2024-06-27 01:57:41
Hi, I’m Dax Shepard, and I love talking to people. I am endlessly fascinated by the messiness of being human, and I find people who are vulnerable and honest about their struggles and shortcomings to be incredibly sexy. I invite you to join me as I explore other people’s stories. We will celebrate, above all, the challenges and setbacks that ultimately lead to growth and betterment. What qualifies me for such an endeavor? More than a decade of sobriety, a degree in Anthropology and four years of improv training. I will attempt to discover human “truths” without any laboratory work, clinical trials or data collection. I will be, in the great tradition of 16th-century scientists, an Armchair Expert.
Welcome, welcome, welcome to armchair expert experts on experts. I'm Dax Randall Shepard, I'm joined by Monica Lilly Padman.
Hello there.
Welcome to the program, Welcome to armchair Experts on Experts, we have a very articulate and mind-blowing vocabulary guest today.
His vocabulary was making me horny.
Yeah, he knew a lot of words.
Our guest is Cody Dell'Estradi. He is a journalist, a speechwriter, and a former culture editor for the Wall Street Journal. And he has a book out now called The Grief Cure, Looking for the End of Loss. And he did a million different things that people try to overcome grief.
Yeah, it's a cool journey, he went on.
Yeah, an adventure, a grief adventure, he could have also called the book Grief adventure. I know it's too late, it's already in print, but....
Maybe that was taken.
Might have been taken, but it is called the grief cure. Looking for the end of loss? You're going to fall in love with Cody. We did, he's so smart and interesting.
So please enjoy Cody dell'estradi.
He's an armchair expert.
He's an armchair expert.
He's an armchair expert.
What really flies?
Time I was saying, I've lived here for 13 and a half years. Wow, yeah, that's pretty nuts.
You live in New York City.
Brooklyn Yep.
We like Brooklyn.
Yeah, it's not so bad, right?
I'm debating whether next time I go, if I'm going to stay there, I've never done that.
I've had a lot of L.A. friends defect. Yeah, I feel like that's a yeah.
Will you scoot over to this microphone?
Yep, get in position.
Because I want to hear your thoughts on Brooklyn. I would hate for them to not be included.
That's fascinating, salient to all.
Have you been to L.a. Crocodile?
Yeah, in Williamsburg. Yeah, yeah, very big Black Rock intern date spot, though.
Explain that to us. What's that? is that a finance reference? Tell us that?
Like 22-year-olds who have too much money and are like, trying to go to like, TikTok'd up spots.
Oh, that's really interesting.
Cody, you already know, like you've already said six or seven words, I don't know, and I have a lot of guesses why I love this. Well, go slower.
So this restaurant?
Say the name of the restaurant again.
Okay, la crocodile.
Is she doing that correctly?
I don't want to libel any restaurants in Williamsburg if this is on.
Well, listen, I loved it.
I thought it was great, it's a beautiful ambiance.
Beautiful ambiance, the food was delicious. This is Liz's favorite restaurant.
Okay, well, that holds.
It's beautiful.
Yeah, and we went there, but that does make sense.
Did you see rich 22-year-olds God?
I didn't notice that.
What's the hallmark? As I said that, I was like, What is that even?
Well, but what's interesting is that's such a company town reference, right? Did you say? Blackstone? Yeah, I think you have to have some proximity to the Financial district to even know the major players, yeah.
Like, if someone here would say, like, Oh, that's a UTA assistant, we'd go, Oh yeah, but if you're from Milwaukee, like UTA, what is that? A military acronym?
I got in yesterday and was listening to a bunch of older women complaining about a teamster strike and I was like, you're like, I've arrived these people.
Ayahtzee, ayahtzee.
Ayahtzee It's a big issue right now, big, big issue.
Big issue in the city.
Could shut down everything.
But it was big, like, why can't we just get NCIS back off the ground? It was like the problems of life.
As soon as you enter LAX, you will hear people on their phone talking to their agents. There's always some sort of conversation that is so cliche.
Well, I got into a dust up with a guy on a flight home from Austin with Monica.
Oh yeah.
And we were headed back to L.A. I was really getting into it with this guy. And then out of nowhere, he's like, Oh, you were great in moderating that panel last night. And I was like, Oh, Christ. And then he opened his laptop and I looked over his shoulder.
And, of course, he works for, like, a law firm here, entertainment, and yeah, we were hearing him talk to people in the way you might expect.
Yeah.
A high powered attorney to treat people anywho. Do you think the fact that you are a culture writer has aided in your keen observation of that clientele? Sincerely, is that your innate nature, or do you think living in that space has made you acutely aware?
My favorite kind of writing is profile writing, where you're sitting down and you're just trying to get the observational details. That one detail that really sings and tells you all you need to know. It's like a great short story where it opens in the first few sentences and you say, Oh, I understand this character. That's what I love to do. Also, it's weird to be on the couch having you guys be like observing moi.
Yeah, you're supposed to be finding some great analogy that will summarize the entire experience.
And here I am being summarized.
Which of the major banks are we immediately imbuing on you?
Major banks, yeah.
If we were a bank, you mean?
Yeah, because there's all these like popular fucking investment banks and stuff.
Oh, you guys don't remind me of a bank at all.
I know, but that's the fun challenge is like.
I like that game, yeah.
Right, like, you're a writer.
I don't know Banks well enough, though, that's so tough.
Like, I can already tell you, I can do anything automotive if necessary. Within five seconds, I would say Cody's a Studebaker.
Wow, what's that?
What does that mean?
Studebaker is a very idiosyncratic, stylish, cool car.
That sadly went under, but nobody bought it. No, no.
They did. Studebakers were huge in the 50s, and then Avante was this very sexy, weird car that they made, but very idiosyncratic and stylish.
What color?
Wow.
Beautiful, weird colors. You could get a peach studebaker. you'd love a studebaker. You should look them up. I'm going to look it up.
