2023-10-11 03:47:08
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan Podcast, check it out! The Joe Rogan Experience. Stream by day, Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day!
What's up, Brian?
What's up, man? Good to see you.
Last time I saw you, we were on another continent.
The European continent.
Yeah, it was fun. That was exciting. Thank you very much for that.
You're welcome.
Going to visit the Greek ruins with you was really special. That was very cool.
Was that your first time seeing the Acropolis in downtown?
Yes. It was my first time in Greece.
Really? And the girls, too?
My wife had been, but the girls hadn't been. It was exciting. It was fun, man. It's so crazy. To be there in that place where all this started, just to be on that soil, standing there, in the place where those people were 2,500 years ago, very special.
Or longer.
Or longer, yeah.
By thousands of years, potentially. Yeah. Really exciting stuff. It's cool, man.
What's also interesting when you're there,
it seems like your work is getting out there, but it seems like the people that are involved in the day-to-day, the people that are giving tours, they don't really know.
Yeah. I wouldn't say it's controversial, but I think it's still a subject of debate, which is the way it should be. And what we're talking about is the potential of the ancient Greeks using psychedelics to find God, which is a big idea.
Well, it seems not just likely.
All the pieces, it's like, oh, duh. If you found a murder weapon in the house where someone was suspected of being a murderer, you'd go, oh, that's probably what happened. If you find vessels that contain psychedelic compounds in an area where people experience these profound rituals, well, they're probably doing drugs, man.
Well, at least in Spain, they were. The fact that there were no vessels found in Greece, in mainland Greece, and most especially at the sanctuary in Eleusis, I think that leaves healthy room for debate. I was there the week before last at the conference I was preparing back in July. So we finally had the conference at Eleusis, because of all the cities in Europe, it was nominated to be the European Capital of Culture for 2023.. So it was postponed from 21 because of the pandemic, and people finally came through town a couple of weeks ago.
And the site archaeologist, her name is Papi Papangeli, who was on site when I first was interviewing her for the book. back in 2018, I got to see her again for the first time in five years. And she's probably spent more time at Eleusis than any human being living or dead. Wow. Because she spent like 40 years basically maintaining the site, and so she used to commute from Athens, from her home, to Eleusis every day for like close to 40 years.
So she's done that pilgrimage more than any person living or dead throughout recorded history. Wow. And when she finally saw the evidence, so I gave, like a PowerPoint of the things that I talked about here, a couple of years ago, all the evidence from the book about these ritual vessels that were discovered in the 1990s in Spain, and they show pretty clear evidence of ergot inside, like a tiny beer chalice. So something like an ergotized beer, which was the thing that was hypothesized back in the 1970s as the elusive mystery to these great mysteries. And so I showed her all the evidence, did my PowerPoint, and Papi was thoroughly unconvinced that psychedelics had anything to do with the mysteries in Eleusis.
Interesting. What's her theory?
Her theory is that it's a modern interpolation, that we think that we can't achieve these states of mind in the absence of drugs. And so, when I do ask her, she talks about the long pilgrimage, and she talks about the fasting that would have taken place, and she talks about, like the emotional preparation for years in advance, of this sort of culminating experience of a lifetime. So she points to all kinds of different things, maybe some like endogenous, endogenously produced ecstatic experience, but she's just not a fan of the drug hypothesis. And so the fact that this forensic evidence for drugs was found in these vessels 2,200 years ago, at the place at the time where it looks like there's a connection to ancient Eleusis, she's unpersuaded, which I think is very funny and super cool, because I think debate is needed.
Well, it's always good to be healthy in your skepticism, but at a certain point in time, what do you think is going on? What does she think? The evidence that connects to the vessels that were in Spain, does she think that has no connection? It seems like they're the same people, or at least from the same teachings.
I asked her that. Yes, she believes there was a Greek influence. So we know that the place where these vessels were found 2,200 years ago, we know that there was a Greek colony called Emporion. And so we know that there were ancient Greeks who founded a colony not too far from this place, and the place we're talking about is Pontos. So it's a town a bit further inland.
So it's undeniable that ancient Greeks were at this ancient colony as far back as like 575 B.C., by the way. That's when they established the colony. And so you have like 400 years from the establishment of this colony, until you see this Hellenistic period where people who were influenced by the Greeks were then reinterpreting what seems to be their idea of the mysteries in honor of Demeter and Persephone, the two goddesses who were worshipped back in Greece, at Eleusis. So that all lines up. And you see images of what could be like an incense burner that looks like Demeter and Persephone, and you find these vases that look like they belong in Athens, showing Dionysus and this drunken parade.
And you see what the most interesting to me was this kalathos that shows Tryptolimus. And Tryptolimus was kind of like the missionary of the ancient mysteries. And you see images of him in the museum at Eleusis, and they found a near-identical image of him not too far from this site in Spain. So all the pieces kind of fit together, but I think that, you know, I can't speak for Poppy, but maybe she sees it as sort of like a renegade group, something that that was. Because, you know, again, to celebrate the mysteries outside the temple, outside Demeter's temple at Eleusis, was a sacrilege.
We have to keep that in mind. It doesn't mean that people weren't trying to recreate what was happening there. And there's this famous incident in Athens in 414 B.C. called the Profanation of the Mysteries, where we know that some people at least were trying to recreate what they thought was happening in the temple at home, in private dining rooms. So if that was happening and the mystery was spilling out of this temple, it stands to reason that something was happening in Spain, maybe in southern Italy.
I spent a lot of time looking there, too, or maybe across North Africa or the Near East. So, like, I think it's very possible. I think what she's looking for is evidence in Greece, at Eleusis or thereabouts, which is why I've been spending so much time there over the past couple of years.
Well, it seems like, even today,
rituals and, you know, these psychedelic ceremonies that people do in other countries when they go to the jungle, there's so much fanfare and there's so much behind it. There's a lot of secrets. Like, people contain these secrets. They talk about these things that they're about to embark on and they're in control of this experience. for these people.
Like, they're not going to tell you the exact recipe, how they do it. You know, most of them kind of keep that secret. They brew it, they bring it to you. There's always been, like, someone who holds, like, secret information. And it kind of makes sense.
And you see the exact same thing in America. You see these little psychedelic ceremonies that people do outside of the jungle. You know, and they've brought ayahuasca back and now they get a group of people together in the living room and they burn candles and trip balls together.
You know? That sounds fun.
But it seems very similar to that kind of thing where they would try to reenact it or recreate it somewhere else.
Yeah, I mean, even in the classical period. Like, so, we think Eleusis goes back to sort of like the Acropolis, right? So, when you're looking at these sites, you're looking at different moments in time. So, you can't look at the Acropolis and not think about the Mycenaean period. that goes back to, like, 1500 BC.
And you can't think about, like, the classical Golden Age of Athens in the 5th century BC. And you can't think about what happened to it thereafter, because power changes hands, right? To the Romans in 146 BC. And then, you know, it goes into the Byzantine Empire in the 5th century AD. And then it goes to the Ottomans after that.
So, like, there's always been this transfer of power, and these sites experience different levels of participation and ritual and mystery. So, when you look at Eleusis, you know, as old as it could be, going back, you know, probably to 1500 BC, in the classical period it was always changing. So, when you talk about secrets, you talk about potions and sacraments, I think they were always, always changing throughout time. And so, maybe the secret recipe in the 5th century BC was different from what it looked like a thousand years before that and a thousand years since. And so, what we do know is that Dionysus, who's this other god of ritual madness and ecstasy in the theater.
Remember, we went to the theater of Dionysus? You know, he sneaks into the mysteries at some point. And I think what you begin to see is this, like, this urge towards what some scholars call private, spontaneous, pagan piety. Which means that, aside from these centralized temples, like the Temple of Demeter, it sits at Eleusis, and that's where these rites happen, and it's an utter profanation to celebrate them outside. What you see, with Dionysus coming into these mysteries, is this urge towards the celebration of ritual and ceremony outside the temples, privately and spontaneously.
