2024-06-07 02:11:11
The Tucker Carlson Show is your beacon of free speech and honest reporting in a media landscape dominated by misinformation. The only solution to ending the propaganda spiral is by telling the truth. That's our job. Every day. No matter what.
Welcome to the Tucker Carlson Show. It's become pretty clear that the mainstream media are dying, they can't die quickly enough, and there's a reason they're dying, because they lie. They lied so much it killed them. We're not doing that. At TuckerCarlson.com we promise to bring you the most honest content, the most honest interviews we can, without fear or favor.
Here's the latest. Do you know, James Carville?
Yes.
So he got stuck at a roast one time when we worked together in New Orleans, and had to take a leak, and it was on C-Span, and on the tape, which I have seen, he's sitting there and he's kind of shuffling in his seat, and all of a sudden he takes this water pitcher off the table and sort of, he takes a leak in the water pitcher.
Oh gosh.
So what is that thing? moving on your lapel, on your pocket? That's the debt.
That's my anxiety generator.
It's actually making me really anxious. Is that real-time?
Yes, so it's synced to Treasury, it gets the debt to the penny once a day, and then it looks at what the debt was a year ago, and it comes up with a rolling average debt per second, and it interpolates on weekends and holidays when the Treasury is not paying attention. I am.
So I think you're the only one who wants to know.
Yes, and I want my colleagues to know, and it's great to wear this thing in an elevator with like Adam Schiff, and he's got nowhere to look. I once caught a female congresswoman staring at it, and had to tell her my eyes were up here.
She asked me why I didn't make a belt buckle out of it.
Can you say what it was, because I like-.
No, I cannot.
Oh, well, she's funny. That's very impressive. So what's the message of it?
The message is, this is urgent. It's hard to comprehend 14 digits of debt, but when you see the last five digits are moving so fast, you can't perceive them with your eyes, then you kind of understand, whoa, we got a problem here. I mean, it's $100,000 a second, roughly. So imagine we had this catapult, and we were launching cyber trucks once a second into the ocean. That's how much debt we're taking on continuously.
Now there is some good news. I noticed last month it went down, and I'm like, is my debt clock broken? Why is it going down? And then I realized, oh, it's April 15th. Everybody's paying their taxes.
So the good news is we balanced it for a month. The bad news is April 15th is the only reason that happened, and now the debt's going back up again.
So maybe when it gets so big, it becomes something that you have to ignore. It's almost like if you fall off the wagon from drinking, you binge. If you fall off your New Year's diet, you just eat the pizza and the bread and jerry. It's like, why do you care? You know, you sort of go crazy, and it feels like we're there.
I am trying to make people feel very uncomfortable. I wear this on the floor of the house. Yeah. And people, literally, they'll press the button that says yay or nay. I've argued we should relabel the voting button.
spend and don't spend. They're red and green. if you got that far and can't read. I say it's like stop and go, but I've seen people press the spend button, then turn around and look at my debt badge and ask, did it just go up? But I want them to realize there are consequences to what they're doing, because they have been, I think, as you said, just ignoring it, putting it off to the side.
It almost feels like it's so big that why even deal with it?
That's where we are. I think a lot of lawmakers are apathetic. They're like, well, we can't fix it. We're not going to fix it. We might as well indulge in it, and I'll see what I can get.
Well, exactly. Yeah. So where does it end?
Right now, we're able to finance it because we're the world's reserve currency. And when we print more money, which we're doing all the time, the Fed is doing that. We're actually taxing the world. Everybody in the world who holds dollars gets like a 3% transaction fee. I say we're kind of like the credit card at the gas station that gets 3% because you're using that credit card.
Well, we get 3% from inflation we cause because the world is using our currency, and we can do that as long as they use our currency. But I think it's going to end at some point. They're going to quit using our dollars as reserve currency. I mean, I watched your interview with Putin, and one of the things, whether you hate him or not, one of the things he said that is true is when we sanctioned him, before we sanctioned Russia, 70% of their transactions were in U.S. dollars.
And after the sanctions, it's less than 20% of their transactions are in U.
S. dollars. So what we're doing with all these sanctions, ironically, we're shooting ourselves in the foot. every time we sanction a country and say you can't use our currency to have a transaction. We're taking away our ability to charge them 3% for that transaction, because when we print 3% more dollars, we're just taking that money.