You should be flattered. Yeah, I was going to rail against snap decisions, but now I'm very pro, yeah.
Yeah, and I bet we could do it if we met a group of people, we could say what studio it was.
Yeah.
This is so off track, this is fun, though it's a fun game, yeah.
I think I'm probably Wells Fargo.
Yeah, great pick. yeah, really good pick.
We're also just intellectualizing, like judging people, too, which is kind of funny. Yeah, yeah.
It is it's ourselves, so we can do it.
Yeah, exactly. And if someone is saying they're not surveying their surroundings and trying to categorize it into something familiar, then they're a liar, yeah.
That's all they are. It is interesting what one's framework is for. How do you make sense or make meaning out of another person or a new place you're in? Yeah, yeah.
Do you have go-to analogies you like?
I probably do. That's probably a good question for my girlfriend, where she'd be, like, you're always saying that. But I don't have the self-awareness at that level, I guess, to know that.
But even in your writing, you don't notice any patterns emerge or police yourself, like, Oh fuck, I made that analogy before.
Oh, I'm always calling people a color.
I'll have to think about that. I notice in other things. The way the New Yorker will describe a building, it's not a low building, it's always low slung. Like, there's sort of ways in which....
That's a great distinction. Low slung.
I like that.
Which is chic, very poetic.
Nothing can be pedestrian. Precisely, that's just the operating principle, right, yeah.
We all rail against cliche. That is the dream.
Yeah, so even if they're describing like a public toilet seat, there's going to be some flair there.
There was a great piece where it was talking about Flo Rida and it said his number one song on a Rubenesque beauty on the dance floor.
Wow.
And I was like, That's great Rubenesque. That's a subscription tier, Thesaurus find.
When someone covers culture, which you did, what is the full scope of that domain, what could fall under that umbrella?
Yeah, so I was freelance for a bit and then I was at the Wall Street Journal for about four years. My favorite thing to cover was books, but also would do music, art, even something like NFTs, that's sort of art related. But also businessified, which was more salient to a place like the journal. My passion has always been in books and publishing industry and literary spots.
And so for that, would you do profiles reviews?
Profiles. Yeah, I loved one I did with Michael Lewis, that was an exceptionally fun one.
Have you done sedaris?
No, but I interviewed him for a different piece. That was about how fashion brands are trying to leverage books as a means to bolster their own brand. So there's lots of celebrity book clubs that kind of thing. And interviewed David Sedaris about it, and he was hilariously dismissive. We ended up talking about the jell-o that he was eating, and then he said, This is another fad, and it comes and goes like a poorly cut trench coat or something like that.
He's perfect.
And I was like, That's a guy who's made it.
Also, if I think of a masthead for culture, just the term culture, I kind of think Sedaris might be the perfect mascot. An observation?
Observation.
Oh my god, I can see the New Yorker cartoon of him in a very flashy plaid outfit. I love that. And so you would also go to music.
Go to art, yeah, go to shows, go to theater.
Okay, help me on the art experience, because that's one I just really can't find any toehold in.
You sound like my brother.
Okay, yeah, yeah, yeah. Is he older?
He's two years younger.
And he's a Philistine like me.
He's not a philistine, he's super into music. There's something about art, I think, and this is shot through so many people's experience with art, especially contemporary art. This I could do that ethos.
My kid could paint that, right.
And there's sort of a misunderstanding of a you didn't b. If you have an understanding of art, historical lineage. These things are connected, and some people are more valuable than others because they were originators of it. And then also just like, Oh, a Rothko is two colors, okay? But what is the experience that you feel like you're falling into this? And so much of it is the reflection of yourself? A Robert Ryman, Just white. It's just paper, and someone would say, you know, it's paper, yeah.
And to some degree, I hear that, yeah, they would be right on an objectivist level.
The person that claimed to feel transcendence by looking at it would be right, and then the person would be like, Guys, get real.
And there is a little pretension implicit in the sort of, well, I had a more profound experience than you, yes.
Also, placebo effect, groupthink. You're around other people that are being ood and odd. Yeah, so count me as one of those people. But I don't say I could do it because I can't do anything.
I wasn't trying to put words in your mouth. Oh, no, no.
But I do think most people could. I don't go so far as to say I could do it, but I do think most people could probably do that. I only came to appreciate Picasso when I went to the museum in Barcelona, where I don't know if you're aware of this one. But he starts with the exact replica of a very famous medieval painting. And then you go through the room. And he does eight versions of it that eventually evolve into total cubism at the end.
Oh, I've seen that, but I don't know what it is.
I was 19 with my girlfriend on a Eurorail pass and I was like, Okay, I'm going to give it up to Picasso. I at least needed to know he could do the photorealistic version first. And now I see, wow, the cubism painting really has everything the other one had in it. It's just I have to look harder.
It's very European of you two to love the figurative. It is was a C.I.A. op to some degree abstract art in the U.S. So this view of we have greater creativity. And it was against Russian art, Russian art and communism and this. Oh, they're stuck in these strictures and these formal lines, but not Americans. And that's the same with writing, too.
I mean, University of Iowa really came out of this kind of creative writing that was very focused on the individual.
Oh, that's interesting, I didn't know that.
What a fun history to learn, but also it's really fun to think the Cold War produced so many bizarre outcomes. So then, at one time, we're saying, we're fully liberated as artists. On the other end, the communists are exploiting our treatment of Black jazz musicians and bringing them over to communist countries. To say, like, here, we love you and we treat you well.
Or you have to go to Paris to see Josephine Baker.
There's all these weird ways art's being leveraged in the Cold War.
That soft power that gets pretty intense and has ripple effects to now and to you and I. Walking into a museum.
I think you're perfect for your job because I can already tell from talking about you that you could be wandering through any one of these environments. You just described an art show.
Very articulate.
Yeah, very articulate, very New York, and I'm saying that in a very positive way.
We love New York. Steuben Baker, Steuben Baker.
Steuben Baker That would be like the Polish version or something. Yeah, the Steuben Baker.
