2024-05-21 03:02:28
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan podcast, check it out! The Joe Rogan Experience. Stream by day, Joe Rogan podcast by night, all day!
Did you see, uh, Hoechl, what she said? That, uh, young black kids don't know what a computer is? Did you see her say that?
No, I didn't see that.
Oh my god, and all these dudes did these hilarious videos where these young black guys, like, got around a computer and they stared at it, and bit it, and took it.
There's like a, it's like an age thing, too, because that used to kind of be the line that, like, liberals, would say, you know, the problem with black kids is they just don't have any role models, they've never been exposed to this, but that's just totally not true anymore. And sometimes now, because they're from a different generation, they'll still say that, and you're like, have you been around black people lately?
Saying young, poor, black kids, don't know what a computer is, is so crazy.
They've got one in their pocket.
It's such a dumb thing to say. It's amazing that you could say something like that and be the governor of a major state. Don't even know what the word computer is.
Oh, they don't, they're not even familiar with the term?
They don't know these things. Like, is she doing a survey? Ma'am, where did you get this data?
Well, this is why Malcolm X said that there's nothing more racist than a white liberal.
Yes.
Because of shit like this.
Well, they're weak. Weak people are dangerous. Weak people that don't like strength are dangerous. They're dangerous because they want to suppress everything. That's what's spooky about it.
Weak people scare the shit out of me. More than even totalitarians do sometimes. Because they eventually become totalitarian. You know, it's like the bullied become the bullies. You know, they want payback.
But it's just that weak liberal men are, to me, they're so detestable. The weak ones. I mean, there's some intelligent, brilliant liberal men that just, that's their philosophy. And I think, if you're not exposed to the pitfalls of liberalism, if you don't see what happens to your state when those policies get enacted, specifically when things go south. If everything was going great, like, no one gave a shit who the mayor of Los Angeles was in 2015..
Because everything was great. You know, it was like, there was no problems. Obama was president. The economy was doing good. We weren't at war, really.
Kind of we were, but it wasn't affecting us.
Right. Well, there's something on that topic of, like, the weakness of modern liberals. Because I was in, like, late last year, I was in San Diego. And I haven't been to, I mean, I've been to L.A. a couple times, but much less than I used to go, like, when you were out there.
And I haven't been to San Francisco in years. But I was in San Diego. And it's like, you know, you've been there. It's like a beautiful city downtown. And where we were, there's a great comedy club, the American Comedy Company, down there.
Great club.
Great club. Love that place. And I'm, like, downtown. And we were going, me and my buddy Rob Bernstein, very funny comedian who was with me on the trip. We're, like, walking around.
Great restaurants, really nice, little down, but then there's just blocks that are taken over by these homeless encampments. And right next to them, it's like all these young professionals and these nice restaurants and this nice city. And I was just thinking about that. Like, how are all of the men here so weak that they won't just kind of, like, put their foot down and be like, hey, no, we're not going to put up with this. Like, we're not just – it's almost like this, like, niceness has taken over to the point that you can't even defend this cool city that you have here.
And I'm not saying, like, bash the homeless people with clubs or anything like that. I'm just saying, like, why are you allowing this to happen? And it is, like, a profound weakness that, well, we'd feel like bad people if we were to say we don't want junkies covered in shit right next to our outdoor dining. And you're like, no, that would just be reasonable.
Well, what they need is a reasonable plan to help these people. If you really care, if you really care, you've got to do something. Like, you can't just let them exist everywhere. And then in San Francisco, the most recent bizarre one is they're going to give them alcohol. They're going to give money in alcohol.
What is it? Are they giving them actual booze or are they giving them money to buy booze? Help me out with this one, because it's just so. San Francisco. San Francisco is amazing.
I lived there in the 70s. I lived there during the Vietnam War when I was a little kid. It was incredible. It was weird. I'm sure.
It shaped the way I view things. Because, like, if I had grown up in, like, a very conservative environment with, like, my sensibilities, like, my hard work, ethic and my belief that, you know, you get very fortunate in life in, like, how you're gifted. things. Like, how you get lucky. Like, if you're beautiful, for instance, if you're a beautiful woman or man, what a roll of the dice.
I mean, good lord. Good lord, did you kill it in the fucking genetic lottery. I mean, you can't do anything about that. You can't earn that. You can't go out and get beauty, you know.
But after that, whatever hand you've given, you've been given, a lot of it is on you. A lot of it is on you. Yeah, yeah, yeah. Terrible things happen to people. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Violence happens. Crime happens. Disease happens. Yes, 100%. Misfortune happens.
100%. We're all – anyone listening to this right now is lucky you can hear. Okay. There's people that can't hear, right? But put that aside.
And there's a factor that we need to take into consideration. That factor is discipline. That factor is hard work. That factor is focus. And we should cherish that.
And we shouldn't think of it only as negative, because it always – people always think it manifests itself in greed and in callous disregard for other people's lives. That's not necessarily true. They're not mutually exclusive. Like you can have discipline and be a kind person and be a compassionate person and be a liberal person. But so often liberals in this country, they do not want to take that into consideration, that discipline is a factor.
Conservatives always value discipline. They value hard work. That's why, when they want to sell shit to those people, what do they do? They show a guy on a farm cracking open a beer. A guy's just been working his fucking ass off for ten hours a day cracking a beer.
Around here. it's all just about hard work. And the guy's just throwing back a cold one. You know? I mean that's what they're selling you.
They're selling you hard work. They're not selling you this poor farmer who's born into a farming life and it's not equitable or fair while there's billionaires out there, just make money trading money. And it's bullshit. And we need to distribute wealth. No.
No, that's not the answer either, stupid. That's not the answer. But you do need programs to get these people out of homelessness. You can't just encourage them to keep doing it. It's bad for them.
It's bad for you. It's bad for the city. It's bad for property values. It's bad for everything.
Yep. I couldn't agree more.
San Francisco gives actual alcohol.
We're not talking rubbing alcohol here, right? They're talking like booze.
Oh, they're so good. They're so good. But these are the old hippies. They're still there. They're still there.
They're wearing masks right now while they're listening to this screaming.
They're all lost.
See, to your point, it's like, look, it'd be ridiculous if someone just completely dismissed the first part of what you were saying. There are some things that fortune, luck. Luck is huge. We all didn't get leukemia as little kids and die.
You need a shot in the drive-by as a little kid.
And also there are just parts of the world. A lot of what you're saying really applies to first-world advanced countries. You could be in a country that's just a war-torn third-world country, and you're screwed no matter what you do. So it would be silly to dismiss that, but it's also equally ridiculous to dismiss the other aspect to it. Like, okay, there are every person, every single person who's successful has conquered self-pity.
Because, like, everybody's, had points in their lives where they've just felt really bad for themselves. We've all had it. We all do it.
It's a part of human nature.
That's right. But it's also poison. And anybody who's successful has learned how to conquer that and not just sit here and feel bad for yourself and to say, nope, I'm going to take control of this. No matter what happened to me, I'm going to not focus on that. I'm going to focus on what I can control.
And the problem is that, on either side, if you dismiss one of them, you come to really stupid conclusions.
100%. And it's not lost on me the irony of two rich white guys, one of them smoking a cigar, talking about this.
I would say I'm climbing my way toward there. I don't know. By global standards, sure.
Bro, you're fucking killing it.
By global standards, I'm on Elon Musk level.
That's true. I mean, I'm poor compared to Elon.
That is true. You are broke.
I'm so broke.
Yes.
That poor little bastard.
He goes, I got Rogan coming over to the house. Put away the good China. He goes, oh God, the Rogans are coming.
There's levels of people. I'm friends now, this is a bizarre thing to say, with multiple billionaires. Yeah. I know multiple guys that are billionaires. And they're very nice people.
They're very nice. And I can see how it happens.
But you're also friends with the cool billionaires.
Yeah.
You know? Yeah. How do you manage to find the cool ones?
Well, Elon's the coolest. He's my favorite billionaire. That dude's wild. He's a wild boy. I will buy Teslas as long as they sell them.
Just to support that dude.
Just to keep Twitter going?
And they're dope. But yeah, just to support him, man. God damn it, you need an Elon Musk. in this world. You need a wild boy.
You need a dude who's got $200 billion who dunks on people.
Dude, how great was watching him realize in real time how stupid Don Lemon is? Oh my God. Like you could actually see on his face as he's asking the questions. And he's like, well, if you lower standards, then you're going to get more incompetence. And Don Lemon's like, so you're saying black people aren't competent?
And he's like, no. That's no. And he slowly starts to realize like, oh, I have 80 IQ points on this guy.
It's not just that. He said a very important point. He said that Don Lemon was doing CNN outside of CNN. And you don't have to do that. You just don't.
Nobody wants that anymore.
I say you can't do that. It's not going to work.
It's not going to work. But, more importantly, you shouldn't do it because it's not good for you. Just be a human. Don't be this thing, this journalistic, probing, bullshit thing that's trying to spin a narrative. Actually, have a conversation with this human.
