Red Sea Task Force, Texas Border Law, Blessings For Same-Sex Couples

Lawmakers in Texas say their federal government is failing to enforce immigration laws, so they've written a new immigration law of their own.

Governor Greg Abbott has signed a bill making it a state crime to cross the Texas-Mexico border illegally. We'll hear what it could mean for migrants.

I'm Michelle Martin, that's a Martinez, and this is up first from NPR News.

And in a reversal, the Vatican now says Catholic priests can offer blessings to same-sex couples.

This is a step, and I would say a significant milestone.

What does it actually change, and how are Catholics reacting? Stay with us, we've got all the news you need to start your day.

Rule.

If they gain more power, it could mean fewer rights for you. I'm Heath Druzin and on the new season of Extremely American, I'll take you inside.

The movement.

Listen to Extremely American from Boise State Public Radio, part of the NPR network.

On the Ted Radio Hour, MIT psychologist Sherry Turkle, her latest research into the intimate relationships people are having with chatbots. Technologies that say, I care about you, I love you, I'm here for you, take care of me. The pros and Cons of artificial intimacy. That's on the Ted Radio Hour from NPR.

It's already a federal crime to enter the United States illegally from Mexico. soon. It's going to be a state crime in Texas under legislation Texas Governor Greg Abbott signed yesterday.

The measure means state and local police will be allowed to arrest people they believe are in the state illegally. Critics of the new law say it is unconstitutional and they worry it will encourage racial profiling.

Julian Aguilar from the Texas Newsroom is here to tell us about what this all means. So, Julian, what penalties are baked into this legislation?

So Senate Bill 4. It makes it a class B misdemeanor for people who cross the Rio Grande, and that's punishable. Up to six months in jail. That's a first offense, any subsequent offense is a second degree felony, and that jumps up to two to 20 years in prison.

Okay, so what's the argument for also making illegal crossings a state crime?

So the biggest takeaway is. Governor Abbott and his supporters say that Texas needs to do this because the federal government, the Biden administration, isn't enforcing the law. On the books. You know, watching the governor's press conference when he did the bill signing? It's clear that the new law will empower state and local law enforcement near the border to crack down on unauthorized crossings, according to him. But the way it's written, it's a statewide bill, so this really applies across Texas. And advocates worry this is going to erode people's civil rights and specifically target mixed status families.

Now the pushback that I keep hearing is that this law infringes on the federal government's power to regulate immigration. Is this designed to maybe trigger a lawsuit that would wind up in the Supreme Court?

Right, correct. So, Governor Abbott says President Biden's administration isn't doing enough to enforce existing immigration laws and that Texas has the sovereign right to do this. But it gets to the heart of a 2012 Supreme Court ruling over an Arizona immigration law in which the court said local police didn't have the authority to arrest people solely based on their immigration status. You know, legal experts I talk to, they say issues like abortion, gun control, these are domestic issues, but immigration is a federal issue because it involves cooperations with other countries.

So how does all of this fit into Texas Republicans other efforts to try and take control of immigration powers?

Sure, it just adds to the list of what the state has done over the last few years. Including Operation Lone Star, which is a state-based initiative that sent thousands of law enforcement to the border. You have the governor also ordering Concertina Wire to be strung up on the northern banks of the Rio Grande. He's deployed the National Guard down to the border, and, you know, he's also installed a floating barrier over a stretch of the Rio Grande.

So, Julian, what happens then, if federal officials and state officials both want to make an arrest or prosecute the same person? Who gets priority?

Sure, that's one of the ambiguities about Senate Bill 4. The state and federal officials work together under Operation Lone Star already. But because this is a new bill, we're going to have to wait and see how it plays out.

That's reporter Julian Aguilar from the Texas Newsroom. Julian, thanks a lot.

Thank you for having me on.

The U.

Houthi rebels, who control part of Yemen and get weapons and training from Iran, have launched missile and drone attacks on commercial ships passing through the Red Sea in recent weeks.

And for more, I'm joined by Paul McCleary, who covers national security for Politico Paul. Why are Houthi rebels waging these attacks right now?

It stems from the Hamas attack on Israel on October 7th and the Israeli response. The Houthi rebels have been sponsored economically and militarily by Iran. So they're basically like other militant groups in Syria and in Iraq in recent weeks that have attacked U.S bases there. They're kind of taking their marching orders from Tehran here.

All right, so the U.S.'s response is this task force Operation Prosperity. Guardian What's that supposed to do?

