#2105 - Dr. Phil

I like how you did the cliff notes, that's a slick move.

I don't have to look very far.

This is the NYPD dance team. So they developed a dance team.

You remember when you were a kid and you thought about the fall of the Roman Empire? And you were like, did they see it coming?

Is that what you're thinking?

What is this? that they put this on, Jamie?

I mean, how much training is involved today, in this time of such a demand for police officers? They're trying really hard to get police officers. They should train them like they train Navy SEALs. It should be a very difficult process to get through. And we should be very thankful that people are doing the job.

And they should be rewarded and treated well.

A police officer should show up and enforce the law. If not, people are going to get shot and killed. Police officers should show up and suppress illegal activity, disarm people that are a threat. And after all that's done, then fine. Bring in somebody that is a social worker or whatever.

But you don't want a police officer doing all of that stuff. They're there to do one job, and that is suppress illegal behavior, disarm dangerous people. And they need to do it as quickly and efficiently as they can. They don't want to do all that. They got one job.

Right. And they need to do that one job and do it very well. And they don't need people in there saying, well, you need to kind of talk to them, and you need to this, you need to that. I'm not saying be heavy-handed or badge-heavy, but they need to do what they're there to do and then let other people come in behind them and try to do all the rest of the stuff. You don't want a cop doing three different jobs.

You want them doing one job, and that's suppress illegal behavior, get it under control, and then let somebody else do everything else.

They didn't want less police. And it's so often that these activists, and I call it tyranny of the fringe. I've written this new book we'll talk about, I'm sure, in due time. But I talk about tyranny of the fringe. These activists aren't speaking for the people.

they say they're speaking for. They're speaking for themselves. They like the camera. They like the attention. They're not speaking for the groups they supposedly are speaking for.

And the next thing you know, you're supporting the wildest of the leftists. You're supporting Antifa. You're turning a blind eye to violent thugs. And this is how screwed up everything's gotten just over the last few years. It seems like ten years ago.

this is not possible.

Like my grandmother used to say, now you've gone from preaching to meddling now.

And he specifically said that parents don't have rights in Canada. I feel like he said they have obligations. Is that the term he used? But he said under Canadian law, parents don't have rights. Like, what the fuck are you saying?

Let me make sure that's exactly what he said before I get sued. But when I saw it, I was like, this is such a crazy thing to say. And if that's the way their law is structured, fix that. Like, who are other people to tell you how to parent your child? And who are these people?

Have they been vetted? Are they really good at parenting? They're supposed to be teachers. They're not supposed to be parents.

If you look at this right now, and I understand,

I don't know if you know, but I'm starting my whole new network called Merritt Street Media.

And I have committed myself to owning the debate lane in America. I'm willing to let all sides come and say what they want to say, but they got to be willing to answer hard questions. And I've had some of these folks, I've already shot about 30 shows on Dr. Phil primetime. And we're going to have four hours of news and a whole lot of other programming.

But it's all about, I mean, let's be commonsensical. Let's look at the facts. Let's look at science. Let's not look at what you want to be the truth. Let's look at what is the facts.

Let's look at what is science.

And we've got these people that it's interesting. they choose words like gender affirming care. You know, that's interesting, that they call it that. But really what they're talking about is hormonal therapy or sex reassignment surgery on children. And, in fairness, the American Medical Association, the American Academy of Pediatrics, the American Endocrine Society, or whatever the exact name of that is, all of the major medical associations have signed off on this, Joe.

They've signed off on it. And I have never seen those organizations sign off on anything with less information as to whether or not it does long-term harm of anything in my life. And when I ask about that, when I bring that up, then they immediately label you as transphobic.

And I thought that the deal was first do no harm. And all of the European countries, you know, Sweden, Norway, they've all stopped doing it because they say we cannot say in good conscience that this does no harm because it does harm. If you look at the long-term consequences, if someone changes their mind at 10,, 11,, 12, 13 years old, they can't decide which pajamas they want to wear at night. And their reason for doing it is it stops this drive for suicide, that there's a suicide epidemic. It doesn't fix that.

It doesn't fix all the comorbid issues that come along with feeling like they're in the wrong body. But yet they're pushing this. And we're going to do some shows that are already taped, that are revealing what the real results of this are. And I think people are going to be shocked that these medical organizations have signed off on this. I think they've just given in to the pressure.

