2023-10-30 01:33:34
Pod Save America is a no-bullshit conversation about politics hosted by former Obama aides Jon Favreau, Jon Lovett, Dan Pfeiffer, and Tommy Vietor. It cuts through the noise to break down the week’s news and helps people figure out what matters and how they can help. They’re regularly joined by journalists, activists, politicians, entertainers, and world leaders. You can watch on YouTube or listen to new episodes every Tuesday, Wednesday and Friday. Ad-Free Pod Save America episodes available NOW through Friends of the Pod subscription. Head to crooked.com/friends to join today! For a transcript of an episode of Pod Save America, please email [email protected] (edited)
Welcome to pod Save America, I'm John Shapiro.
I'm perry bacon.
I'm John Lovett.
I'm Tommy Vitor.
I'm Dan Pfeiffer.
We have an outstanding show for you tonight. Your congressman, Morgan McGarvey, is here.
Your state Senator, Karen Berg, is here.
And we are so lucky to be joined by Louisville native Perry Bacon, also a columnist at The Washington Post.
All right, let's get to the news.
I believe we have breaking news here. Oh, wow, wow. Major shakeup in the Republican primary. Former vice president Mike Pence has suspended his campaign for president.
His surprise announcement came at the end of his speech to the Republican Jewish coalition. He said It's become clear to me that it's not my time. And he called on voters to give our country a Republican standard bearer. That will, as Lincoln said, appeal to the better angels of our nature. Little dig at Donald Trump, who Pence will now go from running against to testifying against in the January 6th trial.
To endorsing.
You know what the Republican Jewish coalition said to Mike Pence after he dropped out? Terrible in such small portions.
You know what I mean?
How do you guys think this bombshell will change the race?
Dan.
I don't think it'll change the race.
Okay.
Who's going to get the Pence endorsement? the vaunted Pence endorsement?
I think what will likely happen is this 0?
6 Support in the polls will be divided up evenly among Nikki Haley, Ron DeSantis and Tim Scott.
I think Doug Burgum's making a move, all right, let's talk about that's enough of Mike Pence.
That's more time than Mike Pence's campaign deserves.
Let's talk about Mike Pence's spiritual successor, Mike Johnson, the new speaker of the House.
New speaker of the House Who thinks Noah brought Dinos on the Ark?
That's not a joke.
Yeah, yeah, no. He fought for tax breaks for a park right here in Kentucky, you guys know.
Yeah, yeah. Have anyone been to the Noah's Ark?
No.
With the Dinos.
I got to say.
Yeah, you think the Dino....
No, look, we can debate whether or not the dinosaurs were on the Ark. But he was right to fight for those tax breaks, that's right.
I'm not saying the museum was accurate.
All right, so Mike Johnson, he finally sits down for a hard-hitting interview with Sean Hannity. We learned in the interview that Johnson doesn't want to keep the government open unless Republicans get some policy concessions. Though, they're still fighting with each other about what those are. On the menu are massive budget cuts, immigration restrictions, a national ban on mailing abortion pills. Johnson also admitted that he doesn't want to expel George Santos because Republicans can't afford to lose the seat.
He said he wants to change the motion to vacate, which makes him smarter than Kevin McCarthy. And he told us a little bit more about who Mike Johnson is.
Someone asked me today in the media, they said, it's curious, people are curious, what does Mike Johnson think about any issue under the Sun? I said, Well, go pick up a bible off your shelf and read it. That's my worldview.
That's what I believe. Comments you had made both in writing and advocacy for this group about homosexuality, calling it sinful, destructive.
And not supporting gay marriage quote No clear right to sodomy in the Constitution. You have been getting hammered on this and I want to ask you about it. I want to know exactly where you stand. Some of these comments were 15 years ago.
I don't even remember some of them. Do you see in Joe Biden a cognitive decline? And if so, is that a danger to the country? I do, I think most of us do.
That's reality. This is not a personal slight to him. If, in fact, all the evidence leads to where we believe it will, that's very likely. Impeachable offenses, you know, that's listed as a cause for impeachment in the Constitution, you know? bribery and other high crimes and misdemeanors. Bribery is listed there.
And it looks and smells a lot like that. And I think the evidence. We're going to follow the truth where it leads, we're going to engage in due process because again, we're the rule of law party. I want to thank my dedicated wife of almost 25 years, Kelly. She spent the last couple of weeks on her knees in prayer to the Lord.
And she's a little worn out.
That's Mike Johnson Perry. What's your early take on the Mike Johnson era?
I mean, just, I know we're trying to keep it light, but when I just. We lost McCarthy and we have a less experienced, dumber, way more radical speaker. In all honesty. I mean, this is a sign of how bad things are this guy. I'll be honest with you, I had not heard much about Mike Johnson two weeks ago and I don't really know. And all I've learned about him is that he is significantly more conservative than McCarthy, who was no moderate. And terrible at the job in a lot of ways.
So things are bad. And also he's doubled down on impeachment, particularly, which it seems like I McCarthy did not seem that invested in. And maybe, I mean, if you're doing an interview with Sean Hannity, you probably can't downplay impeachment, but that's it.
It's a lot of chaos, but ultimately, we end up with a speaker who's going to try to do the exact same things that McCarthy. Was that Matt Gaetz wants a speaker who's even more in Trump's pocket.
Also, and yeah, and James Comer just said the other day, too, that he doesn't know if he wants to have another impeachment hearing. And he's the guy that was leading the impeachment charge and Mike Johnson's talking about doing impeachment now.
Because the first one went so well.
Yeah, so he wants a better impeachment trial. Tommy Johnson also said in that Hannity interview that he respects the Supreme Court's decision that legalized same-sex marriage and that he thinks abortion should be left to the states. Even though, of course, he has long supported national bans on both abortion and same-sex marriage, what do you make of his comments to Hannity?
So look, I think he presents well, right? He looks like Harry Potter's older brother, a friendly English teacher who doesn't teach evolution or believe in it. But he seems like kind of a nice guy. But, to Perry's point, he's a super, super conservative lawmaker, he's a white Christian nationalist.
He believes there is no separation between church and state, as he said, there, the Bible is his worldview. So when he says that there shouldn't be a national abortion ban, it should be left to the states. I don't think we should believe that at all. I think we should treat that as a comment made with political expediency in mind. The same way all of Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominees said they respected precedent, right that Roe v. Wade was settled law.
Now, I mean, he's a smart guy and maybe he will not try to advance wildly unpopular things like overturning gay marriage or a 15-week abortion ban. While he's the speaker of the House, and Democrats control the Senate, and Joe Biden is in the White House. Because he knows it'll go nowhere, but it will make his moderate members take really bad votes. But, you know, like, a friendly-looking ideologue is still an ideologue, and I think he's someone we really should worry about.
Yeah, well, it's very recently that he sponsored bills on national abortion bans. He refused to vote for codifying gay marriage as legal. He introduced the legislation to make Ron DeSantis Don't-say-Gay law a national law and expand it from schools to public libraries, hospitals, military, anywhere that gets federal funding from the government.
So he's pretty extreme and if he had a majority, he'd probably do that stuff.
Yeah, I think there are Republicans who got into politics for a bunch of different reasons, a messy coalition. There are Republicans that do the evangelical shtick, the anti-gay shtick. But their mission in life is deregulation and lowering taxes for corporations and rich friends. This person has a genuine motivation based around Christian nationalism. If you go back and look at the speeches he was given when he was running for Congress. If you look at his work as a lawyer before he was a public official, it is all around advocating for these hard-right, socially conservative views.
He advocated not just against gay marriage, but against legalizing gay relationships. After the Supreme Court ruled in Lawrence v. Texas that the sodomy laws in Texas were unconstitutional, he wrote several pieces where he excoriated. The Supreme Court said that there was no right basically against a right to privacy. And explicitly saying that states should have the right to discriminate against same-sex relationships versus heterosexual relationships. That he explicitly believes that a state can outlaw gay relationships because there is an inherent good in heterosexual relationships that doesn't exist for gay people. That was his view for many, many years.
