2023-11-29 00:37:32
Private equity insights for and with top business builders, including investors, operators, executives and industry thought leaders. The Karma School of Business Podcast goes behind the scenes of PE, talking about business best practices and real-time industry trends. You'll learn from leading professionals and visionary business executives who will help you take action and enhance your life, whether you’re at a PE firm, a portco or a private or public company. BluWave Founder & CEO Sean Mooney hosts the Private Equity Karma School of Business Podcast. BluWave is the business builders’ network for private equity grade due diligence and value creation needs. To learn more, visit: https://bit.ly/3oPBjs8
Welcome to the Karma School of Business, a podcast about the private equity industry, business best practices and real-time trends. In this episode, we have a fantastic conversation with Eric Jensen, operations director with Nordic Capital. This episode is brought to you today by Blue Wave. I'm Sean Mooney, Blue Wave's founder and CEO. Blue Wave is the go-to expert of those with expertise.
Blue Wave connects proactive business builders, including more than 500 of the world's leading private equity firms and thousands of leading companies to the very best service providers for their critical variable, on-point and on-time business needs, enjoy.
So.
I'm really excited to be here today with Eric Jensen from Nordic Capital. Eric, thanks so much for joining us.
Thank you, pleasure to be here and thanks for having me on the podcast.
Eric, you've had this kind of great career, coming in from a variety of not only private equity experiences, but operating experiences. And what I love most, or one of the things I love most about the modern era of private equity, is. There's so many different routes into PE versus this kind of one track in the 80s or 90s. And so I'd love to hear a little bit more about your background, what attracted you to the industry, how you got here?
Yeah, absolutely well, you know, and I should say I haven't been in private equity for that long. I joined Nordic about a year and a half ago. And in many ways, you know, I guess I've always treated my career as if I'm a kid in a candy store. And so there's been a couple of different phases. And I'm hoping, you know, I can tell the story that says, Oh, this all sort of fit together and made sense about where I am now. But I guess time will tell whether that narrative plays out.
So maybe just to give folks a quick orientation. So I spent the first decade of my career in management consulting, worked with McKinsey Company, doing a fair amount of work in the healthcare services space. And then maybe part two of my career was very much focused on entrepreneurship and operating companies. So was part of the co-founding team for a company called Avia, which helps hospitals and health systems with their digital transformation. And, you know, also spent time running a health systems business for another health marketing oriented firm. And sort of came to this step in my career two, three years ago, where I said, Okay, I am absolutely convinced I just need to go run my own thing. I need to be a general manager or a CEO of some kind of firm in the health tech space, and I started pursuing those kinds of opportunities.
And then, as luck would have, it had this call from Nordic Capital and I said, Well, who are you guys and what do you do? And what I'll say is that I didn't originally envision myself getting into private equity. But there were just a couple of things about both the role and the organization that were incredibly appealing. For where I was in my career, the first thing was, you know, I actually really liked consulting, you know, in the first part of my career. But what I didn't like was not having skin in the game and being able to see the results of my work carry through and sort of fully realized. And so the operations function within private equity really helps bring those two things together in providing continuity of experience with our portfolio companies.
You know, the second thing is, I really liked the performance orientation of private equity. So, having been an entrepreneur, I spent a lot of time seeing venture capital, how venture capital worked, how venture capital backed companies worked. And, you know, on the margin, that was a great experience as well. But it was striking to me how much focus was placed on storytelling and management of optics versus. What are the numbers telling us and how do we use those to inform where we go strategically and operationally? And I really appreciated that kind of fact-based, rigorous way of looking at organizations.
You know the third thing? Well, I guess there's two other things, and I'll say both of those were very specific to Nordic capital, as opposed to private equity. Writ large, but one. They just had a fantastic health tech portfolio, and as somebody who spent a lot of time in health tech, I could tell. It was a group of people who really knew the space and had gone, you know, built some assets that I thought would continue to grow and be valuable. And then the final thing is, I sort of love the opportunity to be a bit entrepreneurial in helping grow and promote Nordic within the U.S. So the firm has been around for 35 years.
