Democrat Congressman shoots his mouth off

Text Dan to 989898 to claim your free information kit on Gold Today with an A-Plus rating with the better business bureau, Birch Gold is who I trust. To protect my future and yours, Text Dan to 989898 today. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results. Message and data rates apply.

Dan Bongino Welcome to the Bongino brief. I'm Dan Bongino. We are being led, governed, whatever you want to call it, by idiots, by idiots.

Watch this Democrat Jamal Bowman, I mean, a total life loser, an obvious coward as well. The guy does nothing but scream. It's amazing.

Screaming at Byron Donald, screaming at Tom Massey here, the guy does nothing but yell, he doesn't actually know anything because he's a moron.

But here he goes full lunatic up on Capitol Hill. Because he wants to put your kids in danger. No, no, no, he really wants your kids in danger. You're speaking in hyperbole.

No, no, I'm not. no, I'm not. Jamal Bowman does not want anyone with a firearm protecting your kids in school so that your kids are sheep for killer savage wolves who may murder them. Jamal Bowman also wants you in danger because Jamal Bowman knows full well that criminals don't care about gun laws. But Jamal Bowman wants to make sure he takes away your gun so the criminals can kill and shoot us.

Yes, he wants you in danger, you in danger. See, Jamal Bowman's a coward, though he's always been a coward, and I've noticed this about cowards.

My time growing up, whether it was boxing or MMA or this stuff, the loudest screamers are always the biggest chumps and cowards. That's this guy. It's almost like, Did you notice this? show they? It's a compensation mechanism.

I don't know if it's like a genitalia thing or whatever it is. They have a compensation mechanism. See, because they feel inadequate, they feel like if they scream, they'll intimidate you. I'm telling you, it's a golden rule coming up a little short.

Yeah, yeah.

That's good every time, every little short, every time. They are the biggest screamers, the biggest chumps. Here he is.

This guy wants to put you and your kids in danger. Screaming up on Capitol Hill has no facts to back up anything, he says. And Tom Massey, who's a really terrific Republican congressman, everyone else is ignoring this idiot because he's a clown.

They're like, look at this loser. Matter of fact, Steny Hoyer tries to be. I don't know if you saw that Jeff. Maryland Congress tries to grab him, like, please shut up.

You look like a loser. Tom Massey has the courtesy to stop and actually talk to him, and he can't stop screaming because he's a lunatic. Take a listen, freaking cowards.

This guy, I almost feel bad for him. He was probably beaten up a lot in high school, whatever it may be, maybe he got mugged in a way. No, I'm serious, I'm not being silly about it.

And what they do is then, you know, they try to overcompensate when you give them a little power as they get to be adults. I've seen it before, Guy's probably a real life loser. Somehow got elected. I mean, listen, I'm from New York. But these liberal districts, they're known to elect morons sometimes. I'm sorry, but it's true.

You got AOC, you got this, this loser, so he's screaming, and he screams. Of course, he's got nothing but talking points. You're in the gun lobby, the gun lobby, by the way, which spends a fraction of what anti life, pro abortion organizations spend.

Teachers unions, the gun lobby he doesn't have. I mean, I'd like to see what kind of organizations have donated to him. Oh wait, there was one, there was one.

Wasn't it in the show? The other day? We had the Red State article that the Tick Tock donated to a group he was part of. When he then went out and backed up the Chinese Communist Party. Tick Tock, same guy.

Sellout, total, sellout, complete life loser. This guy's for sale for whatever, you just give him this.

Give him his silver and this guy's for sale, OK, because he's a chump and a coward. He's a total loser now, he said. At one point, you probably heard it while he was screaming like a maniac.

More guns equal more death. OK, that's an interesting talking point. You probably got that from your Chinese benefactors in the Chinese Communist Party, who would love to see us all disarmed. Because that's what he is. Well, I'm going to sell out and a coward. So I thought, let's look that up because I've shown this chart probably close to 25 times.

Joe's seen it so many times. AEI has a chart up here, they put up gun ownership per person versus the gun homicide rate. Now they did it. You want to accumulate data over a good period of time to make sure the data is robust, right?

You don't want a one day measure, you want maybe one year, five years, 10 years, so you get a good data set, correct? It's no different than studying a drug, you don't study the drug's effect on one person.

You study it on thousands, tens of thousands, millions, so you get a good idea if it works or not. None of this is difficult. Jamal Bowman, of course, doesn't understand. You can tune out now.

