James Quincey Chair and CEO of Coca-Cola

2023-05-24 00:38:30

The CEO of the largest single investor in the world, Norges Bank Investment Management, interviews leaders of some of the largest companies in the world. You will get to know the leader, their strategy, leadership principles, and much more.<br /><hr><p style='color:grey; font-size:0.75em;'> Hosted on Acast. See <a style='color:grey;' target='_blank' rel='noopener noreferrer' href='https://acast.com/privacy'>acast.com/privacy</a> for more information.</p>

2Speaker 2
00:00.82 – 00:29.46

Hi everyone and welcome to our podcast In Good company. I'm Nicola Tangen, the CEO of the Norwegian Sovereign Wealth Fund, and your host today. In this podcast, I talk to the leaders of some of the largest companies we're invested in so that you can learn what we own and also meet these impressive leaders. Today, I'm speaking to James Quincy, the chair and CEO of a company that has satisfied our thirst for over a century, namely the Coca-cola company. Coca-cola was initially introduced as a medicine in the late 1800s.

00:29.84 – 00:34.74

Now, they are the world's largest beverage company, with over 200 brands serving 2.

00:34.74 – 00:51.10

2 billion people every day, we own over 1 of coke, translating into 28 billion krones, or almost 3 billion U.S. dollars. Now, how did they manage to develop such an iconic brand, and where are they keeping? The secret coca-cola recipe? Stay tuned.

01:01.08 – 01:09.40

It's funny. We had Bill Gates on the podcast quite recently, and he only had one thing he asked about what diet Coke, diet Coke.

1Speaker 1
01:10.92 – 01:12.14

He's a believer.

2Speaker 2
01:13.04 – 01:22.80

He's a believer now. We, of course, we all know about coke. If you were to distill down the secret sauce, what do you reckon has been the secret sauce to coke?

1Speaker 1
01:22.80 – 02:09.56

I think one of the pieces, one of the elements of the secret sauce, particularly a brand coca-cola, has been this. In two dimensions, one has been an enduring ability to be both a touchstone to something, you know, that has been there for a long time. I mean, the formula of the same, the Spencerian script of the font, like, there's all these touchstone elements of comfort of the past. Yet each generation of managers have made its marketing and the way it's brought to the marketplace relevant for that moment in time. So it is both representative of continuity into the path of comfort, yet also relevant and exciting about the future. Which is a very hard balancing act to do.

02:09.86 – 02:37.58

The other hard balancing act which has been achieved is to be both a global brand and local in each of the countries it's sold in. So, yes, it's a global icon, it's obviously heavily linked to being an American icon. But in many countries, most countries in the world, they see it as a profoundly local brand. So, again, generations of managers have made, not just maintained, a unique, coherent global.

02:39.10 – 02:42.96

Unity, but have also managed to make it profoundly local.

2Speaker 2
02:42.96 – 02:59.08

I believe that 94 of the people in the world actually recognize the Coke logo, which is probably one of the highest brand recognitions in the world. Right? How do you develop that type of iconic brand?

1Speaker 1
03:00.26 – 03:23.04

Firstly, a massive, massive, massive amount of consistency. We have never, ever, ever changed the logo, not that the number of design agencies haven't tried to entice us to do so. Not that it was standardized in 1886, it took us until about 1923 before we standardized the logo.

03:23.72 – 03:58.88

But once we standardized it, we never ever changed it, because people learn to recognize things, not just the words and the sounds, but the visual image. So we have protected jealously all that iconography around Coke and never ever changed the font and the fact that Coke is red all the time. And I think that, after so many years of marketing and success, is part of why it's so widely recognized.

2Speaker 2
03:58.88 – 04:18.24

One of the brands which has really done the worst on Blind Test is Red Bull. I mean, people just absolutely hated it. Yet they made the boxes smaller, they increased the price, and hey, it's selling incredibly well. So is it all about brand and association?

1Speaker 1
04:20.82 – 04:42.20

It's about everything you experience a beverage product with five senses, it's not just about the taste, the package it comes in. Will. You can get people to debate heatedly whether a beverage, a coke, is best drank from a can or a glass bottle?