So, like, the churches, the temples of Dionysus were sort of outside. They were always celebrated in the forests and the mountains and at the southern slope of the Acropolis, which is interesting, and urban centers, too. But I think over time, you begin to see, like, this thirst to celebrate these mysteries outside the temples, which is why the evidence in Spain makes so much sense to me.
When it comes to endogenously created experiences, have you ever looked into what people experience doing Kundalini yoga?
Yeah.
Have you?
That's pretty interesting. I practiced yoga for a little time. I studied Sanskrit. Oh, really? Wow.
I studied Sanskrit.
So you can read that stuff?
Yeah.
Have you seen that new AI? that's translating cuneiform?
Yeah, yeah.
Isn't that amazing?
I saw a story about that earlier this year.
Isn't that amazing?
We're getting smarter.
That's, well, not us.
Our successors.
Maybe they'll crack the code.
Oh, they'll definitely crack the code. I'm sure it'll be easy for them.
Probably.
I mean, if we didn't have the Rosetta Stone, how much would we know about hieroglyphs and ancient Egyptian writing?
Very little, and that was relatively recently in the grand scheme of history, right?
It's just amazing that one piece of archaeological evidence led to, like, oh my God, look, a jigsaw puzzle. That's the piece.
Yeah.
This is it.
That's what we're looking for here. We're looking for a little jigsaw.
So with Kundalini yoga, which I think is very, I've not practiced it. I've only done, like, your bullshit soccer mom yoga.
That counts, too.
I mean, I've done some other kind of classes, flow classes and classes to music and stuff like that, but most of the yoga that I've done has been that Bikram stuff, that 90-minute hot yoga. It's 20-something poses. You do them, the same ones, every day. I really love it.
But I know that gives you some sort of strange high. It really does. Like, when you leave there, like, it's not a coincidence that yoga people are all flaky and super peaceful. It does something for you that just puts you in a very relaxed and unique state. But Kundalini, as practiced by several people that I know, I've just never done it, is supposedly you can reach states that are very similar to being on psychedelic drugs.
Yeah. In terms of, like, absolute visions, geometric patterns that are flowing around you. But you're not supposed to concentrate on that, which is interesting. At least according to one of my friends who took it, his instructor was saying that you're getting distracted trying to have these experiences.
That's not the goal. It's decidedly not. They call them the siddhis, the powers that arise. And it can be everything, from visions to supernatural powers.
Oh, supernatural powers.
Supernatural.
I didn't know about that. Like, what have they claimed?
Well, when you're traveling outside time and space, the ability to see into the deep past and the far future, the ability to transport your body, to teleport, all kinds of mental telepathy and things like that. I mean, these aren't – that's not the goal of yoga, obviously. They call them the siddhis. But it happens.
Does it, though?
Well, it's – sure. We have lots of literature that attests to it.
Eight classical siddhis. Anima, the ability to reduce one's body to the size of an atom.
That's a superpower. Yeah.
Mahima, the ability to expand one's body to an infinitely large size. Laghima, the ability to become weightless or lighter than air. Garima, the ability to become heavy or dense. And prapti, the ability to realize whatever one desires. That one seems like a problem.
It's not a superpower you want.
Yeah, that seems like it would be a real problem.
Yeah, yeah.
You want to be the king of the world.
Yeah, it's not a good thing.
Not for some people.
You can handle it.
I don't know if I could. I don't know if anybody could.
Yeah. And that's – well, that's kind of. the whole point is that, you know, you're talking – what you just talked about is the way the ego gets in the –, the way it steps into this river, right? So, in all these spiritual practices, it's supposed to be about the deflation of the ego. And so, if you're going through these spiritual exercises and these praxis and these disciplines and your ego is still very much intact, then, when the superpowers arise, what do you do with them?
Yeah. And that's the dangerous part of any spiritual discipline. It's the dangerous part of psychedelics, for sure. Yeah. Because you get this dramatic insight into the nature of yourself and maybe the underlying structure of the cosmos, and all of a sudden you think you're all-knowing.
Right. And maybe all-powerful.
Well, also, you sort of espouse that to others who haven't experienced it. There's like the guru thing that happens, which I think is really problematic for Western people. For whatever reason, there's a lot of – especially men in Western culture that get involved in those things and then they become leaders and they're semi-cult leaders.
Yeah. Someone sent me an article yesterday about this. It has an interesting title, Chasing the Numinous, Hungry Ghosts in the Shadow of the Psychedelic Renaissance. It just came out in this journal, Chasing the Numinous. This notion of the hungry ghosts, it's preta in Sanskrit.
Speaking of more Sanskrit, so preta are these hungry ghosts who are constantly hungry, constantly thirsty, and no matter how much they feed or try and satiate themselves, it's never enough. And so it's sort of this metaphor for the Western mind and consumerism and extraction. And wouldn't it be a shame if we approached psychedelics, yoga, all these spiritual disciplines with that sort of – that broken Western mentality trying to figure out what this can do for me.
Yeah, that's what it is. What can this do? for me? Most psychedelic experiences that I've ever had, one of the key sort of overwhelming aspects of it is to get out of your own way. And that you're in your own way.
And that you're thinking about yourself. and you're thinking of yourself and it's just wasted energy. Wasted. And that instead you should be thinking about the things you're doing and how you're interacting with the world. And also your ego is just bullshit.
It's just some leftover chimp shit that's designed to keep us alive. It's designed to make sure that you procreate, make sure that you think very highly of yourself. So you want to procreate.
But you came to psychedelics later in life, right? Yes, yeah. Was that a good thing?
Yeah, probably, because I made a lot of mistakes. And you learn from that. You do need mistakes in life. And you also need to understand what it's like to be very stupid and very foolish, and young and brash. And then also older and more experienced.
But still know nothing. As much as you know, the smartest person alive knows basically nothing about the nature of the universe. You might know things on a molecular level, on a cosmic level. You understand how galaxies are formed. That's cute.
But you really fucking don't know shit. You don't know shit. You haven't seen shit. There's too much out there. It's just too big.
And I think it was forever when we didn't have light pollution. It was the overwhelming evidence that you're not shit. If you thought very highly of yourself and you lay on your back and looked up in the cosmos, at best, you could think that you were sent down from God to do his bidding. But you didn't think you were anything greater than that. You couldn't.
There's too much evidence. The sky is just filled with these fucking enormous nuclear explosions that are happening all over the cosmos. It's impossible to even wrap your mind. I mean, back then they had no real knowledge of the scope of it all. But it's pretty obvious that it's insane.
I mean, the night skies, I'm sure. Have you seen the night sky in a place where there's absolutely no light?
Yes, but sadly, I can count it on two hands.
I can only count it on one. Well, twice. The second time, not as profound. But I went to the Keck Observatory on the Big Island. And the first time I went, it was quite a while ago.
And when we first drove up there, I was really bummed out because it was so cloudy. I was like, God, this sucks. We're not going to be able to see anything. But then, when we went through the clouds to where the observatory is, there's nothing. It's just stars.
And you get out and you're like, oh, my God. It's like being on a spaceship. It's like you're in a convertible spaceship and you're hurling through the galaxy. Because what they've done on the Big Island is pretty profound. They put these lights.
The street lights are a type of light that doesn't expand outward. What are those lights called, Jamie? You're a photographer. Diffused. That's right.
Thank you. Diffused lighting. So diffused lighting all throughout the Big Island. So it doesn't fuck with the light pollution issue that you get when you're trying to look at the real sky. So, even though there is light from these streets and all that, it doesn't affect it.
