2023-07-14 00:28:30
Every Friday, Guardian columnist and former Washington correspondent, Jonathan Freedland, invites experts to help analyse the latest in American politics. From politicians to journalists covering the White House and beyond, Jonathan and his guests give listeners behind the scenes access to how the American political machine works.
This is The Guardian.
2023 has been the year of indictments.
I did everything right and they indicted me.
But Donald Trump is not the only high profile figure
connected to the American presidency
who faces federal charges.
Joe Biden's son has reached a plea deal now
investigation.
Hunter Biden has reached a tentative deal
on two tax offenses and one firearm charge.
As you'd imagine, Republicans at the right wing press
were quick to react and cry foul.
This deal stinks and it embodies three things.
It embodies cronyism, camouflage, and corruption.
When it comes to commentary on the left,
the lack of discussion of the Hunter Biden case
has been noticeable.
So are America's liberals usually so quick
to pour over the legal woes of the former president
wrong to pay so much less attention
to the current president's son?
And how could Hunter Biden affect
the re-election prospects of his father?
I'm Jonathan Friedland, columnist for The Guardian,
and this is Politics Weekly America.
Hunter Biden is a son of Joe Biden.
He survived a tragic accident
in which his mother and his sister
were killed when he was a small child.
He and his brother, Beau, survived,
and now Beau has passed away.
Margaret Sullivan is a columnist for The Guardian US
and the host of the podcast, American Crisis.
And before all that was the public editor
of The New York Times,
writing and observing on the media.
He is also someone who has suffered
from drug addiction with financial problems
and has been the focus of a great deal
of political commentary on the right for many reasons.
Which we will discuss.
I mean, we should remind ourselves
there is a very sort of human drama
at the center of this.
This is a president who's been multiply bereaved,
who has this son who I think,
you know, for the reasons you've said,
has obviously brought much pain
and his pain has brought pain to the family.
There was this moment, we should hear it,
this voice message that emerged of Joe Biden
leaving a message for his son, Hunter.
I mean, listening to that, Margaret, it is,
well, tell us what you think.
Well, it's, you know, Joe Biden is,
certainly has his flaws as a person
and as a public official,
but we do know that he loves his son
and that he seems to love him unconditionally.
President Biden has expressed many times
that he knows that his son has had troubles
and has struggled,
but that he loves him deeply and stands by him.
I have great confidence in my son.
I love him and he's on a straight and narrow
and he has been for a couple of years now.
And I'm just so proud of him.
The first time some people encountered this name
was during the impeachment,
of Donald Trump,
which was about Donald Trump putting pressure on Ukraine.
And Republicans tried to divert attention away from Trump
and say, hold on a minute,
there's something fishy here,
which is when Joe Biden was vice president
under Barack Obama,
his son Hunter got a job with Burisma,
a Ukrainian energy company
for which he was paid $83,000 a month.
What possible skill set was Hunter Biden
offering Burisma that he would be paid that money?
Surely he was only there
because his last name was Biden
and perhaps he promised even implicitly access
to a man close to the center of power.
That's right.
And I think that it is correct
that Hunter Biden has used the family name.
I mean, I don't think it's right.
I think it's correct to say
that he used the family name
to get on a board like that and make money.
And so the idea of his being something
of an influence peddler,
I think is a justifiable claim.
And then I suppose perhaps the second time
people heard the name Hunter Biden
was in the lead up to the 2020 election.
And the phrase was part of,
his name was part of a three word phrase
you heard all the time,
which was...
Hunter Biden's laptop.
Hunter Biden's laptop.
Well, just before the 2020 election,
a very important election
in which Joe Biden was running against Donald Trump,
the New York Post,
which is owned by Rupert Murdoch,
published a story about a laptop,
which had purportedly been dropped off
at a Wilmington, Delaware computer repairs shop.
And through many twists and turns,
it was revealed,
if I guess it was said at least,
that this laptop had belonged to Hunter Biden,
that he had dropped it off for repair
and never picked it up.
And now we see that there's a lot of emails on it,
many, many emails that seem to suggest
some dastardly deeds.
In the emails,
they're discussing a meeting
with the then vice president, Joe Biden,
who could, quote,
use his influence in those business dealings.
It was well-timed just before the election,
and it did create something of a stir,
and it's a stir that has never really gone away
because that, as you say,
Hunter Biden's name pretty much now
is Hunter Biden's laptop.