This is a wild thing, man. I've never seen anything like it.

First off, this is either a psychological phenomenon or a medical phenomenon, and the teachers are not trained in either psychology or medicine. They're not any more trained to deal with that than they are to take out the kid's spleen in the homeroom. So if that's true, if it's a psychological thing, if it's gender dysphoria, or it's a medical issue, then you need someone trained in child psychology, psychiatry, or medicine. And the teacher's not trained in any of those three things. Like I say, they're not any more trained in that than they are to take out the child's spleen.

So how are they qualified to deal with that? Secondly, it's teaching the child to keep a secret from their parents. It's teaching deception and interfering between the child's relationship with their parent. Now, their justification for that is, well, if the child goes home and announces this, or if we tell it to the parent, then the child could get abused, the child could get judged, the child could get kicked to the curb. But they have to admit, statistically, that that is very rare.

And if that's the case, that's what we have the Department of Child and Family Services for. That's what we have Child Protective Services for. If that's the case, then you call in for some intervention if the child is being abused at home for whatever reason.

Then you get intervention in that way. But you don't come between the child and their parent. The parent has the right to know what's going on.

It's not like the threshold for teachers is so high that only the elite of the elite cross it. You see a lot of these weird people teaching classes, and you don't necessarily want them giving advice to children about decisions for the rest of their life. And here's an important point that people need to really take into consideration. There's a reason why they have little kids become suicide bombers. Because you can talk kids into almost anything.

You can talk them into believing in Santa Claus. You talk kids into believing in all kinds of ridiculous shit, because they're really young. You could easily convince them in one way or another that they're anything. That they're queer, that they're trans. You could 100% convince some kids of all kinds of things.

Especially by reinforcing it with love and support and happiness. You can convince people of a lot of things. That's what's uncomfortable for a lot of people. For a lot of gay people, they're uncomfortable with the idea that a lot of these kids are just going to grow up to become gay. My friend Tim Dillons talked about that a bunch.

He says it's homophobic. It's like they're trying to say, no, you're a girl. And really, maybe you're just gay. Like, that's okay. It was always a thing.

And now all of a sudden it's getting... You're looking at little kids that might just be gay kids. You're saying, maybe you're a girl. Maybe you need to go to a gender reassigning surgery center. And never have an erection or an orgasm for the rest of your life.

Like, what the fuck are we doing? They're so young.

And that's the problem. And what literature is out there suggests that you get... And this is what you see from the European countries. They've done study after study from these suppressive hormones compared to doing psychotherapy. And there's not much difference.

If you do psychotherapy, you can ease the depression. You can ease the suicidal tendencies with psychotherapy without doing the irreversible things. They say, well, you can reverse those things. No, that's not true. If you arrest the development, that can have ramifications long term.

Or at least they can't say it doesn't have ramifications long term.

And I'm... Look, I'm not a physician.

Do you think it's because there's people that are queer or LBGT, whatever, and they want other people to be a part of their group? Is it? they want more LBGT people? They want to encourage this behavior? They think it's suppressed.

And maybe there's more people that are gay or whatever, and they want to come out and they just get suppressed by it. So they're trying to make it more enthusiastic. How is this trans thing becoming a major point of debate with children where it never has in history? In your life, in my life, there was never all this talk about trans children. This seems insane, that we've forgotten that kids don't know what the fuck is going on yet.

Some reports say it's gone up 800%, 1,000% over the last several years. And they say, well, that's because they feel more comfortable talking about it now. Is that true, or is it because you read about it, you see it on social media, and you think, well, I can distinguish myself in this way. I think there is a social contagion effect. So, people jump on the bandwagon, and if it's for a short period of time, but they've done things that can't be reversed, I think that's really tragic.

And they say there are very few detransitioners. I don't think that's true. I think there's a lot more detransitioners that want to reverse this and come back than are being reported.

Everyone's going to know that's the guy that used to be a girl and became a guy again. And there's all the questions and all the bullshit that comes along with that.

They're very good people that teach because they really want to help young people. I think they're some of the most underpaid, dedicated people in this entire country, and they don't want to deal with this stuff.

It happens all the time to teachers. There's all these cell phone videos of teachers getting beat up.