The guy's a moron, he doesn't understand any of this data or anything like that. So when you look at when the assault weapons ban, the 1994 assault weapons ban. They did a good study over 10 years about, you know, what was the effect of this stuff? Did it actually work?

Well, as you'll notice on the scale here, because Jamal Bowman says, more guns equal more death. That guns per person over the 10 year period. A good data set from 1994 to 2014. And we'll have the next 10 years, 2014 to 2024. When the next year passes, right, you'll notice guns per person went up. See, Jamal Bowman doesn't know what that means. went up means up.

On the scale, Jamal guy's quite dumb. You'll notice. The gun homicide rate went down, went down guns.

Weird, it's so weird, Joe, you know, screaming. More guns equal more death, and yet you look at a solid 10 year study and you get the opposite. Well, you may be saying, well, okay, that's guns per person. I'd like to see just the number of guns.

Okay, we have that, too. Here's an AEI chart as well. From that percent changes since 1993. Number of firearms versus the gun homicide rate. Well, Jamal Bowman, one of the dumbest individuals up in Congress, said More guns equals more death.

It's really strange because when you look at the 10 year period from 94 to 2014, you see the number of privately owned firearms again going up 56. Plus plus means you guys are data guys, plus means up, right minus means down.

Yeah, plus is up, okay, Joe's like, I don't know. I've been out of school a while, I forgot.

So plus means, yeah, me too. I'm a little confused. Thank you for clearing that. So gun ownership went up pretty dramatically. Plus 56. So if Jamal Bowman's correct coward, chump life loser Bowman, then it should be more deaths.

Well, you look at the gun homicide rate, it's kind of weird. It went down minus. hey, can anybody blow that up? is that minus 49%?

It is, oh, it is a minus. Look, okay, thank you. thank you very much. I thought I might not be seeing that.

It's almost symmetrical, you know? yeah, it's weird, right? It's almost symmetrical. Joe's right. It's almost like more guns equals less death.

Now, listen, I'm not in any way because I'm not a moron. Like Jamal Bowman. Suggesting to you that this is causal, I'm not suggesting to you that the presence of more firearms in the society causes less gun death. That's hard to prove causation because you can't do a study like that, right? What are you going to do? Get a control group?

No guns here, it's impossible, no guns here, let's see, and then a control group here.

Everybody's got a gun here. That's how you determine causality. See, Bowman doesn't understand any of this because he's an idiot. When you come to this show, we will give you actual science and real data. Unlike this moron who's screaming like a freaking lunatic more in a minute.

But first, folks, inflation has consequences. As the Fed raises interest rates to combat out-of-control government spending. Long-term bonds have diminished in value, crippling banks. I've explained that before, diversification of your assets has never been more important. The recent surge in gold prices show why gold has historically been a great hedge against the stock market and against inflation. Candidly, I've purchased gold from Birch Gold many times.

I'm glad I did it before this crisis. The only company I trust to help you diversify into gold is Birch Gold Group. Do it now, before it gets worse, I buy my gold from them. You can do the same.

Text Dan to 989898 to get a free information kit on gold, Don't wait any longer. Birch Gold will help you convert an existing IRA, or 401K that's tied to a volatile market into an IRA in physical precious metals, gold and silver. And the best part, it's tax sheltered.

Text Dan to 989898 to claim your free information kit on Gold today. Don't wait. With an A-plus rating with the better business bureau and thousands of happy customers, Birch Gold is who I trust. To protect my future and yours. Text Dan to 989898 today. Past performance is not a guarantee of future results.

Message and data rates apply. However, you can determine correlation correlation, meaning two variables move in a certain direction. Bowman's saying As more guns are present in society, gun homicides are correlated and go up. He's wrong.

It's in the opposite direction, at least when you look at a 10-year data set. But Bowman's an idiot, I don't expect him to even understand. He's like, correlation, I don't know.

Moron people are so stupid. I'm going to go through this throughout the show today. Bernie Sanders video coming up next. Ehud Barak, another moron liberal, former prime minister of Israel, just basically laying out the battle plan about how the left works.

They're mob rule, folks, that's what they are, Bowman thinks. If he screams loud enough, just like Ehud Barak, that if they scream loud, mob rule takes over, you'll be disarmed and you'll be the sheep they want.

He was wrong on that. And then he starts yelling later on in the video about how, you know, basically, conservative states, you're more likely to be killed with open carry. Really, that's interesting because I just went to Google, why would you go to Google, Dan?