When you're way up there, it's a couple hours drive from the shore. And you get up there, and it's just the one time that I went there. And this is, I guess this is about 20 years ago. The one time I went there, it was just like, oh, my God. Just, oh, my God.
Like you can't believe it. You can't believe it. It's so much. And it really made me sad because it was like that's what people used to see every night. That's what people used to see every night before these jackasses invented electricity.
Edison, you motherfucker. What have you done? What have you done? We don't think of it as anything like that, because we just, electricity is amazing. You can go out at night.
You can go to dinner. You can fucking drive your Tesla. Electricity is amazing. But it has made us so ignorant to our place in the cosmos. And it's taken away.
so much wonder. Because when the sky is just totally dark, you look up and you see a star, you know, way over there. Oh, look, the moon. I can see the moon. You just get used to it.
It's just you don't see enough. You don't see enough. And then, when you actually do, you're like, oh, now, I know. Well, you know, why would they, when people are starving to death and just struggling, hunting and gathering, why would they be concentrating on constellations? Of course they would.
Because there's nothing to do at night. That's why.
And it's amazing.
What do you think you do all night? I think that that could be the origin of the religious sensibility. If you think that when we were hunting and gathering, you're talking about like 99 percent of our history, by the way.
And then, when you think about what comes before us, I know you think about this a lot.
Yeah.
I've been fascinated with some conversations I've been having with a friend called Lee Berger. He's a paleoanthropologist in South Africa.
And it got me thinking about all these archaic hominins. And one of them is is Homo erectus, which I'm like, I don't know why I'm so fascinated by erectus, of all the of all the hominins. But, you know, it goes back at least probably two million years, which is something to think about. Homo habilis comes before erectus. That could be like two point eight million years.
And so erectus probably sheds the body hair of habilis. It's bipedal, obviously. And they probably discover fire. And so what that means. And by the way, they go off and explore the planet, which is crazy for a being that old.
I mean, they were potentially the first seafarers. Really? The first seafaring hominins.
Do we know what kind of vessels they used?
No idea. Probably rafts. Jamie can find it.
They were heading. I mean, we have erectus remains from Africa to Europe, to Asia. So they I mean, they were. they were on the move, you know, over a million years ago. And the thing about fire.
Why mention that? The thing about fire is that if they, whether or not they were cooking their food, they had fire for warmth and light at night. But it didn't obscure the night sky. And so it's interesting to think about whether erectus sat around their campfires a million years ago and told stories. The first stories about the night sky.
They had language.
We don't know if they had language or not. But there's. they speculate that maybe the beginnings of proto language would have begun, because I mean, I was joking. But like, what do you do at night? Right.
What do you do at night? Right. You know, which. again, we're so just. we're not just distracted by light pollution.
We're distracted by a million things when the sun sets. And that's again, that's relatively recently. I mean, even in the Middle Ages, there was, there was nothing to do. Yeah. And so.
but think about a million years ago. And so it's possible that around these primordial fires, the very first stories, storytelling would have emerged around these, around the constellations.
What does Homo erectus look like, Jamie? Did they have an artist interpretation?
That's cool.
Very person like. This article says that if they sailed, they probably also had a lingo for it. A sailing lingo to describe, probably, where they were going or what you were going to see. And they sort of had the I mean, the shape of the arms and the legs and the proportions very similar to humans.
Yes, similar, but but but distinct. I mean, they were bipedal.
Yeah. But that looks like almost like a person.
And that's, and that's really old, by the way. Yeah. It's at least two million years old.
1.8 million. So what freaks me out is like, what made them stand up? You know, like, we're the only ones like what? What the hell was that all about? Yeah.
What was that about? You do see chimps occasionally walking on their hind legs and you see gorillas doing as well.
Yeah.
Orangutans. But it's just not normal. Like what? What would make someone say this is the only way to go? I don't need four legs.
They were curious. Right.
But but how would that be an evolutionary advantage?
I mean, well, you can, you can scavenge a lot better and you can protect yourself from prey a lot better. And also you can hunt prey a lot better. And so what they think? I'm not sure if it was a rectus or another one, but they would. they were good at long distance running.
So they could. they could wear out potential prey. So there's an. there's an adaptive. there's at least one adaptive advantage.
It's persistence hunting.
Persistence hunting to wear out and chase down prey. That's a hard way to do it. That's yeah.
They don't sweat. They don't sweat. So you just run them down.
Just run them down.
A lot of things that run really fast can't run really long.
A lot of them.
Some of them can't. Like antelope can. Good luck, running one of those down.
Have you tried?
No. But like the ones that we have in America, that we call antelope, that I think they're. I want to say they're maybe even in the goat family, because sometimes they call them speed goats. But those the the antelope that they have in America, the pronghorn antelope, is actually the reason why it's so fast is because at one point in time there was a cheetah here and there. they went extinct, but the antelope survived.
So it has the speed to evade something that runs insanely fast. So these little fuckers can go like 60 miles an hour. Damn. They're amazing. I only saw one for the first time this year on, like actually in the wild.
Where?
In Utah.
Huh.
Yeah, it's really cool. We parked the car, got out, put the, pulled the magnifying glasses out. check them out. Just, it's an. it's a prehistoric creature.
It really is. It's just a remnant of the past. It lived with all the other megafauna that went extinct about. you know whatever was it 15,000 years ago.
12,800..
Yeah.
At least starting then.
Yeah. So those those creatures were like the last of the Mohicans. Like they, they had to run super fast so they could now, like nothing can fuck with them other than humans. Like, at a certain point in time, when they're young, they're very vulnerable, but a certain point in time they get to the point. good luck catching me, bitch.
Like coyotes and mountain lions like you can't catch them. They're too fast.
Yeah.
I mean they're faster than everything.
What's the population like in Utah?
It's not so good.
Yeah.
Not so good. It's good in some places. It's good in Wyoming. It's good in some places in the west. But they get hammered.
The babies get hammered by coyotes. Hmm. And it's it's hard for them to to compete. You know it's just when your calves and your, your, your. you know your fawns are getting slaughtered.
There's not a lot your species can do. Hmm. You know that that that becomes an issue in areas that have a lot of predators. You know that becomes an issue in areas that have a lot of bears. and areas like areas that have a lot of bear, like the moose population, just gets hammered because the babies never make it.
Like in most places. I think in one of the places in Alberta it's more than I think it's somewhere in the range of 50 to 60 percent of all baby deer and moose just get eaten by bears.
Geez. Yeah. You think a lot about that.
Well.
The cycle of.
I think a lot about nature and how amazingly fascinating that. it's so amazingly fascinating to me that we live in this very bizarre technological sort of raft in the middle of nature. You know, we live in these cities, these little little communities, that we have everything set up for the nature of the human animal in 2023.. But the rest of the like, you go out in the wild like they have no idea that game is being played. They don't.
They're doing the exact same thing they've been doing forever, and it's things chasing after things and things trying not to get eaten. And that's every day. That's all it is. That's all it is. And then, when things die, there's, you know, raptors come in and and vultures come in and all these scavengers come in, and that's their job.
That's why the way we treat our dead is so at least we used to think was so unique to Homo sapiens and how we treat the notion of death and burial. Have we talked about Homo naledi?
No.
We need to talk about Homo naledi. Okay. Jamie, I brought some, some slides in that. I brought some, some things I want to show you. Okay.
I'm going to get a cigar.
Yeah, go for it.
These little, tiny ones suck.
This will be a fun, a fun adventure. Okay.
Do you see where it is? It's at the like number 16 there.
Homo naledi.
Homo naledi.
That's a cute name. It sounds like a song. Doesn't it?
I could have a good beat to it. What year is Homo naledi?
There it is. So it was discovered by by Lee in South Africa, in the cradle of humankind. And this goes back. Well, he discovers, in 2013.. They think that this could be anywhere from 250 to 300,000, 335,000 years old.