And I think that's one of them. I think it would be a great way to weaken America, to make everybody at each other's throats about the dumbest fucking things and then even put children and children's health and lives at risk with this crazy shit that we're talking about right now. And the more that stuff is going on in our country, the more there's going to be a decay of our appreciation for America, less patriotism, less paying attention to what we're doing.

And you get into who, all saying this. These aren't real accounts. They're not real people. And so somebody goes, oh, well, I need to apologize for this or apologize for that.

You know, I know who I am. I know what I believe. I'm not transphobic. I'm not racist. I'm not any of those things.

And so they jump on and start saying all that stuff about you. Well, you know, you just got to decide, you know who you are or you don't.

You can learn a lot of things. You can interact with a lot of people. But also there's a lot of fake accounts, a lot. And there was an FBI, a former FBI, was he, an analyst, Jamie? He estimated that it may be as high as 80% of all the accounts on Twitter are fake.

I won't say X. Elon's my friend, but X is ridiculous. I'll say it occasionally if I'm being charitable.

But that's an insane number. Let's say he's wrong. by 30%. It's still half. Half the people online.

I mean, if he's accurate, that's crazy. That means there's just been a mass infiltration of foreign agents into all of the discourse about politics and gender and society, and women's rights and men's rights, and war and Ukraine and every fucking thing that happens in the world. Everything. And you're getting confused as to what the general consensus is of the population. Because you go out with most people, and you're like, what do you think about that?

And they're like, fuck, that. You're like, yeah, right? Fuck that. Why is everybody going along with this? What the hell's going on?

But I wrote this book, We've Got Issues. How You Can Stand Strong for America's Soul and Sanity. Because I looked around at what was going on and said, somebody's got to tell the truth. Somebody's got to call this for what it is. And one of the big things I talk about is what happened to our society because of social media platforms and the Internet.

And think about it. We had the Industrial Revolution, right? And until that happened, we were a very agricultural-driven society, right? Everybody worked on the farm. And so family units were really tight because everybody had to work all day, every day.

And so they'd come in at noon and have a meal. And they'd come back at dinnertime and have dinner. And everybody worked together on the farm. But then, when things got mechanized with the Industrial Revolution, then people moved to the city. And we went from 95% agricultural to now it's about 1%.

And that was a huge change in the human race. And there's not been that big a change until 2008 or 2009.. And that was the advent of the smartphone. It was like big airplanes flew over the country and dropped smartphones on everybody. That's the biggest change in society since the Industrial Revolution.

Think about it. We went from walking around with our heads up like this to down. People checked their phone an average of 352 times a day. Think about it. 352 times a day.

That's insane. Now, that's adults and children alike. And look what happened to kids. When I turned 16, when I was 15 and 364 days, 23 hours and 59 minutes, I was at the DMV waiting to get my driver's license. Now, kids turn 16, they don't even go get their driver's license.

Yeah, I get it sometime. They start dating later. They start having sex later. They get their driver's license. Everything later.

Why? Because they're watching people live their lives on the Internet instead of living their own lives. And in 2008,, 2009, and 2010, we saw the biggest spikes in depression, anxiety, suicide, and loneliness since they've been keeping records. That's when the cell phones came out. That's when smartphones came out.

That's when the Internet blew up. Because people started watching people live their lives instead of living their own life. And those lives they were watching were fiction. And they compared their life to that life and said, I suck.

The Coddling of the American Mind. It shows. There's a real spike when social media becomes invented. Because you're comparing yourself. There's no comparing.

You can't compare. First of all, those people are either surgically altered or they're using filters. There's a lot of them. I mean, some of them are natural. But for the most part, you're getting these glamorous depictions of a life that's impossible for you to imagine.

that's depressing.

I'm not going to the NBA All-Star Game. I'm going to sit on the couch in my sweats, just like everybody else. You've seen it. There's that private jet thing in Santa Monica. They rent that out by the 15 minutes.

They compare themselves and go, yeah, I'm no good. Everybody started getting depressed. It went up.

If you want to be an influencer, they're just sort of LARPing.

What's your average?

Well, you know, as we've become, especially if you're living in the city, as we've become more populated, people have become almost, they look at people as like a liability. They look at people as like an inconvenience. There's too many of them. As opposed to if you live in a place that doesn't have very many people, you look at people like, that's my neighbor. What's up, Bob?