He can play games here and say, I don't even remember half of the things I've advocated for, but I don't really take him at his word.
I do think this brings into sharp relief what a Republican trifecta in 2025 would look like. You have Mike Johnson with these incredibly retrograde views on reproductive freedom, sexual relationships, same-sex marriage, you have Mitch McConnell, who has advocated for a federal abortion ban. WHO, in the early part of the century was one of the leaders in demonizing gay people in order to win the 2004 election. With a bunch of trumped-up bullshit about same-sex marriage. And then you have Donald Trump, possibly in the White House, who we know will go along with all of these things. Because that's what he did the last time he was in office. You can pretend like, Oh, he's this guy from Manhattan. But he immediately did. The ban on trans people serving in the military.
He used the—or at least allowed his staff to use the administrative state to make access to abortion that much more difficult. And he appointed three Supreme Court justices who overturned Roe v. Wade. And so for all,—this is, I think, something we are going to have to make a huge issue in 2024. Because it is what is on the ballot now because of Mike Johnson.
So, Lovett Johnson's first order of business this coming week is dealing with some House Republicans from New York who will force a vote to expel George Santos. He's still in Congress.
Yeah, all right. Marjorie Taylor Greene will force a vote to censure Rashida Tlaib for speaking outside the Capitol at a rally of activists calling for a ceasefire in Gaza. And congresswoman Becca Bailent will try to force a vote censuring Marjorie Taylor Greene for about 40 different actions and statements, including public appearances with white nationalists and comparing vaccine requirements to nazism. How big of a deal are all these votes and do you think they go anywhere?
I don't think they're a particularly big deal. Mike Johnson has already poured cold water on the Santos one, which is hard for him to do because he barely can get above the table. It's the era of the short King, and I'm loving it.
I was going to say, it's interesting your attack on Mike Johnson is height, that's where you're going. How tall is he?
Actually, I could not find anywhere because he's so unknown. We don't yet have publicly available height information.
But he has short king energy.
Like McHenry.
And as does McHenry, so that's exciting.
There's a Napoleon movie coming out, being short is happening, it's very right now.
So I don't think the Santos thing is going anywhere, especially because you need two-thirds of the house to expel, so I don't see that happening.
Stranger things have happened. These other resolutions Marjorie Taylor Greene's resolution, I think, goes after Tlaib for things that actually there would be a majority in the House to vote against. But then goes way too far and calls her an insurrectionist for participating in this peaceful event.
Tlaib has received a lot of criticism from Democrats and Republicans for some of her statements around what is happening in Israel and Gaza. But this goes well beyond anything related to that. And then this tit-for-tat thing with the Marjorie Taylor Greene resolution.
I can't imagine Republicans going along with that, but pass, don't pass, it doesn't matter really. This is a sideshow to what is ultimately facing Mike Johnson as speaker, which is the same dynamic that felled Kevin McCarthy. Which is, if a bill to keep the government open is going to pass, it's going to have to be bipartisan by definition. And these people find that anathema to their whole vibe.
I sort of feel like the whole censure thing has gotten a little cheapened. Once they did it to Adam Schiff for basically no reason, now it's like, you're censured. No, you're censured.
Well, the other thing, too, is the tit-for-tat censure thing. I think that there are people. There are even Republicans that don't particularly like Marjorie Taylor Greene, but they're not going to vote to censure Marjorie Taylor Greene. To get back at the Republicans for the Tlaib thing, it's like, Hey, can we all just chill the fuck out? Can you just keep the government open? Once you've kept the government open? You can have a fun day where you just fucking go ham on each other.
It'll be interesting to see how many Republicans vote to expel Santos. I think the swing district Republicans don't want to defend Santos, because who does? He seems like he's validated 97 laws. I think there will be 10, some number of Republicans will vote for that. There is a divide on the Democratic side about what's happening in Gaza.
I wonder if the number is higher than zero of people who will be. There's a congressman in New Jersey, for example, who I think might be open to censuring Tlaib. I think the number's probably low, but I think it'll be interesting to watch in terms of the divides in these two parties.
I do think, though, for both of these, Johnson gives Republicans the talking point, which is we should just let the due process play out and people can hide behind that. Then, on the Marjorie Taylor Greene point, you can just say something along the lines of, Look, I have strong disagreements. But the idea of calling this anything like the insurrection on January 6th. Both sides have given the other side just an easy out to get away from this thing.
If you're a Democrat, you can criticize Rashida Tlaib and not vote for censure. Voting for censure is such a fucking, that's a move. Santos is interesting, because I think Santos. I don't think he'll get two-thirds, but I think he'll get a majority. Because he'll get all the Democrats and, like you said, he'll get a lot of them.
He'll get every Republican in New York, all the New York Republicans, I mean, it was three New York Republicans who introduced it.
They're leading it, yeah.
Yeah, which is interesting.
Dan More importantly, government runs out of money in a few weeks. We've now heard from Mike Johnson and some House Republicans on the issue. How likely do you think it is? We're headed for a shutdown, if not November 17th. I think that's when the government runs out of money, like in another month or so.
I think it's a question of when, not if. I think there is a chance that –.
No one likes a shutdown.
You want me to just come over here and say, Mike Johnson's going to solve the problem.
Well, once you get him a phone book to sit on.
I'm five foot, six and a half.
I think there is a chance that Mike Johnson could delay this into next year. Republicans are tired, everyone's exhausted. He did propose in his nomination speech before he became the speaker nominee that he was advocating for a short-term extension. So the Republicans could pass appropriations bills so that they theoretically have some negotiating position in a negotiation with the White House and the Senate. They actually passed a couple of those bills in the immediate aftermath of Johnson winning.
So I think there's a chance that maybe we get through the holidays and then we have this confrontation next year. But at some point, it's going to come to a head. Because Mike Johnson cannot stay speaker and extend, keep the government open at current levels or at the levels the Senate Democrats and Republicans want, and keep staying in his job.
Yeah, and all these Republicans, some of the ones that ousted McCarthy in the first place, and some other freedom caucus types. They want these massive cuts, they don't like the bipartisan budget deal that McCarthy struck with Biden.
Which already offered some cuts, so they're already annoyed about that, so they're going to ask for more. And I don't know how Johnson gets a bill through the House, even if he wanted to that doesn't have a bunch of cuts. That then the Senate and the White House immediately reject.
I guess the question is whether there's any appetite, even among someone like Matt Gaetz, to go through the whole motion to vacate process again.
Yeah.
They might change the threshold, too, to make it harder.
And then also they can kick this can down the road. Because one thing Mike Johnson is promising is that they'll go to rather than these omnibus bills, but they'll go to whatever department-by-department budgeting. The thing that the Republicans in the House claim they want that, actually, Republicans and Democrats have been doing together in the Senate, despite what's been happening in the House. But even then, even if that were to take place, it's sort of the promise of mini-shutdowns, or sort of smaller versions of this fight over and over again.
Another thing you're going to have to contend with, Tommy. The president wants the speaker to pass a $100 billion aid package, most of it for Ukraine, but also for Taiwan, Israel, and some humanitarian aid for the Palestinians. What have you taken from Johnson's comments on those issues?
So the Hannity interview was interesting and sort of a departure from where he's been before. He told Hannity that he basically has written a $14.5 billion bill that would be basically military aid for Israel. And it sounds like that's ready to go, they'll pass that.
They'll send it over to the Senate side, I don't know what the Senate folks will do about it. I don't know if they're not going to want to divide the Ukraine support and the Israel support, necessarily yet, but that'll get passed and that'll happen. The Biden request for aid for the Palestinians is much, much, much less money, it's $100 million as opposed to tens of billions of dollars.
Unfortunately, he and Hannity, in that conversation, immediately started demagoguing that money, suggesting that it would go to terrorists and not to people. Who are in week three of getting shelled relentlessly and sort of living in a nightmare scenario. So I have less hope there. On the Ukraine funding in the past, Johnson has voted against support for Ukraine. In this interview, he said, We're not going to leave the Ukrainians hanging, we can't let Putin prevail.