We know it's a hack, a left-wing activist site. Exactly. It's a screenshot of my phone, you can see by the little photo of me and my daughter, and it's my phone. I went to Google, a left-wing activist site, so no one can accuse it of any, you know, right-wing bias.

And I just put in, as you can see, right there. Top cities for gun crime. Joe, They have something in common now. I know you're not a trained political analyst like me, Joe. I know that. Okay, yeah, yeah.

You understand, but I want you to say now, governance-wise, I'm going to read to you a few cities and are they led? Just take a stab at it by Democrats or Republicans. Give me a second. You have familiarity, one of them, by the way.

New York, New York, Baltimore, Maryland, which you know well, Oakland, California, Detroit, St. Louis, Missouri, Memphis, Tennessee, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and New Orleans, Louisiana. Now I'm going to ask you, Joe, to venture a guess. Here are those cities with the most gun violence. Paul Don't get too excited, ladies and gentlemen.

Calm down, we don't want an accident here. Do you think those cities are led by Democrats Joe, or Republicans? oh, Democrats, Dan Democrats, that's so weird.

I mean, he's not a trained political analyst like me, but even Joe Joe can figure it out. I kid, Of course, Joe's very smart. Joe actually did radio in Baltimore, Maryland, a long time, which hasn't been led by a Republican in, I don't know, 50, 60 years.

All of those cities are led by Democrats, which is weird. Because Jamal Bowman just told you that you're more likely to be killed in areas led by Republican-leaning, conservative, liberty-oriented policies. When he told you, more guns equal more death, even though the opposite is true. So I said, let's get outside of guns in general, let's just go to danger in general. Danger of being mugged doesn't necessarily have to be a gun robbed, raped. Maybe they have a knife, right?

And another strange pattern emerges. You go to this Forbes article again. No bastion of right-wing values. And you put in the 15 most dangerous cities in the U...S, you'll notice again. St. Louis Mobile, Birmingham, Baltimore, Memphis, Detroit, Cleveland, New Orleans, Shreveport, Baton Rouge, Little Rock, Oakland, Milwaukee, Kansas City, Philadelphia. That roughly 90 of them are led by Democrats. Again, so strange, it's almost like Jamal Bowman.

If you're governed by cowards and life losers like Jamal Bowman, that your life is in danger. Weird, weirdo. He claims to be a big advocate for your public safety. What about the kids? Yeah, what about the kids, Jamal?

How many kids are dying in the area? You lured over Jamal of the gun violence you claim to be stopping. Maybe if those kids parents had the ability to defend those kids and there was some semblance of a dad in the home over there, maybe we wouldn't have this mass murder problem in cities. People like you govern, maybe.

Folks, they're putting you in danger.

Please, I'm asking you, going forward, to no longer accept the premise of the argument from the left.

We've got to do something. What about the kids? You need to turn it around on them and say you have done something in the past and you put us all in danger. Because wherever Democrats like you do something, the rate of gun violence, homicide and danger goes through the roof. So I'm going to hold back on you doing anything more because whatever you do puts me in danger.

And you're asking me, What about the kids? Yeah, what about the kids? It's people like you who want these kids killed and threatened because you don't want armed security protecting them. What about the kids? Jamal? What about the kids?

Of course, the stupidity didn't stop with Jamal Bowman, although it did peak. You can't get dumber, you can get as dumb as Bowman, but you can't get dumber. You've reached an asymptote there, you don't know what that is either.

They want you in danger, they want you in danger. They are protected by armed security. There's no need to even debate that politicians, Hollywood folks, entertainers, they're protected by armed security.

They just want you in danger. What about the kids? Yeah, what about the kids? What about me? They don't care about you at all.

They will use the murder of six people in cold blood in Nashville to make sure that you're in danger.

I hate to even put this idiot on my screen. Behar This show is just a humiliating embarrassment. It is that they came up with an idea. I mean, listen on the five, you have five people around a table on Fox who do political analysis for a living. And even then, sometimes they get stuff wrong.

I've been on the show many times and this is what we legit do for a living. The idea for the view is perplexing. Let's put, what is it? Five? I don't even know.

I don't watch it. Five or six idiots around a table who don't know anything about politics at all. And let's have them opine on the most important issues of the day. So what happens? They never get anything right.