04:42.90 – 05:12.18

I mean, people have strong opinions on the matter, and that's without talking about the liquid. That's just the thing they're holding in their hand. Because touch matters, smell matters, sight matters, everything matters when you drink the drink. So these tests, you can test one sense if you want. But in the end, it's the package of senses and the ideas that in people's heads that make the brand of the beverage. You cannot fully disaggregate them.

05:12.58 – 05:20.38

Generally speaking, people prefer things that taste good, but you cannot disaggregate the whole mental imagery of what goes together.

2Speaker 2
05:20.64 – 05:23.48

Now you often have athletes in your ads, why is that?

1Speaker 1
05:24.28 – 05:50.80

People want to connect with people they know sometimes. We generally spend most of our connectivity on the overall sport or music in general, rather than personalities. Personalities can come and go. But the World Cup is always the World Cup. We've been doing the Olympics for almost 100 years, very long-term sponsors of FIFA, World Cup, etc. etc.

05:50.80 – 06:00.86

And so it's much easier to build a long-term platform around the property or the event, rather than a person who's going to come and go.

2Speaker 2
06:01.10 – 06:02.86

You also use Santa Claus as a spokesperson.

1Speaker 1
06:04.22 – 06:04.60

Yes.

06:06.14 – 06:07.78

True, why?

06:09.54 – 06:59.42

When you think of coke, it's happiness, it's optimism, it's enjoyment. I mean, it's a set of things that are very true about the Christmas period. And so over the years, we have used the vehicle of Santa Claus, or the polar bears. Famously, one of the more modern characterizations of Santa Claus was actually known as the songbloom Santa, who, by the way, he was Swedish, so very near to you. And there were actually many Santa clauses in those a hundred years ago, and the Songbloom Santa was one characterization that caught on. And it just fits very naturally with the brand and the time of year and people coming together and sharing meals and occasions.

2Speaker 2
07:04.16 – 07:16.30

Changing tack a bit and talking about your distribution. You know, I've been to places where there isn't even clean water, but guess what you find in the fridge a coke. So tell us about your distribution network.

1Speaker 1
07:17.90 – 07:45.38

Absolutely, the product reaches almost every corner of the world, and I think there are two aspects which are very interesting one by chance, not necessarily by design. It is a product that survives a decent amount of time in tip-top condition. You don't get degradation of the product over time, so it stays in, you know, good drinking order for a very long time.

07:46.42 – 08:24.60

Secondly, obviously we have created demand, and because we've had the philosophy of everyone should make money along the chain. It gets to the far reaches of the world because there's an economics incentive for it to do so. Actually, there's a good podcast by Melinda Gates talking about actually how ultimately we ended up helping the Gates Foundation. Move some AIDS medicine around Africa and various very rural areas. And part of the thing that they. The reason they got to Coke was, they thought, well, if Coke can get everywhere, we can get everywhere. But then they couldn't. And they were trying to think, well, why does Coke get there and we don't get there?

08:24.80 – 08:33.60

Because it's, you know, often life-saving. And the answer is everyone along the chain wants the coke to get there because they make a bit of money. So economics matter.

2Speaker 2
08:34.38 – 08:50.92

Now you have one competitor called Pepsi, and you may have heard of them. They have a very big market share in Norway, so I think it's one of the countries where it has the biggest market share. How come Pepsi in some countries have a high share and in other countries they haven't?

1Speaker 1
08:52.84 – 09:04.98

A lot of historic reasons, is the short answer. There were some countries where they got to before us, and they have had, you know, some historic share positions.

09:06.94 – 09:30.30

There are some countries where we fell asleep at the wheel. I think the one that's big in Norway is actually the zero sugar version of it, spent too long trying to hang on to Tab in Norway. And so that is generally one of the two buckets that characterizes where we have yet to become market leader in every single market.

09:30.40 – 09:39.10

There are a few left that we are not a market leader in, but overall, our leadership position keeps extending each year.

2Speaker 2
09:39.58 – 09:43.22

Now, looking at the consumption trends, what are the trends?

