know, versus today. The world's your oyster.

11:34.56 – 11:35.70

Everything's in your hands.

1Speaker 1
11:36.46 – 12:05.94

Well, we also had to think through more things, rather than relying on some algorithm to determine whether a peer was a peer. You had to go through those filings and look at a public company and see what percentage of revenues in the business group were associated with the business you were working with. And make a judgment call, and you're a younger person. You talked about it with the VP who is on the job.

12:06.24 – 12:25.24

And as I said before, it was, it was more pick and shovel work. And you know, I am not one to say that, you know, people in the past were sharper than people today. I think we get to work with a lot of plenty sharp young people, but they get their sharpness from different experiences because they're not called on to.

2Speaker 2
12:25.24 – 12:38.62

Do that, Yeah, absolutely, and it's it's. You know, things are always just different, but they're not necessarily easier in one time or another. And whether you're talking about the NBA or or investment banking or private equity, there's there's different times and things evolve.

12:38.98 – 13:04.82

And I think you're totally right. It was. I think today it's still very much an apprenticeship business, but but just in different ways. You're able to maybe jump through some of the picks and shovels a little bit more. And it's more about the, you know, in some ways, how things, kind of the you can jump past that first step. And so maybe that that's a that's a good segue into, you know, you've been in the business, you've seen it evolve.

13:05.42 – 13:15.66

How does? How has the business evolved today versus maybe those kind of grand old times, you know, when we were starting off? what does it look like today versus that?

1Speaker 1
13:16.32 – 14:08.46

I think it has evolved significantly, even over the past decade. And, you know, Blue Wave is perfectly encapsulated. Some of the trends that I'm about to talk about, you know? Since leaving Brown Brothers, I spent most of the past 15 20 years with middle market investment banks. Again based here, more generalist in nature, but primarily focused in working with industrial businesses. 10 years ago, I think the coin of the realm was relationships and distribution and firms. Investment banking firms got mandates by being able to impress clients with industry knowledge as a means to an end.

14:08.58 – 14:23.78

And the end was relationships with strategic financial buyers and an affinity. Where, you know, the person who was a step removed would be talking, you know, in the pitch, would be talking about multiples and macro trends.

14:25.60 – 14:52.96

And the specialist would be able to say, Oh, is, you know Charlie? you know? Is he back from his skiing injury? Yeah, I mean, they're, you know, they're, they're, you know, getting to be acquisitive again. And you know, the client can't. The clients can judge three things. They they. They can judge whether they like you, they can judge whether they think you're smart, and they can judge whether you know their world. And that really emerged.

14:52.96 – 15:41.48

And you know the industry boutiques, and you know the larger, higher volume, middle market deal shops. You know, their coin of the realm was just having more distribution based on that, being able to get out, you know, more books quickly into the hands of informed buyers. I started Greenberg Variations Capital in 2019. Because I saw that movement toward industry specialization, I wanted to continue to work with businesses across a somewhat broader range of sectors in the industrial field. Um, so I saw the subset of business owners who, for good reason, we're not headed for a far flung auction.

15:42.32 – 16:12.88

Is one to five or six buyers, and I don't really like one buyer, you know, two to six optimal. So they didn't need and didn't want to pay for the staffing, the infrastructure and all of the stuff of the auction. So GVC, basically, uh, uncoupled marketing from execution, and we just provide execution, so that's my path to a more structured approach.

16:13.04 – 16:31.64

And then, of course, you don't need me to tell the Blue Wave story, but you know, I've. I've kind of watched you build a business also based on private equity firms and the deal ecosystem, seeking a more and more refined view of a given business.

2Speaker 2
16:32.20 – 16:53.38

I think you brought up a number of really, really good examples of what happened, and I thought you very elegantly summed up what happened. A lot of the market. So as I, as I turned the, you know, the lens, my lens backwards. You know, in the late Nineties, early two thousands, you know, it was almost. The pendulum has kind of gone fully. Back in the late Nineties, there was information asymmetry.

16:53.70 – 17:13.40

And so there were trusted advisors who had access to information and network that no one else had. The world was a smaller place and then tons and tons of private equity firms and investment bankers came in, and then the world became more and more efficient. In the name of the game. And kind of, like the two thousands to maybe the two mid 2015.