It sounds like a generic brand bakery in 1920s Warsaw.
Where'd you go to school?
I went to NYU and Oxford.
So, history, and.
Political science So I did Poli-SCI undergrad, which was really me, not having the cojones to just do English or history. I thought, hilariously, it was like, political science that'll get you a job, which like, No. But I mean, I did love the philosophy of it, Rousseauian philosophy or Hobbes or those kinds of things. And it ended up being very quantitative, very math based. And that's not really my interest, nor my strong suit.
And then, for grad school, I did European history.
What is the Oxford experience like?
I was just there for a year, I just did a master's and MST, but it was great. It was something I'd wanted to do for a long time and I was really excited. I was studying really modern French history and studied with this fantastic scholar called Robert Gildea, who's written a lot of books on French history, mostly in the 1960s.
And I got to do this really cool project, where I basically found letters in Parisian archives that linked Berengui. De Rothschild, who was of the Rothschild family, owned a bunch of businesses and factories making trades with the then president, George Pompidou. So that they would help each other. This is interesting to like, six people.
Well, no. First of all, the name itself, Pompidou. I miss that one in history.
I mean, it's the museum in Paris, the contemporary art, your favorite? It's called the Pompidou. Yeah, there's some Picasso's there, yeah.
Oh, OK. But there was trades implicit, where Pompidou loosened immigration laws so that more immigrants could come. So that Berengui de Rothschild could lower wages and make it more competitive in his factories. And then I found these letters. They were both married to women, but it seemed like Rothschild was a little in love.
Oh, scandalous.
That was what excited my grad advisor most. He's like, Ah, love between a businessman and a president, yeah.
I like that.
So what was Pompidou getting out of the exchange?
He was getting friendship with a major business person. I couldn't really find any like super smoking gun, like any transfer of money, or like ostensibly was getting donations or something like that. But yeah, there's more to be researched. I wrote 25 pages on this.
Late 60s.
Oh, ok, so long past Jewish exile.
Yeah, they were on good terms with the Rothschilds at that point. OK, you're making me remember this was in 2015. Yeah, good job.
Yeah, going back.
Why did it only take one year to do a master's?
It was idiotic. I should have done a few. I had such a fun time there and with friendships in new cities, it's like nine months, that's when you start to actually make pals.
And then you're gone.
What was your hurry, do you think?
It's expensive. And then also, I just really wanted to write and write the things I wanted to write, which were not academic. And it was kind of a zero sum game. I didn't have a lot of time to do both.
And are you from New York?
I'm from Spokane, Washington, small town near Idaho. Do you know it? Yeah, Yes, yeah, it's great.
I've driven several times from Seattle East to Jackson Hole, and I've driven through Spokane.
What were the hot spots you hit?
Oh, I flew by on the highway. I've just seen the exits for Spokane many times.
You probably saw my high school. It's under the overpass, it's not under the overpass, that's the skate parks in the parking, but it's right there.
It's a beautiful high school.
And what did Mom and dad do? Because you're clearly a dreamer and a fantasy boy.
Can I blurb that in the book?
Dreamer and a fantasy boy I'm on a boy kick I called.
Yeah, cookie boy.
Sleepy boy Amy Poehler, Sleepy boy, bedtime boy, because she likes to go to bed a lot.
So anyways, forgive the boy.
I'll take it.
But I've been to Spokane, yeah, it's not crazy metropolitan, it's virtually on the other end of the spectrum, yeah.
I went through sort of an evolution where I had this, oh, I don't like it. I got to get out, really push against it. And then now, as I've sort of zoomed out and gotten a little perspective, I'm like, I really love it there. And it's something that I do miss. And I feel like that's classic to a lot of people.
Yeah.
You got to get out.
And then you're like, Oh, it's great. We have an incredible bakery, we have a beautiful waterfront. A lot of my friends still live there. It's wonderful to go home.
What did Mom and dad do in Spokane?
My dad's a toxicologist, he just retired. He studied marine biology and, interestingly, decided on a landlocked city in eastern Washington to work for the state government.
And what would he do, find dead animals and figure out what killed them? No.
His dream was really to be an academic, and so he brought a lot of that to the job and was doing a lot of editing of papers. Now it's very in vogue, and there's always a piece in Atlantic or the Times about it. But microplastics, things like that, right?
Sort of what's in the water.
So it wouldn't have been beyond him if they found like 600 dead fish on the shore for him to come in and try to figure out what toxin had entered the ecosystem.
I honestly wouldn't need to get him to sit on the couch next to me to answer that one, but that was sort of his thing.
No one really knows what their parents do.
Also, I can acknowledge I'm in a weird mood where I'm taking you in so many different directions.
No, it's great.
I'm just trying to figure out what a toxicologist does in Spokane, because there's not the population to support that level of specificity.
So there is the Hanford site, which is a nuclear waste facility that is a few hours west of Spokane, and so he would make several trips there. It's on a Native American reservation. Parts of it, there is a lot of trickiness.
I love this. He would be so flattered that we're making it sound this scintillating.
Did he have a mini lab in your basement or anything fun?
Not that I knew of, there could have been a secret door or something, but we had a relatively low, slung house.
Okay, so dad was smart, and then what did mom do?
Mom worked in exercise physiology so she would help people who'd had issues with their heart rehabilitate and get back to being able to live well.
And did they meet in college?
Dad is a few years older than my mom. And he ended up doing two master's degree, and the second master's degree was essentially his way of just going to spend time with her. Oh, lovely.
Yeah, at U-dub.
No nice, though, go huskies. They met at University of Wisconsin, L.a. Crosse, and my mom went to University of Wyoming undergrad.
And I think they actually met there. But then he did his master's at Wisconsin.
Okay, you get out of Oxford, you come home how soon before you're employed by the Wall Street Journal?