1Speaker 1
09:44.40 – 10:09.84

So, two ways of looking at consumption trends, one is to say they're incredibly stable. One of the arguments I make with the investment community is to look at the beverage industry and think about, firstly, how stable it is. If you do a histogram of the growth rate of the beverage industry, the median growth rate is, let's say, four percent, maybe not in the last couple of years, but let's say historically last 30 years, 4 percent.

10:10.76 – 10:27.58

And the chance of it didn't grow 4 percent, it was three or five. I mean, this is not fluctuating in wild numbers. It's a very steady industry and that's driven by the fact it's really a small ticket item. Beverages are cents or a few dollars.

10:28.32 – 10:45.28

And it's a population driven business, and the industry is largely as yet uncreated in the developing emerging market. So there's a long way to go. So, firstly, actually, in some ways, the beverage industry is very stable, it grows at a steady rate and it got a long way ahead of it.

2Speaker 2
10:45.48 – 10:51.38

Is that why Warren Buffett, Who is your biggest shareholder? I think he said that a ham sandwich could run coca-cola.

1Speaker 1
10:52.24 – 11:00.22

I, I, I. I'm not sure I would count myself as the bread or the ham, or maybe cheese in the ham sandwich.

11:02.20 – 11:27.44

But I think Warren loves it for a whole set of very obvious reasons. Like I said, it's a stable industry, we're the market leader, we gain share steadily each year and we have a long track record of continuing to grow. We had 61 years in a row of growing our dividend, and that makes us an all weather play.

2Speaker 2
11:28.12 – 11:40.24

Moving on to AI, which is really, of course, the hot talk now, and we discussed it when we met in in America. And you mentioned yourself, it's been driving some of your advertising. now. tell us how do you use it?

1Speaker 1
11:40.24 – 12:19.02

So the first way, I mean, apart from some of the kind of already existing models, that kind of optimize for certain things within the supply chain and other ways it's used. I think this next generation of AI examples, the first thing we did, we got, we married. The text AI with the visual AI, and allow people to make essentially outdoor ads about Coca-cola through the AI machine. So they were able to go in, pick coke images and then tell through the chat AI. You know, what did you want him to do? Like? I think the winner was There's a coke with a cat in space like.

12:19.02 – 12:40.64

There's zillions of images. So it was a competition, hundreds of thousands of entries, and we put up a whole selection of the best ones. In New York Times Square and Piccadilly Circus on London. And really, it was empowering consumers to play with the assets and the AI technology, so you can clearly see how AI can revolutionize content creation.

12:40.72 – 13:07.64

The reality is, it already is in the movies we watch through the CGI, but that's kind of large set piece movies. This is coming down to a kind of a very simple terrestrial level, it can. Every image you see outside, on outdoor, and not that far in the future on. Advertising is going to be can be generated by the machine, and that's going to be profoundly change everything.

13:07.86 – 13:36.38

We're also just rolling out internally within our own kind of cloud, basically taking all our internal documents and putting them into the machine. So instead of hopelessly trying to find something in the company, which, of course, you never end up finding, you can just ask the machine. Tell me how to do X, and that X could be. How do I give money to a charity that gets matched by company funds? How do I maintain a juice line? How do I do X?

13:37.32 – 13:47.52

And all of that is going to be at people's fingertips. So it's going to make people more productive because it's going to make the knowledge more instantaneously available.

2Speaker 2
13:48.88 – 13:50.28

How much do you think you could drive productivity?

1Speaker 1
13:50.84 – 13:58.44

I don't know how high is up. What I do know, though, is I would rather be on the front end of this than on the.

2Speaker 2
13:58.44 – 13:59.76

Back end, Are you worried about it?

1Speaker 1
13:59.76 – 14:32.36

Yes, I think there are a lot of general kind of technology related potential disasters, potential problems, whether it be bad actors or, you know, more, dystopian kind of outcomes. So clearly, there are ways this can go wrong in a general sense, and there are ways it can go wrong in a specific sense related to us. You know, some of these models don't necessarily optimize for truth, they optimize for engagement, and they optimize for credibility.