17:13.40 – 17:49.82

ISH was large numbers and efficiency. So the investment bankers would do a 200 PE firm auction with another 50, another 50. Uh, you know, strategics involved in. It was just brute force. Boil the ocean and that would drive an outcome. But then what happened, you know, in my mind since that point was then you entered this era of, you know, you got. There's so much efficiency. They entered a new age of enlightenment, both on the investment banker and the private equity side, where specialization became important, where it all became about alpha, not beta cause.

17:49.82 – 18:16.36

Beta used to get your results. And the returns were good enough for investment banker, for the for private equity firms, and the money was good enough for investment bankers. And I think what you really, really appropriately pointed out is we're in this new era. And now it's about specialization and it's about being better at fewer things and really driving insights to drive outcomes. And that's true, you know, we certainly saw it in the private equity side, and that's that's really why I founded Blue Wave.

18:16.36 – 18:35.90

Is I needed alpha? I needed specialization? I needed the right resource for exactly what I need when I need it, and I think that. And then the same thing you're articulating in in the investment banking world. It's about knowing what's going to happen before they do it, and not brute forcing it. Because that gives you beta and what you're doing at Greenberg Variations Capital is bring an Alpha.

18:36.52 – 18:38.76

And so I'd love to maybe drill down on that a little bit.

1Speaker 1
18:39.26 – 19:22.16

Well, it goes to your comment about information asymmetry. There. There are certainly still industry sectors and deals where it makes sense to have a wide open process with the idea of capturing an outlying bid. You know, I talked to friends, I'm sure you do, too. And you know, the most active, uh, middle market investment banks. And they don't talk about the auction in as many processes as, uh as they used to. And there is more information on the business owner side.

19:22.58 – 20:24.92

And it's it's very easy to caricature. The owner operator is like the classic data miner. And you know, the guy who remembers the one deal that was done at 11 times in his industry. And it beats you over the head with that. But information is information, and somebody built a successful business is usually pretty shrewd, even if they are pushing investment bankers to be more aspirational. So I do think that there are more processes where, you know, to your point, about, uh, Alpha? There are more processes where market clearing value is going to be within a relatively narrow range. And what the market wants on both sides is efficiency, certainty of close and quick, thorough ventilation of the issues that could cause a deal to go sideways.

20:26.24 – 20:53.78

And that's where my approach comes in, and that's where the appetite comes in for a sponsor calling you. And not not necessarily looking for a general, broad industry view, but say, hey, we're buying this type of business. And we need somebody who can talk to us about how, you know, production lines are assembled in this industry, and there's an answer for that.

2Speaker 2
20:54.20 – 21:30.80

A hundred percent, and that's exactly the questions we get. It's like, we have a company that is a food manufacturing company that has high mix, low volume manufacturing for the organic food, snack business. And the companies in the Midwest. And we need someone to both assess it, but then also live in the plant for six months. And it used to be, it used to be, you know, 15, 10, even five years ago, even shorter than that it used to be. I need a lean, six sigma person because you need to get every little element right now where it used to be. You know, at times, right now we've got the deal.

21:30.80 – 22:01.06

Market is in effect right now, and it could be. I need a commercial due diligence provider, and it used to be. I'm going to go to the large firm that everyone knows that does commercial due diligences. And on that same vein, they're like, No, I need the commercial due diligence group. That knows. The high mix, low volume, multi-tier distribution food snack manufacturer in the Midwest, who already knows that world. And so I think that you're, you're right in that, that's where the world maybe is and is going.

22:01.40 – 22:20.38

And, to your point, the information can be available not only for the private equity firms, but the same vein the investment bankers are continually evolving in their own right. And so maybe let's talk a little bit about that in terms of how did that lead you to? With that in mind, to bring Greenberg Variations Capital into being.

1Speaker 1
22:20.46 – 23:28.82

What I saw in my investment banking practice, and also we haven't talked about GFData, the data company that Graham Fraser and I started in 2005, was that industry expertise, as it was practiced and marketed by investment banks, generally had to do with buyer identification, qualification and relationships, it didn't have to do with building and articulating the value proposition. So I would say to someone today that you know, if you have a business in, you know. One of these high multiple commercial services HVAC services being provided to hoas, where you don't really know how high is high. Go and hire an investment bank that's going to market the hell out of the property because they're the center of gravity is with the marketing.