Biden is his middle name.
I mean, we'll get into some of the specifics later,
but just in terms of how
the press covered that at the time,
would it be fair to say
that the media was aware of it
because it landed in the middle of that 2020 campaign,
and there was some nervousness in some newsrooms
that this looked so convenient
that maybe this was another,
you know, disinformation operation
by the Russians who,
you know, one way or another,
we knew they wanted to play a role
in the 2016 campaign,
and that therefore, in some ways,
the media undercovered this discovery,
insufficiently covered this discovery
of the Hunter Biden laptop
because they feared it was a kind of ploy,
an operation by Moscow.
I think that's a pretty fair characterization.
I was working at that time
at the Washington Post.
The Washington Post's top editor
at that time was Marty Barron,
someone who goes after things hard
but is also cautious and rigorous
in the way reporting,
in urging reporting to get done
in that particular way,
and I think it was appropriate.
Did it result in not paying enough attention
to this thing?
Perhaps, because there is a story there,
but it, I think,
would have been much worse
to jump on something
without being able to verify it
and really do the deep reporting
that it deserved.
Yeah.
So the Hunter Biden investigation,
it's not quite a name
in the way Hunter Biden's laptop is now,
as you say,
his actual name,
but what was the Hunter Biden
investigation?
And just explain to us
how it's played out
when it started
and who's been doing it.
Well, this is a federal investigation
within the U.S. Justice Department,
which has actually resulted,
quite recently,
in Hunter Biden's agreement
to plead guilty
to some charges having to do
with his not filing taxes on time,
and they are misdemeanors.
According to court documents filed today,
Hunter Biden will acknowledge his failure
to pay taxes on income
he received in 2017 and 2018
as part of the plea agreement.
There's also a gun charge,
which has to do with his purchasing a gun
without disclosing
that he had had a drug problem,
but that is not apparently going to result
in any kind of direct punishment.
This deal would likely end
the federal investigation into Hunter Biden
and spare him any possible prison time,
they believe this is only the beginning.
It's far, far less than what figures
on the Republican side
of the right wing people
thought would be valid.
And do any of these things,
and we'll go through them in a second,
but do any of them relate
to what was on the laptop
or is that a separate thing?
You know, I'm not absolutely sure.
It's a confusing,
it's a confusing question.
I think that there are emails
on the laptop,
which are said to be,
you know, make him look
as if he was trading
on his father's certainly image,
if not direct help.
But I would say,
just as Hunter Biden benefited
from his father being prominent
vice president,
he has also, I think,
suffered from that
because the way he's being persecuted
if he weren't the son
of a very prominent person.
So it has cut both ways.
We should just say something
about the investigator,
because if you listen,
as I actually did this week,
to conservative talk shows
and podcasts about this subject,
they are not placated by the fact
that the prosecutor
or the investigator
who looked at this
for the Department of Justice
in Delaware
was actually appointed
they even say this man,
David Weiss,
they still somehow cast doubt
on his fairness in this case.
Yes, and I think that's unwarranted.
He was appointed by Trump.
He was very well regarded
on both sides of the aisle
as being impartial
and non-political.
There is a complication,
which is that there's
a whistleblower involved,
a former IRS official.
The whistleblower is accusing
of providing preferential treatment,
which the department denies.
Who has said that he thinks Weiss
didn't have the power
that he should have had.
And Shapley told lawmakers
that U.S. Attorney Weiss
was blocked from bringing
stronger charges.
But U.S. Attorney General
Merrick Garland said last week
that Weiss was not.
I would say he was given
complete authority
to make all decisions on his own.
IRS being the Internal Revenue Service,
the tax collecting authority,
of course.
And then in this odd twist this week,
Gal Luft, the co-director
of a Maryland-based research group
who had claimed to have
damaging information on Hunter Biden,
has now himself been charged
with arms trafficking,
sanctions violations,
and acting as an unregistered agent for China.
We should say that Mr. Luft
has denied any wrongdoing,
claims he's being targeted
because of what he told prosecutors
about Hunter Biden.
I mean, I'm just thinking,
having listened, as I said,
to some of the sort of chatter
in the right-wing infosphere,
this is absolutely going to lead
to just feed the conspiracy theories,
won't it?
Right.
Look, they're going after this guy.
They're removing him
because he actually would be
such a great witness for our side.