I had never heard of them because it's been mostly Europe-focused for the first 75 percent of the history of the firm. But I will say that over the last five, you know, five, six years, the U.S. has become a really important area of focus for the firm. And so it's been fun to be part of building out our team and the infrastructure that exists here in the U.S. To catch up really with, frankly, where our capital was already flowing.
I love so much of what you said. And one, I think I completely understand that journey where you've gone through consulting and operating and now melding those together. As you said, kind of like, have some skin in the game and benefit from the value creation, really from both folds. So it's this great middle ground. And then I really also appreciate kind of some of the things you talked about of the business of private equity and becoming more businesslike.
And you think about one, it's this melding and integration of OPS teams and deal teams working symbiotically together, but also becoming more global. And you know, we've had the privilege to do some work with Nordic and seeing this perspective that you all. That goes beyond one shore. And being able to look not only with the business internally, but bring this perspective throughout the world, and that's really unique.
Yeah, no, and look, I mean, I'd say. For almost every one of our U.S..-based companies, they have a global customer base. And for most of our companies in Europe, in many cases, the U.S is one of the most important markets. I mean, so, certainly in the tech space, it is a global market.
But that also applies in a few of the other sectors that we invest into as well.
I think that's fantastic. One of the things I love to ask, just to get to know people better, is what is one of the things that we would know you better for if we knew this about you?
Sure, sure, well, you know, it is maybe a little bit embarrassing to talk about this, but since it's not particularly private, or at least it's not private with certain people. I know my nickname is Thor, which actually in some ways fits great with joining Nordic Capital, right? But you know a little bit of the backstory on that. My co-founder in Avia, the last firm I was at, was also named Eric, and so especially early days, it was always Eric and Eric.
And people get incredibly confused about who said what, and which one are you talking about? And so it was determined that somebody needed to take on a nickname so that we could differentiate between the two. And almost as a throwaway comment, I said, Well, you know, if you're going to give me a nickname, it better be something really masculine, like Thor and really just joking. And it absolutely just stuck. And you know, it's actually interesting.
I mean, I will say that there was a little bit of truth behind the nickname as well. And in the sense that I could be pretty direct. I sometimes threw down the hammer and was very clear about what I thought about something or a specific direction. I do tend to tell things or say things like I see it, which is a very kind of Danish heritage, kind of way of communicating. But I will say, over time, I have acquired a bit of a soft side. And for those of you who are fans of Thor Marvel movies, you may be able to track a little bit of the arc of how. He was very emotional and brash, and, you know, thought he could control everything in the first couple of movies.
And then, I don't know. I even watched Love and Thunder, which is probably one that's off the radar screen for some folks, you know, he's, like, very much focused on how can he help and support the people around him. And so hopefully I've made a bit of that change and followed a bit of that, the arc of that narrative in my career as well.
Of all the nicknames I've had, if I could only be so lucky to have Thor as a nickname.
Yeah, well, if I could only be so lucky to have Chris Hemsworth's, and I will say that's where the nickname definitely doesn't hold true.
One of our recent guests on the podcast is Ed Hein, who is an F-18 naval aviator. And they all get call signs, and the one thing that he made very clear is no one gets a cool call sign. So I think you came out of this great.
All right, maybe I need to resuscitate the nickname a bit.
All right, so let's jump back into this. And one of the great things. With your background from consulting to operating to now as a private equity professional, I'd be really curious. You have this rare vantage of. When you look at a company, I'm sure you kind of have a yardstick or something for you're looking for. And certainly I did when I was in PE.
I had kind of, here's the checklist to help kind of rein in the chaos and the noise that was in my head. So I'd be curious, Eric, What are maybe two or three of the most important traits or ideal traits that you look for in a company? When you think about operational excellence of a business or its related potential? And maybe I position it also is not only what they have, but also what they could have given what they are today.