23:29.48 – 24:38.98

But there are other businesses, as I said before, where valuation can be higher or lower within a trading range. But the center of gravity in the assignment is understanding where you need to take the clients to cement a value proposition that will carry through to closing. So, in the past year, we've done a couple of deals in medical devices, extremely profitable, highly valued businesses. I am not a boutique authority in the medical device industry, but I understand, looking at strategic buyers, strategic buyers owned by private equity groups. On the other side, that the value proposition there is helping them understand, with incredible particularity in each case, how a an extremely profitable business makes its money. What are production cycles?

24:39.70 – 25:40.90

What is the usage of material? How is labor dealt with at a business where there's almost no direct labor involved? And whether it's the company's management team or retaining the kind of outside experts that you're involved with. You know. I saw an ability to get involved with business owners away from the wide open auction and say, Look, there, there are five, you know, five, six, eight likely buyers for this business. They're all knowledgeable, none of them needs us to educate them on the market and the opportunity. But let's talk about the questions that they will ask in order to get the closing. Of the kind of elevated multiple, you know, that industry, double digit teens multiple, and let's figure out how to make that happen.

2Speaker 2
25:41.72 – 26:31.06

So I really like the way that you said that and the way that you were thinking that led you to this. This business here, in part going back to what you said earlier. It's like there there are certainly a time and place for the big firm, big process, or or different type of methodology. That are. They're going to be taken from the the kind of the larger shops. But there's absolutely another place in that market to have this curated experience, where you know who the buyers are, and you don't need to necessarily do the big machine. And and it resonates a lot with me from my investing days, where those were the types of almost companies that we had looked for. It's like we're not going to try to own a market or be everything to everyone. We're going to try to be good at one part of the market and be really good at that. And we were very successful doing that.

26:31.42 – 26:52.10

And you've taken that same approach to investment banking advisory, and I think that's got to resonate really well in the same vein with your approach. You're not turning companies upside down. Because we would when we would go through the big machine, and I think that's evolving in many places. But when we would do it, your company was just exhausted by the time you got through it.

1Speaker 1
26:52.62 – 27:26.04

Right, right, it. It requires a very cold eyed, realistic view of every situation, because there are a lot of scenarios to get presented as a targeted process. And they shouldn't be really. Yeah. You know, owner of a business, got a call from a, you know, a business development person, or an out, you know, a buy side search firm. And they happened to get them in the office. And now he feels like, Well, what, you know, what does this mean?

27:26.46 – 28:24.82

Well, it could be that there are three or four dozen private equity groups that would be interested in that business as a platform and it. It's not a good use of my time to try to suggest anything else to them, but it works the other way. We get referred into situations by attorneys, wealth managers and other trusted advisors, and it often is helpful for the clients to have come from discussions with more traditional M&A firms. Where part of the pitch was being talked into something that they didn't really want to do right? There was a theory of why it made sense to be interested in a handful of of buyers. And, you know, for traditional investment bank, it's not really economical to do, like the way we're set up.

28:25.16 – 28:54.14

If you're doing little marketing and focusing on execution, you can charge less. So we priced at a discount to what a traditional M&A firm would charge for the fully loaded sales mandate. You know, if they work with us on a one-off and it becomes something else and they don't want to continue, then I don't want to make their life contractually complicated. So they like the fact that we just focus on the thing.

2Speaker 2
28:54.74 – 29:19.40

I love that approach and it's the it's one in some ways. It's kind of. Treat the business of your business like a business and have the audacity to ask your customers what they want. And they'll tell you. And you're providing a solution that's needed and wanted in in the market to people going through one of the most important decisions of their life. And so I think that's got to come up really well with them. When you're able to put it all out there, listen to what they want and respond.

29:20.06 – 29:27.42

And for that, they give you all the trust in the world, with their most important asset, probably of their life, other than their their friends, family and children.

1Speaker 1
29:27.84 – 29:28.40

Exactly right.

2Speaker 2
29:28.40 – 29:30.76

Or at least family and children, at least family and children.

1Speaker 1
29:31.00 – 29:31.98

Some of their kids.

2Speaker 2
29:34.40 – 29:35.76

At least one of their kids.

29:37.56 – 29:53.62

So, you know, I think that's a good, it's a good thing to kind of transition here on. And that we've talked about where the market has come from, where it is today. With this really unique vantage that you have, where do you see it going in the in the visible future?

1Speaker 1
29:54.58 – 30:40.72

Setting Sean Mooney aside for the time being. For me, the most memorable guest that Charlie Gifford and I've had on our podcast, Middle Market Musics, was Eugene Fama, the Nobel Prize winning economist at the University of Chicago and the father of efficient market theory. And I think, in many ways, we're living out the prophecy of Fama and his colleagues that the market is becoming more and more and more efficient. And artificial intelligence has become a big part of the discussion. And I think you and I agree that, you know, there's both stake and sizzle there.