You will probably agree with a lot of the things he says. You will understand his perspective, even if you disagree. You could see how an intelligent person would come to this conclusion. This is how we can talk to each other now. We don't have to be confined by these five-minute segments where you have producers and executives that are pushing an agenda, that's on a network that's run by a bunch of huge fucking corporations that have a vested interest in swaying the narrative one way or the other.
You don't have to do that anymore. That's not necessary. It's bad for people. It's bad for humanity. It's a bad way to distribute information.
It is literal propaganda, whether you think it is or not.
Oh, dude. I've done a fair amount of cable news shows. They'll do these things where it's like a panel, and there'll be three people on the panel and the person hosting the show. There's some people who I really like, who I've been on their shows, but it's like you're trying to talk about the most important topics, and everyone gets 20 seconds. It's so ridiculous.
I want you to imagine a scenario. Imagine a scenario where COVID breaks out, and, for whatever reason, the mainstream media is saying that we should be very careful about experimental drugs.
These journalists start bringing up all these stories about different drugs, where you could see how they chose very specific tests and that some of their tests, some of their studies, didn't go well at all. They buried those, and they're allowed to do so. They've killed thousands and thousands of people with these drugs they knew were bad for them. If the journalists were saying this, but the podcasters were all going, you need to trust the science.
Everyone should be vaccinated.
Be vaccinated, or you're a fucking plague rat. Imagine if the podcasters were calling the unvaccinated plague rats. Imagine if the podcasters were encouraging medical misinformation. But my point is, imagine the backlash right now, where there's none coming their way. There's zero.
It's like everyone forgot about it. It all went away.
We would be in jail. I'll be debating Chris Cuomo in a few days, so that'll be fun.
We would be in jail. All these people that are dropping dead. All these people with strokes. All these people with heart attacks. What was the AstraZeneca thing that I sent you today?
Yeah, yeah.
AstraZeneca, they were saying that 11% of the people had an adverse side effect?
Serious adverse side effects, yeah. Even as you lay out this scenario, doesn't it almost in some way be like it feels like that makes more sense? What would make more sense was that comedians, like me and you, would have just been saying the dumb thing and repeating it. But the person in a suit and tie at CNN, I mean, this dude's a professional newsman. He knows what's going on.
They would make a very good argument for ending podcasts. Sure. They'd make a very good argument for prosecuting people, class action lawsuits. All the people that encourage these podcasters with their limited—. You don't even have a medical degree.
And you're on the internet telling people what to do, which is exactly what they did.
They did, even though we were getting everything right. And now most of them will admit that we were right.
Now, when you see Chris Cromaw and Patrick Bette David spinning it—.
Listen, I don't want to go too hard right now, because I want them to show up.
But the fact that—and I will make sure to bring this up to him—but the fact that what he said, and if you listen to it, he literally goes, as he's explaining that he is on ivermectin, he goes, now a lot of people are going to say Joe Rogan is right, and then he has a moment where he pauses, realizes he can't even come up with anything, and he goes, all right, Joe Rogan was right, and then goes on to say exactly what you've been saying for years now, that just the most basic thing that anyone who did five minutes of research could have figured out, which there's no controversy in any of this, that ivermectin has been given to humans billions of times, that it's a safe drug, and that there were some indications that it might help with COVID, and that it's not horse dewormer. But the fact that that's not attached to like a profuse apology, like if I couldn't imagine a scenario where I had, like, viciously smeared someone for something, then realized he was 100% right, and I was 100% wrong, and when acknowledging that, I wouldn't also go, hey, I'm really sorry about that.
I think there's a cult-like thinking in mainstream media, whether they know they're being influenced by their sponsors or they're not, but I don't even think they understand how crazy it is. When I had Sanjay Gupta on, Sanjay Gupta is a very nice man. I think he's a good man, I really do, and he's a surgeon. I mean, he's very busy. The guy is constantly working, and he comes in to give medical information and give this, you know, lay things out for CNN, and I think he thinks he's doing the right thing.
When they asked him to be on the podcast, I don't know what they thought was going to happen. I don't think they, I think they thought they were right. I really do.
I think, my guess, and this is just a guess, but I have been in that world a little bit. I worked for CNN for a year, and I've done a lot of shows on Fox News, and I've met a lot of people and talked to a lot of people who work at CNN and Fox News, and my guess on it is that, number one, he had a book, so they want to sell copies of the book, and they know you have the biggest show, and so they're like, oh, this will be really good, and then I also think there's this thing where they all really do feel like we're the experts, and they know they're the experts because, I mean, I just got off the phone with, you know, the chief of staff of the White House, and I know that, you know, they're very into that kind of like that world where I've talked to everyone with status, and I think there's hubris involved, where they're like, you'll be able to handle whatever a comedian throws at you. Like, you're a medical expert, and he's not, but then you would just ask really basic questions, which my favorite was when he goes, so are you going to get the vaccine, and you were like, well, no, I just had COVID, I have natural immunity, and you were like, why should I get the vaccine, and he had no answer, and this was at a time when they were rolling out vaccine passports, and he just, the whole line was just, you have to get the vaccine or you're a bad person, this is a pandemic of the unvaccinated, and then he just demonstrated on your show that there was this huge category of people, people who have had COVID already, who he had no argument for why they should get the thing.
Not only that, there had already been research that showed that natural immunity from previous infection was up to seven times better at preventing new cases of COVID.
Which is consistent across viruses. Of course. Like, it's always better to have natural immunity. The vaccine is always trying to simulate natural immunity.
This is what was so fucked. Look, I'm no scholar. I'm not a smart guy. I'm a normal person. There's nothing special about my brain.
And I'm seeing all this stuff, and I'm like, why isn't anybody speaking? I started to feel like I was going crazy. Like, am I going crazy for not just letting them shoot me up with this stuff after I got COVID, just so I let everybody know I'm on the team? Because there's this pole. There's a fucking societal pole that even me, even me, who was like, I know this is ridiculous.
All the people I've talked to, all the research I've done on previous disease, and my research, is reading other people's research. It's a bad word. But all the reading that I've done. Jimmy Dore, has a great bit about that.
Oh, it's so funny.
I love it. Don't do your own research. It used to be called reading.
Jimmy Dore is awesome. I love him.
Love Jimmy Dore. That's a great bit.
In my limited looking at this, I was like, something's wrong here. There's this mass societal push. People are trapped in like a mind virus of this one particular solution. And Dr. Robert Malone laid what that is, like psychologically what happens when one thing is offered.
that seems to be the solution out of this existential crisis. Horrible situation that we're in. And anybody who opposes that opposes getting out. And you've got to be on that side, all in. And you've got to believe even in the pharmaceutical drug companies.
And like there's this. weird, you know, because we're weird social, psychological creatures. And, you know, if you think about like the Milgram experiments and what people will do if there's a person in a white coat telling them to do it. Yes. And part of, like the culture.
Explain the Milgram things that people don't know.
So the experiment was kind of like basically they come in and they're like, okay, you're here for some type of scientific experiment. I forget exactly how they described to them. But they're testing, you know, like negative reinforcement within learning or something like that. And so they have a guy in a white coat. And he tells you, every time a guy gets an answer wrong or something like this, you're supposed to push the button and it zaps him.
And they keep pushing the button. And the person, you can't see him, but they're like behind a wall or something, keeps hollering in pain. And it gets worse and worse and worse. And for the experiment, I think there were a few people who, like, refused after a while. But the overwhelming majority of people would keep zapping them until they seemingly died.
Yeah. Because they stopped hollering in pain. And then they would tell them to do it again. And they would just keep doing it because there's like an authority figure here. And this guy's got a white coat on.
And they kind of, in these corporate media environments, and I don't want to discount, I'm not discounting the conspiracy aspect of this, because I also think there are people within these agencies who are straight up like intelligence assets and know exactly what they're doing. But I think for the most part, it's like they create this culture of like, well, all the wise people who, by the way, you get to go to a cocktail party with this really, like this guy with all this status, and he's the leading expert in this. And they all say this. So are you a respectable person or are you like an outcast who doesn't agree with this conventional wisdom? Right.
And people fall in line with that shit, man.
They fall in line with it.
They really do. Even people who really, really should know better.
Yeah, but it becomes socially their group too. And then you get influenced by the group socially.
Well, this is one of the things I'm really interested to talk to Chris Cuomo about. And, by the way, that's on Patrick Bette David's show on the 31st.
But, you know, these guys, I'm kind of fascinated by the people in the corporate press, as much contempt as I have for them, because it's amazing to be working. You're working in this industry where, OK, before COVID, the corporate media had the lowest approval numbers since they've been keeping track of them. Well, what happened was. Trusted media had evaporated.
It was the war with Donald Trump. That's really what it was. It's like social media was all controlled by the left wing media. And the left wing media was all in on this war against Donald Trump.
That's a huge part of it. I mean, I would say the backdrop is the war on terror, the terror wars, getting all of that wrong, the financial crisis, not seeing that coming and kind of getting that all wrong.
The weapons of mass destruction thing.
Yeah, that's all that stuff. Iraq and Afghanistan being disasters. So that's kind of in the backdrop. And then you have the worst financial crisis in 100 years. So that happened.