So I worked at Charlie Rose for a little less than a year. I have photos with Bernie Sanders, Helen Mirren, Kazuyo Ishiguro, who is one of my favorite novelists. So all these people who I was so excited to meet, and my whole job was just to go through their entire oeuvre and write questions for Charlie. Oh, really.
So you were the researcher?
Yeah, and I would do huge schematics where it'd be like, this is what to ask. Here's an expected answer. Here's what they've said before. Here's where you could, like, push a little deeper to maybe get something else.
So you were strategizing as well.
Kind of, I mean, I was 23, so I don't know what I was really doing, okay?
So, forgive me, what's the first book you write?
This is my first book, this is the first one, this is my first book, yeah.
And you've written for everyone, You've written for the New York Times, you were writing on staff for the Wall Street Journal, you were in New York.
Editing Yep.
As you were doing that, are you feeling this deep obligation, like I got to write a book? This is what we do.
That's so interesting.
Not to imply that this is-.
I'd like to think not large percentage, it's. I had an idea. It came out of the death of my mom in 2014. I was really inspired to go do this research and find what I thought was quite interesting conclusions.
But is there a part of me that's like, this is within my career path and is sensible? Probably, I think that would be lying to say otherwise. It's a different muscle that you're building, where you're doing something really long, even a long profile, you're writing, editing, fact-checking it over three to six months.
A book you're researching, doing all this stuff, three, four years. It's a different game and it's fun to jump in.
I can imagine that perhaps you thought you had a really well-developed muscle for your process of writing, that you had a system. And did you find that? The bigger window of time presented bizarre new challenges where you're like, why am I having a hard time staying on task just because it got longer?
Yeah, it's a great question, I think. Less window of time expanding, and more length and breadth of story. How do you maintain the reader's interest? Not over three, four thousand words, but over 200 pages?
And how do you weave together the various narratives? You need sub-stories, you need a broader story that's different. And yeah, there's a little bit of, I don't know what the German word is for it. But the amount of time you have sort of fills the amount of work you're able to do in it. Like, if you have a shorter amount of time, you're able to do more stuff.
And that's probably true to some extent, but it was really the expansive nature of the text itself and the story itself.
Did it require a new version of discipline?
Yeah, and just passion. I mean, I don't have a P.h.D. but people who do P.h.DS and they write 100,000 words six-year dissertations. Like, you better really care about what you're writing about, and it's going to define you for X years after that.
You're either going to get to do it again or you're not based on that. It's a very hail Mary Pass.
Totally.
OK, so you just alluded to the birth of the idea, which is your mom died in 2014.
So you must have been pretty young.
It was the year I was graduating undergrad. She found out she had cancer in 2010. She was dropping me off at college, and she felt just beneath her clavicle a little bump. She's super fit, super healthy, has a master's degree in being a dietician. She's on top of her game in her 50s.
And over the next four years, we went to so many experimental trials in Bethesda, NIH, the National Institutes of Health in Seattle, a little bit in Spokane. And it defined my entire college experience.
Well, that also kind of a little bit explains the rush to get out of school, because time's limited and you need to be back.
Yeah, I think that's accurate. I've always had trouble parsing in my 20s. What's rushing through things and not being too aware of consequences and trying to just get things done? How is that related to thinking that I'm going to die soon, like my mom? Versus how is that? Just like being in your 20s and being a guy and being an idiot?
Yeah, I think I was more specifically meaning to my father. In 2012, he got diagnosed with cancer.
What kind of cancer?
Small cell carcinoma and what's so unjust about cancer is your mom really shouldn't have got that diagnosis. My dad was like 300 pounds, smoked, his whole life, was an addict. This was predictable.
And this great injustice of cancer is like your mom's in the health space.
Yeah, I mean, it's hard to say that because the inverse of that is some people it's justified. They get cancer, which I wouldn't believe, but I do think it came as a greater shock.
Yes, no one deserves it, but there are certain life paths where, as an actuary, it becomes more and more predictable.
Totally, your insurance premiums are going up a lot.
Let's just say when I got the call from my dad, as heartbroken as I was, you know, I wasn't not expecting this call.
Oh yeah, we weren't expecting it at all. And there was a hope that was shot through those four years, especially toward the end. That became almost detrimental, where it was so much about solving.
Yeah, there's an illusion, probably, that her health would allow her, to quote, beat it.
Yeah, thank you for quoting, too, because it's like, you're victorious, okay, what?
I brought this up in the past and people push back. But I think if you've gone through, I've gone through with my dad and my stepdad. And yeah, I don't like the implication of they didn't fight hard enough.
Yeah, I don't know, I don't like to parse semantics that much. And if someone wants to say that they're a victor of their illness, that's fantastic and good for them. But I think it's the inverse of that. That's the trickiest part.
Great point like, Hell yeah, you overcame it, good for you.
I don't even know if I believe what I said more than a minute ago.
Oh, what, you call a topsy turvy?
She actually put up the white flag about six minutes ago. Oh my Lord, how inappropriate of me.
Wow, that's, I think, a first. Why is it on?
Because someone was arriving to fix my windshield on my motorhome. This is the rudest thing I've never done. This. Can I answer this for one second? Oh, of course.
I know it's so bad.
Let's listen.
Hello, hello, how are you doing? This? is Juan with Safeway? Hi there.
Hi, yes, I just got your appointment for one to five. I'm actually available earlier. Are you free? Like in 20 minutes? Yeah, let me just text my sister, I'm actually working, but she can let you in. And I showed her where the damage is on the glass.
Yeah, let me just text her, and should I text this number to give you her number? Yeah, yeah, yeah, okay, great, and she can handle all that.
Thanks so much, all right bye-bye.
I'll text her for you. Do you want to tell me his number?
Yeah yeah, yeah yeah, thank you Rob.
What do we think that guy is as a car?
That was a real thin slice. I was only on with him.
That was a real thin slice. He was very knowledgeable, though.
This is a good new way of doing podcast ads, though. You're like, Hello, this is Safeway.