And we're also sending a really clear signal, which is the dollar is not safe for you.
Right.
It's the reserve currency because it's a safe haven, because it's a stable country. It's the most stable country in the world, and we're not going to weaponize the dollar because that would be shooting ourselves. But suddenly we are.
And they'll tolerate like 3%, because we're not backed by dollars. We're backed by aircraft carriers right now. So they'll sort of tolerate that 3%. But one of the things we recently did in Congress, we passed something called the Repo Act, where we said we're just going to seize all of Russia's sovereign assets in the United States. Well, it turns out a lot of that is Treasury debt that they've agreed to buy so that they can hold dollars.
And here's the problem with that. When people see that we've seized their money that they gave us in exchange for these Treasury notes, then other countries won't want to buy our debt. It's already happening. And the price of a long-term bond that the Treasury puts out will go, it's already gone above 4%. It's like over 4.5%.
They don't want to buy them anymore, because, you know, we probably wouldn't seize Great Britain's assets, but I could see us seizing China's assets.
Why would, I mean, that seems like theft. Just like take a country's assets, I mean, that belongs to the people of the country, right? It's not just Putin.
It is theft. Like, it's immoral. But even if you're okay with the amorality or immorality of it, it's short-sighted, because eventually it'll catch up with us.
So, do any of the dumbos you work with understand that? Did you say, wait a second, if we do this, first of all, it's wrong, and if we're going to be a beacon of light and order and justice in the world, we should abide by those principles. But even if you don't care about the, even if, as you said, you're immoral, like it's self-defeating to do this. Do they understand that?
Some of them understand it, but it doesn't matter. They'll still vote for something like the Repo Act anyway, because it's popular.
And with whom?
With voters. They think, yeah, take Russia's money. Like, you know, let's take, yeah, yeah, that'd be great. Let's take their money and use it in a war against them. It kind of feels good.
But the problem is it's not moral in the long run and it won't work in the long run, even if you were okay with it.
Why are we in a war with Russia? I've never figured that out. Why Russia? It almost seems like they picked it off a map. Like, why would it be a war with Russia?
You know, what's interesting is, we were in Afghanistan and I was tracking this. I talked to the special inspector general, John Sopko, about twice a year about the money that was being wasted in Afghanistan. It was about $50 billion a year. And I was glad to see us get out of Afghanistan, but kind of like feathering the clutch and shifting gears, we just went from second gear to third gear. Because as soon as we quit spending $50 billion a year in Afghanistan, we started spending more than $50 billion a year.
in Ukraine. There's a military industrial complex, they call it the Defense Industrial Base. now, in the United States. They say we have to, they're hungry and we've got to keep them fed. And since we don't have any of our own wars and we don't have a reason to deplete our stocks and our bombs and weapons that we have, we engage in these other things to keep them healthy and thriving.
In fact, the Biden administration even made that argument in a letter to Congress for why we should do this supplemental foreign aid to Israel, to Ukraine, to Taiwan. They made the argument that the Defense Industrial Base needs to be strong, and so we need to spend this money. And they gave a list of all the states in the United States that would benefit from this spending. And that's why they said we should do it.
But if you're, if, I mean, look, everyone who lives here wants to be proud of the country. I always have been. And I'm proud of its people still. But if your main export is death, you know, that, I mean, why?
It doesn't work in the long run. I mean, there is a blowback. We're engendering a lot of ill will. Look, 10 years ago, even more recently than that, the only way we could get to the space station was on a Russian rocket. Right.
And we, you know, we had a collaboration with them. We were able to get to space that way. And now we don't. I mean, it's. and the bad thing that's, you know, like in the Middle East, Israel is creating tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of people who are going to hate the United States.
And, you know, they're going to hate Israel also. But because we're giving Israel the weapons to do what they're doing, we're creating a lot of people who hate us in this country.
But we're told that it's essential to our national security to do that. Do you believe that?
No, I don't see that. I mean, one of the reasons, like I said, the Biden letter said, well, we need to keep our industrial base strong. So let's fund all these weapons and send them over. But I don't see how it's strengthening our country. In fact, we're getting weaker by doing it.
So you've been, I think, the lone Republican to dissent from a lot of these votes. How many votes have there been on this question? And where have you voted on them?