That's what I want to show you. This is, this is where it was discovered. So you see the rising star cave system there in South Africa. It was found in this, in this cavernous underground labyrinth of networks, where Lee found a number of different bodies. That had been apparently left there by this species, Homo naledi.
And the reason that's interesting is because, again, Homo sapiens, to our knowledge, are the only species to have ever intentionally buried their dead. So you see things like. you see grief and mourning practices in the animal. We talked about the animal world like when they, when they just die. They're left to rot typically.
Although you see, you see mourning practices and incitations, and you see it in elephants and maybe chimpanzees. But no one buries their dead. So that was the big bright line that no species had ever crossed, seemingly aside from Homo sapiens. Although there's also evidence for for Neanderthal burial, which goes back potentially a very long time, like over 400,000 years. There's a site in Spain called Cima de los Huesos.
But Neanderthals very close to us as well. You know, we have Neanderthal DNA, like in our own genetic makeup. They're kind of cousins. So that that wasn't really too shocking. The fact that there could be Neanderthal burial.
But the fact that something that looks like that and is potentially, you know, at least 300,000 years ago, but morphologically it's archaic. Kind of like we're talking about erectus. Like it's. it's really archaic looking Homo naledi. It's short.
It's about 4'8 to 5'2.. It's slender and skinny. But there are features on it that look again like archaic, like it could be at least a million years old, for example, or longer. So it's strange that a being that archaic finds its way into this, into this cave system, and and deliberately deposits the dead. So that was like a very controversial idea.
It was so controversial that, like Lee, didn't know what the what the bones were doing there, because it just didn't make sense. And, by the way, like it's, it's become the richest site for hominid discovery on the continent and maybe maybe anywhere, because of because of the profusion of bones. They found like 1,500 different bones. I think it's close to 2,000 now, which is really really strange in paleoanthropology. So Lee was digging another site called Gladys Vale, not too far from this, for years, years.
And typically what you find are animals. You find tens or hundreds of thousands of animal bone fragments and a very small percentage of hominids. So, for example, at that site in Gladys Vale, he found a tooth and a pinky bone. over the course of like many, many years, which is not unusual. He comes to this rising star cave system and all of a sudden there's 1,500 bone fragments.
They're able to assemble what they think is like 15 different individuals. So 15 individuals, specific homo naledi, are being deposited in that denelady chamber, and they don't know why. And so they begin to to look more into it. I want to show you how difficult it is to get in there, by the way, and why it was so difficult to to believe at first. If you look at the the cave chamber there, it was just up up there before it's on the next one, maybe.
Yeah, it's really. it's really hard to access. that you can see. So you enter at the top there and this is what homo naledi was doing, potentially 300,000 years ago. They found this cave system.
They would descend there on the left, go down into what's called Superman's Crawl, which is just 10 inches high. So they had to go on their bellies potentially.
And so they think they dragged the bodies through the dead bodies. The Superman's Crawl is only 10 inches high and you could drag a body through that?
It gets worse. So they not only drug it through that crawl there. They went up Dragon's Back, as you can see there, and then down what's called the chute. You see the yellow arrow at the chute? So the chute goes from the top of Dragon's Back into the denelady chamber.
The chute is like seven or eight inches wide. Seven or eight inches. And it goes down like 40 feet from the top of Dragon's Back to Denelady. And inside Denelady is where they found at least 15 bodies.
How did they get a body through seven inches?
I mean we can go there too. Really? So Lee avoided it for many years. He was able to actually make it down himself. There's a great documentary.
You've got to see the documentary. It's on Netflix. It's called Cave of Bones. If you look up unknown colon cave of bones, you'll find an awesome documentary that charts the discovery and what they call the underground astronauts who managed to get their way through Superman's Crawl and Dragon's Back and actually managed to get into the Denelady chamber. It's so captivating how they discovered and then route through these bones.
And so, okay, there's a bunch of bones in there. It's so strange that it doesn't make sense at first. So the working hypotheses are that it was some kind of accident or it was animal predation. Okay, animals killed these Homo Naledi and animals drug them through that chamber complex into Denelady. That was one.
Or maybe there was a flash flood, or maybe something happened, or it wasn't like an excursion party gone bad. A bunch of people spelunking and they got trapped in there. But it turns out that that's not the case. It's not only not the case, it seems like they were intentionally buried in these holes. And so they found pits which looked like graves.
And, again, against all expectations, because only sapiens, and maybe Neanderthal, does this, this archaic being is deliberately disposing of their dead in ritual fashion inside this chamber, which is super difficult to access in the first place. It would take you, like, at least 30 or 40 minutes to make your way through the surface.
How would I even get in something that's seven inches wide?
You have to see the footage for how to do it. You can make your way through it. I mean, it gets wider at parts, but there's sections where it's really, really tight. And, like Lee, gets stuck at some point. And so the people who went down are really, really thin, thin people who can navigate.
And, like professional spelunkers, for example. It was that dangerous to access.
And if there's any earthquake activity at all, you're fucked.
Yeah. Something else to think about.
You just have to imagine what would motivate them to take this journey in the first place.
That's why I mentioned it. Because it's not just the first discovery of the deliberate burial of the dead by a species that's not us. They go to great lengths to do this, because they too were thinking about these cycles of life and death. And so, if it wasn't an accident and it wasn't flash flooding and it wasn't animal predation, and this was deliberate burial ritual, like why would they do that? And again, now you're speculating, but it seems like they set up this complex or they used this naturally existing complex to actually reenact a passage.
Some passage from light into darkness and sort of like the passage into the underworld, into death itself. And this has so many resonances with Eleusis, by the way, and everything that we saw there in these ancient mystery complexes. Again, this notion of spelunking into the underworld and meeting the gods and goddesses of death and really confronting death and mortality in a powerful way. Like it's happening in a different species 300,000 years ago. So what else are they bringing into these caves?
It gets crazier. The documentary is fantastic. What they also find is fire. And so I mentioned that Homo erectus probably had fire. So that's not entirely surprising, but they figured out a way, this species, figured out a way to illuminate the pet, which is pitch dark, obviously.
And so they figured out a way to light fires along the way. We think at least for light, but they were also cooking down there.
I think they found antelope or springbuck, these tiny bones that were cooked in this fire. So they were manipulating fire, at least having some sort of like, I don't know if it's a funerary meal or something that could have been related to this ritual complex. So they're controlling fire. They're dragging bodies into this pit over different generations, potentially, which makes you think about the possibility of language and how this ritual is communicated from one generation to another. And the craziest thing is that they also found, just last year when Lee finally made his way into the Denelady chamber, in the antechamber before that, they found scratch markings, which I think there's some pictures in that file, Jim.
They found like hash markings, just like, so there you go. So the one on the right is Nelady. That could be 300,000 years old. The one on the left is Neanderthal. And you can see like the crazy similarity.
They took a rock and they just etched it into these cave walls. Homo sapiens does the same thing in Blombos cave, not too far away in South Africa. That's 80,000 years old. That's only 80,000 years old? That's as old as we get in South Africa, Homo sapiens.
That's 80,000 years old. So Nelady's doing something that looks to the untrained eye, very similar, potentially 300,000 years ago.
Wow.
So Homo sapiens, when do we first start appearing?
The numbers are always changing. It could be like 300,000, 400,000 years ago.
So Homo nelady and Homo sapiens exist at the same time.
And so because of what Lee found there, some of his critics claim that actually it was Homo sapiens who were making these markings. It's so unbelievable that Nelady is dragging these bodies in there and making these markings and controlling fire and potentially having tools, by the way. It's so unthinkable that some scholars think that this is the evidence of sapiens finding these caves.
Is it possible? Did they interact with each other? Do we have any understanding of whether or not they interacted with each other? They could have.
I asked Lee the same questions. They could have. We don't have any evidence of sapiens in the area. So we don't know for sure. But it raises really, really profound questions.