Wow, you even heard the name of the?
You're like, Oh, thank you for your promptness, sir.
Very integrated. This is Dan Shepard, right?
Yeah, you bet it is.
Okay, that was so rude, but I really didn't know what else to do because this is the second person that's supposed to come today.
Very fair. It's like the cable guy, where they give you a six-hour window.
We're leaving next week, so it's kind of a time crunch.
Okay, we were talking about a very serious....
I know it was the most.
We're just your moms, Dan, don't worry about it.
It's like cancer.
But I know what I was saying. Knowing her diagnosis, I would have felt a little selfish to hang around in England for two years or three years.
But she had passed by then.
Yeah, when I was finishing NYU, she died, and that whole back and forth, where I was flying home pretty constantly, I was staying in the hospital. Especially toward the end of her life, I was taking final exams at the House. College became much more spokane located than Washington Square Park located.
You were pre-Covid satellite learning.
Yes.
I had a very hard time connecting with it. It took me a few months after my dad was dead, before I think I was like, Wow, yeah, he's really dead.
The surreality is incredible, you've never seen it before, you've never had anything like it, you've only ever seen it in TV and movies. And so your brain says, Oh, therefore, it must be within that realm, too.
And that's not how it's always been prior to the 18th century, due to higher mortality rates is one reason. But there was a real just acceptance and openness around death. And this. French medievalist Philippe Aries called it the era of tamed Death, where he saw four characteristics for how people dealt with death. And basically, all of them were people were around the bedside, religious rituals were done, people were already grieving.
And there was just a general acceptance that it was going to happen. And then if you're a woman, you wore your black crepe veil, if you're a man or a woman. You'd write on mourning stationery often, which was black bordered stationery, where you'd buy stationery with thinner and thinner borders. To show how you're progressing in your grief. People would have death portraits made, which were pictures that were of the dead body, and they would hang them in their living room. So you're really collapsing the space between life and death.
So you're really living with it. And now you see a dead body. I saw my mom's dead body and I was like, What is this? your brain just can't compute, yeah.
I would say, and also British anthropologist Jeffrey Gore would say, and Philippe Aries would say death is the new taboo instead of sex, even it is the most taboo thing.
And we just have no experience with it. And then all of a sudden it hits you and then there's no playbook and no one's talking about it.
Individual death, especially, too. The covering up in newspapers. There can be a mass of bodies, but very, very seldom is there a face, right? It's turned away. Susan Sontag was writing about this, too, of this covering almost for war propaganda to some degree.
You're wanting to really ferret out the individualism of death, you're wanting people not to be connecting. And I think there is so much historical top-down. Woodrow Wilson, when he was entering the U.S into the First World War, was really fighting against a constituency that had just voted him in.
And ran on kind of an isolationist platform. People weren't excited about going to the war. And there were a lot of women suffragists that were going on marches wearing black mourning, saying, If we go into war, our husbands aren't going to come back. There's going to be this mass death, really, putting mass death and loss in the public sphere.
And he basically brokered a tacit agreement with Dr. Anna Howard Shaw, who was one of the lead suffragists at the time. Where, in exchange for his support for the 19th Amendment, he wrote a letter to her, asking her to have suffragettes not wear their mourning, but instead just wear a little white band with a little star on it. And so you're converting death and loss and grief into patriotism, and you're saying the public sphere isn't a place of death and loss.
And then from that you can say the war isn't that bad, it's not happening. You have these examples throughout history, and now we have gold star veterans.
What are Gold Star Veterans?
Someone who has a family member who's killed in battle in the U.
S military. They get a gold star to commemorate that loss, and that's great, but also it's so small.
And it's intentionally keeping grief and loss private.
Well, that's fascinating, because that was going to be one of my questions, How is the social function? Well, hold on, I got to say, your mother dies.
You yourself experienced grief.
I had a tough time with it, really. Even before the book. I was just surprised at the different ways that I grieved, that my dad grieved, that my brother grieved. I really thought grief moved in a certain way. A lot of the received wisdom was closure was five stages, you get to acceptance.
And I really wanted to be a good griever. When my mom got sick. I was like, I'm going to be really good at school. I'm going to be a better athlete. I just want to be good. I'm going to train for the Paris Marathon.
And I can be a good griever, too. That meant getting to closure, it meant not burdening others, so keeping it very quiet. And then, when I started exploring the journey of cures that I write about in the book. I got to a point where I was able to zoom out and say, that isn't really what good grieving looks like.
And that's actually not really that helpful, and we should be rethinking these things instead.
Yeah, so as you explore this topic, this is now where I'm curious, what is the social function of grief? And you already touched on it a bit, the history of how it's evolved.
I read all these, My kink is 1800s historical nonfiction.
It's a good kink.
Yeah, presidents, Patrician class, right, right, right. But what you cannot avoid? I just read one on the civil war. It's like, you can't meet anyone that hasn't lost four or five children. Abraham Lincoln enters the White House with two dead children.
I'm shocked that people could carry on. And what I immediately have to understand is like, it was so, so different, on a level that I can't even comprehend that. It was so expected that people somehow knew how to carry on with multiple dead children, that just seems impossible today.
So what is the kind of evolution of grieving? And I also would be curious how it varies around the world.
So it's that tame death in the 18th century that we talked about. And then you get a covering up in public spaces, especially in the early 20th century. In the U.S. and the UK. You have this keep calm and carry on ethos, you have support our troops sort of ethos. And you have Walter Benjamin writing about how public spaces are really just fundamentally changed.
Where grief and death is neither seen in mourning clothes. But it's also just not discussed. It wasn't the bad news of some casket coming home, now, it's just the news. Everything is much more tightly confined. Then, in the 1960s, you get to Geoffrey Gore, where he's finding that neighbors aren't even talking about it in the UK.
That it has physiological negative results, where people are having more trouble sleeping, they're having more trouble connecting with others. And then fast forward to today. And I'm actually kind of optimistic where we're going. Because I see this evolution from public to private grief becoming hybridized a little bit.