I've tried to keep track. There were something like 18 votes on Ukraine, and I voted against every one of them. since, like 2014,, when we started, you know, saber rattling. We do these non-binding resolutions, whereas, you know, Russia's evil, you know, whereas we support democracy. Now, even then, we knew that Ukraine was just corrupt as hell.
But, you know, like the most corrupt country in Europe by far.
Yeah. So I started, you know, there's been 16 or 20 votes on Ukraine. I've been against all of those. just in the last seven months. There have been probably 30 votes on Israel in the Middle East.
30? 30..
How many votes on the U.
S. border during that time?
Oh, maybe, maybe four show votes that, you know, where. we know they're going nowhere in the Senate. Look, we haven't named 30 post offices.
Last month, we voted like 15 or 16 times on issues related to Israel. And, you know, I've been hit because I voted no on all of those.
Why do you, because you hate Israel, or is there another reason?
No, because I'm against sending our money overseas. I'm against starting another proxy war. I'm against sanctions, because it's going to weaken the dollar. I'm for free speech. Like all of these resolutions run afoul of those things.
And that's why I can't vote for them.
Tell us what the free speech part of it.
So recently they brought a bill to Congress and this was actually a binding bill, not a non-binding. resolution. Like this was going to have the effect of law and people would get, you know, prosecuted if they engaged in anti-Semitism on campuses. And the problem with this bill is they use some international definition of anti-Semitism on a website somewhere. My first question is, why don't you just put the definition in the bill?
Why are you pointing to somebody's URL in a piece of legislation?
You are the Congress, right? Right. We are the laws.
We should be. Instead, we're referencing a website that's not even, you know, hosted in the United States. And so. but so I went to this website and it's got a fairly short definition, but it's also got examples of things that would be considered anti-Semitism. And some of these are actually passages in the New Testament, if you will, would be banned by this international definition of anti-Semitism.
For instance, saying that Jews killed Jesus, which is in the Bible, he was, he was not welcome among his own people. OK. And so that would be anti-Semitism. And if you engaged in that on campus or just offered that as a thought, let's say in a classroom, you would be anti-Semitic and you would run afoul of the Department of Education and some federal laws. And, you know, there were other examples in there that were hard to believe.
For instance, comparing the policies of Israel to to the Nazi regime would be anti-Semitic. But the question is, what if their, what if their policies ever became the same? Is this a static definition?
Or what if we just have different opinions and your opinion is now a crime? Right. I mean, even if it's abhorrent, even if it's wrong and stupid.
Yeah. It's still legal. It should be.
You may have come to the obvious conclusion that the real debate is not between Republican and Democrat or socialist and capitalist, right, left. The real battle is between people who are lying on purpose and people who are trying to tell you the truth. It's between good and evil. It's between honesty and falsehood. And we hope we are on the former side.
That's why we created this network, the Tucker Carlson Network. And we invite you to subscribe to it. You go to TuckerCarlson.com slash podcast. Our entire archive is there. A lot of behind the scenes footage of what actually happens in this barn, when only an iPhone is running.
TuckerCarlson.
com slash podcast. You will not regret it. So, your colleagues, I think it passed, right?
Oh, yeah. It passed with flying colors. But at least a few people woke up to this.
I mean, so, but the members of Congress who go to church on Sunday, who just voted to ban the New Testament on campus, make it illegal to quote from the New Testament, the Christian Bible, like. how did they square that?
I think their voters. let them get away with it. I mean, they don't have to square it unless they're.
But why would they want to do something like that?
Because there's a lot of pressure in Congress to vote for these things. And our Republican leadership thinks they're so smart. You know, we're in an election year and they want to bring up issues. They want to put them in front of Congress and make us vote on them, whether they're going anywhere in the Senate or not. And they want to split the Democrats.
They want to show that Republicans are united and then split the Democrats. That's one of the reasons they do it. Another reason they do it is there's a foreign interest group called AIPAC that, you know, got the ear of this current speaker and demanded 16 votes in April on on Israel or the Middle East. We haven't had 16 votes in April on the United States in Congress.
So what's AIPAC?
AIPAC is the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. And they didn't start out as a PAC in the sense of a political action committee, but now they have a political action committee. Ostensibly, it's a group of Americans who lobby on behalf of Israel. They're for anything, Israel. And they're a very effective lobbying group.
They get in there. They they try to get me to write a white paper as a candidate, for instance, for Congress. They almost get on one on Israel like that and I wouldn't do it. And they said, why? And I'm like, I don't do homework for lobbyists.