Well, I think that last point you raise is maybe the place to start, because you know, it's interesting. You don't want a company to be good at everything, then you actually can't create any more meaningful value. And so, in the diligence process, finding some things that don't work well is actually a good thing. Because it says, OK, well, we can work on that and help take them from X to Y. So maybe that's obvious, but I think it's worth just bearing in mind. Here's what I would say is, let me start with the things that are non-negotiable. And then I'll work towards the places where we look and hope to find things that we can improve. So the non-negotiable for us at Nordic, which I think is just really wise, I take no credit for. This is we really do look for companies that have best of breed products within the given vertical that they participate in.
And a bit of that orientation is grounded in the belief that over time, the companies that have the best products will tend to win. And they will tend to win disproportionately. And so I think the diligence process certainly is focused on, Hey, do we believe this is best of breed or has the potential to be, you know, best of breed within a period of ownership? So, having said that, when we think about the levers that we could apply in order to drive value creation, I think there's a. You know, there's a couple of things that really focus on first. It really does start with with the team, right, and the management team that is in these companies. And this takes a little bit of, there's a little bit of subjectivity involved in what that looks like.
Do you have the right folks on the team? But in many ways, it's like sports teams. And it's not just about the individual capabilities of folks. But how do they mesh together and play well together? So that's certainly something we spend time on, you know, the second thing I would say is we are a very growth minded investor.
And so what that, you know? What that tangibly means is we spend a lot of time looking at commercial processes and activities. So what does the sales process look like, what's the sales team look like, what kind of cadence is in place? Are they doing the things they need to do to drive performance conversations within that function?
You know, just broadly, maybe elevating from the sales team and process. What is the go to market, how could that be improved? And, you know, are there opportunities to cross sell and other products on the back of sort of the core customer relationships? And then, lastly, I think, you know, looking at your value based pricing is also something that's important, especially in tech. Are you demonstrating the outcomes that you're driving for your customer base?
So that's, I'd say, maybe the first and biggest lever that we spend time on, you know? The second thing I'll kind of call out is that I spend a lot of time with health care companies that are tech oriented, but no company is purely tech and health care. There's a lot of services and so the management of professional services functions and how that looks and operates, and again, sort of the performance metrics. All of those things are another space that I spend some meaningful time on.
And then the last thing I'll call out, which is maybe not a traditional operating lever, but one that I think a lot about. In collaboration with our deal team, is like, at a strategic level, what are the untapped assets that could really provide meaningful value? So does this company have data assets that could be used in new and different ways? Do they have access to market segments that would allow them to sort of accelerate distribution of other products? So thinking about those kind of additional assets that are outside the bounds of commercial levers and all those kinds of things is another area we spend time on.
I think that you said a lot there, that makes a ton of sense and that one so often. In private equity, what we're looking for is not what the company is, but what it can be. And that's what ultimately gives the investors opportunity to create real value and returns. And then two is this idea of product, market fit and growth and team and all of these great things. That I think when we sum up everything that you said here, you can probably save your future. Alums from the University of Michigan Ross School of Business a lot of time. And just say, listen to this, listen to Eric's last five minutes and don't spend the money.
And by the way, you didn't point out. I'm also an Ohio State alum, so I don't know if the Michigan folks will disown me for that, but it is what it is.
I was thinking, that might be your what I? You might know me better if the inner conflict that you have between two rival schools, but for another time.
So maybe I'd love to kind of segue here into talking about you've got this company, you like what you see, you like what it could be. Then how does Nordic? And how do you then approach the value creation phase? And maybe what are some of the resources that you bring to bear to support your portfolio companies on this journey?
Yeah, well, you know, the how we approach it, you know? What I'd say is, I think there are some kind of pretty traditional phases to the process you close on a deal. There's a heavy emphasis in the first six months on both aligning around the value creation plan and building sprints with that company. And then providing sort of the support to execute on them. And then a bit of a performance monitoring over the period of ownership. And so I think, in a lot of ways, that is probably near universal across many different private equity firms.