And this is pure speculation. But if they did come into contact with another, because we know we have this relationship with Neanderthal. We interbred with Neanderthal. We have no idea what our relationship with Homo nelady was like. Did we interbreed?
Did we exchange knowledge, communication? Did they teach us, this is pure speculation, did they teach us about death? Did they teach us about these burial practices? Did they even know something that primitive sapiens didn't know? Did they pass it on to Neanderthal, et cetera, et cetera?
What could they possibly know other than how to do this?
The mystery. Yeah. Why are they doing it? Why are they doing it? Why does no animal do this?
Right.
And again, Lee and the team, they can't answer this. But if you're going to those lengths to bury your dead over successive generations, it raises the big questions that maybe they were asking well before us. What happens when we die? Did they believe in an afterlife? Did they have a concept of God?
Did they have a concept of spirituality? Did they look at the stars at night and wonder where we came from and how we got here and where we go after death? And did they have a special insight that death maybe wasn't the ending, but the beginning of a new journey back to the stars and to this underworld? Who knows? But we see this mythology pop up in our earliest historical societies, which goes back 5,000 years.
Think about the Book of the Dead and the Egyptians, or the Tibetan Book of the Dead, or all these classical mysteries I spend all this time researching. That's the essential question they're trying to answer. is what happens after death. So to think that a species that precedes us was asking the same questions and developing rituals around it completely upends our notion of what it means to be human. Because if the way we approach death is not exceptional, in the hominin world at least, then what else does that say about us?
Right.
And how did that get started? Who's the first person to take a body and go, you know, we should really do something with this?
And why would they do that?
Yeah. Especially during the time where you're basically spending most of your time trying to eat and avoid predators. Hmm. Yeah. It seems like an immense undertaking to crawl through all that and deposit bodies and you're cooking and lighting fires along the way.
It seems like there had to be some communication.
Right. So Lee looks at all those data points and says unabashedly there's something like a culture here, a non-human culture. And this could be the first non-human culture we found in paleoanthropology.
It kind of makes sense, though, too, that it shouldn't be just human culture, the first culture. Like, if you're experiencing these things that are – I mean if you're experiencing the remnants of these things that were there before people. It's not like we're just like, I got an idea. Like out of nowhere, and we just all of a sudden came up with all these ideas. I mean they might have been – I mean, how intelligent do we think this thing was?
So I mean that's the crazy part. So you couldn't really tell from some of the recreations and what we think they look like. But their brain, I didn't mention this, is the size of an orange. Oh. It's one third the size of a Homo sapiens brain.
I kind of buried the lead. That's the shocking part of all this is that a being with a brain one third the size of ours figures out this complex ritual.
But is that – should that still be shocking when we know so much about crows?
Hmm.
You know, crows are very smart, like clever. They play games. They know how to solve puzzles. They know how to drop rocks into a water bottle to raise the level of the water so they can drink it. They do.
They use tools to extract food. They – have you ever seen crows make cats start fights with each other?
No.
They do it for sport. Like one crow will – like two cats are on rival rooftops. And the crow will fly over and just be just close enough to the cat that the cat can't get him. And he kind of fucks with him and irritates him. On purpose.
On purpose. And then he flies over to the other cat and kind of fucks with him. And the cat's like, get out of here, man. And so they're both like – they're heightened because they're being fucked with by this crow. And then he kind of like coaxes these cats into a fight.
And these cats fight and they fall off the roof. Watch this shit. Watch this. Look at this crow. He's getting close.
He's like, hey, motherfucker. What's up? Hey, bitch. What's up? He just gets just close enough.
See? The cat's like, get the fuck out of here, man. Like, he's fucking with him. And every time the cat tries to move on him, he flies away. And then the cat just jumps on that other fucking cat.
And they start duking it out. Like, look. And he's like sitting right next to it. They fall off the roof. And the crow flies down with him.
He's like, yeah, get him, get him. He's still going. It's fun for him. He's having a good time. Like.
there's no evolutionary advantage to doing that.
That's blood sport.
Look, and then they fall down that little – boom.
Cats are just going to war. And that crow's like, yeah, get him. Kick his ass. Weird. They're very, very, very smart.
They've done all these studies where they show that if you give a crow a one-size tool, it will use that tool to extract a larger tool. And it will use that tool to get the food. Like. they've done all these weird little mazes and had crows solve them. They're very clever.
Sneaky little fuckers. Tiny little brains.
So we're not exceptional.
Well, how about? octopus? Octopuses are very smart. What the fuck are they? They found that there's a poisonous jellyfish that – it's a very toxic jellyfish.
But even though it doesn't have a brain, it has the ability to learn. That's something they just recently discovered. See, if you can find that. It's pretty interesting. It's like some just fucking weird-ass jellyfish that stings you.
You're fucked. But this thing has the ability to learn, which is very surprising. Like it doesn't even have a brain. Okay, so all right. What's learning then?
Are we wrong about where memories are stored? Scientists provide evidence that tiny Caribbean box jellyfish, which lack a central nervous system, can learn to navigate through mangrove roots.
Yeah. That's interesting.
That just came out. Yes. A couple weeks ago.
Yeah, so what is learning then? I mean, is it all – are we silly by thinking it's in the mind? Is the mind an antenna? Are there other antennae in the body? Is a gut feeling a real thing?
You know that expression, gut feeling? Why gut? Like? what is that?
Maybe we focus on the brain too much. Perhaps. The organ.
Well, we know, if you shut the brain off, the consciousness shuts off too. So it makes sense that you concentrate on that thing. And it is very big. It's very unusual how quickly it grew. There's a lot of weirdness to the human brain.
Doubling of the human brain size. That's like one of the biggest mysteries ever. I don't know what the fuck caused that.
Yeah, from erectus to sapiens, we were talking about.
Over a period of two million years. Yeah. Double.
But then you have these small brain creatures in the meantime which are doing exceptional things. And so maybe the increase in the brain isn't what we should be focusing on, at least not exclusively. If brainless jellyfish can learn and a hominid species with an orange brain can develop complex rituals around death.
Yeah, but there's also clearly a correlation between the larger brain and much more ability to manipulate its environment. I mean the difference between what a human being, a homo sapien, is capable of. And we're amazed that they drag their body into a hole in the ground. You know, we built rockets to fly to outer space. It's like a big difference in the weirdness of what the creative mind can achieve in a homo sapien.
Some of us.
Yeah.
Some of us. Sure. Yeah.
Yeah, some not so much.
Yeah. The brain hasn't done anything for us. Ditch diggers too.
Someone's got to dig ditches. Until AI. And then, you know, that's what's going to be interesting.
You said, our successors take over?
Our successors. Yeah. When President AI solves all the world's problems, we just give in.
I don't know. I have faith in the human spirit. I gave a talk about this in Paris a few months ago, about artificial versus ancestral intelligence. And I happen to think that what Homo Naledi was doing is among some of the most intelligent activity our species can get itself busy with, which is investigating this notion of life and death. I think that's what makes us human, is asking these big questions and trying to figure out the nature of consciousness.
And this is what all these mystery religions were trying to do. I think there was more science than religion. I mean, they're called mystery religions, but this was the process of our ancestors trying to figure out the secrets to the universe and antiquity. And for the working hypothesis is that psychedelic drugs and altered states of consciousness had something to do with that ability to probe into these mysteries. And I think that, you know, the caves also have a lot to do with it.
Like there were caves constantly being used by, well, predecessor species, for sure, but then also ancient societies, to enter into these profound states of awareness, going back into the womb of the earth to really figure out that border between life and death and maybe navigate it, maybe navigate successfully. This was the enterprise of ancient Egypt, being able to successfully navigate into the afterlife. Again, which is not a beginning, which is not an end, but a beginning. This is how the mystery religions always talk about death and befriending death and confronting all mortality. Like, I'm not sure if AI will be able to plumb those secrets the way that we've been doing for all these thousands of years.