So it sounds like he's willing to allow a vote on a stand-alone Ukraine bill. Will it be the amount that Biden wants? We don't know. Could his caucus sort of upend it somehow? I guess, probably.
But the things he was saying were better than where he's been in the past. And then, in terms of Taiwan, that's a little harder to divine. I mean, I think the one thing that unites Democrats and Republicans in Washington right now is fear-mongering about China. And especially for the sort of, like far-right evangelical Christians, they're particularly worried about the godless communists taking over the world. So I suspect that he will be in favor.
Those are their words, not mine. But I suspect he'll be in favor of support for Taiwan to help them. Kind of harden, it's this like Porcupine strategy thing, sort of get all the weapons and things they need into Taiwan before. A Chinese invasion that everyone thinks is going to happen at some point, so I bet he will get there on the China support. But, you know, it all sort of remains to be seen.
Trump gave a speech today where he said that across our southern border with Mexico, there are young, strong Chinese men coming over the border. Buff, buff.
Shredded Chinese men.
Very strong, very young, very buff, very virulent. Coming over the border and I'm like, What?
Love it, can you confirm?
What is it? Every once in a while, a Republican will just kind of look, remember when, what that guy Steve King, was like. They're coming across the border with calves the size of cantaloupes. It's like they can't help but paint a vivid picture of these just sort of rippling muscles.
Swimming over the Rio Grande to get into the country. And Trump did produce Broadway musicals, or at least he wanted to, so something to think about.
Last question on Mike Johnson For everyone Perry, Do you think Democrats should make Mike Johnson famous? like should he be a central figure in the 2024 campaign?
You know, I was thinking about this this morning because you all asked me about this. And it's hard to raise the profile of the speaker on some level. Like Pelosi was famous, in part because she was a woman from San Francisco. I don't think that John Boehner was well-known by the average voter. But I think I'm more convinced by what Dan said, which is like, you now have. Johnson does fit the kind of MAGa, ultra-maga, ultra-ultra-maga thing in a way that McCarthy really did. McCarthy at least seemed moderate in his persona on some level, versus Johnson has said every conservative thing possible on every issue, including on the sort of cultural anti-gay.
So I think in that way, it would make sense to sort of not, maybe not necessarily talk about Mike Johnson. But talk about the idea that the Republican Party is going to be very radical. If it wins the House, wins the presidency. And it sort of makes it easier to trumpify and to describe the Republican Party in sort of a universal way.
Just think about this as the most powerful elected Republican in the country wants to ban abortion, ban gay marriage, ban gay sex, does not believe in evolution. All across the board, that is a very people won't fully get that.
He believes in evolution, he just thinks it happened in six days.
Again, Dinos on the Ark.
Plus all the food they'd have to eat.
And where do they poop?
Well, here's something I've never quite understood.
What kind of dinosaurs were they?
What?
Were they the little ones, the compies?
So, having looked at the actual exhibit?
Were there raptors on the Ark?
They have a whole, there's a whole listen, there's a whole like, you know, what was it called? When they wanted the Earth to be the center of the universe? They had the kind of. They had the different circles to keep complicated circles, to explain the more complicated circles. Because it didn't work. And so they have, like, a complicated philosophy around, not different. Like tyrannosaur nids, like there were dinosaur families that were on the Ark as represented by certain kinds of dinosaurs. Here's what I've never understood.
I don't care what's on that ark when they get off the ark. Did a tiger not want to eat one chicken? because if that tiger ate one chicken, no chicken?
Dunzo.
You know what I'm saying, like, what did they eat for the first couple weeks? what did the predators eat when they got off the ark for the first couple weeks?
Or years?
It takes years to make new prey.
Also, what happened, what ultimately happened to the dinosaurs in this scenario?
Was it a double-decker ark?
I would just say there's the Lido Deck, the Fiesta deck.
Anyway, I would just run the Mike Johnson, Noah's Ark stuff, that would be my thing.
I like it.
Bring people in with that, then talk about all those positions. All right, when we come back, I'll talk to Kentucky State Senator Karen Burtt.
Please welcome the Democrat who represents the 26th district here in Louisville, State Senator Karen Burtt.
Hi there, hello, hello.
Thank you for being with us tonight. we are honored to have you on the show.
Well, thank you very much for inviting me, I really appreciate it.
So you first won this seat back in 2020, when the district at the time was much more conservative. You are now just one of seven Democrats in the state Senate.
I think we're down to six.
Are you down to six? okay, six? Do you have any advice for people who are in the red States who are always asking us how they can elect Democrats like you and turn their states a little bluer?
Okay, yeah, I have a lot of advice in that regard. First of all, vote.
Vote like it freaking matters, because guys, it actually does. it actually matters whether or not you vote. And here in the state of Kentucky, we have a real serious problem with turnout.
If we get 32 of the electorate to get out and vote, we think we have done a good job with turnout. And that is really the problem. Because people on the right, I promise you guys, they are voting, they are voting like their life depends on it because they think it does. And then the rest of us who, like, would prefer to go around and not have to deal with this stuff. You know, just go through your day-to-day life and let's be normal people and let's not have to worry about politics. And then they don't vote.
And then all of a sudden you look up and we have really bad people elected in this country.
Vote, vote and the other thing I can tell you, guys run for office. I know that sounds like such pie in the sky, but it actually isn't. What John Yarmuth told me years ago is, first of all, the closer to home your seat is, the more impact you will have on the people around you. Which means running for school board, running for metro government, running for your local mayor, running for elections close to home, and then running. Like, I did just put your name on the ballot, guys.
Get out there, shake hands, tell people that you care, ask them to vote for you, and they will, and that is the truth.
So vote and run, those are the things that I have to say.
Good advice.
You have been outspoken about losing your son, Henry. He was a transgender rights advocate who tragically passed away by suicide last December at the age of 24. I read that he was the person who inspired you to run. What was he like?
Oh, wow, what was Henry like? Henry was a handful.
Henry had a heart, he had too much of a heart, he was one of these people. That if he saw somebody in a room who looked like they didn't feel comfortable, he would immediately go up. And he would immediately introduce them to people and sit with them, and, you know, ask them who you are, what do you care about? Because he could tell so intuitively when somebody didn't feel like they fit into the space they were in. And that's because for so long in his life, he had felt that way and he didn't want other people to go through that.
My son was big-hearted, big-hearted, soft-hearted, he cared about this world and he cared about making this a better place.
So Henry came out in 2012, at the age of 14.
Yes, how did the other kids and teachers react, and how did you and Henry handle that experience?
Guys, this is a long, long, long story and it depends on the day, it depends on the person, it depends on the situation for the most part. When my child came out at the age of 14, he was the first kid in his school who had ever come out as transgender. The school had never had a child in that position before. And honestly, we had at the time very few, if any, children in his class who were willing to be openly gay either. So he came out to his classmates, to his teachers, a couple weeks later, to me and my husband.
Henry honestly thought that.
He had gone to the same school from kindergarten through 12th grade, and this was the beginning of 9th grade. And he honestly thought that once he told his classmates and his teachers who he really was. That things would sort of just magically fit into place and people would understand sort of why. It was that he had never really fit in in the first place, and that's not what happened.
Unfortunately, Henry's first suicide attempt was December of that year. He came out in September, December of that year. And what he told my husband and I at the time is that he thought when he came out that things would fit into place. And instead, it just made it that much worse. That he could no longer hang with the girls, that the boys wouldn't have anything to do with him, he had nobody to sit with, nobody to talk to.
And he was very, very lonely.
Some of your Republican colleagues have said kind words about Henry, have said they've learned from you. But they keep voting for these anti-trans bills and it seems like their minds aren't changing. But I imagine that there are parents out there who maybe don't know any trans people. And they hear these Republicans saying that all they're doing is trying to protect kids and maybe they aren't sure what to believe. What would you say to those parents?