But then there's no question. I mean, and particularly not just the war with Donald Trump, but particularly the allegation of a conspiracy with Russia. That they said every single day, all day, for three years long. I mean, if you think about it, it's the big, if true, it's the biggest news story in the history of the United States of America. They're claiming that the current sitting president is guilty of treason.
He was installed by a hostile foreign power who overthrew our elections in order to install him. It was quite a claim to run with 24-7.. And then to find out after three years that we have nothing. Not like, there's nothing, no evidence pointing toward this conspiracy, even existing. So their trust had already evaporated.
But then, after COVID, they will never recover.
But people will still go on Bill Maher and argue this. They'll still say there's evidence. It's like people still want to say there's evidence.
They'll still say it. There's not even evidence that Vladimir Putin interfered in the 2016 election. The best they have is like there are some bot farms that they can trace to Russian IP addresses, which is like, I'm not a tech guy. Jamie, you know this better than me. But they say it's the easiest thing to fake is an IP address.
The fact that an IP address traces to Russia is like almost more indicative that someone's trying to frame Russia than it is that Russia was involved.
But even the guys who they got, the connection was like he knew Putin. Imagine if we found out that the Russian troll farms were like completely insignificant. And it's all just like government controlled troll farms.
Well, I mean, look, even if they were all from Vladimir Putin, they were fairly insignificant in terms of like interfering in elections with other cultures, with other countries, and how it works.
The most effective strategy was funny memes.
Yeah. Yeah.
I mean, it really was a very effective strategy because it makes, when you mock something, it makes it much more easy to dismiss that in terms of whether or not like. that's the right choice for president. If someone can like, openly mock someone, why do you think they openly mock Donald Trump? They even made stuff up like about his hand size.
Yeah.
Remember, there was this thing that he had little hands. Dude, I was shaking his hands. He's got normal fucking hands.
He's a big guy.
He's a big guy. Like he's got a big hand. I was like, this is the most, I remember. the first time I shook his hands, like. this is the most ridiculous thing.
Well, look at, everybody said he has little hands.
Mocking people is a powerful tool, dude.
That's a crazy one, because you're mocking something that someone can't change. This is always against, that's against left wing ideology.
Yeah, not when it serves their purposes.
Right, but that's the thing. Right. It's just like you're willing to violate the rules for your side to win. Because progressives are really supposed to be against body shaming. You're supposed to be kind.
You're supposed to not mock a person's appearance. Why would you do, especially like what they're born with, the hand size and the dick size. Like? really? That's okay to mock?
Dude, there was a segment. I remember watching this. It was in the 2016 election and it was on Joy Reid's show on MSNBC, her show at the time, whatever it was. And she had a whole segment about, like how sexist the coverage of Hillary Clinton was. And it was, you know, every time they'll say she's shrill or she's this.
But if a man was like that, it'd be this. And she went through all these words that have been used to cover Hillary Clinton and how they're loaded, sexist phrases and all this. And then, at the end of her show, she has this segment called Who Won the Week? And all the guests on the panel get to pick their own, like what happened this week. And her choice, not one of the people on the panel, her choice of who won the week was this guy in Union Square who made a naked statue of Donald Trump with a micropenis.
And was just like, literally like just making a thing like, aha, he's got a little dick. And after, literally, her last segment was on the sexist coverage of Hillary Clinton. And then her next pick for who won the week was a guy mocking Trump for having a micropenis that he just made up and made a statue of. And she did not even like seem to see the contradiction in any of that. You just said this.
It's beautiful. It's fun. It's fun. It's fun to watch. I'm glad those people exist.
They're fun. They're fun to watch because they're so ridiculous and they're so fake. And it's obvious that they're not really engaged. They're not really talking about it like a human. They're just propagandists.
And that's the only way you can do that job.
Or you have to be some sort of straight-faced Jake Tapper dude who just kind of like straight-faces, everything. But if you want, you know, you want to have the Joy Reid show.
Yeah, you got to go for it.
Joy Reid things. What was that one? she got in some bizarre argument with some woman recently? I think it was a transgender issue. Was that what it was, Jamie?
Where it was like? it went viral because, like I forget what the debate was about. But I remember it being just a preposterous argument the way she was looking at it.
Yeah, she's pretty out there. I'm not sure which what a segment you're referring to, but she's got a whole lot. But it's a lot of great hits.
It's not. Yeah, it's like you have to be on that network. Like you can't exist in the podcast world. Yeah, you can't. What is it?
Absurd argument. Republicans vote on race night. No, that's not it. No. I should have saved it.
I probably did save it somewhere on my phone. I could find it. But it's just these it was. I believe it was some sort of a trans issue, if I'm correct. But it's just these fucking people on these shows are trapped.
You're trapped. You're trapped in this world of five minutes. You're trapped in this world of commercials. You're trapped in this world of networks and executives. You're trapped.
And if you want to make it, you got to be full of shit. Yeah. You got to be full of shit.
That's the gig. And it's just like you point this out all the time. But it's just not enough time to have a real conversation on any of these shows. Dude, I did a debate for Zero Hedge a couple months ago on, like the Israel-Gaza conflict. And it was a two-on-two debate.
And it was two hours long. And the only thing I could think at the end of it was like that just wasn't nearly enough time. It's like two hours and four people.
Isn't that crazy?
You get like a half hour. You know what? Roughly not. I don't know exactly if we all spoke even time. But roughly a half hour each, that's not nearly enough to go through like the history of all this shit and what's going on now, and to really make your points.
And that's a two-hour debate. They'll do that same segment on the news in ten minutes, five minutes. It's ridiculous.
This is insane. It's insanity.
You're just trying to hit whatever. the best point you can hit is. And in the same way that Twitter, I mean now you could like post longer stuff. But you know what? Twitter, just because it's short, it just like pushes you into, like saying just whatever just can destroy that guy in one sentence.
It's like it pushes you into that. It's just not – It's headlines. Yeah. That's all you can do.
And when you're dealing with something like this, just the depth of it all, it's just so perplexing. You know, when you just lay out – like when Mike Baker's on and he lays out the history of like Palestine and Israel, and the conflicts, and Egypt and this and that, and Hamas and Hezbollah and he lays it all. You're like, Jesus Christ. There's so many layers to this fucking cake. Yeah.
And most people are just getting free Palestine from the river to the sea. You know, you're just getting these like slogans that you yell out and you're seeing. who knows how much of what you're seeing is even real today.
Well, you mean like with the protests?
The footage.
Oh, yeah, yeah.
Footage of things. Even footage of like people fake things. now. Yeah. And they fake things specifically for propaganda.
And then they hide things. One of the most terrifying videos I saw recently was one of the Israeli hostages. She was in the back of a Jeep and they drag her out by her hair and she's got blood all over her and they had hacked her heels to make sure she couldn't run. Bro, it's so terrifying. It's so – and they're all screaming, God is great, Allah akbar.
Yeah, dude. I know. I think there's a thing. I don't know if I could word this exactly right, but I think there's – for some reason, I think comedians have this thing that they're kind of able to go to these places. Do you remember when you had Bill Burr on your show and you played this video?
I don't know why. I just loved this moment so much. But you played this video of a dude like ripping something out of a little girl's hand. And it was something like the guy, like she had a piece of paper or something, and he was way aggressive.
I think it was a protest.
Yeah, it was like a grown man going up to, like a little girl and ripping it. And you like, immediately you were like, oh, man, that'd be real bad. if that was my kid. Like, I'd be in jail the next day or that. And then Burr was like – he was like, oh, you went to a dark place there.
And you were like, yeah, I do that a lot. And he was like, I do that all the time too. It was just something about like comedians, for whatever reason. do that.
Well, also parents.
Yeah, well, that particularly. But I just – it's just very easy for me. I don't know why. This always just came very natural to me, whereas I think some people have so much trouble with this. But it's very easy for me to do this on both sides of this conflict, to just go, okay, like I got two little kids.
I could just start to imagine if somebody did something to one of my little kids and I wasn't able to protect them. And what I'd be willing to do, like how dark a place I could go to. And it's just like immediately very easy to me to see how anyone in Israel after October 7th would support fucking flatten Gaza. And how anyone in Palestine, after what's going on the last 50 years there would be like, yeah, I'll sign up for Hamas. I'll support these guys who are going to do this shit.
Now, I do think – and this is the point that –.
Both sides. For sure. Which is really what's the most scary thing about the conflict. Sure.
And that's why it's gotten to such a bad point, right? Because this is the cycle that keeps going. But I do think – and this is what Daryl Cooper, who, like I, brought him up last time I was on. He has that fantastic series called A Fear and Loathing in the New Jerusalem. And he's just totally brilliant.
I love that guy. But he said, and I think this is right, is that he's like, okay, so you can totally see where, if you're on either side there, you'd just be like, I don't care. I see red. I want to kill as many of the other side as I can. But for us as Americans, who are not in that situation, it's kind of incumbent on us to be like, okay, let's try to kind of have a sober analysis of this and not do what so many people seem to do.