14:32.88 – 15:00.12

Credibility is not the same as truth, and so I think it's very important as we go on this journey. Not, you're never going to understand the math behind it. My brain's not big enough for that, but you can understand that. It's an optimization model and therefore the questioning, what are the objectives that it is being set, what is it optimizing for? and what are the parameters around it?

15:00.18 – 15:06.80

What are the safeguard rules around it, what corridor can it operate in? I think, are critical questions that could be asked.

2Speaker 2
15:07.38 – 15:25.94

Well, we're coming out with an expectation document this summer on this, so stay tuned. Now moving on to governance. So we recently voted at your AGM and we looked at the filing that you sent us beforehand and.

15:27.10 – 15:34.74

You spent a whole 40 pages to explain the salaries and the compensation system. Does it really need to be that complicated?

1Speaker 1
15:35.12 – 15:52.86

Does it need to be that complicated? Maybe not, but there's a lot of appetite from investors to understand the compensation, and I think rightly so. To have disclosures arguably got too long for the average investor, probably.

15:53.04 – 16:27.00

But I think this idea that on the investor should understand. What are the incentive systems in place in the company, what are they driving? Because at the end of the day, you know, incentive systems do work. They're not the only factor that people pay attention to. Of course, there are other other other guardrails, other incentives, other ways that, you know, people derive success in companies, promotions or other things. But incentives, incentives are there because they work, or at least partially work.

16:27.10 – 16:56.22

And therefore, investors should understand what they are there to reinforce. It's all very well as having a clear strategy. But if we had incentives that pointed in a different direction, then, you know, investors, including myself, should be worried. And so I think it's important they understand them. This amount of disclosure is largely driven by the zeitgeist, rather than necessarily. I think 39 or 41 is the right number of pages.

2Speaker 2
16:56.68 – 17:06.08

Now, as you know, we as a shareholder advocate that the role of CEO and chair should be should be split, and you have both the roles which we vote against.

17:08.70 – 17:11.94

Who is who is controlling you, who is overseeing you?

1Speaker 1
17:12.10 – 17:48.04

I'm overseen, of course, by the board and the leading independent director and the investors. There are no shortage of investors looking over my shoulder as well. And so we feel that for the coca-cola company, combining the two roles is the right answer. Because we have a robust lead, independent director, and we have a robust board environment. In a business that is very large and very complicated, and therefore we find that this moment in time, this is what best suits the company. It is ultimately a very large enterprise.

17:48.68 – 18:11.40

There's no, there's no real. I mean, there's a tremendous amount of transparency and visibility to what's going on in Coke and a lot of observers. So it's not like there's an absence of oversight. Either by the lead independent, or the board, or the investors, or all the other people who analyze the company. So I think perhaps that provides a different environment, and certainly I would.

18:11.40 – 18:23.10

I would invite people to look at. The results are good too, so I think the governance is there as it should be, and and the performance is also there, which is good.

2Speaker 2
18:23.72 – 18:31.62

But you are, you are yourself a board member in Pfizer, correct? How much? how much influence do you feel there that you have over the CEO, and?

1Speaker 1
18:31.62 – 18:39.68

The chair. I feel that the board can absolutely execute its role if it so chose to do so.

18:41.48 – 18:57.02

You know, there are a set of critical decisions by the board capital allocation, CEO, succession. And, you know, being on both ends of the of the stick, so to speak between the two boards. I don't feel it's a problem.

2Speaker 2
18:57.38 – 19:01.00

OK, anything you learned from Pfizer that you are applying to Coke?

1Speaker 1
19:01.60 – 19:42.66

Yeah, I, obviously. I joined them at a rather interesting time at the beginning of 2020, and I had thought that we had got better at innovation. But when I saw what they were able to do to bring the vaccine to the market in less than a year. Given that it's normally many, many years before, a vaccine was truly a staggering process. The rate at which innovation can be called forth when you need to, when that, when the focus is. There was firstly, incredibly impressive in their case, and I think a source of inspiration to me as I think about our own business.

2Speaker 2
19:46.80 – 20:02.34

Now obesity has grown to pretty epidemic proportions. I think now more than a billion people worldwide are characterized as obese. Do you think we'll be able to reduce obesity rates going forward?