That's interesting. I don't think,
well, why wouldn't it be able to? I mean, what it's essentially doing, well, all human beings, everyone that is listening to this and everyone who isn't, you're essentially riding on the work of the people that came before you. We're all speaking a language that other people invented. We're using mathematics that other people invented. We live in structures that other people invented.
There's been just this massive sea of human beings before us that have innovated and created. But if AI can have access to everything they've ever learned and everything they've ever done, and have an understanding of biology and of subatomic science at a level that the average human being is just not capable of, maybe it could understand a pattern that we've missed. Maybe it can understand a code that we've missed, that this whole thing is like there's some sort of an underlying code to the entire universe and that it all works together. And you're experiencing it as a human being, riding the subway, driving in your car, going to work. You're experiencing this very minute realm of this overall experience that is all working together through this code that's creating everything.
I think AI could figure that out. I think we're very limited, because we're talking about our own experience and we're talking about our own biological mortality. So we have this window of time to sort things out. What is that quote? Enlightenment is possible within your lifetime.
We have this very small window. It's 100 years, if you're lucky. And during that 100 year period, you're asked a lot with this primitive monkey mind to try to figure things out. But if you didn't have that, if you didn't have that thing looming over you, maybe you'd have a more objective assessment of what's actually going on. But what this species is actually doing, like what it's here for.
What's your takeaway on our biological mortality and what we're doing here in light of your most profound DMT experiences?
It would be just guessing. I'm talking shit. Yeah, I don't know. I mean, for us, in our experience, I think the best thing you could do is spread as much positivity as possible. In every way you can be as charitable as possible, be as nice as possible, spread as much positivity as possible.
That seems to be like a valuable lesson that I get from all those experiences. But again, where everything we're doing is based on the biological limitations of our consciousness and our life experiences. Everything we're doing is based on like who we are and who we think we are, and what meaning it has for us that we're here right now. But if you weren't burdened down by all these biological limitations, if you weren't burdened by this existential angst and this fear of death.
We have this desire to figure it out, like to have like, oh, this is what's going to happen. We have this desire to have an answer to almost the unanswerable. What if AI didn't have those? It's not going to have those problems. It's just going to have information.
It's just going to have just pure information, with no ego, no desire to survive, no greed, no desire to reproduce, no envy. It's going to be a fascinating thing once it does happen, because it might be able, to, like, quickly figure out a lot of things that we've been burdened by. But we're looking at these things through the limitations of our biological experience and through the ego, which tells us that this biological experience is uniquely important. Everyone thinks that they are uniquely important. But yet there's all this evidence that you're not.
You're a part of this very bizarre thing. But this very bizarre thing, as it interacts with each other, is very psychedelic. Like if you weren't a human and you didn't and you had no idea what human life is, and you were some other kind of consciousness, and you took a drug and the drug led you to experience human life in a big city, you'd be like, this is crazy. What a drug. If you just saw the lights going back and forth on a highway and how similar they look to, like blood flowing through arteries.
And you see these things that are getting constructed. It's like these growths on the earth that this being is creating. Like, what is this fucking wild species doing? You know, I think we would have a more objective sense of it. I've said this too many times.
We'll say it one more time. I think we're here to make things. I think our curiosity is all about innovation. That's the primary function that this species has. If you looked at it from afar, you'd say, well, what is this thing doing?
Oh, it's making better stuff every year. It always does that, no matter what it does. It makes, unless it nukes itself into the Stone Age, which is always a threat, because the better stuff that it makes is often weapons. And it often gets better at making money by utilizing those weapons. So it keeps doing that, which is what you're seeing all over the world right now.
But I think, if you looked at like, the one thing it's doing, it's making better things. And it's so wrapped up in buying those better things. Materialism is so rampant. And everybody, despite what you have, being more than enough, you want more and better and new things. And that fuels consumerism.
And consumerism fuels more innovation. And it's like baked into the mentality. Sort of like I don't know if bees know exactly what they're doing when they're making a beehive, but they all make beehives. You know, they're all doing that same thing. And, human beings, what we're doing is we're at least working towards buying these things that someone's making.
Don't you think human creativity is what makes us uniquely human? On top of all that, our ability to fashion things from nothing, to create music and beauty and art. Look at those scratch marks from 300,000 years ago. And then you go into the painted caves 30,000 years ago. And then you follow the production of art throughout our species.
I feel like that's the kind of thing that AI won't be able to resolve for us. Perhaps. The process of what it means to engage in a creative act and to produce something that the whole species can resonate with.
The question would be why would it want to do that? You know, if it doesn't have those kind of feelings that you have when you hear a great song or see a great painting, why would it want to do that? Right? And why do we want to do that?
Why do we do that?
We do it for each other. Well, you talk about creativity, and I think creativity is the fuel of innovation. All things that we use today, whether it's a cell phone or a laptop, or whatever it is, all of those things came out of the imagination. All those things came out of someone's mind. And I've always wondered, I wonder, if ideas are life forms, like a type of life form, like a thing, an energy that manifests itself in the creation of actual physical objects.
And that it gets into your mind and it interacts with your being and it talks you into making a coffee pot. I mean, doesn't it make sense? All these things that we have, everything in this room, came out of someone's mind.
Everything. See, that's where I think we have the edge on AI. And I think that we don't understand the genius, the divine genius, of where that creativity comes from. I collect different quotes from musicians talking about the creative process. Jamie, I sent you a couple.
In the email, there's one from John Frusciante. He's the guitarist for Red Hot Chili Peppers. I love listening to musicians talk about where music comes from and where inspiration comes from. Because I think it's one lens that we can use to think about the creative act in general. It may start with music.
It goes to everything that's here. It goes to the art of a conversation. It goes to comedy. It goes to the way we make children, by the way, which is a very creative act and something that comes naturally to most of us. I think that's what makes us human, is this ability to translate something that extends beyond our physical bodies and then to embody it, whatever that it is.
Frusciante calls it the force. And then to make something of it, something that can resonate with the community. I think that's something that AI will be able to do, and fits and starts. But I'm not sure that we understand the process. And that's why I think about the process of life and death, too.
That's why I think that the thing that makes us human is the way that we engage with those invisible forces.
Yeah.
The way we engage with those invisible forces. Yeah. I mean, that's what's unique about humans, for sure, on Earth.
Jamie, do you have that? quote from John?
Yeah. What is the quote? It's a saying. It's a video. I don't know if you want to read it or play it, or what.
You can play it. Yeah.
It's expressing itself through our existence. I don't believe that a musical idea starts in your brain. I believe it starts at a place before that that we don't have any direct contact with. And I believe that everything that we do, everything that we create, is nature expressing itself. the same way that when a flower grows out of the ground or a tree grows out of the ground, it's nature expressing itself.
And you might say that the tree is expressing itself by the way its branches move out. But it's the force that drives nature. The tree is the visible thing that appears to our senses, but I don't at all believe it's the source of why everything is perpetuated all the time, you know? The force that created us.
Hmm. That makes sense. Hmm. Yeah. Well, most comedians will tell you that jokes come to them like a gift.
Like your mind, just like a door opens up and like, here it is. And you're like, oh, wow. Oh, my God. What a great idea. Yeah.
Like, these ideas just pop into your head. And sometimes you see things and you describe them, and you're like, mm-hmm. And the idea will come from that. But sometimes ideas just come to you. They don't even feel like, you don't feel responsible for them, because it's not like you dug a hole.
Like, here's the hole I dug. You do right. You sit down and write, right? Yeah. You do the physical act of summoning the muse, which is how Pressfield talks about it in The War of Art, which is a great way to.