2Speaker 2
30:41.62 – 30:42.42

Absolutely.

1Speaker 1
30:43.08 – 31:09.70

But I think that directionally, the process of selling businesses will continue to evolve in the direction of applying expertise to prospective buyers, the company and the value proposition, as opposed to the brute force of the of the marketing exercise.

2Speaker 2
31:09.98 – 31:34.96

I a hundred percent agree that there's, there's going to. Efficiency is the constant in this industry and any industry, really. And if you think most people don't realize that the capital markets world is an industry, right? And it started off in the in the eighties and nineties, and maybe early two thousands. It was relatively inefficient. More information came to bear, this thing called the internet came to bear, this thing called the iPhone came to bear.

31:35.14 – 32:14.26

You introduced this great tool called GF Data, that gave everyone insights into key capital market metrics that help make them make their decisions better. So all of this is playing out into this world that has been gradually maturing, as every industry does. And it seems to me, you know what's happening and what will happen, will, you know? Follow some of their markets and see how they've evolved, they become more sophisticated. You know, with the advent of AI, this is going to be the greatest efficiency enhancer in my mind since the advent of the modern internet in 1995, Netscape.

32:14.62 – 32:34.90

Um, and so I, I a hundred percent agree that the world is going to be playing this game and it's going to be, like anything else. Harder and harder to find alpha, but it's still going to be really good compared to most other things. So in my mind, it's not a message like, Well, it was me. It's just okay, don't hate the player, hate the game. We're all going to have to work a little harder.

1Speaker 1
32:34.90 – 32:48.48

And there will still be a role on the buy side for smaller sponsors who have the focus and the tenacity to achieve Beta.

2Speaker 2
32:49.12 – 33:19.32

Absolutely, and I and I think the the world is it in some ways. I think there's going to be a consultant in the private equity world. Or certainly be consolidation at the top of the market, there's going to be more fragmentation at the bottom of the market. Like you. Because the big, the big PE firms anyways, won't be able to do the the smaller end of the market efficiently. Cause they're going to be built to handle the large checks. And and the same way, you're going to see that exactly mirrored in the advisory market.

33:19.56 – 33:35.78

The big will probably continue to get bigger and and there are going to be the boutiques that address the lower end of the market. That, in some ways, is the most interesting, highest returning end of the market. But it's just harder to do at scale, does. How does that resonate with you?

1Speaker 1
33:36.10 – 34:33.60

It's classic Porter theory that you can't be great at two things at once. So, on the sponsor side, it's very hard to excel at gathering assets in volume and at achieving consistent, above par returns. You got to pick one and then on the advisory side, I think it's. I think it's the same idea that you can focus on scale, or you can focus, as I have, on a kind of specialization. But Porter's language you don't want to get middle. And I think, I think, I think. In both ends of the industry, you know, the consolidation occurs among firms that are not really disposed to be great at one of the relevant strategies.

2Speaker 2
34:34.52 – 35:25.08

Yeah, I think that is is spot on, and you very, I think, pointedly portrayed where this world's going. If we just look at some of the models that we've all seen to become true in the history. And the one thing that I would say is you think about the people in this industry. They're incredibly tenacious, they're smart enough, they're clever, and they're going to find a way to. To continue to be successful in what is otherwise a very large set of markets. Even as they kind of tectonically move away from each other and distinctively form continents, maybe. And one of the things that you know what I would say is is I reflect even on these prior changes. And it's been pretty consistent in movement over time. Is that every year I would say, Oh, I wish I was 10 years old?

35:25.70 – 35:40.22

And then 10 years later, to go, Oh, I wish I was 10 years old, 10 years later. Well, okay, I'll stop with the tens and then. But it was, but they were all still good times. It was just relative to maybe a more distant past. It seems like it wasn't as good.

35:40.46 – 36:24.84

And I think when people and I look at 10 years from now, it's going to be like, Oh, I wish I was 10 years old. But it's still going to be pretty darn good. So maybe as a as a good turning point here, let's talk about we, let's talk about a little bit more about the lighter topics. And one of the things that, you know, I think we all do. When we're after a long day and friends like you and I and Charlie, we're at a bar afterwards or something and drinking. You know, being responsible is is that we will wax poetic about, you know, some of the look in the in the rear view mirror? And the things we knew now that we wish we knew then, and if we only had a time machine? So I, I'd be really curious. Eddie, Maybe what's one of these things that you'd go back to to young Andy and say, Hey, kid, listen up?