1Speaker 1
20:03.04 – 20:33.56

I think we can and should reduce obesity rates going forward. I mean, we certainly have probably happened a few decades ago, gone past the point where there are more calories available in the world than human consumption. Generally speaking, for most of human history, we've had a slight deficit now there's enough food generated. So it absolutely needs to be an overall, and it is an overall governmental policy, policy focus.

20:34.06 – 20:59.66

And a bit like the earlier questions like, what's our role in it? yes, we have a role. We need to make sure we're offering products that help in that sense. Whether it be smaller portions of our calorie products or zero sugar products, or as we innovate to reduce the calorie profile. So absolutely, it needs to be part of the future.

2Speaker 2
21:00.86 – 21:04.68

We are seeing many governments implementing sugar taxes. What is your view on that?

1Speaker 1
21:05.44 – 21:29.26

Yeah, I think, look, there are a couple of pieces. Taxes certainly tend to affect demand. The question, I think would be twofold from my point of view. One is, is the action likely to produce the outcome that they're looking for? If the outcome is less? Obesity, Does that very narrow tax on one product category? Is it likely to drive down obesity?

21:29.56 – 21:49.64

And you can look around the world where they have the sugar taxes on soft drinks or beverages in general, and find that. Essentially, it hasn't made a material difference. The problem needs to be addressed in a much broader perspective. That's point number one, point number two is, I think, that where the.

21:51.20 – 21:56.32

Taxes have been put in place that also provide an incentive for innovation. I.

21:56.32 – 21:56.54

E.

21:56.54 – 22:31.10

For example, they're tiered the more the sugar, the more the tax, the less the sugar, the less the tax. Then there's an incentive for companies to continue to provide great tasting beverages, but to slowly bring down the calorie profile, as indeed happened to some extent in salt in some countries. I think, you know, pressurising things with taxes, really. It's about innovation and getting people to change their diet sometimes, which is a broad topic that needs multi-pronged action. And I think that's really a matter for the policy.

2Speaker 2
22:31.40 – 22:34.48

You're also moving into alcoholic beverages. What are the plans here?

1Speaker 1
22:34.78 – 23:15.38

Yeah, we've been experimenting in the boundaries between the non-alcoholic and the alcoholic world. You know, as every industry develops, people look for the white spaces and look for the opportunities that are most adjacent. And there are a set of occasions which tend to mix alcohol and soft drinks mixes, and we see an opportunity, what is called the alcohol ready to drink category, so pre-mixed cocktails, hard seltzers. If you're in the U..S, it's a very interesting space because a lot of the drinks in that space leverage our existing brands.

23:16.60 – 23:23.96

And if they can be provided in a registry format, it's potentially very interesting. So we're currently rolling out Jack Daniels and Coca-cola pre-mixed.

23:25.48 – 23:41.96

And I think that's going to be very interesting to see how big could this segment be. We don't need more hobbies at the company, but if this could be a material segment. And I think Jack Daniels and Coke will be a leading indicator, it could be very interesting.

2Speaker 2
23:41.96 – 23:47.66

For us now, the last question in this area, you are taking action to reduce plastic wastes.

23:49.40 – 23:53.06

What are you doing here and what do you think is achievable here in the longer?

1Speaker 1
23:53.06 – 24:23.14

Term Yeah, so plastic waste, I think, has two components. And I think with all these kind of systemic issues, it's important to make sure that everyone can restate their objectives and clarify. What is the outcome in one? And I think here it's. We don't want waste in the environment, whether that be land or sea, and actually preferably with a lower carbon footprint. If we state those two objectives, what we see is that a circular economy on packaging material can achieve both those objectives.

24:23.26 – 24:46.84

So we set ourselves a goal called the world without Waste. So by 2030, all our packaging will be recyclable. We'll collect the bottle and can for every one we sell, and we'll use 50 percent of that back in our own packaging. Because it often gets downcycled into other uses of recycled pet. If we can do that, we can create a circular economy in which there is no waste in the land and the sea.

24:47.28 – 25:13.10

And the carbon footprint of recycled material is much less than original. So whether that be pet, aluminium or glass, all those three formats collected and recycled have a low carbon footprint. So it's a very attractive objective. Secondly, this is not some blue sky fantasy. There are already countries in the world which have almost 100 percent collection.