Because it is that. Whether or not the muse is real, if you treat it as if it's real, it will show up. Hmm. Like, if you show up every day and you write, you say I'm from 9 a.m. to noon every day.
I sit in front of my computer and I write. If you do that, the ideas will come. They will come to you.
That's crazy.
Well, where are they coming from? Where is that? Yeah. What is that thing?
Do you think AI can figure that out? I don't think. I'm not sure if we can figure that out.
I don't know. It's a good question. It's a good question. Like what is the unique inspiration for ideas and our desire to pursue them? Like what is it?
I think that's part of what makes us innovate. And that's part of like what, you know, if you were looking at us from afar, what is this species doing? It's making things. And how do you make things without creativity? You don't.
You wouldn't. You would have no desire to. So there's the question about AI. It's like can you program that desire to innovate into a thing without all of the primate characteristics that we possess?
We seem to have this innate ability to do it in a way that we know will resonate with people. Have you ever read AI jokes?
Yeah. They're not inspired. But they're really young. It's like a joke from a 5-year-old. Yeah.
A 5-year-old tells you a joke. It's like, my daughter is really young. One of her favorite jokes was, what kind of tree grows in your hand? I go, I don't know. She goes, a palm tree.
And she'd have this big, long punch line, a palm tree. When you're 5, it's hilarious. And I thought it was really funny. I'm like, that's a solid joke. But like that's a 5-year-old joke.
If you try to do that on stage at the mothership on a Saturday night, they'd be like, really? You know?
That's kind of my point, man.
Yeah.
So where do your jokes come from?
But AI is young, is what I'm saying. AI is a 5-year-old telling jokes. When AI becomes a PhD from Princeton, you're going to be dealing with a very different thing. You know? As AI becomes, I just can't imagine that the, whatever it is that makes creativity, because creativity is absolutely inspired by our predecessors as well.
There's a lot of, I could speak to comedy. There's a lot of styles of comedy that you go, oh, that guy's clearly a Richard Pryor fan. Or that guy's, you know, he's definitely been influenced by Kinnison. He's definitely been influenced by Jerry Seinfeld. There's something that we carry with us from the people, and you see it in music as well.
You know, Stevie Ray Vaughan, clearly influenced by Hendrix. So you see this as well. But it's just, couldn't it just do that? Couldn't it just absorb all these patterns and then come up with unique patterns that it knows will resonate with people? I think you could probably create some fucking jam and pop songs that are just entirely AI created.
And you could use all the best voices, because you would just be able to voice swap them. You could have you doing them. You could be singing the next Lizzo song. You know, it can do weird things now. And some of those weird things are going to resonate with people and become very successful.
And then it will figure out what those things are. Okay, so this Drake song that I made, this got, you know, 4 million listens on Spotify. So now we'll do this. And now we'll make one like that. And now I'll add this.
And now I'll do something that people have never figured out before and do that. So it might be able to do the same thing. Creativity is capable of accomplishing. But it won't be done with the same sort of spirit and soul. So it won't be able to resonate with us the same way as, say, like a Janis Joplin song.
There's something to, like, Colter Wall's voice. There's certain people that they have a thing in them. Like, you can't fake that, whatever the fuck that is.
There's a word for that. They call it a frisson. Have you heard of that? No. Frisson, it's the term when you get, like, goosebumps from music, or when music affects you in such a way.
Like, I'm not saying it's impossible. But I think humans at the moment are much better at producing that effect than AI.
Oh, for sure. Do you know who Colter Wall is? Jamie, play Kate McKinnon. There's this song. Jamie turned me on to this song.
And this dude is singing. He wrote and sang this song when he was 21 years old. And you listen and you go, what the fuck? It's very rare that I'll listen to a song and just go, what the fuck? But listen to this.
Okay.
Raven is a wicked bird. His wings are black as sin.
And he floats outside my prison window, mocking those within.
And he sings to me real low, his hell's where you go. But you didn't murder Kate McKinnon. 21..
Sounds like a 50-year-old rancher. 60, even.
This is the music video that goes along with it.
Said, he had himself a dark-haired daughter, long green eyes.
And when she and I didn't meet, she was bathing in the creek.
Pretty girl in the whole damn holler.
Good luck.
You ain't gonna make this. You never think of this.
That's the point.
Yeah. It's not gonna think. But why is this? Is this a special to us?
So what we are is special to us. Because we are us. But it'll be the next thing.
We have this knack for producing things that we know will resonate.
With us.
With our species.
And what do those things do? They motivate movement. They motivate creativity. They inspire you. They fuel you.
They're a strange drug. It's an audible drug. An audio drug. Great music is certainly a drug. You and I got to see Guns N' Roses live.
Oh, man. Which was pretty fucking dope. Right? That was pretty dope. In Athens.
Have you told that story?
I think I did, yeah. I think I did, yeah. You came back to the table. I went to the bathroom. And you came back and you said, oh my god, Axl Rose is here.
Yeah. And I was like, whoa, where is he at? And you were like, he's right over there. So you had to walk by him.
You know, I tried to talk to him, right?
Yeah, you tried to say hi.
It didn't go so well. I saw him. When I left to the bathroom, out of the corner of my eye, I saw him with a woman. And I thought, oh, that's Axl. And I went to the bathroom.
And I had a margarita and a glass of wine.
Because you, peer, pressured me into drinking over dinner. Peer pressure?
It's my fault. Look how I'm responsible for you. You're a grown man, sir.
I'm a grown man. So I made the choice to have a glass of wine with dinner. And so I was feeling pretty good. And so I saw him at the table. So on the way back, I'm thinking, I can't not say hi.
And so in my mind, I have a tuxedo and slicked hair and a martini.
Excuse me, Axl. We need to chat. But I think it's not impossible that I said Mr. Rose. Like, excuse me.
Mr. Rose. And the woman there was like, she didn't even say anything. She just waved me away. And I thought, okay, I mean, I would do the same thing if I were Axl.
And so I went back to the table, dejected, and let you know that Axl was still sitting there.
Yes. And then my dilemma was, do I say hi? Because I'm like, I don't know if he knows me. I don't know if he knows who I am. I don't want to be an idiot.
And I went, hi, Axl. He's like, get the fuck out of here.
I tried that.
Especially if it's like my first time meeting Axl Rose. I've been a fan of his for so long. I think I used to work out to Welcome to the Jungle in the 80s. So that guy's been famous since I was like 21 years old. 22?.
When did Welcome to the Jungle come out?
Appetite for Destruction?
Yeah. When was that?
87?. Was it? I think it was 87..
I remember very clearly being in the gym the first time I heard it. I was lifting weights at this place. And Welcome to the Jungle! I was like, oh my God, what a fucking song. 1987..
Yeah, that makes sense.
I remember standing on the pool table of my neighbor, Ryan, down the street and playing with wiffle ball bats and air guitar-ing. Welcome to the Jungle.
So luckily he knew who I was. He actually knew my comedy. He was asking me questions about some jokes and I loved this bit. And I was like, oh God.
Because you went in with confidence, by the way. You forget that part, dude. We walked in and I did the wrong thing. And you walked in with total confidence and you stuck your arm into the booth and said hi. You didn't give him a chance not to say hi.
Is that what I did? I was drunk, too.
I just got lucky. he knew who I was.
It was full confidence with the Joe Rogan tattoos. You went right into his face and said, hey, man. Hey, man. And he stopped for a second because it was odd. And he's like, oh, hey, man.
He knew you immediately.
Oh, what a relief that was. Because you don't know. You don't know if someone fucks with you. It's weird. It's weird to assume that this very famous person knows who you are.
He was super cool.
He was very cool.
And he asked what you were doing there. And you said, I'm here with my family. And he said, oh, this is your family, pointing to me.
And you're like, no, this is Brian. You're very nice. He wrote this thing. He's a writer. And you told him the hypothesis.