Right. I mean, I didn't. I didn't like writing term papers at college. I'm not writing one for you.
What did they say? They said, oh, well, here, just copy Rand Paul's term paper and put your name on it. We'll accept that. And I'm like, no, I'm still not cribbing somebody else's homework to do homework. I'm not turning in my homework for you.
And you're laughing. But you know what? I bet I may be the only Republican in Congress who hasn't done homework for APAC. And it's just what it is. It's conditioning.
They want you to do something very simple and benign. And, you know, for them, they don't really. they don't really grade your term paper. They just want to know that you'll do something for them. And if you'll do something for them as a candidate, you're more likely to do something for them as as a congressman when you get in there.
So this my rift started out in 2012, when I refused to turn in an Israel. How did they respond to that?
Well, they kind of got in my race a little too late there in the beginning and because it was hard to tell that I was actually going to win. And when they saw I was going to win, that's when they tried to get me to do the term paper. They didn't have a political action committee at the time. They couldn't spend hundreds of thousands or millions of dollars against me at that time. It was just sort of like a whisper campaign to try to, hey, don't vote for him.
Blah, blah, blah. Why? Because at that point, they sensed I wouldn't do what they wanted.
What did they whisper against you? What were they saying about you?
Well, they would do it through, for instance, churches, evangelical churches. They've got an organization called Christians United for Israel, where they sort of co-opted evangelicals. People think it's a grassroots movement. in Kentucky. It's actually a top down movement from AIPAC, so that people who aren't even Jewish will feel like they've got to support Israel, you know, no matter what.
And even if it's a secular state that funds abortions, they just sort of forget that part. And we've got to fund Israel. So they have networks. So it's more than just about the money.
So you get elected despite their efforts. And then what happens? Do you talk to them after that?
And by the way, let me just put a little footnote here. I'm not against Israel. I've never voted to sanction Israel. I've never said anything particularly critical of Israel, you know, other than, for instance, right now they're bombing. They've killed one percent of the civilian population in Gaza.
That's concerning to me. But so what do they do now?
Yeah, you get elected 2012.
. Do you hear from them again?
I vote my conscience, which they won't tolerate. So they ran with their 501c4 before they had a super PAC. They were running educational advocacy ads against me, saying that, you know, I'm bad on Israel. They didn't say don't vote for him. They just said he's, he's a bad guy.
And so I said, all right, well, you're not welcome in my office anymore, because for years I invited him into my office. Let's talk this through. Let me explain to you. I'm a libertarian, leaning Republican. I don't vote for foreign aid for anybody.
So don't be offended. when I don't vote for your foreign aid. I don't vote for wars anywhere. So don't be offended if I tell you that. I'm for free speech, even if it's abhorrent.
And, you know, we used to talk, but now they're banned from my office. Situation went from bad to worse. This election cycle, they spent $400,000 against me, $90,000 last fall, running TV ads in my district and Facebook ads and whatnot, trying to equate me with the squad. And then this most recently, in fact, as I'm speaking to you today, even though my election is over, they're still running hundreds of thousand dollars of negative ads.
It's a little weird, though, because, as you said, you're probably the only Republican in the House who hasn't done homework for them, who isn't on their side.
And that's okay. I mean, you can have, you know, you're a libertarian oriented Republican from Northern Kentucky. You're probably not going to single handedly determine our foreign policy. So I think you should, but you don't, and you're not going to. So why do they care?
Why not just let Thomas Massey be Thomas Massey in Northern Kentucky? Like, why the need to crush you?
I don't know. I think they don't want one horse out of the barn. If one person starts speaking the truth, they're afraid it could be contagious, perhaps, or it's like a new car. They go to Mike Johnson and they say, we want a Cadillac, you know, Escalade with pearl white paint. And here's, you know, here's the rims we want.
And Mike Johnson puts that bill on the floor. It passes with a unanimous vote, except for one guy votes no. And I think they feel like it's a scratch on their car. They wanted a brand new car and it got scratched by this guy named Massey. They were going to drive it over to the Senate and ask for unanimous consent.
But now the senators are saying, wait, why this wasn't unanimous in the House. Why should we do it unanimously in the Senate? And it starts raising questions. And I think that's why they get mad.
What I find interesting is that it's not just that they disagree with your views, which they do. And I think they have an absolute right to disagree with anybody's views. We all do. But they've called you a bigot and they call you an anti-Semite and say you're a hater and try to destroy your character. That seems like a very different level of response to me.