25:13.26 – 25:46.44

Actually, a number of the Scandinavian countries are already there. There are also countries in the world where over half of our pet bottles are made from recycled plastic. In fact, a number of countries in Europe, including some of the Scandinavian countries, all the pet bottles that we sell are made from 100 percent recycled pet. So you have a fully circular economy that basically drives out waste and materially lowers the carbon footprint. So this is, this is a very doable long term objective, and the technology available to make it happen exists.

25:46.86 – 25:54.66

Of course, we made better with innovation, so it's a matter of collective will, rather than something new that needs to be invented.

2Speaker 2
25:58.86 – 26:11.78

James Moving on to leadership. You talk about being an authentic leader, but how authentic can one be when one runs a big public company where you have to be so careful with how you communicate?

1Speaker 1
26:13.50 – 26:44.46

I don't think there's a difference between being authentic and, at times, being reserved or being diplomatic. I probably like that in my personal life anyway, so maybe that makes it easier, but I think, look, let me let me put it this way. It was probably possible 20, 30, 40 years ago. For you to say one thing to the employees, another thing to the customer, another thing to the investor, et cetera, another thing to the media. But this is a radically more transparent world.

26:45.32 – 27:08.26

And so the first thing, if you recognize that the message ultimately needs to be the same to everyone, otherwise it's going to go horribly wrong. You just start there and say, OK, so that's so. There's no point trying to spin everything everywhere. I just need to tell people, you know what's the what's, what is the what's the point of view? And it's basically the same message for everyone.

27:08.26 – 27:37.78

And then it needs to be grounded in what you believe, because there's no nothing more obvious. You know when someone is making it up as they go along, and so you know if you're inauthentic, people spotted immediately. And so I think it's very important to be grounded in, like what you believe in and what's what strategies, what companies, what things are you bought into? And then it's much easier to represent it. I think it'd be very hard to represent something you didn't believe in.

27:38.78 – 27:40.88

No, you're going to have to say the same thing to everyone.

2Speaker 2
27:41.44 – 27:43.52

What's the one thing you would love to say, which you're not supposed to say?

1Speaker 1
27:45.90 – 27:50.84

There's nothing, because, you know, I'm not saying no, I mean, look, I.

27:52.92 – 27:57.44

I, I put it like this to people, sometimes people find out the South is a very.

28:00.92 – 28:27.84

It is a polite part of the world. Actually, most parts of the world are quite polite and quite indirect. When you, when you ultimately stand back far off on the world, most parts of the world. You know, shouting and screaming is not a way forward, and so I say to people, look there, you need to be able to disagree without being disagreeable. So, you know, shouting and swearing. It's like, I may make you feel better, but it's not productive, and so you need to find ways.

28:27.98 – 28:43.14

Yeah, you don't have to agree with everything else, but disagree with that. So I think that is the art form here. It's not about hiding something, it's about communicating, to be, to connect, rather than just kind of venting.

2Speaker 2
28:43.98 – 28:45.10

How do you disagree in a good way?

1Speaker 1
28:45.78 – 29:07.20

Look, I don't let's. We don't need to whip out the management books. But it's the contrast, the shouting and screaming, so it's like, OK, you know, let's. It's a. It's a rational debate. It's generally speaking. The other person on the other side of people wants to feel that they were hurt, you know? Without going into mumbo jumbo, it's like, Yeah, I like, Do I understand what you're telling me? I hear what you're saying?

29:07.30 – 29:23.68

Do I understand it? Exploring why they're saying, what they're saying and why they're saying it, and then being able to connect, say, OK, I get that. Here's why I'm saying. What I'm saying doesn't mean you're going to agree. And you have to be able to cope with the stress and the tension in the situation that there's not an agreement.

29:23.98 – 29:28.86

But that doesn't mean you can't mutually understand and respect each other's.

2Speaker 2
29:28.86 – 29:31.86

Positions What's the most difficult part of being a CEO?