It's a long story, and it's not actually a very pretty story, It's a story about politics. And I may be a politician at this point, but I never considered myself a politician. I'm a doctor by training and a mother, and that's how I identify.
Really, what happened with this trans youth movement was that the right and certain organizations on the right? Like groups like the Alliance Defending Freedom, which if you all don't know about the Alliance Defending Freedom. I think the New Yorker just did an article on him last week.
Mike Johnson worked for them.
Yeah, Mike Johnson is them. That is who we have now elected as speaker of the House. He comes from a right Christian, nationalist ideology that really believes, believes that homosexuality is ungodly and is a sin. But since they were losing politically on gay marriage and homosexuality, and they were losing politically on abortion and a woman's right to choose. But what they found out about five, six years ago was that this issue about trans athletes polled well, it was polling at 70. And so they went with it because they thought this was their winning political issue.
Never mind that they were attacking children, never mind that they were taking rights away from parents to decide their own child's health care. Never mind that they are literally invading the most personal of spaces that belong between a patient and their family and their physicians. They didn't care what they were doing because if this polled, well, this was going to be their message. Literally, they hooked up with physicians who left standardized medicine back in 2002..
2002 When the American Academy of Pediatrics decided that it was okay for a gay couple to raise a child. These physicians broke off because they felt that the homosexual lifestyle was a moral basis that they could not, under any circumstances, accept it's a basic ethical morality, so they broke off. There's about 400 or 500 of them. They have gone around, funded by the Alliance Defending Freedom, literally to now, like 30 state houses in this country. It is quack medicine.
It is being supported by Christian nationalists who do not, guys, believe in democracy the way we know it. I mean, I point blank? asked a House representative who sponsored House Bill 470 this last session. House Bill 470, in its face, would have. Any health care provider who offered any sort of affirmation to a trans child mental health, physical health, any health care provider whatsoever. Automatic revocature of your license Automatic and permanent revocature of your license for just being reported that you acknowledged a trans child existed, existed. I went to her and I said.
Do you believe? Do you believe this? Do you actually believe in separation of church and state?
Her answer to me was under the appropriate circumstances.
Under the appropriate circumstances. And then she tells me that we don't like these people that testified because they're Christian, and I'm like, honey, 97 of the people in this country are Christian. Being Christian is not an ideology. That says that you have the right to pass laws to make normal health care delivery illegal. Because you're the base that you're playing to likes this.
I mean.
And you hear them say that it's about parents rights. But I know that you introduced an amendment to a bill that was in the legislature where they, you know. If a child wanted to be called by certain pronouns, they said the teacher, the bill would say the teacher doesn't have to call them by those pronouns. And you added an amendment, I believe that said. Well, they do, if the parents say that they agree.
With a note from a healthcare provider that this was important to the child.
And they wouldn't vote.
They wouldn't do that. No, actually, guys. There are good studies, good data that shows if a trans child is affirmed in one setting, either at home, at school, at church, one setting. It can actually decrease their lifetime risk of suicide by up to 70. And what's interesting, what's interesting about this data is that it has to be authority, it has to be school, it has to be work.
It has to be church. Having your friends affirm you doesn't offer the same immunity from suicidality as having somebody. These children want to belong, these children want to fit in. So S.B. 150, which was this bill that Max Wise brought forward, that basically said teachers don't have to use a child's preferred pronouns. What that does is go to the absolute heart.
Of that child's identity, and that child's struggle to belong and to fit in. It is, in my opinion, simply the cruelest, cruelest thing that you could do, much less make it legal to do.
Yeah, and your point that Henry and transgender kids everywhere just want to belong, I think is so powerful. Because the right is trying to let people think that if there is this culture that allows kids to identify as transgender and be protected and stuff like that, then kids are just going to choose this.
Henry Craft went on our airways and said twice, I will eliminate transgender from the classroom, like, what does she mean? you're going to take these children? First of all, being transgender guys is not contagious, I promise you, it is not contagious. Nor for the most part, is it something that's a phase?
Yes, there are tomboys, yes, there are girly boys. Sometimes you grow out of it, sometimes you don't. But these are not the children that are coming to their parents and saying, I feel inside like my gender is this?
It's a whole different world, it's a very, very small percentage of the population, it is not growing. People think that because we're allowing these children to express themselves, that somehow we're promoting this, we are not promoting this.
The reason that you see and you hear more now about transgender children than you did 10 years ago, 15 years ago. The best analogy I can give you is the same thing that happened in the early 50s. When we quit requiring children to use their right hands, the number of left-handed students increased exponentially and then leveled out. And it's not that we were promoting them, not that we were, it's that they were already there, they already existed, guys.
And we were letting them exist.
My last question, Senator Byrd, you've had an unimaginably hard year. You serve in an extremely right-wing legislature, but you are still here and fighting as hard as you can every single day. What keeps you going?
Honestly, what keeps me going, and this is the truth, I believe in the goodness of people I do.
Well, I'm very glad that you're here and still fighting, so thank you and thank you for joining us.
Thank you, Sir State Senator Karen Byrd.
I still think the left hand is the devil's hand.
Lefty, yeah.
And it should have been trained, and, by the way, you should have been forced to use your right hand.
Outrageous, all right back to the news. So before we get to the 2020 election, you guys have a big election here in Kentucky on November 7th, just one week from Tuesday. Your governor, Democrat Andy Beshear, is at least in the polls we've seen, polling ahead of his Republican challenger, Attorney General David Cameron. Oh, yeah.
It's a race where a lot of the ads and a lot of the debates have focused on the issue of abortion. Cameron has long supported the state's current ban, which makes no exceptions for rape or incest. Though he now says if the Republican legislature sent him a bill adding those exceptions, he'd sign it. Beshear has vetoed abortion bans as governor.
Harry, There aren't too many Democratic governors left in solidly red states like Kentucky. What is Andy Beshear's secret and why do you think Cameron has been trailing him in the polls?
So I'll start because I used to work at 538, the data website, with a very sort of structural analysis. Which is that. The last four presidents have mostly been unpopular, like Bush is very unpopular. Most of the time. Obama had some moments of popularity, but up and down, Trump very unpopular, Biden pretty unpopular, unfortunately.
But governors, for whatever reason, people like their governor. The average governor's approval rating is 57, so Andy Beshear is at 62 or 63, so he's doing better than average.
And that's good for him. But I think people like their governor and I've been trying to sort of figure out exactly why, because some of the governors suck, to be totally honest. And the second point is like, Beshear is a great last name to have here in Kentucky. His father was a two-term governor, a very effective two-term governor, you know, famously sort of expanded Medicaid and was invited to the State of the Union address when Obama was president.
So those are the two factors that have nothing to do with kind of Andy Beshear, who his dad was, and kind of that. He's an incumbent governor, but there are two things he's doing right, and the first is he's good at the kind of I-feel-your-pain kind of dynamic. He's very empathetic.
Like, if you watched his press conferences during the pandemic, and I know people here probably did. He was just great at seeming genuine, like he cared, like he wasn't like every other politician. When there's been flooding or tornadoes or other things that have happened, a mass shooting here, he's always there, he connects. If you talk to him, he's, you know, either he's very good at faking sincerity or he's very sincere. I hope the second, but he comes off well.
He just and Daniel Cameron does not come off that way. I don't think so. There's a sincerity factor that matters. And the other thing I would say about Beshear is, as somebody who's pretty progressive, I'll vote for Joe Biden. There's been some great days with Joe Biden as president.
There are some days that I've not been as thrilled, let's put it politely. But with Andy Beshear, he rarely does things that I disagree with. I'm guessing it's probably not going to help his campaign that I'm saying it that way.
We'll keep it quiet.
But that said, he's, you know, Kentucky's a conservative state, but he vetoes abortion laws, he vetoes terrible anti-trans laws. He doesn't do a lot of like punching the left to show how moderate he, he's. Not a Joe people call me about Andy Beshear. I have to tell them this is not a Joe Manchin type. This is a person who believes in the right values and does the right things and has been a governor.