1Speaker 1
36:25.46 – 36:52.76

Periodically, on the podcast I talk about it's number one unwilling listener, my 16 year old son who, who, who gets it. Like, all the way to school, all the way home for a wrestling practice and has no shortage of critical comments. So I told him I was doing this podcast, he says. Charlie going to be there? and I said, No, it's just me, and he said, Who's going to listen to that?

2Speaker 2
36:56.08 – 36:58.98

Sounds like my kids, yeah.

1Speaker 1
36:59.48 – 37:06.96

So the the, the, the only. The only light of the New Testament that I quote is no man is a prophet in this whole lab.

2Speaker 2
37:08.62 – 37:09.06

Amen.

1Speaker 1
37:09.06 – 37:38.70

A lot of I got a lot of opportunities to use that. So, uh, what, what advice would I give? A younger? Andy? Uh, I think, uh, just say yes, you know, as as things cross your field of vision, have have a disposition to try different things. And you know, I guess the the modern, fashionable way to say that might be lean in, but of course, I, I mean, it's more fundamental than that.

37:39.60 – 38:20.36

I did more sports when I was in junior high school, and I got into high school. I was small, I gravitated to brady activities like like, debate. And uh, the guy who is the lacrosse coach at my high school, uh, came up to me after he was a history teacher and came up to me after class one day. And he, he said, You know, the varsity is looking for a Coxswain. And I just looked. I looked down my nose at it, and, uh, you know, I. I thought Coxswain was like, glorified equipment manager, uh, uh, on uh, the rowing team. That's an example of something I really regret as I've gotten older.

38:20.48 – 38:50.12

I don't know that it would have been a life changing event, but of course, as you learn about that sport and and what that means, that would have been a terrific challenge for me. And, uh, you know, that's an educator, right? I mean, that's an example of a teacher looking at a kid and thinking he does, okay, you know, in in class, but this would be a good thing for him. And I didn't say, I didn't say yes. And I think, you know, we, we all get into those situations.

38:50.34 – 39:01.04

We recognize we recognize them more readily as we get older, but, you know, my advice for younger people would be, where possible, try to say yes.

2Speaker 2
39:01.04 – 39:07.46

And what would be an example of one of those times where you were going to say no, and you said yes?

1Speaker 1
39:07.66 – 39:47.42

Um, that's, that's an interesting question, where I got into something that was totally outside of my comfort zone. I've never, I have never felt as prosperous as when I was a first year law firm associate, making $37,000 a year and leaving that job to work. Uh, for a long shot, political campaign was, uh, that that took a deep breath, and I did it with a buddy of mine. And I told myself that the chances that it would be such a failure that I ended up at Skid Row were small and did it.

2Speaker 2
39:47.86 – 39:58.78

I think, I think that's an amazing example. And then you were the secretary of Commerce of a of a founding state at your at age 30, that's amazing.

1Speaker 1
39:59.48 – 40:12.32

Well, yeah, right, it paid off. But, as I said, it also had a quality of of having a kind of heady success early, where I needed to go back and pay some dues later. But it.

2Speaker 2
40:12.32 – 40:43.86

Worked, but that's interesting, cause, like, you know, it speaks to kind of the way I think of the world. Is like, life is not a straight road up into the right, it's more of a meandering path. But you know, the the the most straight road to Rome isn't always the fastest or best. And so, you know, the example, maybe I would use on, on on, maybe a wrong turn, but eventually right turn was. I grew up in Texas and I decided, you know, it was a small school and every kid had to play football because we couldn't feel the team.

40:44.00 – 40:56.86

And so I go into this thing, and our coach was a former All American tight end for the University of Texas, and so I go into this thing. And like you, in eighth grade, I was five feet tall and I probably weighed a hundred pounds.

40:57.74 – 41:18.08

And my freshman year, I think I did something where I couldn't get into it. So sophomore year, I'm starting to grow a little bit and springing up and very awkward, awkward years. And. But the coach looks at me. And my dad was is is six, four, and my brother is three years younger than me, but it was at that point taller than me. And he goes, Sean, you're going to be tall like your dad.