1Speaker 1
29:32.90 – 29:59.58

There's one part of the CEO that you never find out until you get there, and the way I describe it is. If you think about an organization, let's just use the classic idea of an organizational pyramid. It's a it's a big, it's a big pyramid, and most people think, OK. You spend your years working your way up the pyramid and eventually you'll get to the apex of the pyramid. And, you know, in a simple way, everyone in the organization will work for you.

30:00.04 – 30:18.58

And every general manager in the job, general manager, a job in the pyramid, kind of. They have people working for them. But they see their way to the apex. But then when you get to the apex, something different happens. You find out that there's another pyramid, except for it's upside down, you're at the bottom, at the apex of the upside down pyramid.

30:18.74 – 30:45.16

And above, you are zillions of people trying to give you a point of view who want your time. And that doesn't happen to any other person in the organization. And whether it's investors, media stakeholders, everyone has a point of view and directs it at the CEO. So you have, you are much more fragmented, and you're way more stakeholders than anyone else in the organization. And it's it's kind of a shock when you get there.

2Speaker 2
30:46.00 – 30:46.92

What's the trick to that?

1Speaker 1
30:47.72 – 30:48.76

Say no, politely.

2Speaker 2
30:50.94 – 30:53.36

How do you continue to learn?

1Speaker 1
30:54.80 – 31:30.64

I like learning. I am probably slowly becoming more old school in the sense that I prefer to read it than to watch a podcast or a talk. But I'm slowly moving with the times. But I do have to say I still have a yearning for the tactile nature of getting something from a book and being able to ponder it as you read it. Rather than being marched along at the pace of whoever's trying to teach you.

2Speaker 2
31:31.62 – 31:33.34

What good have you read lately?

1Speaker 1
31:36.30 – 31:54.96

I've read a few books lately on the on the fiction side. I read a book called Clara and the Sun, which is kind of an in the future novel about the relationship between robots and US. It's, it's very different. It's a Japanese, British writer.

31:54.96 – 32:36.04

On the kind of more businessy side, I tend to go for more of the history ones. In the last couple, I read, one called Money for Nothing, which was a history of the South Sea bubble crisis, which I recommend people. The other one was the Lords of Finance. Because I'm very intrigued and interested in the fact that ultimately, you know the underlying structural changes. They always win. In the end, things can go up and down, but the profound structural stuff in the end, you know, wins out. Which was ultimately the story of both these books.

2Speaker 2
32:36.92 – 32:37.80

What motivates you?

1Speaker 1
32:39.56 – 33:07.82

I'm kind of mission motivated in the sense of, you know, I really want to do the thing, I have to feel like, I really want to do the thing. Whatever that thing ends up being, whether it be, you know, I think we've we. For example, we put code back on a growth trajectory over the last number of years. Or I want to learn to be good at X. I normally start off with the perspective, how hard can it be? And then, of course, you find out that most things are much harder than you think and you're not very good at them.

33:08.02 – 33:22.32

But occasionally you find some things that you are both good at and you enjoy. They don't have to be the same. It's a Venn diagram that doesn't necessarily overlap between enjoyment and good at, but I experiment with lots of different things.

2Speaker 2
33:23.08 – 33:38.06

Jensen Huang of Navidia, who we had on recently, also talks about this. How hard can it be? But he also talks about working hard. And he says, Well, you know, you have working hard, and then you have working insanely hard. Where are you on this scale?

1Speaker 1
33:41.44 – 34:05.02

Life is a marathon, you can have periods of working insanely hard, but it's hard to live your whole life at that pace. And so, you know, I think it's the pendulum swings between working hard and working insanely hard, because you can't keep it up forever. Life is not a set of sprints, it's a marathon.

34:05.18 – 34:12.54

Now some people can run a lot faster than other people, but you've got to pace yourself, particularly when you get to be kind of CEO, I think.

2Speaker 2
34:13.10 – 34:14.20

How do you pace yourself?

1Speaker 1
34:14.68 – 34:28.64

I, you know, I'm somewhat European in that sense. It's like there needs to be some boundaries. I know it's a 24-7 job that there also needs to be some downtime. You need to be able to walk away, not always.