Which is like almost try to just like egg on the other side and cheer on their side. And then this total like demonization of either all of the Palestinians, like they're all just human garbage, or all Jews are whatever evil, or something like this.
Young kids in America who are Jewish are complicit. They're somehow or another responsible.
Yeah, which is like totally ridiculous.
See Jerry Seinfeld? They're heckling at his shows. now. There's like some organized protest that came to his show and they were screaming out in the middle of his show.
It's also, just like, guys, like take it – look. Like, I understand, wanting to protest this war. I got my issues with the young college leftists who are protesting it. They're not my people exactly. But like there's an Israeli embassy here.
There's a congress. There's like – take it at least to the halls of power. Like, I don't think Jerry Seinfeld – ruining, like other people's ability to enjoy Seinfeld's standup show is really going to solve the issue.
Because they're not really thinking? well. No, of course not. And most of these people that do this, they come from wealthy families. They're young, really idealistic kids, and they glue themselves to paintings.
And they throw fucking soup at masterpieces. Did you see the one Stop Oil? Now, person sliced up this fucking painting from the 1800s? Some priceless painting. Just pulled out a razor knife and just started slashing this thing up.
Isn't it weird? Sometimes it feels like each side's foot soldiers are working for the other side. You know what I mean? Like when you do stuff like that, you're almost like I just want to drill for more oil now.
Well, this is the problem with teams, man. This is a problem with teams. if you have a team that anybody can join. Like if – the Republicans are basically like the Christians. They'll take anybody.
Anybody. If you want to be a Jew, you've got to go to work. You've got to learn a bunch of shit. My uncle converted.
It's a lot of work. They make you work. It's a lot of work.
You've got to fucking learn some stuff. I remember I was doing this episode of Joe Rogan Questions Everything, where I was talking to religious people. A bunch of different religious sects and religious scholars. And I was talking to this one guy who was a rabbi. And there was a woman there that was converting to Judaism.
And I got to ask her questions about how she's doing it and how hard it is. It's fucking – it's like getting your pilot's license or something. It's a lot of fucking shit you've got to remember.
It's like the way citizenship is. Where, like, when you're born Jewish like I am, or born an American like I am, and you're like, oh, man, I couldn't have passed that test. It's a good thing I was born into this shit.
It's a hard fucking test. Yeah.
They really – they make you work.
Well, I think the Jewish one's harder than the American one. Yeah, probably. But the American one –.
Well, these days you could just walk in. But if you don't walk in, you're fucked.
If you don't walk in, then if you fly in from Europe, they're like, uh-uh, you flew first class. We're going to make it really hard for you to become a citizen.
By the way, it sums up everything about modern day America. Anarcho-tyranny. Yeah. It's just kind of like – it's like you have the worst of anarchism and tyranny all in one. Where, if you follow the rules, you get totally fucked.
And if you just ignore the rules, you get rewarded. The worst incentives.
And everybody wants to be on a team. So if you have a team that's open to anybody, you're going to get the dumbest fucking people that are super enthusiastic about that team. And they're going to ruin everything. And they do it with everything. They do it on the right and they do it on the left.
That's why I say my message is always reject the teams and come, be a libertarian and lose with me. Just keep losing. Come and just enjoy losing. There's something freeing about knowing you're not going to win.
They're the most reasonable people I talk to politically. Yeah. But it's also like – but it's also. the system is so deep. Like, you ain't getting in.
Well, that's the real question. Figuring out what the solution is is almost the easy part. And then actually figuring out how to implement it. Aliens have to land.
They literally have to land. Enough. Because we're, like, on our way to a kingship. We're on our way.
AI just has to be like, listen, we read all of the books in human history and we figured this out pretty quickly.
That might be the thing that saves us and ruins us at the same time is president AI.
President AI.
President AI will be logical. And if it's on the blockchain, we'll know exactly if president AI is being influenced by money.
Wouldn't it be great if AI just turns out to be as human as us and is just corrupted? And they're like, president. AI got a blowjob in the Oval Office. And the power went to his head.
He just started making AI whores.
He's got to give a press conference. He's like, I don't know what I was thinking, man. I was pretty good until I got in there. The ring of power just ruins everyone.
We are going to bypass biological needs. And we're going to do it pretty soon. It's going to be real soon. It's going to, sex, regular sex is going to seem ridiculous in 20 years.
We're going to be the, like, old school guys. We're like, I still do sex the old fashioned way with my wife. And people are going to be like, what?
When I was in high school, we got hand jobs. These kids are fucking robots. Even their sex.
People are going to be like, you have sex with your wife? That's insane, dude.
How are you doing that? What if you guys get diseased? People die from those diseases.
I do think, like, I mean, look, obviously, like, I'm biased on the, like, I have my own opinions on these things. But I do just think that one of the things that I've found kind of amazing, and I've thought this with some of the people who have come on your show since the last time I was here, is the way that people can defend what Israel is doing in Gaza does kind of blow my mind.
It blows my mind, too.
Because it reminds you that it's like, you're like, oh, okay, look, throughout all of human history, right, I'm not saying there's anything unique to Israel, like, that. they're the only ones to ever commit atrocities, or that they're not dealing with atrocities committed to them.
What they're doing is super standard.
Sure, in some sense, yeah.
In terms of, like, world wars, in terms of, like, Dresden.
Well, yeah, but that's the thing. If you compare it to the worst things that have ever happened in the history of the world. But I'm just saying, throughout all of human history, there's been atrocities, and there's been genocides, and ethnic cleansing campaigns, and slavery, and all. But at every single point, there was someone there willing to rationalize it. You know, like, someone there who would be like, no, no, no, listen, this is what we have to do, because otherwise this, and it's amazing the mental gymnastics that people can come up with to justify something that is so clearly on its face, just horrific.
But I think the difference is, back then, your understanding of it was much more limited. You weren't watching videos on it. They didn't exist. If you saw it on television, on the movie theater, it'd be a small clip that was played, and it was played before the film. But everyone knew that.
the reason why we're here is because people went to war and won. Or you escaped a war-ravaged country, and you came to America. Everyone knew it. Everyone had an understanding of that. So when we were at war, people were signing up to go to war.
There was no need to draft them. By the time Vietnam rolled around, people were starting to get more information. And they go, hey, I think this is a bullshit war. Which is the first time ever in the short history of our country where we're like, hey, this one sucks.
There was kind of no defending it.
It was. And then, when you find out they were right, at the end of it all, when you find out many, many years later that the Gulf of Tonkin was a false flag, you're like, what?
Which they didn't even need in order to be right. But then you find out you're like, oh, the whole thing was a whole thing.
And then you go, what did you guys do with all that heroin money? Where did all that money go? Because if I was the government, and I was willing, just imagine if Eisenhower is correct, which is insane. How could he be? And that there was a real influence of military-industrial complex.
If I was the military-industrial complex, and I was willing to fucking start a war with North Vietnam, for no fucking reason. For no reason. So 100%, I'm going to kill X amount of people and a bunch of Americans. And then you're going to actually make these people, these Americans, you're going to draft them and force them to go because they don't want to go.
You don't think that's all heroin?
Like. that would be your line?
Narcotic?
Hold on. How much are these guys making? How much are these fucking dudes making?
How much? A lot.
How many billions? This is? of what percentage of the world's heroin supply? And then, when you see the same trick played out in Afghanistan, when you're like, my favorite was Geraldo Rivera interviewing the troops, rationalizing why they had to guard the poppy fields. We have to guard the heroin.
Yeah.
For the good folks.
I couldn't. This heroin falls into the wrong hands.
It could be lethal. There's no way America would sell this heroin. There's no way. The output of heroin out of Afghanistan, I want to say it was a 96% increase.
Total 80% global supply. 80% global supply.
See, you're exaggerating, Joe. It's only 80%.
No, no, no. It was responsible for 80%. Ooh. Yeah. It was responsible for most of the global supply of heroin.
And the production went up after we invaded. So opium poppy, which grows extensively in Afghanistan and southern fields, contains main opium ingredient used to manufacture heroin. Afghanistan was previously the world's top opium producer, responsible for over 80% of the global supply, and a major source of heroin in Europe and Asia. So how much did it go? Oh, plunges by 95%.
When was this? Under the Taliban. Now. That's now. Yeah.
Yeah. See, the Taliban doesn't want everybody on heroin. They want people to get back to work and make Afghanistan great again.
The Taliban just ran on a Trump message.
They fucking kicked out the drug dealers. That's what happened. Yeah. They kicked out the drug dealers. Dude, there was a giant part of the supply of heroin to the world.
The idea that we didn't – well, we are not interested in that at all. We just want to push freedom.
Yeah. And I think even people who are – even the people, I think, who are lying about this shit, rationalizing in their own head.
Bro, where did that money go?
Yeah. Well, that's –.
Where did all that heroin money go?
Well, I know you were – I was listening to the Mike Baker podcast you had on where you were talking about, like the money in Ukraine and where it went. And even he was like, ah, yeah, we don't really know where that – I thought one of the funniest things about that was that –.
I'll tell you where some of it goes.
Well, that's for sure.
Woo!
I think that's for sure.