Right.
They, there's no need to do that. I'm not anti-Semitic. I don't have an anti-Semitic hair in my head. Okay. It's, I mean, I don't like AIPAC anymore.
Like I used to be neutral toward AIPAC, right. But I, I have no antagonistic feelings toward Jewish people. I am the last thing. I think I'm probably the least xenophobic person in Congress. I mean, these are the guys, my colleagues want to sanction everybody, you know, declare them terrorist states, you know, come up with these strongly worded resolutions.
I don't vote for any of that crap. Right. I'll, unless somebody does harm to me, I'm not going to call them anything. So I get called names just for staying out of all of this political posture.
That's disgusting though. Isn't it?
You know, I guess that's your character.
They can, they can disagree with your views, but, but to call you like the worst thing you can be in America, like that's disgusting.
You know, I have a thick skin, and here's the good news, Tucker, my constituents aren't falling for it. Two weeks ago, I just had a primary and got 76% of the vote, with AIPAC running hundreds of thousand dollars of ads. So it's, it's not working against me. I, I think it's short-sighted on their, you know, on their side to do this. They're just burning money, but they're trying to make an example of me.
But they're also exposing their weakness.
I think they are. I think they've exposed a real weakness here, and, you know, it used to be just me voting against some of these resolutions, but recently, where they tried to ban passages in the New Testament, I think we got like almost two dozen Republicans who said, wait, hold on there.
Can I ask a question, though? Just a fundamental question. So the Biden administration has put a bunch of people in jail for violating something called FARRA, the Foreign Agent Registration Act, 1936-ish. It's been on the books for, you know, 90 years. And it's never been enforced ever until recently, until really the Trump era and Biden era.
So, but the law requires people who lobby on behalf of foreign governments to register. It's that simple. And this is the largest lobby in the United, most effective lobby in the United States on behalf of a foreign government. Are they registered with FARRA?
They're not, but they should be.
Well, how, how can that, how can that be? How can they put Paul Manafort in jail, which they did on a FARRA violation, and a bunch of other people in jail on FARRA violations, but the largest and most effective and most feared foreign lobby working for a foreign government doesn't have to register under the law. That's insane.
Oh man, don't make me take their side, but I'll explain as best as I can what their argument is.
I mean, maybe I'm wrong. Maybe we should take their side. I don't know.
Well, I'm going to agree with you at a second, but let me at least offer what I think is their argument. They would say we are Americans. You know, the members of AIPAC are Americans and that they have the right to free speech.
Paul Manafort's an American. Right, right.
Yeah. That, so there's. the good rebuttal is FARRA applies not to foreigners, to foreign agents of foreign principals, agents of foreign principals.
It's Americans lobbying on behalf of foreign governments.
So this is, AIPAC is exactly what FARRA is meant for. Now they would say, and we have a first amendment, right? Okay, well, I agree with you there, but we also have election laws and to the, it's disclosure, right? We're, they're not, FARRA doesn't say, you can't say. Thomas Massey's, you know, an ignorant hillbilly.
You're allowed to say that if you want to, but we just want to check where your money's coming from. Tell us where it's coming from, what you're spending it on. And if you are lobbying on behalf of a foreign country. So they should be. now to your point, they should be registered with FARRA.
This is what FARRA is, is where there's gray area where it's an American representing a foreign country. Let's, let's look and see if you're getting any money from that foreign country. Are you a dual citizen with that foreign country? Are you being directed by, for instance, is Netanyahu speaking to your group, advising you on your next move? Those, are you getting money from the military industrial complex?
Like, because, to understand AIPAC, I think it's easiest to model them as a military industrial lobby. Like their biggest thing is they want more equipment, more military equipment from the United States, going to Israel. In fact, when they used to be allowed in my office, the thing they, the argument they would make is, Oh, we're just stimulating the U S military industrial complex, because every single penny of the 3.8 billion that they nominally get now they're getting way more than that, but that Israel nominally gets goes to U S military contractors. Now, that didn't make me warm and fuzzy. Okay.
But that is their argument. And if you notice what they advocate for, I think sometimes they advocate for things that even Israelis wouldn't advocate for. Like they would, I think, be okay with a war with Iran, like an all out, you know, apocalyptic war with Iran. Whereas there are people in Israel say, Whoa, hold on a second. We we'd rather not have a war with Iran, but AIPAC does things that lead us in that direction.