34:28.76 – 34:38.04

And if there's a crisis, there's, you know, sometimes you're the only person who can decide, and it's 24-7. Literally, you have to be able to walk away and do something else.

2Speaker 2
34:38.04 – 34:43.50

What's your advice to young people? We have a lot of young professionals listening to this.

1Speaker 1
34:45.16 – 35:21.80

My first piece of advice, or my main piece of advice that comes with a caveat, is find something you really love doing. Sometimes people take jobs because they think it gives them status or money. But I feel in the long run, you're likely to rise to the top or be happier. Doing the thing that gets you out of bed in the morning if you don't love what you're doing, the chances of getting out of bed early and working insanely hard just go down, in my mind. Certainly do over time.

35:22.60 – 35:42.50

Having said that, the caveat is, you need to be OK with the life, the choices that implies. Sometimes people talk about work-life balance, it's not a balance between work and life, work is part of life. Your life is composed of a whole set of things, and it's a hundred percent bar chart.

35:42.84 – 35:58.84

You can't have more life and more time available, it's a question of distribution. And if you choose a career that has more time or whatever, more money, less money, more status, less that. You have to be comfortable with that choice within your hundred percent bar chart.

2Speaker 2
35:59.52 – 36:02.10

And what's the most fun piece of your pie chart?

1Speaker 1
36:03.42 – 36:26.66

Look, everything can be fun, there can be times when you do really cool stuff. I mean, like, I got a lot out of all the AI marketing recently, but that can be cool stuff. On the family side, like, you know, spending time with family and friends, seeing them grow and achieve stuff. Or even for yourself, going off and learning something new, or trying something new, even if you're terrible at it, just trying something new and learning something new.

2Speaker 2
36:27.94 – 36:30.28

And the last thing you learned that you thought was cool?

1Speaker 1
36:30.96 – 36:49.08

I think I've become a part of the sad or not so sad trend to trying to swimming in cold water. And I'm. I found out I had to google how fast I was and see whether it was any good. And I was really slow. Unbelievably slow, like right down at novice. And I'm like, OK, but it was fun.

2Speaker 2
36:49.30 – 36:55.66

Well, I have to say, if you want to come training in cold water, you are very welcome to Oslo. We we have some really good conditions for that.

1Speaker 1
36:55.80 – 36:56.72

I might come in July.

2Speaker 2
37:00.22 – 37:05.74

Just one more thing I'd love to ask you about, so the coca-cola recipe, I think it's called the Merchandise 7X.

37:07.26 – 37:10.74

Closely guarded secret, You know what's in it?

1Speaker 1
37:12.42 – 37:31.04

If I had a better memory, I would. The formula for Coca-cola lives in a safe, which only a very few people have access. I went in there once just because I became CEO, I have to go in with someone else. Looked at the piece of paper and more or less instantly forgot everything about it when I walked out the room.

2Speaker 2
37:32.08 – 37:36.70

How many people have access to the safe? That's a secret and tell me about the safe. How did? What does it look like?

1Speaker 1
37:36.88 – 37:41.18

It's very, very big. Well, actually, most of the safe is the concrete wall.

2Speaker 2
37:41.60 – 37:43.54

And and is the recipe the only thing in the safe?

1Speaker 1
37:44.70 – 37:52.80

No, there was a filing cabinet, it's like the matrix, there's a filing cabinet with other stuff in it. I didn't look at the other stuff.

2Speaker 2
37:53.98 – 37:57.30

I don't. And if we, if I, if I came to visit, were I allowed inside?

1Speaker 1
37:57.52 – 37:57.68

No.

38:00.36 – 38:04.06

That's a simple one, you can look at the outside, but no, you can't go.

2Speaker 2
38:04.12 – 38:14.42

Sounds good, well, you, you are clearly very good at saying no in a very polite manner. So I have to give you that. James, it's been tremendous to have you on the show. absolutely love it.

38:14.72 – 38:17.54

Good luck with everything. And, you know, go get them.

1Speaker 1
38:17.78 – 38:19.54

Thank you great, nice to see you again.

2Speaker 2
38:20.10 – 38:21.96

Fantastic, thank you, bye bye.

v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os