But I don't think that is the case.
And more generally,
what are you hearing?
What are the sort of Fox News,
as it were, talking points
about Hunter Biden
and about this investigation?
I mean, you might have thought that,
you know, the combination
of him being charged,
entering a plea,
not going to jail,
that might wrap it up.
But in Fox News world,
what are they saying about Hunter Biden
and on this whole business?
You know, I think the right-wing
politicians and media
don't really have a lot
to talk about with Biden,
with President Biden,
other than the fact that he's old
and that he has a son
who's been something of a ne'er-do-well.
So they will never let this go.
Every Democrat,
every corporate media outlet
is saying it's all wrapped up,
it's Hunter's fault,
he's the little scapegoat,
now be done with it.
This is disgraceful
and it is not the rule of law
in our country.
There's always a lot of chatter on Fox.
The latest wrinkle in this case,
even if there isn't much of one,
it's in the conversation all the time,
as is the idea that Joe Biden
is senile and is, you know,
barely functional.
And that is not the case either.
And they've got this line,
Biden crime family.
You know, what are they basing,
what's the sort of material
they use to make that claim?
I think that's a bunch of nonsense.
I really do.
I don't think there's anything there,
but it, you know,
it makes a good hashtag.
Yeah, I think they go on this idea
that somehow the job
for the Ukrainian natural gas company,
that must have been something corrupt.
Hunter Biden made a living
selling access to daddy,
access to really shady foreign characters,
or corrupt Ukrainian oligarchs.
He made millions.
The struggle is,
but they've never been able to find
any exchange or any decision
by Joe Biden that seems
to have been influenced
by the fact that his son
was receiving money
from this big company.
If anything, as I understand it,
as vice president,
he was actually quite tough
and gave a few decisions
that would have hurt those,
his son's employers.
So I think it doesn't work.
But I think that's where
the case seems to go.
There is a house
of representatives committee
or subcommittee on oversight,
which has been looking
into president Biden's
supposed financial corruption
for several months.
We're not trying to prove
Hunter Biden is a bad actor.
He is.
If anybody wants to disagree with that,
then there's nothing
we have to talk about.
Our investigation is about Joe Biden.
And it has not turned up anything.
So that is also an out,
of all of this, that, you know,
there's been an effort
at different levels
to try to find something
that maybe Biden
could be impeached for,
whether it's his policies
about immigration
at the southern border
near Mexico or something else.
But they don't seem
to get much of a purchase.
And we should take a step back here and say,
is this all about Republicans
seeing that there's multiple
criminal investigations
into Donald Trump
a kind of symmetry
and that Hunter Biden
is their sort of tool for that?
Merrick Garland, I believe,
is the most political
attorney general
our country's ever seen.
He entered DOJ
wanting to and intending
to indict Donald Trump.
He needed to indict
Hunter Biden as camouflage
to say, look how fair and even I am.
Just to be clear,
the indictments
that have been lodged
against Hunter Biden,
do they compare
with the charge sheet
against Donald Trump?
Well, first of all,
Hunter Biden is not
president of the United States
and never has been
and never has had a job
in the White House.
So let's let's set that straight.
But even if you compared them
in some sort of equal way,
they are they don't compare.
President Trump was impeached twice
and you can say
that that was political.
But there was there was meat there.
These different indictments,
these different charges
that are that are happening,
whether in whether in Washington,
D.C. or in Georgia,
where he insisted
that the secretary of state
find some votes
because he needed them
to take Georgia
in the 2020 election.
There are very serious
kinds of investigations,
indictments and criminal prosecutions
that involve Donald Trump.
And I don't think
that there is any symmetry
between him and Hunter Biden,
who, again, is not
and never has been the president.
I do wonder, though,
because we know that Donald Trump
doesn't scruple to go hard
in on even people's vulnerabilities.
I'm just imagining
if it is a matchup again,
a rematch of Biden and Trump
on the debate stage in 2024
and Donald Trump brings up Hunter Biden.
Just from what you've seen,
how does Joe Biden respond to that?
You know, he he may not
want to go there at all.
He may simply say
that this has nothing to do
with my campaign or my presidency.
And it's a family matter
and a personal matter.
Meanwhile, according to three people
familiar with the discussions
inside the White House,
President Biden has made it clear to aides
he doesn't want to hear any suggestions
about limiting his son's visibility.
In fact, we've actually noticed
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os