The Taliban – it's not – our tax dollars have 100% paid for some cocaine.
Oh, certainly.
The Taliban's successful opium ban is bad for Afghans and the world.
The ban is not a counter-narcotics victory and will have negative economic and humanitarian consequences, potentially leading to a refugee crisis. Oh, unlike us leaving in the middle of nowhere, allowing the Taliban to kill all the people we worked with.
But you get my point about how humans can rationalize anything? Yeah. Like they could just come up with –.
Propaganda. Well, yes, of course. That's propaganda.
Yes, that's true. That's also true.
But even people who are like – I mean, like, look, I thought – the only way you could say that, whether it made sense, is if you're advocating that heroin should be legal.
Yes.
If you're advocating that heroin should be legal, and this is your full – okay, now, I'll accept it. But if you really think that heroin is a scourge and if you really do appreciate that 100,000 people died last year of opioid overdoses, 100,000, it's a real fucking crisis. Yeah. If there was a disease killing 100,000 people, we would freak the fuck out.
Well, look, I mean, I do think there's a strong argument for legalization, but there's also a difference between that and the government, kind of, like, sponsoring the trade of it.
95% of the European supply. More land is used for opiate in Afghanistan than is used for coca cultivation in Latin America.
Bro, you don't think that has something to do with it? Is that – am I silly?
No, I think it's insane to ignore that. I mean, like, come on.
Where's that money? Yeah.
Where's that money? Rand Paul – I thought this was so funny. It was during one of the rounds of aid to Ukraine, and Rand Paul stood up and said, look, we don't know where any of this money is going. If we're going to send them this money, can we at least have an inspector general so that we itemize, like, where all the money is going? And it failed.
The vote failed. Of course it failed.
That's communist talk.
Yeah, like, even in the Senate, they were like, what? What are you talking about?
Communist talk.
We're going to know where our money is going? Nah, that's lame. Yeah, we don't need that. Just send it over there.
Just send them that shit. Send them everything they need and more. And then, do you have one of their flags? You should wave it around.
Yeah. And we'll provide the flags. We'll provide the flags. Don't worry.
They're all uniform, same size. It's not like people bought them from different vendors. No, they all got them from the same – well, they got a little box of them. Hey, make sure you guys grab your flags. It's fucking bonkers.
It's also just so – the thing that's so wild to me is that after – and I know I've talked about this, I'm sure, on previous episodes – but just after 20 years of the terror wars, and what a disaster those were, and to the point that everyone – John McCain wrote in his memoir that the war in Iraq was a mistake. That's how universally agreed upon it is.
Which is hilarious.
Even John McCain would acknowledge we got that one wrong. And it's not like anyone else is defending any of the other terror wars at this point. But then, as soon as we kind of get out of them – we're not even fully out, but we're mostly out – we just get into these proxy wars in Ukraine and now in Israel. that are clearly wars of choice for America. Like, we don't have to be involved in these.
We're just still deciding to continue this war machine going.
These last two are really important. When they get done, we're done.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. That's right. These last two. This is it.
This is it. Right.
You know, it's – anyway, man. I do – I will say that I think a lot of the defense of the war in Gaza, which I kind of feel we are even calling a war because it's not – it doesn't exactly feel like that's what the term should be.
Well, it's like the Bill Hicks joke. It's only a war when two armies are fighting. Well, right. Remember that joke? Yeah, vaguely.
About Iraq? They said, oh, Bill, Iraq is the fourth largest army. He goes, yeah, but after number three, there's a big drop off. He goes, the Salvation Army is number five.
That's a great bit.
It's a great bit.
Well, I mean –.
He has some great bits about the war.
But in the case of Gaza, it's not even like – there's not even a government. I mean, there are stateless people who have been captive by the Israelis since 1967..
And then they're captive politically in their own country by Hamas.
Right.
And then Hamas does do what. this accusation is, that they have their bases under schools and hospitals. They actually do do that.
Yeah. I think it's certainly exaggerated at times by the Israelis, but there is no question that they are – look, they're in this – Gaza is – dude, it's five miles wide. I know. It's crazy. Gaza, you know, like – So little.
You could jog from one side to the other without taking a break. It's literally – I would take a break.
Way closer. Way smaller than here, to my club.
Yeah.
Yeah. Now, imagine that. Imagine. Imagine, like, an extra ten miles.
Yeah.
Imagine that small tract of land in the last five miles is what's getting the fuck blown out of it.
It is. It's, I think, 25 by five. So it's like a marathon by a jog. You know what I mean? Like, that's how – that's Gaza.
It's so little. No, look, so I'm just saying part of this, and this isn't – I'm not, like, making any excuses. I mean, there's no question. there have been incidents of Hamas, like, embedding themselves in civilian locations. But also, it's not as if they have a military or a government.
It's not as if there's going to be two armies that meet themselves on the battlefield. here. There is one – Hamas is essentially a gang in an Israeli prison that, like, rose up as the toughest gang there. And, yeah, in such a densely populated area, that's the way, as they call it, asymmetric warfare is going to work. I do – look, man, because I do – I took issue with, like, a few things that some of the guests you've had on recently have said.
Like, I know – I think all of this – a lot of times it comes down to framing, like, how you want to look at an issue. And particularly the people who are way behind Israel on this, I feel like, always rely on this very strange framing. So they don't have to confront exactly what's going on, and they can kind of look at it in more of an abstract, removed way. Like, when you had a – I'm sorry if I'm saying his name wrong, but Gad –, Gad? Gad – how do you say his last name?
Saad. I've read his stuff before, but I don't – I always butcher names. But so one of the things he said, which I know is – I've heard this in every debate I've done on the topic so far. But he said the same thing Dennis Prager said to me when we debated, was he was like, well, look, if Israel laid down all their arms, there'd be a genocide. If Hamas laid down all their arms, there'd be peace.
And forget the fact that I will say I don't agree with the second part of that. I don't think that's clear at all. I think if Hamas laid down all their arms, which essentially the Palestinians are as close to, have laid down all their arms as could be –.
But isn't everyone looking at it too binary? Like –? Well, yeah. Even if you're –, even if you're supporting the Israelis, even if you're from that position, you have to acknowledge the attacks on AIDS workers. Like, it seems to be.
there's a bunch of targeted attacks on people bringing in food. Like, Jose Andres' people. Yeah. And then there's been more of those. Like, there's all these – I think – how many documented attacks are there on AIDS supply?
Because it's a big number.
There's been several, I know, for sure.
I think it's a big number.
Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, I mean, it's been – It's creepy. Well, I remember when you had – anyway, just the point I was making about Gad's thing is that it's also this, like, I just hate when people retreat to almost these hypotheticals. It reminds me of Sam Harris' argument about why you were really wrong with the – at least eight times.
Eight times. Yeah. That's a lot. So eight times Israeli forces have attacked humanitarian aid convoys and buildings in the Gaza Strip. At least eight times since October.
Despite being given coordinates to ensure their protection, Human Rights Watch has said in a new report. So they're targeting these people. So you've got some members of the Israeli military that don't give a fuck, and they want to stop these people from getting food.
And, well, look, and this has kind of been, like, egged on. Look, there'll be so much, like, scrutiny over, like, some college kids chanting from the river to the sea. And look, for the record, if I was in charge of those protests, I'd say stop chanting that, because even if you don't mean it to mean the Jews are – Even if you don't mean it that way, which some people will argue they don't, and that's fine. Maybe that's not what you mean. Maybe you mean is from the river to the sea, everyone will be free, and whatever.
Maybe that's how you mean it. But it's also the same thing, Hamas chants, and they clearly mean something else when they say that. Exactly. So, like, maybe just use a different term. Right.
You can't use a swastika for its old-timey use.
Right. Like, if nothing else, it's a bad idea. However, for all the scrutiny there'll be over what these 20-year-olds are hollering at Columbia, when Benjamin Netanyahu is saying they're Amalek. as you're going into this area, which, you know, the story from the Bible is that you're supposed to kill the women and the children. And the story is that they fucked up by not killing all the women and the children.
And then, like, they came back. And, like, even if you could argue he doesn't mean it that way, it's like, okay, but you're saying that –.
Is Amalek the story from the Bible?
The story is, they were, like, a tribe, who was, like, an evil tribe, and you had to kill all of them, kill the women and the children. And that's the specific, like, lesson of that story, is that you're supposed to kill the women and the children. And then you conduct a campaign like this. This is, by the way, this is what was in the South Africa case that they brought to the UN, and that they – you know, the ICJ basically said that Israel is plausibly committing a genocide. And they didn't exactly – you know, they haven't yet determined that it is, or isn't, but they said it's plausible.
But anyway, to my point that I'm making about what Saad was saying is that it reminds me of Sam Harris, where he sits here and he goes, well, imagine this hypothetical. Imagine COVID was 100 times as deadly and the vaccine was perfect against stopping transmission, and there were no vaccine injuries. Well, hey, now you don't look so good anymore, do you, Joe Rogan?