I'll be very excited to vote for.
That's great, that's good to know.
So, Dan, abortion has been central to this race. We'll be in Ohio tomorrow, where abortion rights will literally be on the ballot. Do you think the results from these 2023 elections can tell us anything about how big of an issue abortion will be in 2024? Or is it just? Is it hard to draw conclusions from non-presidential elections?
I think it's hard to draw conclusions from not-presidential elections, like, for example, we're talking about Ohio. In 2022. The turnout in Ohio was 4.2 million. In 2020 it was almost 6 million. So, like, there's a huge gap.
There's a huge difference between midterm elections and general elections. Here in Kentucky. Turnout was about 20 higher in 2020 than it was in 2019 when Beshear won. But I think that there it tells us a couple things that are informative, if not instructive. The first is how salient abortion remains. More than a year after Roe, like, it makes sense that abortion was top of mind in November of 2022, only five months after the Supreme Court overturned Roe.
It was interesting that it did so well, that abortion was so powerful in the first Ohio special election a few months ago. Will it remain that way? Really interesting, but I do think there is a powerful, powerful symbolism if Andy Beshear wins. Because here you have the governor of Kentucky, one of the most Republican states by presidential choice in the country, the states that Donald Trump wins by more than anywhere else. Running on abortion, his first ad about abortion, vetoing anti-abortion bills in debates fighting aggressively against abortion bans.
I think that should send a powerful symbol to every Democrat all across the country that abortion is not a blue state issue. It's not a purple state issue. It's an issue that Democrats can run on everywhere in the country.
We just to underscore in Kentucky, I'll be honest with you. When Beshear's staff came out with their abortion ads, I called one of his aides and was like, You realize this is Kentucky, right? What are you thinking? And they said, Basically, the dog has caught the car, so to speak. The Republicans tried to ban every abortion of all time. They've done this for a long time now. They have an abortion ban, and even in Kentucky, the average person does not want no abortion ban in all circumstances. It's been striking to see here how much Beshear has talked about abortion in this campaign and how Cameron is nervous about this issue. He's sort of backtracked into this whole.
I'll support some exceptions. That was not his view. His staff seems very nervous about it. But I think, again, this issue has changed American politics fundamentally.
We were canvassing today with planned parenthood, and we were shout out them, not us. And we were at doors and we were talking to folks who looked, you know, like, let's be old, older white people who were saying, I've never. Because the folks we were canvassing with from planned parenthood were great. They were going all the way down the ticket and there were two different people said. You know, I've never pulled like straight ticket Democrat before, but this year I have to. And it was clearly because of abortion.
Yeah, and a couple people we talked to, like, knew that Cameron is pretty extreme about abortion. Like that was something that had already registered with them.
And I want to ask, this just came to me. So no bad ideas to brainstorm. But Dan Perry Louisville played Duke today. Okay, they won. The Duke. Fans are known as Cameron Crazies, Cameron Crazy. Is there a thing? There is that something?
Could be people don't like Duke here? Yes, that is, you know, so can we tie him to Duke?
Lovett your thoughts.
I don't know what the fuck you're talking about.
This is working.
I just want you guys to know that. So I went canvassing with Lovett, Tommy and Dan were together and we went up to a house. There was someone watching TV. They didn't want to come to the door, Lovett kept knocking. This guy came to the door. He seemed pretty Republican, yeah, and he told us he's like, I know who I'm voting for, but that's all I'm going to say. And then Lovett did the whole spiel about Cameron and abortion rights, and he said, and he goes, Okay, I'll think about it. And then Lovett's like, I feel like this interaction's not going well. What do you think?
And he's like, I'll think about it.
Here's the thing.
It was impressive.
I don't. Well, it's going to happen. You got the lady with the labradoodle, we got a lady with a labradoodle.
Whenever the conversation went a little awkward, I just asked about a hot brown.
Yeah, he did, he did, and that really helped. The Hot Brown conversation helped, all right. Speaking of elections, with just over two months to go until the Iowa caucuses, Joe Biden just got a last-minute primary challenger. Dean Phillips, a 54-year-old Minnesota congressman with a moderate voting record who's worth about $50 million?
Phillips says he mostly agrees with Biden, but that he's running because of polls showing that most voters think the president is too old to run again. He launched with a short speech in New Hampshire, where he's now running this ad.
I'm Dean Phillips and I'm running for president of the United States of America, and I'm coming to New Hampshire to answer your questions. I love New Hampshire. I spent my summers as a kid in the White Mountains, going to camp, got to canoe the Saco River, learn how to fish, learn how to shoot a gun.
And it's also where I learned to love my country, and that's why I'm back. As a candidate for president, we've got some challenges, that's for sure. We're going to repair this economy, and we are going to repair America as long as we do it together. I'm Dean Phillips and I approve this message.
You know?
I'm from Massachusetts, but New Hampshire is where I learned to love my country, too.
Same, yeah.
I couldn't learn to love it in Massachusetts, I had to go north.
Who among us didn't learn to love our country at summer camp?
Summer camp.
Like, I just, first of all, if you close your mind and picture gelato Nepo baby, isn't that what you picture?
You summered here, come on.
It's just not a strong.
It's not a strong message.
Well, I just think.
Look, there are polls that show that Democrats are interested in some sort of generic alternative, and he's like, Well, I'm some sort of generic alternative.
Yeah, that's what it is. Tommy, what did you think of Dean Phillips campaign? Launch, the speech, the ad, the overall message.
The whole vibe? So he did a long interview with the Atlantic where he kind of laid out his theory of the case and why he decided to get in. And there were some things he said in that interview that resonated with me. He's anxiety about Joe Biden's poll numbers, he has concerns about Joe Biden's age. I feel the same way.
I'm concerned, too, and I think that, like, we shouldn't criticize anyone for talking out loud about their concerns about the need to win this next election. Because it is enormously important. But what I think is frustrating for me is just the execution has been terrible because, first of all.
He just waited way too long.
You know, if you wanted to run and try to primary the president, you can't do it three months out.
It's very, very hard.
To primary a sitting president in any scenario. But when you give yourself only three months to build a campaign, raise money, get your name ID. From negative. That vest to where he needs to be. It's going to be really hard. Which makes me wonder, like, what is your goal here, sir? Because, again, in this Atlantic article,....
Very respectful of you, Tom.
Sir, I mean, listen, he seems like a nice guy.
In this article.
His campaign manager is apparently a guy named Steve Schmidt. Steve Schmidt worked for George Bush. John McCain joined the Lincoln Project, left the Lincoln Project, quit politics, got back into politics. Now he's doing the Dean Phillips thing. And he said one of his strategic imperatives, or whatever, is to hire content creators in six different time zones. So they can have the Biden campaign reacting at all times and on edge, and it's like, Okay, so you've set up a campaign infrastructure where you got in too late to get on the ballot in Nevada. But your plan is to fuck with Joe Biden's news cycle every single day for the next three months or so?
That seems like a setup where there's no chance you're going to win, but there is a great chance that you could make it harder for Biden to tell a story about himself and what he's done. And for the Democratic Party, to, you know, hit back on Donald Trump when it's very clear he's about to be the nominee. And so, like, Listen, maybe Dean Phillips will catch fire. What do I know?
Maybe.
I don't think that, like the progressive, primary electorate, is hungering for an extremely rich Nepo baby, as Lovett said, who's extremely moderate. But maybe they are, but, you know, I think more likely than anything. It's just sort of. He's kind of like a milquetoast guy who's going to maybe cause some problems in New Hampshire, and that's about it.
I think it's important to dig into the origin story of the Dean Phillips for President campaign, which is laid out in this very extensive article. In The Atlantic, a populist website available all throughout New Hampshire for free.
So.
That's where you go.
To find Democratic primary voters.
You go to the Atlantic.