Yeah, it's a 10-nation task force that kind of is falling underneath an existing task force that's already in the Red Sea region. Led by the United States. Based in Bahrain, that has a counter-piracy mission that has 39 nations, they either contribute ships or naval officers to the mission. This task force, the newest one, the Operation Prosperity Guardian, is 10 countries U..K. Bahrain, Canada, France, Italy, Netherlands, Norway, Spain and the Sahelis.

I spoke to someone yesterday who mentioned how some of the things that are being shipped in these corridors are things that people use every single day. So a disruption could be pretty major. How are the attacks affecting trade?

Already, BP, the oil giant, has said that they're going to curtail their shipping in the region, Maersk has done the same. The Norwegian Shipbuilders Union and a German firm have also either said that they will try to go around the Red Sea or curtail shipping. We haven't seen the effects yet, but it'll be pretty quickly. I think that over the next week or two or several weeks, we'll really start seeing some disruptions in supply chains and things like that. Moving from the Mediterranean into the Indian Ocean.

One more thing, Paul, really quick before we let you go. Notice that the U.S is addressing all this with a multinational task force. Instead of, say, maybe attacking a Houthi-controlled site in Yemen, is the idea there, maybe to prevent this from becoming a larger, bigger conflict?

Yes, the United States is loathe to attack inside Yemen. I mean, there's been peace talks between Saudi and the Houthis in Yemen that we don't want to see disrupted. But we just moved the Eisenhower aircraft carrier off the coast of Yemen, so attacks might be forthcoming. I mean, the U.S.

Paul MacLary covers national security for Politico Paul, Thank you, thank you.

The new ruling marks a change in the church's position on same-sex relationships. But the declaration makes clear that a blessing does not mean approval of same-sex marriage, and it doesn't permit priests to officiate at them. So what does it mean?

For answers, I'm joined by Dina Pritchett, who covers religion for NPR. And it was just what two and a half years ago, the Catholic Church said it could not bless same-sex unions because, quote God does not bless sin. Dina, What changed?

Well, there have been rumblings of a statement coming down that would reverse that ruling you mentioned in October. The Vatican published a letter that Pope Francis wrote earlier this year saying blessings could be studied if they were distinct from the sacrament of marriage. And bishop conferences, primarily in Europe, have been working on these sorts of blessings.

Now pretty limited declaration. How much does it actually change?

The new document is very clear to say. This is not recognizing or even blessing same-sex marriages. It's a blessing for the couple, not the union. It's not a liturgical ceremony, it can't be part of a church service, but it is a blessing.

Okay, got a lot of family members who are Catholics and we had a lot of conversations about this, so what's the reaction been from Catholics worldwide?

I don't know about your family, but it's been very mixed. There are those who say it's not that big a deal. The United States Conference of Catholic Bishops put out a statement saying the church's teaching on marriage has not changed, and this declaration affirms that. But I also talked to Marianne Duddy-Burke, who heads Dignity USA, which is a Catholic LGBTQ rights organization.

All right, so what's the pushback to the change?

Well, I talked with Father Gerald Murray, the pastor of Church of the Holy Family in New York City.

It's a disaster because the church is changing the way it approaches mortal sin. In other words, the Church teaches that the law of God has been laid down by Christ, and that does not include the approval of homosexual activity.

So then, is this creating, or at least highlighting, maybe a divide within the church?

Well, Father Murray, at Church of the Holy Family, would say yes.

Because the Pope is supposed to lead us in the faith, not change the faith.

I should note this document does not require priests to do any sort of blessing, it just offers the option. But there are people like Marianne Duddy-Burke, of Dignity USA, who says the church has been divided for a while and this is the right path to take. I have seen many, many people leave the Catholic church because of the exclusionary practices and teachings. I look at every one of those departures as an amputation in the body of Christ.

Dina Pritchett contributes to NPR's coverage of Religion Dina, thank you very much for your reporting on this.

You're welcome.

And that's up first for Tuesday, December 19th. I'm a Martinez.

And I'm Michelle Martin. Today's episode of Up First was edited by Ryland Barton, Cheryl Corley, Michael Sullivan, Ali Schweitzer and Alice Wolfley. It was produced by Claire Murashima, David West and Katie Klein. We get engineering support from Robert Rodriguez, and our technical director is Zach Coleman. Start your day here with us tomorrow.

And before we let you go, I have a thank you and a request thanks for letting up. First, keep you informed. Your financial support is what makes our work and the news and podcasts you rely on from across the NPR network possible. Now the thing is, though, even though our journalism is freely available, it is not free to produce.

Thank you.