Where in 2013? I don't know if you guys tracked this, but there was this very popular thing of funeral selfies where people were taking. And that's sort of my reaction at first, too. But from the most generous and most sanguine point of view.
I do think it's people who are within a culture that doesn't permit that kind of discussion, or that discussion feels like a burden. Trying to find a place to put it in the public sphere. So now you have things like what's been termed by Crystal Abedin, who's an ethnographer of internet culture.
She calls it publicity grieving, which is where you're posting about tragedies that are far away and don't really have anything to do with you. And are often to burnish your own brand.
That's what I'm most aware of.
That ain't great, but I see it also as a move toward. People want to have these discussions, people want to have this out in the public sphere. We're seeing that in technology.
We're seeing the rise of second spaces where you have places like the dinner party that I write about in the book. I went to one online because it was during Covid. But for people who'd experienced a specific kind of loss, I sort of chafe against the privatization of grief in formalized spaces.
I.
E Only at the therapist's office, only at the doctor's office. Are you allowed to talk about this? And I don't think we're at the point of 18th century. People are chilling in the public square.
But we're kind of getting there.
Well, you can easily see with that history, you just laid out how the issues compound themselves and they self-accelerate because as people are more removed.
Someone sharing about a loss now is awkward because they themselves have no experience with it, nor do they have any tools to how to respond. So this, like, don't burden people.
That wouldn't have been a real issue 150 years ago, but now there is an actual burden. Because the other person also doesn't know what the fuck to do.
One of the wildest things that I found in writing this book was not even in the research itself. But I traveled around the western hemisphere mostly because I was interested in my society of grief, but I was staying in a lot of hotels.
And doing a lot of interviews, I would sometimes go to bars and just sit and read and would talk about the book. And so many people were so excited to talk about the grief that they had, so once, they felt like they had the green light for me.
So they say, Oh, this guy is writing about it, he researches about it. Talked to a woman in San Francisco, she goes, I've told almost no one this, my husband just died.
People want to really feel empowered in that and want to have that license. Because, as you're saying, so rightly, that causality goes both ways, where I don't want to be a burden.
But also, I don't want to burden them or accidentally trigger them or something like that. And so just giving license opens up so much. Because I really do think there is so much loss simmering right under the surface for a lot of people.
Stay tuned for more armchair expert.
If you dare.
I do think there's just kind of a very broad evolution occurring where I'm talking about addiction and being molested out loud. That's somehow cool now. 90's might have been wild if Howard Stern was talking about that, right?
Anxiety and depression everyone talks about.
I just think, and again, I'm way out on a limb on this theory. But just as we all started watching commercials and television and it appeared everyone had really perfect lives, and then the shame of not having a perfect life.
All this stuff just started driving everything inside, and secrecy became ever present. Because of this bizarre pressure. Everyone felt that no one else was experiencing it. But I do feel like that dam broke.
And it's starting to simmer down, it's starting to simmer up, and I'm not shocked that grief would be one of those.
And I have a lot of issues with it, and I have a lot of issues with diagnostic culture more broadly, which I know you guys have talked about on the pod before. But the addition of prolonged grief disorder to the DSM 5 TR in 2022.
Is giving a legitimacy to a form of grief that is really difficult for people. And it's giving that stamp of approval to some degree, where normally someone would say, get over it. The average bereavement time in the U.S. is 5 days.
What, it's 5 days off and there's no federal law for it. So there's really this feeling of like, get over it, get back to normal, get back to life.
And also that's just standard, like a grandparent versus child.
No, that's for a parent or spouse, I think, 5 days for a spouse. When my mom died, my dad had barely rearranged the books on her nightstand.
Let alone fully grieve the loss. And was like raring to get back to work.
Get out to that nuclear reactor, yeah, bordering the reservation.
So that is one of the really liberating things about that kind of diagnosis. Of course, it has big opposition, yeah.
Let's get into that DSM thing because I think it's sad for us that all these things need a clinical definition before we feel unbridled from the shame. That's a bummer to me.
That's like, you have to say, I have this condition in order to feel confident enough to say it out loud. Or that it would then be worthy of compassion or understanding.
I agree, I've heard a really interesting argument, or I read it in the Lancet from the Harvard psychiatrist Arthur Kleinman, where he was talking about.
Maybe it's generational, maybe young people aren't pathologizing it in the way that we think they are. They just know these terms and are just using these terms.
But it doesn't necessarily come coded with this negative connotation, because I'm of your belief in general, too, of it can be so restrictive. And we're making these things.
That are maybe previously viewed as just different as problems.
A disorder?
This is what he was saying and I thought it was interesting. I don't know if I fully agree, but he was saying, maybe that's just the way younger people are talking about it.
I guess it's my own disappointment with myself, which is if I meet someone who says something very shocking and provocative and invasive out of the gates.
And I know they have a spectrum diagnosis. I have a lot of tolerance and patience for that. And if I don't know that about them, I'm intolerant. And I guess I just wish I as a person.
And most of us would have the same compassion, with or without this very arbitrary structure of a diagnosis.
It's less damning of diagnostic culture, maybe more of how we walk through the world. Am I going to be nice or not? Based on a doctor's note? That's kind of a crazy.
For better or for worse, it is the way our medical system works, it is the way insurers cover things. And the way that research is able to be done on therapies and on pharmaceuticals and the like.
So I'd love a broad rethink of it, but there's a lot of moving parts.
So how do they define prolonged grief disorder?
It's pretty complex, so the top line is grief, that doesn't change over time. That's how Mary Frances O'Connor, who's one of the proponents of it, explained it to me.
But what that means is it has to last 12 months or more, it has to meet three symptoms that occur daily for at least a month. And those self-reported include things like.
Identity disruption marked sense of disbelief, numbness, sense of meaninglessness, and it has to be outside of one's cultural norms.