You talk to Tim Alberta?
So Dean Phillips has been very public about his concerns about Joe Biden and his electability. And not that Joe Biden is too old to do the job, but that Joe Biden is too old to win re-election. It's been his point to date, and at some point in mid-September. Steve Schmidt, current podcast host, DM'd Dean Phillips.
Hey careful.
Don't trust the podcast host, yes.
DM'd Dean Phillips and said, Will you come on my podcast? Dean Phillips did? Afterwards, Steve Schmidt sent him an email that said, All my friends who listen to the podcast said. Something to the effect of this guy has to be president, which definitely happened. And before that conversation was over, Steve Schmidt had a job running Dean Phillips presidential campaign. So I'm suggesting that perhaps not a lot of thought was put into this plan. And we know this because he is on the ballot in New Hampshire, a state that has exactly zero delegates.
Yeah, that's a problem, too, because New Hampshire is still going to go first, even though the DNC decided that South Carolina is going to go first. So they're going to strip New Hampshire of their delegates if they go forward with the primary, which they are. And Dean Phillips is trying to take advantage of that. Because Biden's not going to be on the ballot in New Hampshire, so he's going to try to win New Hampshire. Even though he doesn't get any delegates, and of course, he's not going to get any delegates out of Nevada because he missed the filing deadline for Nevada.
Yeah.
First of all, just a reminder that every member of Congress is just waiting for someone to say it's your turn.
To DM them, yeah.
We have one coming out next.
Yeah, yeah, yeah, no present company accepted, maybe, but also....
Do you know how tall Dean Phillips is?
Honestly, I just think he seems like a generic 5'10".
I like that.
He gives off 5'10 energy.
You know, look, I read his campaign announcement speech with great interest. I read it because the full video is not available on the internet, right? I looked for it for like, hours. The full video of his campaign announcement. Speaking to Dan's point that this thing was cooked up in a DM three weeks ago, no website.
No website, there's no SEO going on, it's not on YouTube, you Google, Dean Phillips. you gotta scroll down, make sure you're on the right, Dean Phillips.
But you can read the full speech if you're a Playbook subscriber.
You can read the full speech.
And the full speech they released was in.
This actually gave me like a pang of anxiety. Because they didn't release a transcript the way a normal campaign would, which is like a press release. They just put out the copy that was clearly for him to read, it was in the big font.
In the phonetic, yeah.
With the kind of spacing of a speech, first of all, extremely generic, it's an insulting document, it's a cursed text.
Did you love it? I had this urge when I was reading the document.
To like, start editing, Oh my god, to edit, yes.
I was like, Where's track changes? I need to get in here?
This is so fucking bland, you can't. Just what are you doing here? We need to be fed and we need to be free. And it's like, it's a lot of that, it's like the 90's shit.
It's a lot of like sentences that loop back on each other. But the thing that's so insulting about it is that there's no real argument in it. It's basically you're meant to read between the lines that Joe Biden is too old. We need an alternative, I am that alternative. The problem with that is he then goes and does these interviews.
He did an interview on Meet the Press.
And Kristen Walker's first question is, What are some places where you disagree with Joe Biden? And he's like, I'm not running against Joe Biden, I'm running for the future, and it's like, Okay, that's a sentence a person can think.
But then when you put it on its feet, it falls the fuck over because the follow up is. But that's exactly what you're doing, Sir, you're running against Joe Biden. So where are there some differences? Then? He kind of fumpers around to kind of find some, and the other problem with this is like, look, he says in that interview. He said In other interviews, he said it publicly that he's wanted there to be an alternative to Joe Biden. This is not the popular governor of a midwest state who's shown the ability to build a coalition. This is a no-name congressman who's making references to his subcommittee work as part of his qualifications.
What subcommittees matter?
I'm just saying, it's not going to move the needle.
Which subcommittee?
Who can remember? But it's just like he then redounds to this electability argument, but it's like, Who are you to make that argument? Why do I have any reason to believe you? Dean Phillips? A person who I googled right after I googled Mike Johnson. And I'm like, Why are you more electable than Joe Biden? He doesn't really have, he doesn't have anything to say. That's actually a cogent, specific argument.
Yeah, Perry, what did you think of the speech? He did? Like, I mean, and Playbook picked this up, and clearly Steve Schmidt told Playbook this. But like he, if you read between the lines, he sort of. He dinged President Biden on inflation, border security, crime, he says. He had a line about We're funding wars, we're, you know, we're funding fighting and more than we are feeding. And he said, We, the new generation will rise not through war, but through peace. Do you think he's leaning into policy contrast?
What is he trying to do there?
I don't. I think it's a great example of polls are useful, but it's clear if you look at crime, borders. If you look at what issues is Biden weakest on, it's clear that he looked at those issues. And I'm going to talk about these issues. Dean Phillips is not known as a leading immigration expert on Capitol Hill. It's more than, and his whole campaign is Biden is unelectable.
Or, like, Biden is too old, people don't like that, and Biden might lose. And therefore I'm running. But great candidacies are actually not made purely or usually by polls at all. Like, I didn't support a Muslim ban or whatever, Trump said. But his candidacy did sort of emerge, sort of organically. Obama's candidacy, one I thought was great, you know, emerged from different things.
He had something to say, he was running for a reason. Just basing and grounding your candidacy on polls just usually doesn't work. I guess. The other thing I would say is polls are not as important as sometimes they are argued, and I think that parties, I think, are actually more important.
What's happened, and I think it's really important, is there are plenty of Democrats who, if they started running tomorrow. If Gretchen Whitmer or Raphael Warnock said I'm running president, I would probably consider I would probably vote for them myself in the primary. But that said, they're not doing that. And I think it's worth considering whether, whatever the polls say, the people who are actually Democratic candidates, actually in charge of the Democratic Party, have decided our candidate is Joe Biden. And that's like, no matter what, that's why the media is sort of struggling with this. We're all sort of struggling with this is, parties have power.
One party has decided, well, one party, you know, we've heard of, Mitch McConnell, is trying to stop Donald Trump, but the voters would prefer Donald Trump. But in this party, like, the voters are actually like Joe Biden. But even more, the viable candidates for president people might actually consider are not running. And I think Dean Phillips should have assessed that, too. He's not, you know, there's no demand for Dean Phillips, and I think that's pretty well, you know. Tommy said he might not win.
I'm going to go further and say, Dean Phillips will not be president.
Yeah.
Well, so.
And I don't think Gretchen Whitmer and Gavin Newsom and all the other governors. Popular governors are not running. Josh Shapiro, of course, are not running. Because someone in the Democratic right, yeah. They have assessed that they either cannot beat Joe Biden, or that they would damage Joe Biden. Or that maybe they'll run down the road and that's going to be better. So, like, they have made that decision.
And look, I'll take Dean Phillips at his word that he is just someone who is freaked out by the polls. Tried to get other people to run against Joe Biden, couldn't do that and decided, Well, I'm so freaked out about the polls that I'll do it myself. But that doesn't seem like a great reason to run for president, but that seems like what he's doing.
And what is gelato, other than just like ice cream? With a master's degree, you know that it's always telling you about.
I think it's important to recognize that the Democratic Party does not lack people who want to be president. Who think that they would be better presidents than Joe Biden. Probably. But the reason that Gretchen Whitmer and Josh Shapiro and Gavin Newsom are not running is that Joe Biden is incredibly popular with Democrats. This gets lost. Donald Trump's up by 60 points in the Republican polls.
His approval rating is 77 among Republicans, Joe Biden's is 80 among Democrats. It's just it would be incredibly hard to beat him. And even in these polls that show that two-thirds of Democrats want someone else, 80 of those of all those Democrats say they approve of Joe. They have a favorable opinion of Joe Biden or approve of Joe Biden, and that's a big deal in a primary.
And Dean Phillips voted with Joe Biden 100 of the time, literally, according to FiveThirtyEight, Perry's former workplace. So it's like, Sir, you know, again?