And so they're kind of like what the NRA is to gun owners, AIPAC is to Israel, or what the farm bureau is to farmers, AIPAC is to Israel. In other words,
Represents a faction.
Right. They represent a faction, but usually a corporate faction that, and they're using the imprimatur of grassroots that they've diluted or confused into bullying congressmen, and the NRA does that and farm bureau does that. I'm, I'm picking on some, you know, other right-wing groups here.
Well, for sure. And by the way, I think there are probably a lot of things that AIPAC is for that I'm for and farm bureau NRA, same thing, but it's, I just, the idea of a foreign government playing in our political campaigns openly.
Openly in that they are showing you they're doing it, but opaquely in that you can't track it because they're not registered.
Is there any other Republican who has your views on this?
Well, I have Republicans who come to me on the floor and say, I wish I could vote with you today. Yours is the right vote, but I would just take too much flack back home. And I have Republicans who come to me and say, that's wrong. What AIPAC is doing to you. Let me talk to my AIPAC person.
By the way, everybody but me has an AIPAC person.
What does that mean? an AIPAC person?
It's like your babysitter, your AIPAC babysitter, who is always talking to you for AIPAC. They're probably a constituent in your district, but they are, you know, firmly embedded in AIPAC.
And every member has something like this?
Every, I don't know how it works on the Democrat side, but that's how it works on the Republican side. And when they, and when they come to DC, you go have lunch with them and they've got your cell number and you have conversations with them. So I've had like, that's absolutely crazy. I've had four members of Congress say, I'll talk to my AIPAC person. And it's clearly what we call them, my AIPAC guy.
I'll talk to my AIPAC guy and see if I can get him to, you know, dial those ads back.
Why have I never heard this before?
It doesn't benefit anybody. Why would they want to tell their constituents that they've basically got a buddy system with somebody who's representing a foreign country? It doesn't benefit the Congressman for people to know that. So they're not going to tell you that.
It's, it's in, have you seen any other country do anything like this? Like Russia, Russia obviously determines the outcome of our elections. We keep hearing that. Does anyone have a Putin guy that they talk to?
Not only do they not have a Putin guy, they don't, they don't have a Britain guy. They don't have an Australian guy. They, you know, they don't have a Germany dude. Like. it's the only country that does this, that has somebody that like.
uniformly, I guarantee there's some spreadsheet at AIPAC where, where, you know, the, the AIPAC dude is, who's matched up with the Congressman, is there and then all the Congressman's votes on the issue. Oh, has the Congressman been to Israel? They, they pay for trips for Congressman and their spouses to go to Israel. I may be, I mean, I don't, I'm not the only Republican who hasn't taken the AIPAC trip to Israel, but I'm probably one of a dozen that hasn't taken that trip. And the other ones just haven't got around to it.
What's the trip like, do you know?
It's kind of like, I think, vacation-y, you go see the wall, you go see the, you know, the sites, things like that.
It's such a great, I must say it's such a great country. Jerusalem, especially. It's just such a wonderful place that that's got to have a big effect.
You go like swim in the Dead Sea. Yeah. Yeah. I've done that. Yeah.
Not on an AIPAC trip, but I would recommend it to anyone.
Are you sure it wasn't an AIPAC trip?
I paid for it myself. No, I mean, it's, it's just funny. I mean, I am like a legit lover of Israel, of the place Israel. I like the people and I love the food and like the whole thing is so great. Look, they have, they've, but that's distinct from the government of Israel, which is just a foreign government.
My, my sense is the people are very entrepreneurial, that they're publicly minded, you know, they care about their country, that, that they're generally good people, right?
That's certainly been my experience in trips there. for sure. It's great. It's just, that's, I mean, I think it's probably one of my favorite, maybe my all-time favorite place to go with my family, but that's just a completely different thing from taking orders from its government, right? I mean, right?
No, again, they'll say it's, these are American citizens who are, you know, coordinating all.
It's just, again, this is almost a rhetorical question, but in your whatever, 12, 14 years in Congress, 12 years, have you ever seen any indication that Russia is influencing election outcomes or candidates or members?
Not, not in a quiet way. Like, you know, they'll put out statements. Russia obviously has Russia Today, RT.
Yeah. I think it's been banned, but yeah.