There's a guy in my neighborhood. I drive by him and he's always working on his garden. I look forward to waving to this guy because he waves at every car, every car that drives by. The guy puts his hands up, waves. I love that dude.

I watch. This guy just waves, waves at everybody.

We went to, uh, Orange County this past weekend for the UFC, and you're driving in Orange County, bro. You ain't going nowhere at 5 PM. You ain't going nowhere. No. You're going nowhere.

That's bumper to bumper. Everywhere you look, it's wild and it takes hours to get anywhere and salute those heroes. Those people who live in Orange County and commute to LA, you people are savages. You just wanted a backyard, so bad.

You can get it in. We used to have a lot of 6.30 jiu-jitsu classes. I was always amazed. But I'm like, yeah, that's what you got to do. You work at 9..

Get in there at 6.30.. You beat traffic. You made it downtown.

It's going to deeper and deeper integration. And it's my fear that this is what we're looking forward to. We're looking forward to some sort of integration, whether it's a headpiece or an actual implant. I don't think we're very far away from that.

We're in an election year right now, and creating deep fakes, using AI. I'm really wondering if it's going to drive the election in some ways this year, because it's getting so good. I've seen myself in ads selling products. I mean, me talking, selling products. I've never even heard of.

It's not me.

And I understand how they can't find this and make it so that no one can upload it. But this video is in, I'll show you, because it's so crazy. It's in so much of my feed. All these giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway. These are all different versions of the same video.

It's like 35% of my feed. All these giveaway, giveaway, giveaway, giveaway. There's so many of them. It's all the same thing. It's all Warren Buffett telling you about Bitcoin, some things they're doing.

It's all deep fake.

They're doing it, especially these kind of things. It's like the Nigerian print scam. They know how to make money. You don't have to get everybody. If you cast a wide net, you get a few fish.

Most fish are like, I see that net. Get the fuck out of here. But there's a lot of people that are just dull-minded. And they've got a little bit of money in their bank account. And next thing, you know, they're investing in some fake Bitcoin exchange.

It's gone.

But they do a voice anonymizer. And they're actually talking to her.

I think it's like 30 seconds long. And they can take that phone conversation and use your voice to call someone and tell them anything. Hey, listen. I'm in real bad trouble. You've got to do me a favor.

A solid favor. right now. You need to wire $2,000.. I'll pay you back Monday. Trust me.

This is like a thing for my life. I can't tell you anymore. But can you do this for me? Yeah, yeah, yeah, man. I got you.

I got you. And next thing, you know, your friend walks through the door. You go, I was just wiring money to you. Like, what? Yeah.

The fuck are you talking about? I'm right here.

the doctor, Dr. Phil? Oh, my God. I've seen you show a thousand times. So they're hypnotized by that.

And then you're making sense. Like, I'm going to do you a solid. You give me this $5,000.. I'm going to give you $50,000 on Monday. Like, holy shit.

Okay. Like, we're running a thing to see how trustworthy people are. I think people are trustworthy. And I trust you. So I'm going to do this for you.

You send $5,000.. You trust me. And then next thing, you know, that guy's out $5,000.. And it wasn't really you. That's easy to believe.

That's when they're most vulnerable. Wow. It had, like, 20 or 30 pickup lines. Wow. It had all of these poems to use, all of this stuff.

We've got the manual. We've put it on the air, so people see it.

But what they're doing is pretty wild, that they use the internet that way. I mean, I wonder how big that industry is. I bet it's pretty sizable.

And he went all the way to Europe to meet her. He had been sending her money. Went all the way to Europe to meet her. And then something came out, but she couldn't meet him. And then it happened again.

He went to Europe again and again. And, you know, by this time, he's in the hole. $250,000, $350,000..

Just sending money to this person that doesn't exist.

And it stopped the bleeding.

It's unbelievable.

Different groups are encouraging it. They're giving people maps, showing them how to do it. This is crazy. This is a mass migration into America.

But what I heard down there was,

even knowing, I felt like I knew a lot about it before I went down there,

but I was shocked. As much as I thought I knew about it, I was shocked when I got down there.