What I would say that the how we approach it in terms of resourcing here at Nordic, I do think is somewhat unique, you know? I think it's fair to say that many, if not most, private equity firms will start with investing in functional expertise that they can provide in a horizontal way, that they can scale horizontally across their portfolio. We absolutely do that, and we have a team. Our operations team is about 20 people, and I'd say about a third of the people within our team are in that functional support area. But the other thing we do is we bring in generalists who are, let's call it, experts in a given industry, who really focus on owning the relationship with a handful of portfolio companies.
And so the interplay of those two things, I think, is somewhat unique. And the benefit of that, in my view, is that it allows us to take sort of the CEO view and lens to what are the biggest rocks that need to be addressed. So I try to say, like, OK, if I were running this company, what would matter most to me now? And presumably, many of those are already on the CEO's agenda, and maybe there's one or two that isn't yet.
And I can have a conversation about that. But it does make sure that we're always kind of solving for what matters most to that individual. As opposed to saying, hey, we have this HR thing or procurement thing, we're able to connect those dots, so that's generally how we work as an organization. Maybe just a couple other points that are worth mentioning.
We've also made a meaningful investment in earlier career folks who are just high horsepower talent that can be dropped into a situation to work on things. And so, you know, sometimes portfolio companies don't have the resources to either recruit these people or keep them. And so that is a big source of value to have that kind of flexibility available at the ready. The second thing that we do is, and this is especially true in Europe. But we talk a lot about the use of black belts, and so black belts in the vernacular of Nordic are individuals who are either independent consultants, individuals, or boutique consulting firms that have highly specialized expertise in a given area.
And you know, in Europe, we kind of have this network and we have some events to keep them up to speed and really seek to cultivate those relationships. Because the fact is, you know, I can't solve for I don't know everything, and I know that I can't. So those resources can be highly valuable. And then, you know, I think the final thing I'll just call out is in the U.S, we don't have that network.
And I don't think we'll really seek to build it in a meaningful way. And so we've been quite active at reaching out to you, Sean and your team, because in many ways, you're the U.S Black Belt network that we have.
Well, I appreciate that, and it's a, you know, at the risk of embarrassing. It's a privilege to work with you all because we learn stuff every day and I really liked your perspective about how you approach it. And I think so often in business and life, people will use the word. Or we're going to be strategic, or we'll be tactical, and you all are taking this integrated approach.
We're going to bring the strategic expertise, but we're also going to bring the tactical expertise. And we're going to have some of that in-house and then a lot of it we're going to use house, house. And so you're creating a better whole. And because you always don't have to make this binary choice that I think a lot of people do.
And so that's one of the things I really appreciate about your unique approach to private equity, and then also value creation.
Yeah, no, I think that's right. It is part of what attracted me to come into the organization. I don't think I would have been particularly excited about a role, at least from my own personal experience. If you said, Hey, like Eric, are you only going to go do commercial stuff or go do product stuff? Which is really kind of the two areas where I've spent meaningful time in my career. I like the generalist orientation.
I think that's phenomenal and one of the things, maybe speaking of this kind of integration, this, and I'd be really interesting. How do you manage this interplay between the deal teams, your PE operating executives and the Portcode leadership teams?
It's complicated.
It's the million dollar question in private equity.
Let me make it messier before I make it clearer, which is, I'll add a fourth stakeholder to that list, which is operating chairs. So that's the other thing that's really, I think, reasonably unique to Nordic, which is, we are a very strong believer in the power of bringing in typically former CEOs who spend meaningful time in their chair position. So not, hey, we're going to show up four times a year at the board meeting and hold court, but really, to spend call it a day a week. In collaboration with the executive team to provide coaching counsel, steer on strategic issues. And so I've got operating chairs, deal teams, portfolio, company executives, and there is a little bit of trying to figure out how to manage through that complexity.