Sir, I don't know why I'm so respectful of this guy. His vest is like, half zipped up, drives me crazy, I mean.
Look.
I have a vest that zips from the top down and the bottom up.
That's pretty cool.
Like, what we need to do for the middle class.
There we go.
Oh, no.
We need to stop these zippers from the bottom up and the top down, we need a zipper from the middle. The fuck out.
If I were a Democrat getting into the presidential primary right now, I would run hard to the left of Joe Biden. On Gaza or anti-war? I would like pick an issue that I think that could get the progressive left excited and motivated. And giving me money and endorsing me. And Dean Phillips is just pointedly not doing that, so it makes you wonder, what are we doing here? That would definitely.
Tear the party apart.
But, you know? But look, and again, I don't want to suggest here that, like Dean Phillips's anxieties about Joe Biden are unwarranted. Right? Like, he's like, who knows, we don't know if the polls are right or wrong. Like, Yeah, there's a clearly reason to worry.
But like looking at the polls, worrying and then deciding, like, going from that point to be like, Oh, I should just run for president. It's just it's a little bit of a leap.
We have talked a lot about how you manage your polar coaster anxiety in this podcast over the years.
This is extreme.
I'm going to do it, I'm going to do it.
DEan Phillips Knock some doors, buddy, you'll feel better.
Anyway, well, that's Dean Phillips. We'll see if we talk about him again. Who knows, maybe we will, maybe we won't.
He could be a guest on the pod.
He could be a guest on the pod, you know what?
If he is, he's going to like me, not you guys.
Well, yeah, Tommy will be calling him sir the whole time.
Yeah, I guess Tommy's the one that's going to get some of that faggy ice cream.
Okay.
We'll be right back with Congressman Morgan McGarvey, who I'm sure is going to be thrilled to join us.
I denounce that joke.
Please welcome to the stage. A member of the Bourbon Caucus, which is what Jon Favreau calls himself. After he's had a few at the babysitter's stand all the way till 10.
It's Kentucky's own Louisville-born and brood and perfectly aged congressman Morgan McGarvey.
Good to see you, thanks for being here.
Congressman, thank you for being here.
I didn't know my parents were here tonight, yeah.
There was no reason to take your shirts off.
Now we would be remiss, Congressman, not to capitalize on your love of bourbon. And frankly, it's just been that kind of a week. So we're going to play something we're calling Drink the Fifth. All right. Here's how it works. It's a casual conversation, but if we ask you or you ask us a question we don't want to answer. We just take a drink. And as we do, we have a couple of bourbons up here that you're going to tell us about because you are the congressman from Bourbon town.
We have a couple of different ones, so I'll kick it off. I just wanted to kick it off with just sort of. Before we get to the nonsense, the House has a speaker. They ultimately had Chad G.b.t create someone with the prompt. What if Paul Ryan truly believed there were dinosaurs on the Ark?
Mike Johnson popped out.
First of all, what of any relationship have you had with him and do you have any observations? As this chapter of Republican chaos draws to a close?
So, I'll be honest, I didn't know who Mike Johnson was.
And he's a colleague, you work with him.
Hey, it's okay. He doesn't know who I am either.
But there's a great thing in law school when you're studying. They call it the reasonably prudent person, It's a made-up character to decide if someone owes somebody a duty, if they've been hurt, that sort of thing. I view my wife as the reasonably prudent person. And hearing you guys talk about Dean Phillips now, we're talking about Mike Johnson. When the Mike Johnson thing hit, and then Dean Phillips announced for president. She actually looked at me and she goes, Okay, are you guys just making up members of Congress now?
I felt that, too.
So no, I'm not on any committees with him. I didn't know him at all, I mean. But look, he represents a very extreme part of their party. I think it's an extreme part of their party. I think it's a dangerous part of their party.
When you talk about national abortion bans, when you talk about targeting LGBTQ youth, when you talk about bringing that type of extremism. Whether it's on foreign policy or domestic policy, it hurts people in their daily lives. And so my hope is that he can rise above some of the things he has said and done and lead the institution as a speaker. But if not, then certainly the Democrats are going to be unified. We're going to continue to fight what we fought for. And Perry, you said this earlier. I think, too, it is going to be something with which now we can run against.
It is a Donald Trump Mike Johnson speakership right now, with that sort of MAGA element. And so I think we're in a really interesting time with the budget coming up. That's the first big test of his speakership. Let's see what happens.
Point of order.
Are these Kentucky socks?
They are Kentucky socks.
Nice, nice.
Those are cool.
They are Kentucky socks and, appropriately for this room, they're blue, which I thought was a good thing to have.
Now we have three kinds of bourbon up here. This is old Forrester 86 proof.
This one is old Forrester, 100 proof.
This one is old Forrester 1920, prohibition style, so I think you drink this one while being very quiet.
Which one should we try first?
So yeah, definitely try the old Forrester 86 first, and there's a reason for this. First of all, when you're trying bourbon, you want to start with the lower proof and work your way up. If you start with the higher proof, work your way down. Then by the time you get to the last drink, you're like, What is this? is this water?
So old Forrester 86, it is 86 proof, the 100 obviously 100 proof. The prohibition is 115 proof, which is fairly hot for a bourbon, so start with the 86, all right.
Glad we did this segment towards the end, this is good.
Now, when you taste bourbon, there's a right way to smell it. Don't dip your nose in it like a wine glass. If you dip your nose in it like a wine glass and take a big whiff of it. You're just going to get a whole bunch of alcohol and burn those nose hairs. You hold it right below, you actually breathe in with your mouth.
So kind of hold it up to your mouth.
Not at your chin, Lovett, not at your chin, you hold it up to your nose.
You know, you're trying here, you're trying.
Good.
That's good stuff, I like the 86..
It's a great bourbon, you can find it for about 23 bucks. I think Old Forrester 86 is just one of those bourbons that punches above its weight. You can put it on the bar shelf, it can taste at a mid-shelf level at sort of that lower price.
So I'm a fan.
How many members of Congress are in the Bourbon Caucus?
Not enough.
After this week, I'll have more.
I hope it's more. And look, you know, obviously it's a bipartisan group. Andy Barr, the congressman from Lexington, is the co-chair of it with me.
Hey, not for this segment.
Shut the fuck up, you show some respect.
Is it the Senate? Included, too? Is Mitch McConnell in it?
The Senate is allowed to be there. They don't come over to our side as much.
They're uppity.
But we've done two bipartisan bourbon tastings since I've been there, now, the last one. We had about 40 members of Congress there from both parties, which is a good number. And I mean, look, there's a lot of dysfunction up there. Henry Clay, I think, is the one who said that bourbon can lubricate the wheels of democracy.
Solid.
We're doing our best.
You have a joke about it, you can question about that later. That's all fucked up now.
Oh.
I was going to say, Was he talking?
No, it's a content issue.
You know what else? I have something else for you? What? Dean Phillips is 5'8"?
Oh.
Honestly, honestly, thank you for telling us.
I'm so confident because I have 5'10 energy.
You know what, I gotta say, it's classic 5'10 guy to be like that guy's 5'8".
That's it.
That's the reason.
All right, you know? They told me I'd have your chair and I was excited because I thought it would be higher. But no, it's the same as everyone else's.
Wow, unbelievable.
It's the same as everybody else's.
All right.
He's flustered people.
The 100 proof is also good, it's also good.
Next question?
Lube us up, Lovett, come on.
Well, now I'm going to skip to a dumb question.
Nothing on the cards for this, huh?
What is happening there?
How many cards do you have?
Got a lot to get through, all right. But as someone who's been vocal about gun violence, what are your thoughts about Speaker Johnson saying that the problem isn't guns, but the human heart? Are you aware of any proposals for human heart reform, and what do you think is so bad about American hearts compared to hearts in other democracies?
Good question.
All of them, no matter what, can buy a gun anytime, anywhere they want to. And you know, the reality is, we've got to have common sense gun reform in this country.