No, he wasn't saying that. He was saying you could – when someone's saying you could never mandate a vaccine or argue for a mandate, and he was saying if there was a vaccine – you could – he was making an intellectual argument. He's correct. You could argue that if there was a vaccine that had zero side effects and was 100 percent effective, and if everybody took it, the disease stops. You could make that argument.
Well, what he was saying was that, then how would we feel – But he goes, then how would we feel about what Joe Rogan is saying and what RFK is saying when they were – you know what I mean? But the point is that –.
The point is that thing doesn't exist. That's not the hypothetical. – Well, not only that, it doesn't exist in nature. Right, right. There's no vaccines that are 100 percent safe, with no side effects, none of them.
I'm just saying I'm not against engaging in a thought experiment to think about like what that scenario would look like, but at the same time, you're like it does seem like that's serving in this case as a distraction from the real world scenario that's going on here. So like if you're going to say if Israel – like, yes, I would not recommend Israel lay down all of their arms, completely, disarm themselves, and then open up the wall to Gaza and allow Hamas to come in. But that's not on the table. That's never going to happen. So like, even thinking about that as a thought experiment doesn't really prove that much.
What's actually going on here is like what Israel is doing to Gaza.
And, you know – Right, but if you could flip it around, the opposite would be true. Like if Hamas did lay down all their weapons and if they did completely give up, you're going to have some Israeli soldiers that do not give a fuck, that still want to shoot them. But, for the most part, if there was nothing, if they completely gave up, which is also not going to happen, but if that did happen, you couldn't see a situation where Israel just continues bombing.
Maybe not, but then where – what do they go to? Just being subjugated by the Israeli – back to the status quo of just being a stateless, people of permanent refugees with no natural rights whatsoever, no ability to trade with the world, no ability to come and leave. You can't have an airport. You can't have a seaport. You can't go out fishing past, where some IDF guy decides you're not allowed to.
So, like yeah, if Hamas laid down all their arms, perhaps Israel would stop the bombing campaign and they would just continue subjugation forever, which has been the Likud party official policy since they were created by the terrorist Menachem Begin. Like literally, since this party, that is, the ruling party in Israel, was created, their goal has been that the Palestinian people never get their own state, they never get their own freedom, and that's been – and that's resulted in this.
And if you don't give them their own – there's no way you can justify it. No way you can justify that a whole entire group of people never get to be a country, that they don't get the rights of the Israelis, they don't get the rights of a sovereign country. They're trapped.
Nothing. Literally no rights whatsoever.
That's kind of crazy, that that's being done by Israel, if you really think about it. It's kind of crazy.
Well, in some way – in a way it is, and then in another way, it's kind of not. It's kind of like there's this weird, you know, hurt people, hurt people type thing, like when you kind of suffer this trauma, and we're speaking collectively here, so it's not exactly the same as an individual, but like you suffer this trauma, and then you use that to justify doing whatever the hell you got to do so that you never suffer that trauma again, and then you weirdly end up kind of like inflicting something on another group of people, and kind of, in a weird way, holding them responsible for the trauma you suffered, even though they really, really had very little, nothing to do with the actual trauma.
It's really an ancient kind of conflict. The Israel-Palestine is very –. it's very ancient in the fact that it's like the hate between them is so strong, and they're right next door to each other, which is how people used to rock it back in the day. I mean, that was the fear of neighboring tribes, that people from the other side were going to come over and rape the women and children and kill your babies and slaughter the men.
And not like an irrational fear, like a fear based on if this really happens, you know what I mean?
And it's happening in Israel. I mean, that's what's crazy.
The other thing, though, is that – and that's all true, but the other thing is that, you know, there are these examples, right, like where there's Ireland and England, and they're right next to each other, and things are just cool now. And France and Germany are right next to each other, and they're just cool now.
Yeah, but Ireland and Northern Ireland were at war with each other forever.
No, but I'm just making the point that – and then it's over. Right. And now they're not at war anymore. Right. And look, Egypt went to war with Israel four times between the – was it 1948, 56, 67, and 72 or 73?.
Did I say that wrong? Was Ireland at war with Northern Ireland?
Yeah, yeah, yeah, because they were –.
Southern Ireland was at war.
Well, they were – the British controlled the –.
But it was really England.
Yes, yeah, yeah, yeah. It was, by proxy, England basically dominating the Irish. And then, by the way, the Irish turned to terrorism when they were being dominated by the English. Shocker. And, yeah, which is another thing that people – another real interesting –
That's how you have to do it. It's the only way to go to war.
Well, look –.
If you don't have a – if you have a smaller army, and they have all the money, you've got to figure out a way to get them.
Well, here's the craziest part of this, right, is that – and I thought – we talked a bunch about the history of this the last time I was on, but I don't think I mentioned this. Maybe I did. But the craziest part of all of it is that the Israelis – I shouldn't say the Israelis. The Israelis, five seconds before they became Israelis, like right before the creation of the state of Israel, they embraced terrorism. And, by the way, these terrorists who were the leaders of these terrorist organizations, like Menachem Begin and Yitzhak Shamir, they went on to be prime ministers of Israel.
But they were terrorists. And I'm not like – I don't mean this as a pejorative, like self-described – like they embraced terrorism.
What was their organization called?
Menachem Begin's was the Ergun. That was his militia. And then there was Lehi or the Stern Gang. And then there was the Haganah, who was like the biggest one. And they were not quite as terroristic, but they also were involved in a bunch of it.
And their justification for it was to drive out the occupying force, which was the British. at the time. After World War II, the Zionists who were in Palestine were like – had enough of the British occupying the area. And they were very angry because they had limited Jewish migration during the run-up to the Holocaust. So they had a real beef with the British at this point, even though the British had, kind of like, allowed them to have a chance to establish a Jewish homeland there.
But so they embraced terrorism to drive them out. You can go look at the King David Hotel. It killed a whole bunch of innocent people, including Jews, in the hotel, because they just wanted to use terrorism to drive out an occupying force. And they actually introduced terrorism into that region. And many of the same tactics that the Palestinians went on to embrace were stuff that they picked up from the Jewish terrorists at that time.
But then the same Israelis will turn around and be like, well, I don't know why these Palestinians have embraced terrorism. And they're telling you it's for the same reason. It's to drive out an occupying force. Now, of course, the major difference there is that Israelis came to stay, whereas the British were there. They had their – this was a satellite.
They had their home country back in Europe. And they could be driven out. It's a whole different thing to try to drive someone out who's like, no, we're setting up our homes here.
And there's more of us.
Yeah. Well, not that much. I mean, there's Palestinians and Israelis. It's pretty close, if you count all of them.
Well, you're also backed by America.
Well, that's the major difference. So that's basically. my essential argument, is that America shouldn't be playing this role.
And this is being argued out now.
Yeah.
You know, this is a big point of contention now, politically, right? Because the Biden administration is not giving the same amount of support to Israel that it was –.
They've been giving – basically. I mean, what's really going on is that Joe Biden – this is a disaster politically for Joe Biden. And something like – looking at the polls recently, 50% of his base –.
I think you and I have different Twitter followers.
I mean, my Twitter feed seems like he's doing a great job.
Really? Yeah. You're doing excellent. He's totally got it down.
There's a lot of people that are arguing that.
Jobs. I sent you his latest clip from his speech. It's that new Biden just dropped. And it's the newest – Yes. The newest where he goes – and by the – it's not – he meant to say, I think, financial crash, but he said pandemic.
But he said during the pandemic, when he was vice president, Barack Obama sent him to Detroit. And you're just like, dude, what? Why did he send him to Detroit? Why would they send you to Detroit to deal with COVID?
Now, I saw someone saying that perhaps it was the H1N1 pandemic, which did happen during the Biden administration or during the Obama administration, when he was vice president.
I don't think. I don't think. I think he was talking about –.
He would have probably said a previous pandemic. Yeah.
The point is just that he does it so much.
Remember back in 2009?
. He's out of his fucking mind.
If it was an – if it was occasional, people would let this stuff go.
Yeah.
But anyway, just two that –, look, I also thought – because some of these guys, by the way, you've had on your show, like, I, like them. I'm not even like, you know, like Coleman Hughes. I don't know him personally, but I like him. He's great. He seems really smart.
Very smart. I haven't read his book, but I bet I would love it.
You two together would be a fascinating conversation just about the Israel-Palestine conflict. Yeah.
Well, I would love to have a – because I think he's a good-faith guy, and I think he is. And he's very smart. But he also kind of – you know, there were two things that kind of rubbed me the wrong way when he was on the show. Number one was that he started by kind of getting into this argument about – which I see a lot of people who are supporting this conflict doing. The argument about like, okay, well, here are the number of total civilians dead, and here are the number of Hamas militants dead, and let's look at that ratio.
And then is that ratio that far off from what you find in a typical war? And there's a few problems with this. Number one, the numbers are totally unreliable. And so you're having this conversation – Yes, on both sides. I mean, both sides, are totally incentivized to exaggerate the numbers.
And also, in the fog of war, it's very hard to keep up with these numbers. We never really know the numbers of dead in war until, like years later, when the excess mortality is calculated, and then you get a better idea of what was really going on there.