That, truth be told, I'm still figuring out, right, so I don't think I've entirely nailed it. But a couple of things that I will say. With regard to deal teams, I do have the belief that operations needs to have a one team approach. And what I mean by that is, we have to be having conversations with executives that are informed by the discussions the deal team is having and are aligned.
And so, you know, the last thing you want is, hey, Eric comes in and has these three topics to discuss. And they're not at all aligned with what the deal teams are having conversations about. So I really, I try to spend a lot of time making sure we're in sync around priorities. Because these folks that run these companies, they have a day job which is not managing their investor. And so we want to recognize that that time is precious. You know, with portfolio company leadership, you know, here. What I would say is my biggest focus is like, how do I build trust with these folks? And they need to believe that in working with me and in spending time with me. That that will make them more successful than they would have been otherwise. And you know, I don't know if you're sort of familiar with the trust equation, or if you've ever sort of heard of this. But you know, I'm going to miss, I'm going to leave one of them out of it. But it's sort of credibility plus reliability, plus something else divided by self-orientation.
And I'm a big believer in trying to think about that as I interact with folks, you know, with operation team members and sort of the extended team at Nordic. I think I've already spoke a little bit about what that looks like, but I try to stay, like, very actively engaged with. You know, we have a pretty well-developed procurement office that has is looking at all the spend data across. Our portfolio has negotiated master service agreements with a number of companies that can get leveraged by our portfolio. So, you know, I got to pull him in. Okay, we need a little bit more juice, all right, Alejandro, help me out here. What can we do?
And so I'm always I'm trying to almost like, bit like a quarterback. To make sure that those resources are all sort of aligned and in sync and that everybody's kind of playing their part, that's right for the situation. And then, I guess, you know, the last thing I'll just say about coordinating with these folks and working with all of the various stakeholders. I called out. There's a bit of a remind, you know, continually reminding myself that, and this is like a recovering control addict point. Like, ultimately, it's not the operations teams decisions that get made here, right? Like we're here in service of others.
We can have points of view, we should share those points of view, we should help hash them out. But, you know, Jeff Bezos has this disagree and commit, you know, notion which is like, Hey, call out what you're thinking and then don't debate it ad nauseum. And once a decision is made, you got to get on the bus and move with it.
And so that's kind of a I just, I think, an important mindset to bring to the job.
Yeah, I love that and one of the things that I I'm taking away and actually writing notes on the side on this. Is this this whole concept that you bring up of? First, you need to, you know, you need to have trust, and you need to have alignment. And that's true not only within private equity and this kind of multifaceted symphony of motion that's happening. But also it makes me think about just kind of where I am on my entrepreneurial journey. And that even within companies, you want a silo and people want to do these their own things, and you have to have disagreements, but you also have to commitment.
And so, you know, kind of what you're saying. The way that you are approaching it is is I'm thinking about in in where the future of private equity going is. This, you know, you're running a private equity firm in some ways, like a larger hole in where the portfolio company, the private equity firm. Their various constituents are broadly aligned in building trust, as a larger hole in itself. As the business of private equity is becoming a business. But you're giving people at the operating company level to Freewill to create truly differential businesses. And you let them to kind of get their, you know, call their shots at the same time. So I think that's it's really forward thinking and I think where the future of private equity is going, for sure.
Yeah, look, I think I would agree with everything that you just said there. And I think the power of the model is that at the end of the day, everybody's largely solving for the same things. We know we're all looking to sort of create value. But the nature of everyone being in slightly different organizations or seats can sometimes create some friction, and some of that friction is quite healthy.
And but when things get tough, the only way to really work through those is if you've built trust with people that you're working with. So anyway, I maybe I'm sounding like a bit of a softie here. But I think it is notable that much of the conversation here has hasn't been particularly focused on hey, this tool or this, you know, best practice, or whatever the case may be. Those things are all, of course, you know, important, but I don't know that they're as foundationally important as some of the things we've talked about.