You know, look, I mean, right here in Kentucky, we had a mass shooting in April that rocked our community. You know, Louisville, I tell people, Louisville is, it's the smallest big city in America. Perry knows this. Everybody's one or two degrees of separation away from everybody else. If you didn't know somebody directly impacted that shooting, you knew someone who did.
Truly, I lost two friends in that shooting. I knew several others who were shot. It happened the Monday morning after Easter. And what happened?
You had a young man who had a long history of trouble. Who went in six days before and bought an AR-15 and walked out in 40 minutes with an Ar-15 and rounds of ammunition. Six days later, Goes, kills five of his co-workers, injures eight others, shoots a police officer in the head with an AR-15 round.
It's unconscionable that we don't have common sense, red flag or extreme risk protection laws that keep people safe from themselves as well as others. It's amazing that we can just buy these weapons of war. That right now in Kentucky, you don't even have to have a license to have a concealed carry permit. That in our hospital right here Norton Children's Hospital. In 2021, there were 80 kids who came in, who were shot, and 85 of those kids shot were accidental. That we're not talking about safe storage laws.
I think if you have an American heart, you should be talking about common sense, gun reform so that we can keep our community safe.
Let's go back to Bourbon.
Now this is a hundred proof bourbon. We're going up the....
Kicking it up a notch.
Kicking it up a notch, where's the best place to smell this across the room?
You've already had a glass, just drink it.
But a hundred proof, obviously, is 50 alcohol alcohol. the most it could be is 200 proof, so a hundred proof is 50 alcohol. It's important to know what has to be in a bourbon when we talk about bourbon, what has to be.
Is this part? Was this one of your questions? Am I messing this up? No, no.
This is good stuff, this is good stuff.
To be a bourbon, you actually don't have to be made in Kentucky now all of the good stuff is made here.
And truly, 95 of the world's bourbon is made in Kentucky, but it has to be made in America, it has to be in. A new charred white oak barrel, has to be aged for at least two years, has to come off the still at no more than 160 proof.
Into the barrel, no more than 125 proof, and the lowest it can be bottled at is 80 proof, so a basil Hayden is like an 80 proof bourbon. Whereas we've got the 86 now, we're at the 100, it has to be at least 50 corn.
And that's basically, I think those are our requirements there to be a bourbon. And so when you're looking at an old Forrester 100 proof, it's 72 corn 18 rye, so it's got a little bit higher proof right there at that sort of 100 proof level. But the corn gives it more of a sweetness, and so the rye is what gives it more of a kick.
If you see more of a high rye bourbon, which I think makes this 100 proof old forrester really, really approachable for what the proof level is.
Yeah, I was gonna say it doesn't taste like 100 proof.
It's approachable.
It is approachable.
It's like a teacher that turns the chair around and raps at you.
It's 100 proof, but it's actually 5.
8.
And yeah, that's good.
That's good.
Have you always known all this shit or do you learn this? For Congress? No, I mean, this is like some deep knowledge of the bourbon.
You know, look, I mean a lot. I think a lot of Kentuckians do know a lot about bourbon.
A lot of people in the crowd, I'm sure I don't, but a lot of people do.
Well, and I was in the state Senate for 10 years before this. And we really do a lot of bourbon bills in the state legislature in Kentucky, as you can imagine. So you learn a fair amount about it there.
Tommy, I can't believe you didn't understand that being co-chair of the Bourbon Caucus comes with real responsibilities.
I apologize.
If I run for president, I'll campaign on that.
That's pretty good, that's pretty good. Now. You've been fighting to the white oak that makes the barrels. Yes, it's what's happening with it.
Because it's not the tree is in trouble.
Yeah, I mean, this is one where you actually see Congress having a little bit of foresight right now, which is good. There's a white oak regeneration Bill, bipartisan bill up right now, and it's a good thing, you know, when you look at white oak again, bourbon has to be made in a white oak barrel.
And there's about an 80-year lifespan to get that tree from plant to where you're going to harvest it for a bourbon barrel. And so we're looking down the road and going, okay. We've got to have enough white oak trees to make sure not only can we have bourbon barrels. All the furniture, all the other things that you use for oak. And so it's one of those things that you see, a Democrat-Republican kind of coming together. Because it can also be really good for the planet as well as being good for business, and I think that's kind of a cool thing.
Now, let's find out about this last one before we get into the.
This is the hottest of the three. Old Forrester is....it was started in 1870. One of the cool things about it is it was put in a glass bottle by George Garvin Brown and then sealed. And so this is at a time when it was before the Bottled and Bond Act.
Tommy didn't wait for the explanation.
That's good stuff.
The 120 was not very approachable. I'm sorry.
And so in 1920, when prohibition started. Old Forrester is actually the longest continually sold bourbon under the same name in the same company in the country, and in 1920. They're one of the few companies that got a medicinal license, had a long history of having a good product, got a medicinal license, were able to keep going. This was released as part of one of their series to honor that legacy. And it comes in at 115 proof because during that prohibition era, as medicine, a lot of the bourbon was a higher proof.
You get like a doctor's prescription, they're like framed doctor's prescriptions for like bourbon.
Oh, wow.
Yeah, you could get prescriptions for bourbon.
And you could also take the grease off a carburetor.
Now, when Old Forrester did this, they were.
It's still pretty smooth, it is pretty smooth.
Old forrester, so good.
Now we tried it last, by the way, now go back and try the 86 and see what you think about it. But you know, they released in 1870, which is when it started 1897, 1910 and 1920. And I will tell you, for anybody trying this at home, if you ever had the 1920 and the 1910, just mix half and half. We call it the 1915, and it's a really good bourbon.
There's your inside tip.
Are you allowed to say if you have a favorite bourbon? I want to ask and you can decline to comment. It might be useful for your future.
I drink the fifth, No. I truly don't have a favorite bourbon, and what I tell people all the time is, look at your price points. And so, you know, if you're looking at a little bit more of an inexpensive bourbon, right? I think that that old Forrester 86 is great.
I think the Elijah Craig small batch, it's a 94-proof bourbon, is a really good bourbon that's out there, you know? Obviously you've got some of your maker's Mark and Woodford reserve, and those sorts of things. Move a little bit high up, like right now, high up for me is $37.99 at Costco.
You can get a bottle of four Roses single barrel.
I like that in Louisville, you don't have to know what a gallon of milk costs.
I think that that's cool.
Now, before we let you go, you have cards in front of you. I have some hard questions for you. Now we're getting into drinking the fifth here. Throw a question out at us. If we want to answer, we'll answer it.
If not, we'll have to drink.
Sure, all right. What's the one thing that really annoyed you about Hillary Clinton?
I'm going to drink on that one, all right. How about this? Who is the last congressperson you'd like to see in the Capitol gym?
Marjorie Taylor Greene.
Next question Who's the first congressperson you'd like to see in the Capitol gym?
First of all, she's really strong, and second of all, I drink.
Boebert.
Boebert.
Because you know what's going on out there with the beetlejuicing.
Better not be any boeberting out there.
Show some respect.
Obviously we mean vaping you sickos.
My turn, my turn, all right. Who was your least favorite person in the Obama administration?
Just drink, just drink. They're written to be drunk during.
Yikes, yikes.
Let's see, let's see what we got for you, all right. Who would win in a fight? Marjorie Taylor Greene or Lauren Boebert? And the fighting style is capoeira.
Marjorie Taylor Greene Look, I mean, she's very strong, as you all know, she would win that fight as long as there's no guns allowed.
That's a good caveat.
Was there any part of you that wanted to nominate George Santos as speaker?
Since he's already been speaker, I knew he didn't want the job again.
That's good, that's true, that's true, I like that. You want to hit one of these guys.
It's fine, Tommy.
Oh God, hi.
If Commander Biden bit you in the White House, would you report it or just suffer in silence? Maybe sneaking him a few treats from time to time to earn his affection.
Oh, this is easy, I'd suck it up.
No, I was going to say.
Patch it up and suck it up, all right.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os