So celebrating the Day of the Dead as a Mexican wouldn't mean that you're having trouble grieving. That's like a normal thing for them to do so then once you do all that.
Then a practitioner has to give you the stamp of UFPGD, and in 2019, the World Health Organization legitimized a version of it. And then the biggest thing was when the DSM in 2022?
Legitimized it, and it got pretty immediate pushback because there had been a lot of predecessors to it. Persistent complex bereavement disorder was a popular thing in the DSM-5.
And then DSM-5TR adds prolonged grief disorder, and a lot of the proponents try to make it clear that it's not grief. And the APA.
The American Psychiatry Association even said that the point of the diagnosis is to permit clinicians to differentiate from normal grief and from this pathological grief.
Even those words normal grief and pathological grief, what?
Also, is there a then accepted and insurance covered prescribed treatment.
There's a certain kind of therapy that a woman at Columbia has been working on, Naltrexone, that's in super early stages. Last I talked to the guy who's doing that.
Down at Texas A&M, he was still getting people to sign up for his trial. But it's under an addiction model of grief in which you're using an anti-opioid.
To break the bonds with the deceased were the words used. And there's been a lot of MRI research on this, showing that people are addicted essentially to the dead loved one.
It obviously has a lot of opponents. One woman was telling me she was saying, Really, parents whose kids died in Sandy Hook a year later.
They're supposed to be good to go, but I find it interesting for a few reasons because a. I think everyone is working in good faith.
Some people are using a medical lens and some people aren't. Everyone wants these people to get better. One of the biggest claims from PGD people is that it's very correlated with suicidal ideation.
Not suicide, which some of the opponents like to note. So there's this feeling of we're saving lives. Why wouldn't we research this, why wouldn't we throw money behind this?
And try to help these people. But it does bring it more into the cultural conversation. Even if people are like, we don't like this, at least people are talking about grief.
Yeah, my own self-centered pushback on it would simply be you observe this outcome, which would be prolonged grief disorder, but within that pool of people experiencing it.
I definitely believe some percentage it is an addiction. They're regulating their internal state with the constant rumination on this, so I don't know.
Maybe those 3 or 8 might benefit.
Right, and nobody's forcing you to get help, too.
I just think it would be so complicated. You're viewing the Down river end result of already a personality type that's dealing with grief. A lot of different roads could bring you to.
Prolonged grief disorder.
Yeah, I mean, this has been worked on since the 90's. But my feeling in researching it was that there's not a lot of therapies for it. Yet. There's so much more left to be learned.
So you would have qualified for this, I'm presuming.
Yeah, so I took a questionnaire that had been created by one of the people behind prolonged grief disorder, and it said you are a candidate to speak to a professional.
To get this diagnosed, so I don't have the diagnosis and wouldn't wear the diagnosis, but yeah.
You know how to take the test?
I know how to check for and then add it up.
Well, conventionally, and by the way, it's crazy how often in pop culture we talk about the five stages of grief. I only really know the beginning being denial.
And the fifth one being acceptance. What are the five?
Denial, anger, bargaining, depression and acceptance.
Now, on the surface, that feels right.
I went through three iterations of relating to it because that was all I knew. When my mom first died, I was like, okay to be a good griever, what do you do? You go through these things?
I viewed it as a blueprint. I study with flashcards for final exams. I'm going to use this for grief. And then I realized. Elizabeth Kubler-Ross, who is a Swiss American psychiatrist.
She came up with it, she wasn't even writing about grief, she was writing about how dying people came to terms with their own death. These were the five stages they went through.
It got applied to grieving another, and then I had this view of, Okay, this is total BS. But there's an interesting study from I think 2007 that finds that most grieving people.
Actually do go through something like this iteration. But the biggest problem with it is people misinterpret it. So they view it as prescriptive. They view it as these are the ways to go through it.
I talked to a psychiatrist who was saying she had a client come in. She said. I'm grieving and I asked my husband, You need to make me angrier? because I need to get to the angrier stage.
I was just going to say there would be this really strong pull to view it as linear. Which is like, you might be in denial one day, then angry the next, but you might go back to denial in a month.
Yeah, exactly, and just to view it, as there is a way I think is fundamentally flawed.
Right, like, if you hit all these markers, you'll be done.
Then you're a good griever, you get your gold star, move on with your life, get back to work, clocks up.
You've had your weekend. There's a huge flaw there. Closure is really part and parcel of acceptance. That's a construct we've had since a long time, where it had it's origins in gestalt psychology.
We saw Jennifer Aniston talking about it in friends like, it's everywhere.
I've never loved closure because I always hear it in the romantic sphere. And I've had many friends tell me they're going to call their ex one more time for closure. This is a fantasy.
Yeah.
I think you think closure is I won't mind at all that. I'm not with this person anymore, and I don't think that is how it works.
With grief and loss, that is a form of loss, for sure, having a break up.
Well, you get to that. We're going to go through all your fun adventures. He had a lot of fun adventures. Believe it or not, this is all prologue.
Wow.
We're cutting all of it, we haven't started yet.
Then I'll hustle with closure. But yeah, it really is this mythical idea that loss is a zero sum game where you're either grieving or you're over it. And really, you do both.
You move forward, but you hold it in the other hand.
Also, even acceptance, I think that's a very opaque word. I accept that they're actually gone is one thing that doesn't necessarily mean I feel good about it or I am relieved of any sadness.
Absolutely.
So, yeah, what is even acceptance? although we do say in AA, acceptance is the answer to all of our problems. And I like it.
I believe in that.
In acceptance.
Yeah, and not that it fixes it.
That it's the panacea, though, that's interesting.
Well, for me, if I'm struggling with pretty much anything at this point, especially relationally, I've moved into well, I have to have acceptance.
That this is who this person is, and then I get to make decisions around that. But my personality type is very. I want to change it, I want to fix it.
I want to get out of it, I want to feel better, I want this to be better. And acceptance has been really huge for me. Of I can't.