Yeah, I view it as it's almost like making a meal, you know, when there's a couple of people in the kitchen who all know what they're doing. It's not always pretty while you're making it, but the end result, it usually tastes pretty good.
Exactly right.
So I'd be curious, Eric, you have one of these rare perspectives. Not only from just seeing all the facets of consulting and operating and PE, but also through Nordic, you get this lens of kind of USPE and Europe PE. As you look at the different approaches, where do you see some of the similarities and maybe some of the distinctions between the approaches?
Yeah, well, look, you know, it's interesting, I think it's first. First off, it's worth saying this is my first gig in private equity. So I don't, you know, I don't have a five data points to tell you, compare and contrast now. Having said that, I do have a couple of impressions just from talking to other people in the private equity community, and certainly my own experiences within Nordic.
Let me start with the thing that's very clearly the same between us and Europe private equity, which is, we're performance focused and performance driven. But maybe, you know, the how we get to performance, I think, sometimes will vary by shades of, by degrees. And you know what I would say, you know, culturally. Within our firm. What we try to do is we try to take a very collaborative approach to engaging with some of our, with our portfolio company executives. And maybe the other way to say that is like, I hear a lot within private equity. Hey, we've got this playbook.
It's 128 pages and we're going to drop it on a company we invest in. I think our orientation is, you know, not 100 of any given playbook we might have will apply for a given investment. And so we want to start with collaboratively building a VCP plan with those executives. And some of those things on that list are not going to be things that we have a playbook or expertise, or whatever the case may be. But we have to back to the point on trust. We have to trust that the people that we have in those seats, running those organizations are directing their energy and focus to the things that matter most.
Now, having said all that, we do have points of view on what best practice looks like. And part of my job and responsibility is to surface and elevate those things that I know are working at other portfolio companies. And make sure that a company that's not doing those things really is both aware of it and strongly considers pursuing it. So, you know, as an example, we do have pretty strong points of view on what good revenue operations looks like to just drive a commercial engine. And I tend to be, I will say, unapologetic in saying, if you are not doing XYZ, why not? And how do we accelerate and get that started?
So maybe just the summary point that I would make here is on the spectrum of hey, we've got this playbook, go forth and execute, and the other side of the spectrum of Hey, here's our phone number, call us if you need help. We're really trying to walk a fine line in the middle ground between those two approaches, in a way that's viewed as value-added by our portfolio company executives.
I think that's a great approach, and as we all reflect on things, and certainly I do so often. It's easy to get caught in the world that I always go back to this and versus, or and this. You know, we're going to be at one pole or the other. And so often, the truth lies somewhere in between. And like your kind of perspective on, you can have common principles, but custom execution in terms of how do you get it right? It doesn't have to be or this or that.
It's usually somewhere in that middle. I think that's a great approach that, you know, certainly, I'll take back from this conversation, even as I think about our own business, because it's, you know, the world's not binary.
That's right, absolutely right.
So, Eric, one of the things that I think most people, if you ask people who knew me back in the day, it's like it was. I was a work in progress. And and, and, and, and I-.
I still am.
I was going to say, and I am a work in progress, particularly if you ask people who know me today. And and and the key? But I've always been kind of one of these people. That you never cross the finish line and the day you, the day you do, you're like, you didn't know that. The next race already started. And so if I could go back to my prior self and even look back of, Wow. I missed all these races because I didn't know they started. You know, I wish I knew this.
Then what would be one of the things? If you were to look back to your, you know, the younger Eric Jensen pre-thor days and say, Young Eric? You know, this might be something that you should listen to.
Yes, this is a good question, so maybe very much in the spirit of my ex-consultant tendencies, you know? Ask me to give you one thing and I'm going to give you three. So everything has to be in threes. So I'll call out three things. The first is practice rule number six.