First off, the morale among those guards down there, the fact that they're hanging in and doing as well as they are,

they're turning into social workers. They went down there to be guards, and they say, what we're doing now, instead of apprehending these people, is we're greeting these people. And we're processing them and giving them money and resources. And it's interesting. You've been down there, right?

Same job, different color uniforms. The green uniforms, their court date might be seven years. But if they run into a green uniform, they get processed, money, and they're into the country.

In talking to the union guy who's head of the union for all of the guards, it was interesting. I asked him, what do you need? What do you need down here to do your job? His name is Brandon Judd. And he said, we don't need more money.

We don't need more agents. We don't need new legislation. We just need you to let us do our job. We just need you to apply the laws that exist now, and we'll be fine. You don't need –.

I said, wait a minute. You're telling me you don't need more money or more agents? He said, no. Just let us do our job. We had in place a hold in Mexico.

Instead of come over here, just use the legislation that's on the books, and we're fine.

We're not trying to keep people out. We just want to have enough of a flow control that we know who's coming in. They're not – these aren't bad guys that are trying to be mean to people down there. We just need to know who it is.

We don't know that, right? Why? Why would they want that? What are the benefits of that? Is it cheap labor?

Is it people eventually that will vote?

I just think it needs to be legal. You need to go through the process. It's a felony to enter this country illegally.

But they're doing that, and they're pulling them out of the water. They're pulling them off of the wall and processing them and giving them a court date. that, because of our system, is sometimes seven or ten years. And then they're legally in the country. They've got papers saying, no, no, I was processed at the border.

They're just not coming through the ports of entry.

It seems like it's something coordinated, right?

I said we've got issues. I talk about ten principles for healthy society, and one is you don't reward bad behavior. We've got people that we know are lawbreakers if they're coming in illegally. And so what do we expect them to do once they get here?

And we're rewarding that behavior. They come in illegally. We reward it by giving them a free pass for seven to ten years, because that's how long it's going to take for them to get a hearing. And you know how many will show up for that hearing, and most people would say none. No, I bet you.

they all show up for their hearings because it's been seven to ten years, and they'll show up and say, hey, I've been waiting seven to ten years. The system will probably, at that point, let them stay. They've been here seven to ten years. They've had children who are citizens because they were now born in the country. I bet you, a high percentage of them show up for those hearings because they will predict getting a good result when they show up for the hearing, and they'll have American-born children at that point.

So we're subsidizing behavior that we don't want. We don't know who it is, and they tell me that between 2010 and 2020, they had about 11,000 to 1,500 Chinese come across the border. And in the first 11 months of 2023, they had about 33,000 come across the border.

We don't know. We don't know where they're going. We're not following them. We're not tracking them. One thing I want to be real careful about—and I'm very sincere about this—I don't want to say anything that causes people to feel badly or foster any kind of hatred toward Asian people in the United States.

It's not the people, it's the government that's the problem. I think that we've got—it's just like, if they are sending people over here that are military-aged with an agenda, would we be naive to think that if we've let that many in, that they couldn't spread out across the country? And, in some coordinated effort, attack the energy grid here on a given day and create havoc? Of course they could.

He killed a bunch of cops. And then they wound up getting to him near Big Bear. Somewhere up there, he had holed up in a cabin and they wound up shooting him. Do you remember that story?

He goes, 10 bad motherfuckers who are well-trained and well-armed. Do you remember the, was it North Hollywood, the bank robbery where those crazy fucks showed up with bulletproof vests and machine guns and took over a bank and had a shootout with the cops on the street? It was insane. It was like a scene out of Heat.

That scares the fucking shit out of me.

that's not being discussed. I mean, I hear a few people like you saying it. Brett Weinstein said it, a few other people say it, but most people don't even want to even put it out there.

Let's pause here. Let's pause for a second and Jamie will get you connected. Hold on a second. You ever seen a man type so fast with one hand?

I heard Carl snoring earlier. I was listening. I heard a little...

Jamie, help him out here.

These children that are coming in with someone that says, I'm their mother, aunt, uncle, or whatever, we have no way of verifying that.

I said, why have you not talked about this? He said, nobody's ever asked me these pointed questions. But I'm grateful that you're asking them now. That's how out of control we are down there. We are paying money to take these children and sell them into sex slavery.