41:18.24 – 41:47.64

And so we're going to put you at tight end, cause that's my favorite position. And the only good player we had in our team was the all was. The all State tight end who grew up on a ranch and chewed tobacco since she was age four. And so immediately I go with, they're like, you got it, coach. Three concussions later, every day he's jamming my head into the dirt. I had a one year career in football, but on the up flip side.

41:48.00 – 42:01.90

I then started studying a lot harder, I joined the student Council, I found my ways, I left my football career behind, but it led me to another road. So, but if I had to say then yes to that, I probably would have, you know, gone on a whole different path.

42:02.06 – 42:28.24

So I love that example. And you know, you think about, you know, the things that we do. They require a lot of time. It's a lot of effort and one of the one of the things that I'm always kind of thinking about it is I've gained a little bit of perspective. It's like, how do I find little life hacks that are like, not only not even just business, but just things that make my life a little easier? And so I'd be curious, do you have anything that you've kind of figured out recently or previously?

42:28.24 – 42:38.04

Recently, you know, this thing makes a lot of sense. And boy, I'm really happy that I, that I, that I have this in in my world, because it just makes things just a little bit easier.

1Speaker 1
42:38.94 – 43:10.44

Part of my classic dad profile is that I think of myself as a very good griller, so I could give you a recipe. But every everyone has their way making, making things. So what I will share is that when you are a young parent and you you have a booster seat in your car, you will never get another device which is useful for holding a propane tank.

43:12.06 – 43:15.10

So my youngest son is now 16.

43:15.34 – 43:27.82

I still have a booster seat and when I go to get the propane refills for the grill, just pop it, pop it right in, and it works good. So that that's my life.

2Speaker 2
43:27.98 – 43:32.40

That is, deceptively and quietly, brilliant.

43:34.16 – 43:55.76

I'm really, I'm really, really angry with myself right now. Because why didn't I keep those car seats, you know, from when my kids were younger? Because every car I've ever owned has that little like slash across the glove box where the propane tank kind of like, juggles around as I'm driving and just carves up, you know, the front of my seat.

43:59.10 – 44:00.40

Literally every car.

1Speaker 1
44:01.64 – 44:20.44

My, my, my sons would say that that is totally on brand for me. I can't watch a football game without them. Just rolling at any progressive insurance commercial and say, Oh my God, like labeling the trash cans, that's like, that's the sort of thing you do.

2Speaker 2
44:21.14 – 44:51.36

That's the home Depot music. No, that's no, that's great. So I am, I am going to. Actually, my youngest sister now has a has a a newborn, and she's going down that journey of of, having, you know, her children. And I'm going to remind her, right after this call, that she needs to save each one of those. And as she moves on to the next, you know, booster seat. As the kids progress to get older, I'm going to see how I can get her last one.

44:52.68 – 44:54.46

So I think it's a great life.

1Speaker 1
44:54.60 – 45:04.68

Having having kids that age and having having to strap those booster seats in on an airplane, isn't that? Like the worst experience you and your wife ever had?

2Speaker 2
45:04.70 – 45:15.44

I did not miss that at all. Renting a car afterwards, I'm like, how do I get them in a car seat? And then, you know, if you ask me, I'm like, Hey, the kids will be fine. My wife's like, you can't do that.

45:16.24 – 45:17.30

She's the wiser one.

45:19.16 – 45:21.52

So don't think less of me, listeners.

1Speaker 1
45:23.08 – 45:23.44

Right?

2Speaker 2
45:23.80 – 45:35.82

So, Andy, this has been a ton of fun. I really, really appreciate it. I've learned an infinite amount here and I have tons of notes from this. So thank you, thank you for joining us today and sharing your two cents.

1Speaker 1
45:36.76 – 45:39.14

Thank you as always, great to talk with Sean.

2Speaker 2
45:39.34 – 45:39.72

Absolutely.

45:46.04 – 46:07.44

Special thanks to Andy for joining. If you'd like to learn more about Andy or Greenberg Variations Capital, please see the episode notes or links. Please continue to look for the Karma School of Business podcast anywhere you find your favorite podcasts, including Apple, Google and Spotify. We truly appreciate your support. If you like what you hear, please follow, rate, review, and share.

46:07.74 – 46:28.80

It really helps us when you do this, so thank you in advance. In the meantime, if you need to be connected with the world's best in class private equity grade professional service providers, independent consultants, interim executives, or anything else, give us a call or visit our website at bluewave..net. That's b-l-u-w-a-v-e, and we'll support your success onward.

v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os