So I learned about rule number six from this book called The Art of Possibility by Ben Zander, who is a orchestra, orchestrates various symphonies. And the essence of Rule number six is Don't take yourself too seriously, right? In my consulting days, I absolutely took myself too seriously. I thought every meeting, every client situation was a very high risk situation. And I entirely overestimated both my own importance and the importance of what I was necessarily working on at the time.
You know, in my entrepreneurial days, I probably took that even further, you know, in terms of viewing everything as sort of life or death. Is this company going to make it, is this decision going to make or break where we head? And in PE, it's a risk that you take everything very seriously, given looking at the numbers all the time and saying, where is this going? But look, you know, life is more fun if you don't take it seriously.
And it's better mentally to not ride the roller coaster if you can avoid it. So that's thing. One thing, two is keep reading. So I was a voracious reader when I was a child, through high school into college.
And then when I went out into the professional world, I stopped reading. I just stopped. I didn't read anything outside of work materials. And around when I turned 40, I know I'm sort of now dating myself. I decided to really pick back up reading and took the orientation of, Hey, if anybody recommends a book to me, I'm just going to buy it immediately.
It's easy enough on Amazon, you know, click of a button before the conversation is over to make that happen. And so a couple of you probably noticed some themes here, but just I'll call out a couple genres I spend time on. So stoicism is one area of interest, with Ryan Holiday, who's got a variety of books in this area, particularly interested in Kind of Human Behavior. And Robert Greene has written a number of fascinating books. 48 Laws of Power, The Laws of Human Nature, The Art of Seduction. Lots of books in that category. In the category of History and Human Evolution, Yuval Harari has written some amazing books about humanity.
Sapiens is just probably a top three book for me. And then lastly, in the category of productivity and resilience. Actually, a former colleague of mine from McKinsey, Brad Stolberg, is just a great writer and most recently published a book called Master of Change. That I'm working my way through. So, you know, keep reading. And then my final point, and I'll be way more short here. With this one, Sean become a bit verbose, but maybe just I would tell myself that careers aren't linear.
And they're probably fair to say that they're sort of happy accidents. And so, you know, enjoy the ride, and certainly enjoying the ride where I am today. And I've been glad to talk a bit about it with you here today on this podcast.
I think those are all great pieces of advice, not only for your former 22-year-old self, but for the current version of Sean Mooney here. So I'm like, on the side, I'm writing these down. And it's so true in that it's so easy to get caught with these blinders on and you're just running. And I've actually, you know, within our company, I've assigned team members these opportunities. Like, you got to remind me, we got to give hugs and like and smell the roses. Just because it's so easy to just get trapped. Particularly for people who have this kind of high achiever, you know, gift, but also sickness.
Yes.
And then the book thing. I was just at lunch with a couple guys who had moved from the New York area to Nashville the other day. And we just started talking about the books we're reading, and so we all. Afterwards, we all followed up and we sent the links to the books and the same thing you said, just hit it on Amazon. So I've got. I think I have about 10 books on my side table, all of which are about a third read right now.
But.
Well, I need the links, I need the links, I'm on my way.
And so I think these are great pieces of advice. I've learned a ton. I've got a mini MBA here, so Eric, thank you, thank you.
Thank you for so much for spending the time and sharing your wisdom and insights here with us today.
Absolutely, Sean, thank you for inviting me on the program. really appreciate it.
Absolutely.
Special thanks to Eric for joining. If you'd like to learn more about Eric and Nordic Capital, please see the episode notes for links. Please continue to look for us anywhere you find your favorite podcasts, including Apple, Google and Spotify. We truly appreciate your support. If you like what you hear, please follow, rate, review, and share.
It really helps us when you do this, so thank you in advance. In the meantime, if you need to be connected with the world's best in class private equity grade professional service providers, independent consultants, interim executives, or anything else, give us a call or visit our website at bluewave..net. That's b-l-u-w-a-v-e, and we'll support your success.
Onward.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os