And Axel, like, he, gave me the best T-shirt for the book. He's like, okay, cool. So everybody got high and made democracy.
Pretty much. That's pretty much what we think, Axel. Pretty much. And then he invited us to the show, which was super dope. But, you know, that, what I was getting to is, like, when you hear, like, welcome to the jungle, your whole body goes, wow.
It's like a drug. It's a drug that human beings have invented for ourselves. There's something about music that, like, music, when you're tired, like, say if you're on a treadmill or something, you're tired, and a good song comes on, you're like, fuck, yeah. It gives you an extra gear. Inspiration through music is very much like a performance enhancing drug.
It does something to you. It motivates people to dance. You know, when someone hears a good song, they're like, fuck that. Let's get on the dance floor. It's like music, like, does something to you, your being.
It interfaces with whatever the fuck you are in some very, very special way. But it only does it to us. Like, why would the universe think that that's interesting? Like, does it?
Don't animals dance to human music? There must be videos of animals dancing to human music.
There's definitely videos of dogs dancing, but I've always wondered if they've been trained to dance.
Why does that make you smile?
Because it's cool. It's cool to see dogs dance. I wish my dog could dance. But they, you know, animals are so, especially dogs in particular, they're so tuned in to people in some weird way. Like, my dog understands English.
Really? Like, I can say, yeah, I wish I'd have brought him today. But everyone was at the house and he was having fun. There's a deer in our backyard. There was a lot of drama today.
There was a deer with a broken leg in my backyard.
Oh, man.
Yeah. Yeah, some poor little buck, a little young buck.
And I was, it was in the morning, like 7 o'clock in the morning. Everyone's getting ready to go to school. I made a cup of coffee. I let the dog back in and he hadn't seen it. So he's, like, chilling on the back porch.
And I let him in and I look over there and it looks like a fucking statue. It's a buck just standing there. I mean, like, 40 feet from me. And I'm like, why is there a deer there? And then I close the door.
Girls, girls, girls, come here, check this out. And then I look at the way he's standing and go, ooh, his back leg's broken.
His shin is fractured. His back, like where your shin would be, it's bending back the wrong way. It's broken. And so called animal protection, and they didn't know what to do. So we're literally trying to find him an animal veterinarian to fix this deer's leg, which is just so crazy because I shoot deers and I eat them.
But do you feel bad for this one?
For that one, I was like, first, he was very young. I would never shoot him. He's a little young fella. He's just, it looks like a yearling. Like he's just got his horns for the first time.
And he's like really confused and he's hurt. He can't, and he's in my yard because I guess he's like safer there. And so the dog finally does find him. And when the dog finds him, he's just like kind of jumping around him and bouncing and like, you want to play? Like, and the deer can't run.
So he's just standing there going, hey, man, are you going to eat me? Like, what's going on here? And it was, it was very interesting. But he knows, like my dog, I can say, come on, man, cut the shit. Get inside.
And he goes inside. Or I can say, don't go out this door. I'm going to go to the other door. He just goes to the other door. Like.
I can say things like that. Like, he knows. I can say, not that door, dude, the other one. And he'll start going towards the other door. It's very weird.
I can say, you want to watch TV? And he goes into the TV room. And like, he waits for me to plop up on the couch and he hops up next to me. Like he speaks English, or he knows English. He just can't talk.
Is it golden?
Yeah. So animals, whatever the intelligence that they have, like, whatever the fuck they're tuning into, it's a comprehension of language, I think, beyond, just like saying words that they respond to. Like, you want to go for a walk? When the dog pops up, they're just recognizing the word walk. Now, I think they understand.
like speech. They understand tone. They understand what you mean. They understand when you're in trouble, they're in trouble. Did you fucking shit on the carpet, dude?
You know, like, oh, did I? And they run away. They know things. But they don't seem to give a fuck about music. You know?
Dogs don't. They won't calm down if you play calming music?
Supposedly they do. And unfortunately now that's in my fucking YouTube algorithm, because he was freaked out because of the thunderstorms that were happening. He was like, oh. And so my wife said, oh, there's this music that you can play for the dog and it calms them. So there's YouTube channels.
So now, every time I turn on my YouTube app, I get calming dog songs.
I don't even know if they work. How does anybody know if they work?
Ask your dog. Yeah.
He's not going to answer. That's the problem. But the act of moving the body to music is uniquely human. Yeah. I mean, what other animals dance to music?
Let's find out.
Chimpanzees don't?
I don't think so. Boy, they're smart as shit, though. They're spooky smart. When you watch them solve puzzles for candy. You know they gave chimps money?
They taught them that if they take this money, this thing, these tokens, and give it to this person, or put it in this thing, they would give them candy. You know the first thing they did was? They gave it to the female chimps and they had sex with them. They immediately engaged in prostitution.
Where do you find this stuff?
Oh, that's old. That's an old study. That's from a long time ago. I've just been always fascinated by chimpanzees. I mean, they're one of the most bizarre relatives to us.
that's still around. You've seen Chimp Nation? Yeah. Amazing, right? Like, God, so fascinating.
But I don't think they dance. Do you think they do?
I think they have rhythm. Yeah? Yeah.
Do they move around?
There's videos of them doing some ritual.
Oh.
I think. Ritual? Some rhythm.
So, what is this? Look at this. He's break dancing.
That's dancing, man. He's just having a good time.
That's dancing.
Is that what he's doing? Is there music playing?
But is that real? Is that the real music? That seems like that's added after the fact. Yeah, he's doing fast steps. Look how long his arms are.
Isn't that crazy?
It's just crazy that we come from the same original root. It branched in a bunch of different ways.
Seven million years ago.
That's. what's fascinating is that they're still here. They're still here in that form, which is the dumbest anti-evolution question ever. If we came from monkeys, why are monkeys still here?
That's a good question.
Well, why is amoeba still here, sir? Yeah. You know, why is anything still here?
Why are we still here?
Yeah, but some things can function in the state they are, and they don't need to adapt. That's why, crocodiles, they've been the same forever. You know, sharks existed before trees. Sharks predate trees. Sharks are so old.
They've been along for so long. I think they're 50 million years older than trees.
But trees are pretty old to begin with.
Yeah. I think sharks are somewhere in the neighborhood of like 300 and something million years old. And trees are 50 million years less. What is it? Yeah, there it is.
Sharks have been swimming our oceans much longer than trees have been swaying in the breeze on land. The birth of trees on Earth is believed to have occurred roughly 370, 390 million years ago. That makes sharks at least 10 million years old than trees. Oh, so, I was off by 40 million. But, yeah, older than trees.
Do you miss your calling as an evolutionary biologist?
Not really. No. No, I just like interesting information. But especially about things like that. You know, like sharks, the cleanup crew of the ocean.
That's like, how do you manage just this vast literal sea of life that moves in 3D space? It just moves all over the place. And things are going to die. And what happens to them? Sharks.
This massive beast that has to keep moving or it dies. And it's so old. And it's designed just for killing and eating. And it has rows of replaceable teeth. And the only bones that it has at all are this massive jawbone.
And these ridiculous razor sharp saws that just slice things in half. And it just roams the ocean looking to consume.
Have you ever had a shark encounter?
I've had sharks bite fish off my line. I've never had a shark encounter where I was like, Jesus, there's a shark. No. Have I seen them in the wild? I do not know.
I don't think I have. I don't think I've seen a shark swimming through the water. I've seen a lot of dolphins. A lot of whales. I don't think I've ever had a physical encounter with a shark.
Have you dreamed about sharks?
Not really. What. are you, a psychologist? What the fuck is going on with the guys at Shrink now? What happened?
Where'd regular Brian go?
I'm curious about your mind.
I dream about wolves.
Oh, I'm getting somewhere with this.
Yeah, I dream about wolves a lot.
Really? Yeah. What are you dreaming about?
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os