They come in with these addresses written on their bodies, written on their arm. And we call up there and say, do you know so-and-so? Yes, we're waiting for them. Okay. They'll be on a plane or a bus.

And you need to pick them up. And I asked him, so some pimp or trafficker or whatever is picking them up up there. And he said, we are knowingly sending them up there for that.

And he said, it's terrible, but that's what's happening.

I mean, what possible justification would there be to stop that?

And so I guess, don't ask and then you don't have the responsibility. But they're sending these children up there. And he's saying we are knowingly. We're knowingly sending them into either a sweatshop or the sex industry up there.

I've then dug into what's happening with Chinese buying, the Chinese government or Chinese nationals buying farmland. And I've got a map, if I can find it, of where they're buying this land. And it's around U.S. military installations. They're buying up land around U.S.

military installations.

And so, when you look at the amount of land that they're buying, it's not all that much. It's a lot of land. But given as much land as there is, it's like maybe less than one percent. But when you look at it strategically around military installations, it's really concerning. And then, when you look at what's happening at those military installations, that they have land around, like B-2, stealth, bomber training, drone training and all, it's very, very troubling.

This is what I'm talking about. Sun owns 40 percent of Chinese land in the U.S. He owns over 100,000 acres of land in Val Verde County, Texas. All those two companies, Brazos Highland Properties and Harvest Texas, all through his two companies. His purchases in 2016 and 2017, his plans to build a wind farm, as well as his purported ties to Chinese military, drew scrutiny in Texas.

several years after his acquisitions. He ultimately was denied permission to proceed with his wind farm plans. So they own the land, but they won't let him proceed with the wind farm.

But it does butt up against a strategic military installment.

They're smart. You can't just buy their land.

Now, is it the government? Is it a government agent who owns it? He said it's Chinese owned and controlled. If they decide to stop buying his grain, I said, what happens? He said, well, we're out of business.

Unless they do something radical to change it.

How they're getting out, I don't know. It's a long way and it's expensive. And you don't just wake up in China and say, I think I'll take a vacation. That's not how that works. You've got to get a visa, right?

You've got to get permission to leave. You've got family back there. I don't know how they're getting out. But I know that we've got an awful lot coming across our southern border. And when military-age Chinese men are showing up at the border, and it's mostly in California where they're showing up, and it's an awful lot.

You really have to wonder. You really do have to wonder.

It bothers me. I feel like my family is under attack here. We don't have the peace of mind that we used to have. Even farmers are saying, this is troubling to us. We don't know what to do about this.

We don't know how to feel about it. We don't know what to say about it. And nobody's talking about this. Well, I'm talking about it.

Why doesn't somebody just say what's happening and let us do it? But the media just won't say it straight. And she was sitting there eating, and she didn't even look up. She just said, well, you are the media.

And I thought, yeah, well. And she said, you have a bigger audience than those last three combined, so why don't you do something about it? Yeah,

it really kind of hit me hard, and I thought, why don't I do something about it? I mean, why don't I create a platform to just ask the questions and tell the truth without all the spin, and let people make up their own mind? I mean, somebody needs to say, have you thought about, or did you know that last year 33,000 plus Chinese came across the border?

Illegally.

Did you know that? And I just want you to know and do with it as you will. And if it causes you to start asking questions and writing your congressman or asking questions of them, then great. But you ought to at least know this is happening. I don't want you to come up five years now and say, well, nobody ever said anything to me.

Well, yeah, they did. I raised my hand and I said it. And maybe it'll cause somebody else to say it and somebody else to say it.

we've always used that term for lack of a better term.

And I totally get it. I would, I would want to be out of there. I really do. I get that. But that doesn't change the fact that we have to pretend that we don't know what's going on.

We need to be aware of it. And if, if, if it means that we need to say, look, this is concerning.

We shouldn't be selling farmland around military installations. There's a lot of land to buy. Wonder why they're buying it. Right up against military installations.

See his sneakers?

One's white. One's red. Yeah. Wow. That looks rough.

Hey, stop it, Jamie. For $400?. Oh, I heard there was $5,000.. That's what. I think.

they're already sold out. They're selling them online for $5,000.. Because we were going to wear them for Sober October.

Look at these things.

That's crazy.

U.K., 2.5.. Germany, 2.3.. And China, 380,000.. And this is as of 2023, June of last year.