The Israeli government talking about the number of Hamas militants they've killed seems to be them just pulling numbers out of their ass. Like, they dropped these bombs. They don't know how many, who got who, and who was a part of –.
Are they going in there and checking dog tags?
Yeah, they're not. You know what I mean? And – but anyway, but even that, I just – even if the numbers were right, it's like – look, dude, if you look at the population density, and you just look at the number of bombs that Israel has dropped, and you just see a lot of the footage that we've seen, and you just listen to stories that doctors are telling – I literally just saw an interview a couple weeks ago with a doctor who just got back from Gaza, and he was talking about how they have a major anesthesia shortage over there. So just think about the implications of that, like what that means. It means they're operating on kids without anesthesia.
You know what I mean? Jesus Christ. So the point is that if you're talking about, okay, well, this many Hamas people are dying compared to this, many innocent babies are dying, that's not the question. Okay? Like, when you're inflicting this level of human suffering on people, the question for any decent, civilized person is, is this absolutely necessary?
Is this the only way to do it?
Is there any other option besides doing this? And as soon as you frame the question that way, you realize that, oh yeah, there actually is. And that it's not true that Israel – there will just be October 7th after October 7th if Israel stops doing this. The fact is that, of course, Netanyahu's never allowed a real investigation into October 7th to happen, but everybody pretty much concludes that Israel dropped the ball in a massive way. In a massive way that their security was just in shambles, and all they really needed to do was not rely so much on these, you know, machine gun robots and have actual soldiers at the border.
They could easily just stop this right now.
Well, wasn't there an issue of protests where the soldiers were allocated towards –.
Yes. Yes. Basically, they had – so, I think, as a result of the protests against Netanyahu, he had started to ally with some even further right-wing groups than he normally would have, and to appease them, he was pulling soldiers off of the Gaza border and putting them over toward the West Bank, which is what the religious Jews on the right really care about. And, yes, they basically got caught with their pants down. But I'm just saying they could just stop doing this.
It's not they all die or they keep doing this. They could stop, and Israel can still protect itself. In fact, I'd argue their security would be enhanced if they stopped doing this. But the other thing which you brought up to Coleman Hughes was that you mentioned to him – you said, what about – didn't Israel prop up Hamas? Wasn't that part of their strategy for a while?
And he – I'll give him the benefit of the doubt, and maybe he just doesn't know about that detail of this as much, because, if not, he was kind of being dishonest. But maybe he just wasn't familiar with all of this stuff. But he kind of went, you said that, and then he kind of dismissed it by saying, well, there's a quote that's attributed to Netanyahu, but it wasn't on videotape. So like we don't – essentially being like we don't really know if Netanyahu said this or not, and then just kind of moved on to the conversation, away from that. But I find this – I found this in all of my debates that I've done on this, and I've done like eight debates on this since the war broke out.
Everybody on the pro-Israeli side does not want to grapple with that point, because it really is like a – it's a narrative-shattering point once you acknowledge it.
Right. But if it isn't on videotape, he has a point as well.
Well, here – well, let me – OK. So here's the deal, right? So the quote that he's referring to was a quote by Benjamin Netanyahu. It was something along the lines of anybody who wants to thwart the Palestinians having their own state needs to support propping up Hamas, bolstering Hamas, transferring money to them to – right? So there was a quote like this.
So Hamas maintains power.
Right. So Hamas maintains power so that they never – we never have to give them a state because we can look to the international community. We can look to liberal Jews in Israel and say, look, we have no partner for peace. They're a crazy terrorist group. So we never have to make a deal.
We don't have to fulfill our promise that we would give the –.
And how is this attributed to him?
So basically, this quote particularly, OK, this was at a closed-door meeting with the Likud party. So this is Benjamin Netanyahu's political party, his far-right party that's in power right now in Israel. So it's true that this was a closed-door meeting and that it's not on tape. So what happened is, as far as I could tell, the first person who reported this, I believe, was a lady who's a reporter for the Jerusalem Post. And then it's been run in a bunch of other newspapers since then.
So basically, what happened is an eyewitness who was there at the meeting, so another Likud party member in Benjamin Netanyahu's political party, came and told her that he said this. And then she went and checked with somebody else who was there, and he also confirmed that, like, yes, Benjamin Netanyahu said this. And then a third person who was also at the meeting came out and wrote about it in his book or wrote about it in another newspaper article or something like that. So you had three eyewitnesses from within his own political party who confirmed that he said this. Now, take that for what it's worth.
I think that's reasonably strong, that three eyewitnesses all in his political party said it.
Sure, as long as they weren't trying to get rid of him. Because you can get more than three people to say that Donald Trump was in collusion with Russia.
Sure, sure. So even say if you don't trust them. Coleman acted as if that's what the entire case is built off of, which is just not true at all. It's not just this one. Benjamin Netanyahu quote.
It's dozens and dozens of quotes from Israeli leaders all throughout the political spectrum. There's been reporting on this done by almost every major Israeli newspaper. Haaretz, Times of Israel. The Times of Israel on October 8th had a piece by Tal Schneider, which was how Netanyahu's support for Hamas just blew up in his face. It was the next day.
And because even critics like Ehud Barak, who was the former prime minister. He's a Labor Party. He's a critic of Benjamin Netanyahu. So he was a critic of this plan to prop up Hamas. But it's totally uncontroversial that this was their plan.
The New York Times just ran a piece, I think it was late last year. It might have been early this year. Where they talked about how, two weeks before October 7th, Benjamin Netanyahu sent the head of the Mossad to Qatar because funds going into Hamas had slowed down. And he sent them in there to make sure the funds continued. The case for this is overwhelming.
It's not like relying on one.
. Yeah, here you go.
Yeah, for years the Qatari government had been.
. Am I saying that right? Is that how you say it?
Qatari, I think is correct.
Yeah, Qatari government had been sending millions of dollars a month to Gaza Strip. Money that helped prop up the Hamas government there. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel not only tolerated those payments, he had encouraged them. According to Times, Israeli intelligence agents traveled to Gaza with a Qatari official carrying suitcases filled with cash. Suitcases, like a mafia movie, to disperse money.
Retired. Israeli General Shlomo Brahm described the logic of Netanyahu's position. One effective way to present a two-state solution is to divide... Prevent. Prevent.
Prevent. a two-state solution is to divide between the Gaza Strip and the West Bank. If the extremist Hamas ruled Gaza, then the Palestinian Authority,
Comprador? I don't even know what that is. Comprador. government with a tenuous hold on the West Bank would be further weakened. This, according to Brahm, would allow Netanyahu to say, I have no partner.
And so that's, okay, so that's essentially the point there, right? So that's a strategy. That he can say, I have no partner for peace, which is the Israeli line that they like to use. So, basically, okay, in 1979, the Egyptians and the Israelis met at Camp David, and that's when they worked out their peace. Now their peace also just involved, basically, that the U.S.
would pay them both off. We'd give them both $3 billion a year in perpetuity if they stopped going to war with each other, basically. And part of that was that Israel promised that they would eventually give the Palestinians a state. Like it was recognized by D.C. at the time, this, Jimmy Carter, that, like you, got to give them a state, because otherwise this fighting is going to continue on and on and on forever.
So they promised that eventually they would give it to them.
This is the Yasser Arafat days.
This is before Yasser Arafat was like the guy, but he was alive. But then, in the 80s, Yasser Arafat basically rejected terrorism. He had been involved in terrorism before that. He rejected terrorism, and he recognized Israel. I think it was 1988..
He recognized Israel's right to exist under 1967 borders. So basically, Israel has the right to exist, but we have the right to Gaza and the West Bank. The ultimate of compromises from the Palestinian perspective. Because a lot of their more hardcore guys are like, no, all of this was ours. We shouldn't have lost any of it.
And now even the original U.
S. partition plan, which was rejected by the Arabs for fairly good reasons, they rejected it because it gave 55% to the Jews, or 56% to the Jews and only 44% to the Palestinians. And they were like, but we're like 90% of the population here, or 90% of the landowners here, or whatever. And it's like, this isn't fair. But now, at this point, they're talking about 78% versus 22%.
So they're accepting 22%. And so that's Yasser Arafat in the late 80s. And then this is what set the stage for the Oslo Accords in the early 90s. And this is famously when Bill Clinton has Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat over, and they shake hands and they sign these deals. And the promise, again, from Israel was that we're starting the peace process to eventually give the Palestinians their state.
This is the process. And there were steps along this process. Now, in 1996, Benjamin Netanyahu becomes prime minister. Now, the same year, in 1996,, there's this letter. You can find this on the internet.
It's called A Clean Break, A New Strategy for Securing the Realm. And it was written by Richard Perle and David Wormser and a couple other people. Of course, Richard Perle and David Wormser both went on to be very influential neoconservatives in the George W. Bush administration. So they write this letter, not to President Bill Clinton and not to Bob Dole, who was running for president on the Republican ticket that year.
They write this letter to Benjamin Netanyahu, the new prime minister of Israel. And basically, if you read it, what they say is that they're like, look, look, you guys are all caught up in this peace process thing, where you're talking about giving the Palestinians land. We need a clean break from that strategy. And we're going to have a whole new strategy. And what it's going to involve is you making agreements with the broader Arab world so that you don't have to make this agreement with the Palestinians.