You could talk about this show all day, how much stuff they screw up. Here's another example. A comedian, and not even a funny one, Joy Behar, who has just humiliated herself on this show. Once or twice a week for the last decade, saying, Hey, you know, gun control worked great. Yeah, look at Australia, right guy.

When I came in this morning, he's like, I'll be doing the Australia thing again. We have to, because no matter how many times you debunk the Australia gun control miracle, idiots like Joy Behar will bring it up again. Check this out.

I wish they would stop jumping around and dancing around everything, but the guns, it's the guns, that's the thing they all have in common.

When I heard that, I was like, Wow, that's deep, man. It's like Socrates or something like Descartes. She's so brilliant. There's one thing they all have in common the guns. It's like accidents in tree houses.

There's one thing they all have in common a tree house. It's so weird.

Guy got confused by that. That's the view, not the five. I'm like, you missed my point altogether. Point I'm trying to make is people on the five again. We do this for a living, screw things up the view. These are comedians and actors.

They know nothing. Australia, she says, is such a successful example of gun control.

Really? Australia Institute, Australia. There are more guns now than before the Port Arthur massacre.

Okay, so again, just to try to help Joy, I'm not even sure it's possible. She's obviously as dumb, can't be dumber, hit an asymptote as Jamal Bowman. You're saying that gun mass shootings have gone down because of a gun ban, gun confiscation program in Australia, so you're saying less guns equals less mass shootings.

Except the fact that Australia now has more guns than before the confiscation program. What are you gonna do? I don't know, Donnie, I have no idea I'm.

Nothing is the answer, because there's nothing. You can't help, these idiots. She's suggesting there's a correlation less guns, less shootings. the problem is there's more guns.

So there's not less guns, is this? I gotta stop, I gotta, cause the audience is getting they're like, Damn, we're not dumb, I get it.

I'm really sorry, it's just you have to understand how.

You're dealing with either one of two things either openly malicious people or manipulative liars who know nothing about what they're talking about. There are more guns in Australia now, the liberals say, Well, there are actually fewer gun owners. there's just the gun owners that exist have more guns. Oh, that's a great point.

So your point is that the people who really want to own guns have more of them, and that's your. That's a good one. You got us there. You guys are just geniuses. You'll always hear them cite the New Zealand example, too.

They'll say, Oh, New Zealand was such a successful example of gun control. The problem is. NewS Hub How effective were the government's gun law changes and buyback schemes? Here is one of the activists over there. I think the major shortcoming of the gun buyback scheme is that it's failed to get illegal firearms out of New Zealand and away from gangs. And gangs don't voluntarily give up their firearms.

Oh yeah, that's a really. So what you're telling me is when you mandate a gun buyback, that the criminals don't give up their guns. And only the good guys do. Which seems kind of counterproductive. To make the good guys less able to defend themselves while making the bad guys more lethal by having guns seems strange, right? What happened in New Zealand?

Well, they mandated you turn in your guns, or they were going to fine you. But what happened? By estimates, less than a third of the people actually turned their guns in. And most of the people who kept them, some of them were in fact, gang members and others. Now, do you see why they want a list?

Now does it make sense why they want universal background checks? They want a computer record of every gun where it is, who it was sold to. That way, when Biden institutes his gun confiscation scheme, they know exactly who's door to knock on, just like the I.R.S knocked on Matt Taibbi's doors. He was testifying in front of Congress about government overreach.

Oh, come on, Dan, that's not going to happen here. Biden's team is not talking about gun confiscation really, because the worst press secretary, anybody changing their vote, Joe.

Anyone still? Oh no, been a long time sucks.

Still sucks, okay? So Corinne Jean-Pierre, worst press secretary in the history of the United States? I think we can say that pretty confidently at this point. Was asked directly, Hey, does Biden have any plans for gun confiscation now? She could have just said, No, we're not looking at that, but we're looking at X, Y and Z. I want you to listen to the answer.

Now, keep in mind, she is quite dumb, so she may just be, you know, extemporaneously not able to answer questions. So engages in another word salad. But I'm telling you, Biden wants this universal background check because they want to come take your guns. That's why she can't answer the question. Take a listen.

The last presidential campaign?

That's what the president believes.

They do not care, bloodshed means nothing to them, they do not care. There has probably never been a time in human history where a larger mass of people have been led by a dumber group of people in government. We are being led, governed, whatever you want to call it, by idiots.

The Dan Bongino Show If you'd like to hear more, subscribe to the Dan Bongino Show wherever you get your podcasts.