Yeah. It seems pretty strategic where it's owned. Yeah.

Yeah. You know, there's another thing that Mike Baker, who's from the CIA, had brought up. Is that one of the things that they're doing is selling cell phone tower equipment. And selling routers and undercutting other companies and making, like, really good deals. So they can set up these cheap routers and cell phone companies.

And, you know, a lot of these have been proven, especially with the company Huawei, right? When they outlawed Huawei from selling phones in this country. Yeah. They were proven that some of their technology has third-party access. They can do things and siphon information and perhaps even, you know, intercept cell phone signals.

B-2 Spirit, Stealth Bomber Base. Missile and drone operations. MQ-9 Reaper. Global Strike Command. Three intercontinental ballistic missile wings.

And they're right next to it. Fort Liberty. They're right next to it. I mean, all of that stuff. Why would you want your biggest global threat next to those?

You have no idea what they have there.

They don't get to be independent.

How about just make it illegal? Tightening the rules seems... You should take back the land.

I don't know what they're teaching at universities now, but if they're not teaching critical thinking, if they're not teaching these kids who were getting ready to turn, the world over to, for your kids, Jay's kids, my grandkids, how are they, how are they going to think their way through this? I mean, we're selling them this land here, and we're getting ready to turn the world over to kids who will be adults, that we're not teaching to critically think, we're not teaching a meritocracy. How the hell does that work?

They'll call in bomb threats. Wild shit. that is the exact opposite of what universities are supposed to be about. What debates are supposed to be about is an opportunity to prove that you're right. And if you're really good at debating, you can make that person look foolish, and you recruit more people to your side of thinking.

That's a great way to figure out who's right and who's wrong. If you really believe that your opinions are so much more valid than some person who's a conservative Christian, let that person talk. Get on stage with them. Have an open discourse in front of the entire population of the student body. Let them all come.

Have it for free. Let people ask questions that they want. Just do it orderly and politely, and let's get to the bottom of it. Let's get to the bottom of it. Let's find out who's wrong and who's got ridiculous ideologies and who's looking at things from a fact-based perspective.

Or maybe there's a little bit of something from both sides you agree with. There's only one way to find out, and you're not getting that from universities anymore.

Now, I'm not going to give a platform to the KKK or somebody. that's just so out there. it's ridiculous.

But I had a show I taped recently about transgender. And I had transgender counselors who are in favor of this completely. And the guy's really trained. I mean, he's actually done training about this. And I had people that were vehemently opposed to it.

But I gave both sides an opportunity to discuss. And they had a really good discussion about it.

And let's air it out. If you think you're right, say so and say why.

I say in the book, we've got issues. I say that all of the major medical organizations signed off on this. I say I don't think history is going to be very kind to them. I say my point of view. But I say, listen, I'm not a physician.

So take what I say with a grain of salt. But all the medical associations say, hey, it's a good thing to do. I disagree. And I think the empirical science supports me. But they have signed off on it.

Even in the book, I put both sides out there. I say I disagree. They don't. I had Dr. Carol Hoeven on.

Do you know her story? No.

Yeah. No, she was on quite a while ago.

They drummed her out. Yeah. They drummed her out of Harvard for doing that. And that is one of the most sweet, compassionate ladies.

You value them. That's the whole reason why sports exist in both the male and female division is because we've agreed that it's unfair. We've agreed. We all know it to be true. It's just unfair.

Are there exceptional women and non-exceptional men? Yes. Do they get close? No. But at the bottom of the men and the top of the women, there's not a lot of crossover when it comes to professional athletes.

It's still a male mind. It's still like Chris Williamson was on here the other day talking about the differences in spatial recognition. Men have like the significant difference in the reaction time. There's like a bunch of different factors that don't go away when you transition someone to being a woman. And then there's tendon strength.

And there's a bunch of things about, like the shape of the hips, the ability to generate force. All that stuff is like so much different.

And they're identifying as male. Or as female, rather. Like. how are you allowing that? That seems insane.

That seems like cheating. Like at its base level. You can identify it as anything. But when you're getting into sports, that's the whole reason why Title IX was created, right, is to protect women's sports.

I'm just telling you what it says. Yeah. Transphobic. Drummed her out.