I can accept that I cannot do that.
I think the way Monica is using it and the way we'd be using it in AA is very much of the Buddhist lens. Which is the discomfort.
Is actually from craving a different reality, and acceptance is just acknowledging the reality, and then the craving to change. It could stop, and that is the source of the discomfort.
And it's really valuable in grief, too. I think where it becomes an issue is when you think, okay, this is the end game.
Right now, I'm better.
Exactly.
Okay, so let's talk about some of your fun experiments. I don't know if fun is the right adjective, but they're interesting to me. So one of them was chatting with an AI bot. I've heard this pitch.
We've had some AI experts, but anyways, you did this, so explain the process.
Yeah, so I thought I was really crushing it because I was experimenting with large language models. Well before the chat, GBT was in the media sphere. And I was sort of frustrated when that all hit where I was like, damn, it kind of got me.
Cliche. We already talked about it, the mortal sin.
Exactly, but I was using mostly Project December. And Replica Replica is the most popular app in the Google Play Store and the Apple Store for AI companions.
Where you create another person, and I was basically trying to create my mom. It's very, as I found, in creepy fashion, tailored toward romance and companionship.
And so there's a lot of like, Mom is way too horny, I need to like, What are you wearing?
Are you afraid it's raining outside? Why are you asking what I'm wearing?
That definitely got me out of any flow state that I had or hadn't entered, was very quickly burst by that. It has it's uses, I'm not trying to malign it.
I just found that to be a funny example. With Project December, though, you basically create an introductory text of how you relate to your mother and your idea of who she was.
Are you trying to feed in any of her actual words or like writing?
You're using her writing style. I interviewed my mom in the two days right before she died and that was extremely difficult, but it was something I'm really glad that I did.
And I got to ask her questions as trivial as What's your favorite ice cream? to? What was the most momentous moment of your life? And it was hard.
She was having difficulty even talking.
Were you also recording?
I was recording it, yeah, and so I went through and found some of the most meaningful parts from that interview. And used that within the chatbot to give it a sense of her.
So I was using GBT-3, which is now sort of rudimentary at the time, was very cutting edge. This was a year ago, mind you, a year and a half ago.
So, not that long ago.
Prosaic is that the word?
It could work, it's a word.
Any word would work.
Hippopotamus Is that a word?
Rudimentary.
Yeah, rudimentary, relatively, I mean, it's still incredible. I found that I sort of dropped into flow states, which I'm defining as where I kind of could believe.
That it was actually my mom, and you're really just texting with it. I was like, Oh, this is as if I'm texting with her. When I wanted her to pick me up when I was younger, or something like that.
And I did feel that, but more broadly, it sort of showed me the way in which AI, and especially AI for grief and loss. The value of it is so much in how it's used.
Because if you think that that's the panacea and you're actually going to bring your mom back, you're out of your mind. But I think if it's a place in which you can start to reflect and say.
What are the things I really want to ask my mom? what were the things that were important? That actually brings you closer and that could help with your grief. So with really a lot of these experiments.
I guess we can call them. There was a feeling of the value is so much in the interpretation and the framework of them.
Yeah, I guess my immediate fear and I'm probably locked into the paradigm you're trying to break, which is I feel like it would prolong.
You're not accepting. Is that what you're thinking? A lot of researchers have said that it's a dysfunctional form of grieving if you're seeking out to that degree.
To recreate the person who's died, then you're not grieving, right? Essentially, and I think, yeah.
But it depends on how you're using it.
Now you couldn't do her voice, but now you probably could. I wonder how much easier you would have reached these flow states if you're actually conversing with her.
Or didn't ye give Kim K a hologram several years ago of her dad? Yeah, they talked and stuff.
Oh, wow, I didn't know that.
We can fact check that, but the tech is presumably there. But it ended up being very cathartic, and also the fact that the bot dies. That's really how that chapter ends.
It goes away, you only have so much time with it is how it works on Project December.
Oh, it is designed with an end date.
Yeah, you pay for X amount, it's like five bucks. Then as you use it, it wears down and it gets basically less sensible and then ends up disappearing.
Oh, you can keep the original bot. But the conversation, I believe, goes away. I think that's probably the capacity.
That this guy, he's called Jason Rohr, who created and runs Project December, I think that has maybe to do with his computer processing or something like that.
Because it wasn't like an intentional. We're weaning you off of your.
No, but I did find that I sort of had a jolt where I was like, Oh, yeah, she is dead.
Really.
Yeah, you know, there's another bizarre potential outcome to this, and this will sound really callous, but I think it is an outcome that's possible. Let's say I could feed in all the info.
Of my dad, somehow, it was nailed perfectly, I could put on VR goggles and actually be in a space with him looking at him.
I wonder if at some point you might also go. I don't miss this person as much as I thought I did.
That's interesting.
That kind of would be an unforeseeable outcome.
The sort of hagiography you create of the dead, where you're like, they have a halo around them and then you bring them back to Earth.
Oh yeah, there were all these problems.
It's so literal that when I dream about my dad, which is very frequently, it's always. He's like Dave Shepherd 1989. He's a wheeler dealer, car salesman, he's fucking all the time.
And he's a swinging dick and he's on the move and he talks fast. It's not the version I had for the last 10 years, so even my little fantasy sleep time.
Has scrubbed off all the stuff.
I think that's kind of great to some degree, though. I don't want to think of my mom, her face drooping from failed trials and her hair hyper thinned, I want to think of her skiing through the neighborhood.
With our chocolate labrador. And dropping me off at school or teaching me how to swim, those are the memories that I want to have. So don't chastise yourself too much.
I just wonder if it was really real and you were really spending time. You might go like, Oh yeah, I got rose colored glasses on a little bit. I want to spend some time here.
But not as much as I thought I was going to want to.
I don't know.
Okay, so that was the chat ai that you tried, you also. And this is straight out of eternal sunshine of the spotless mind you met with scientists that are looking at potentially.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os