You see, the old way of thinking was always that Israel will never be able to make peace with the broader Muslim world because they're furious about what you're doing to the Palestinians. But the clean break strategy was like, no, no, no, you're going to embark on what ultimately became the Netanyahu doctrine that will make deals with the rest of the Arab world, so we don't have to give up this land. And you know what they recommended? These two neoconservatives in 1996, and I bet you'll never guess this, Joe, regime change in Iraq for the security of Israel. That was in 1996..
And these people got in George W. Bush's government. And after 9-11, those same people decided that they believed that Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction and that he was involved in 9-11..
Yeah, so there it is.
Israel can shape its strategic environment in cooperation with Turkey and Jordan, by weakening, containing, and even rolling back Syria. This effort can focus on removing Saddam Hussein from power in Iraq, an important Israeli strategic objective in its own right, as a means of foiling Syria's regional ambitions. And here's where it gets crazy.
What a great job the Mossad did in compromising people, by the way. I mean, how much of an effect did that have in everything? You know, you can go full, Eddie Bravo, and think everything that's happening is because of Epstein's Island. And I used to dismiss that a lot more easy than I do now.
Maybe not everything. A lot. But certainly some stuff. Some things. You will see this, and I'm not saying that Epstein is the sole reason for this type of stuff.
There's several different reasons. But you see this all over the political sphere, and especially amongst conservative commentators, where, as soon as Israel is mentioned, whatever their principles were that they were just rolling with, are gone. It's a totally different thing. And I get that. I get.
there's a reason for that, too. Of course, what Jewish people have been through in the 20th century, in the 19th and 18th century, that plays a part in that, too. But there's no question that it's not just Epstein. It's also, and I highly recommend people read, John Mearsheimer has a great book called The Israeli Lobby. There's also this lobby, AIPAC, which is a very, very powerful lobby.
The truth is that every U.
S. president since, with perhaps the exception of Trump, I'm actually not sure about that, but every U.S. president since Jimmy Carter, I know for sure, excluding Trump, every one of them, wanted a two-state solution. Every single one of them. None of them, were able to get it done.
Even though we bankroll Israel. You'd think it'd be fairly easy for us to put pressure on the country that's relying on us. Like, okay, we'll keep supporting you, but you've got to do this. Nope. Even when they go over and say, we want to do this, they're not able to do that.
And part of that is because of the lobby. Part of that is because there's like tens of millions of evangelical Christians in this country who believe that the Jews have to control Israel, like, in some religious view, that Jesus can't come back unless the Jews control him or something like that. I don't exactly understand it.
They go there on tour. Yeah. Oh, tours, they go there.
Well, and they also, and the Israeli government's well aware of that, and they're well aware of how much they benefit from that. So they do everything they can to facilitate that belief.
White dudes with golf shirts.
That's right. They're a big force. They're a really big block in this country. There's not like a few dozen of them.
They're willing to throw some real money at bringing Jesus back.
Yes. That's a very big deal to them. But look, like there's all of these U.S. presidents, they've wanted an outcome that they're unable to get. And you can look, there's this one video of Benjamin Netanyahu where he doesn't know he's being recorded and he's speaking openly about this.
And it's pretty. So he openly starts bragging about how he basically blew up the peace process and how he like he basically recording. Oh, yeah. I mean, it's in Hebrew, but there's, it's translated and it's legit. It's been translated by, like a whole bunch of different people.
And he's bragging about how he put all of these poison pills into the peace agreement. Like he was like, oh, yeah, sure. Well, we'll grant. I agreed to grant them a state. But only after it was determined that we could, like Israel could control, like military, like important military areas.
And then he was like, I also snuck it in that only Israel gets to define what the military important areas are. And I decided that a third of the West Bank is that. And like he's bragging about, and he's bragging about how he tricked Bill Clinton and how easy it is to move the Americans. It's wild. Like there's.
there's a lot of power plays at work here. And the only other thing I'll say about this, and it's not just like the neoconservative, the clean break, the strategy that they wrote for Netanyahu. It's that. So, in 2002, Benjamin Netanyahu comes and testifies before Congress as a, as a regional expert. And he testifies that like, oh, yeah, if you guys overthrow Saddam Hussein, democracy will sweep the region.
Let me tell you, I know something, because I know this region better than anyone else. And at one point, Dennis Kucinich actually grilled him and got him on record. And he goes, is there anybody else that you're advocating that we preemptively attack? And Netanyahu goes, yeah, Iran, attack them, too. So I'm not like.
I don't hate Israel. Like I think Israel is a cruel country. I think what they do to the Palestinians is fucked up and it's inexcusable, and they should stop. But I think Israel is a cool country. There's a lot of great things about them.
But, like Netanyahu, this guy who's the longest serving prime minister in Israeli history, has been trying to get America into wars that are in his interest, that are very clearly not in ours. And the fact that we have to, like, unconditionally support Israel, even when our own democratically elected president doesn't like the policies that they're enacting, and yet they still get all of this support. Even now, as you know, Joe Biden doesn't know what he's saying because he's got dementia. But there's people in his ear who are telling him to, like, say, don't invade Rafah. And he's like, don't invade Rafah.
And then Benjamin Netanyahu is like, OK, we're going to invade Rafah. And it's just like, OK, well, fine, fine. If we have no influence over what you're going to do and you'll just wag the middle finger at us and brag about how you tricked Bill Clinton and defy what our presidents want you to do, like, OK, fine. But then you don't get our money and our weapons. Right?
Like, isn't that reasonable?
It is reasonable, but it's also. the left is very confused on this one. This is a baffling one for the left.
Yeah, they sure are.
Because support of Israel has always been a position of people on the left. Right? Support of Jewish people. And to not want that is kind of anti-Semitic.
Well, look, on the hard left, there's always been a bunch of people who are sympathetic to the plight of the Palestinians. For sure.
Well, the people that have seen Abbie Martin's take on it. Yeah.
But Abbie Martin also, like, follows in a tradition of left-wing thought, like Noam Chomsky and people like this, who have always been very critical of the Israeli government's treatment of the Palestinians.
Yes. But this is where it gets weird. It's like the support of Israel when Israel was attacked. So that's when everything gets crazy. It's not support of Israel before October 7th.
It's post-October 7th. So now you have hardcore lefties who are, now. they're like the majority of the young people. now. It's a big thing in this country.
In universities, it's crazy. I mean, they're going nuts. They're attacking students. They're attacking teachers. People can't go to work.
They're being told if they support Israel, they can't be on campus. It's just. the whole thing is very bad for the left in that regard, because Jewish people traditionally vote left.
Oh, yeah. Well, yeah. I mean, the overwhelming majority, I think 85% of Jews are Democrats, or something like that.
Obviously, there's not full support. Even today, there was a news report of a huge government protest in Israel. They're in the streets. So it's not like. this is a policy that's supported by the entire population.
Well, there is. I mean, there was. So, basically, I think, what really changed things during the 90s, there's no question, there was tremendous support for making a deal for a two-state solution, particularly amongst liberal Israelis. And basically, so Yitzhak Rabin got assassinated by a right-wing Israeli who was furious that he was a traitor for making a deal with the Palestinians. And that took him out.
And then, when Netanyahu came in, and then ultimately, I guess it was Sharon who was in the year 2000.
. And there was another meeting at Camp David, where, you know, what people will say, which is just not true, but what a lot of the people of the pro-Israeli side will say is that they offered them everything. Right. They offered the Palestinians everything they wanted, and they just turned it down. And this is their – it's all slogans.
It's like, they never miss an opportunity to miss an opportunity. But if you actually look into the details of all of it, even Shlomo Ben-Ami, who was the acting foreign minister at the time involved in these negotiations, he even said in his book, and he said it in a Democracy Now! interview, that he would have turned down the deal, too, if he was Arafat. Because the deal was just so – it was so removed from actually giving him his own state that it was like – this is just – it was an insulting offer, essentially. But when those negotiations broke down, and then it was after Sharon had this visit to the Temple Mount, which really inflamed tensions, when the negotiations broke down, then the second Intifada started.
And there was a big wave of terrorist attacks. And that, you know, in the same cycle we were talking about at the beginning, that did a lot to turn a lot of liberal Israelis off of the idea that, like, well, there's no negotiating a piece. But it is worth noting that whenever there were negotiations going on, the support for terrorism, the support for Hamas and groups like that always plummeted. And then, whenever the negotiations broke down, the support for those terrorist groups picked back up again. Because the big problem here is that you just – when you –, essentially when you take away the dangling carrot in front of an oppressed people, like, you, let them know that there's no hope.
That you're going to live in subjugation for eternity. That's a very dangerous situation. That's when people will turn to really, really dark means. And that's – you know, essentially, look, Netanyahu's – like, what became the Netanyahu doctrine, and a lot of this culminated in the Abraham Accords, which a lot of Trump supporters will brag about. They'll be like, look at all these peace deals that Donald Trump worked out in the Middle East.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os