I like, I think, you know, Kentucky Fried Chicken, of which I'm a big fan, being from Kentucky, right? They realized that fried was, became sort of a pejorative and people didn't want to eat fried food. So they changed the name to KFC. So you don't have to say fried. Okay.
Russia Today changed their name to RT. So you don't have to say Russia, but there's a strong analogy there. But I mean, there are efforts. You'd be a fool to think that they're not trying to influence things here, just like we are there. We, you know, we have what is it, Radio Free Europe and Voice of America.
We have, I mean, we spend a billion dollars, well over a billion dollars, on the foreign propaganda that's out in the open that we know about, right? So there are foreigners spending money on propaganda over here as well. I don't want to say they're not involved, but people don't say, oh, I need to go talk to my Russia guy.
But you've never like in the cloak room or on the floor at dinner, you've never heard another Republican member say, I'd love to vote for this, but Putin doesn't want me to.
I have never heard that. You haven't?
What about China?
No, there's, I mean, unless it's a spy sleeping with a Democrat, there's some of that going on. Yeah.
But that's not, that's not in public. So how do you think, it's just interesting? because you're, you're clearly not a bigot. I think it's very obvious.
And they've called you one and they've spent, you know, millions of dollars against you over the years. And it has had no effect. You get reelected in the primary in the seventies. So, like, why are they still spending against you and in your state, statewide? And can you just continue to serve in Congress while disobeying?
Well, they say that they don't want me to run statewide. They're worried that I'll run for McConnell's seat. And so they're trying to send me a message. That's what they would tell you. Um, but why, I don't know what the message is.
Maybe it's a little presumptuous to decide.
I've never said that I'm running for the Senate, right? Yeah. I, I'm pretty much disinterested in it, personally and publicly, but just in case they're running ads statewide. Now, mind you, there are six congressional districts in Kentucky, and I only represent one of them. They're running the ads in all six congressional districts, just in case.
Amazing. What do you think of Mitch McConnell after all these years of being in the delegation with him?
Um, he's a shrewd guy.
Yep.
He's quick. He's, um, let me, let me give you an example of how quick he is. So we had a Congressman, Jamie Comer, who's now chaired the oversight committee. He got elected in a special election, which means you come in, in the middle of a term and you have to boot up with no staff. And so it's, it's kind of, uh, you know, disorienting.
So Mitch McConnell had a, uh, had an event for Jamie Comer on his first day in Congress, it was in a townhouse with like 200 lobbyists, by the way, I'm never going to get invited to one of these now that I tell you the story, uh, and so Jamie's there and McConnell goes, I believe Jamie took his first vote tonight.
And that's such a perfect imitation.
And I wasn't supposed to speak, but I interrupted Senator McConnell, who was at the time, the majority leader. And I said, yes, Senator McConnell, he did take his first vote and I know he has no staff. So I advise Jamie, when you walk into the chamber, look at how I vote and then vote the other way, and you'll be just fine. And every, you know, 200 lobbyists thought it was a pretty good joke and they were laughing and as the laughter died down, McConnell goes, well, Thomas, I'm glad you and I are giving Jamie the same advice.
And then the place, just, the walls, almost collapsed. No, he's good. He's good that way. So, um, but I think it's time for new leadership in the Senate. I mean, he's obviously, it's way past time, and this is just a fact.
I'll say it. I'll get in trouble for saying it. You know, I'm in races in Kentucky. So we poll things. in case, you know, we poll Trump's popularity.
We poll the Senator's popularity in case they get involved in your race. And Senator McConnell's favorabilities are lower among Republican primary voters than our Democrat governor's favorabilities.
Yes. Lower than Governor Beshear. Yeah.
Beshear's around 40% among Republican primary voters and McConnell's around 30%.
Well-deserved, well-deserved. So I'm glad to hear that, because I like Kentucky and I think it's, it's voters are sensible. What do you think it counts for in the final months and years of his public career, his public statements that all that matters is Ukraine? Like, what is that?
I have no idea. By the way, I have so many fights in the House that I try to avoid every fight in the Senate that I can. You're trying to draw me in and I love you and I'll indulge these questions. But for 12 years, my strategy has been pick my fights in the House. Let, let Rand Paul and Mike Lee and Ted Cruz and, and, you know, J.D.
Vance, Rick Scott. Let those guys figure out the Senate. Cause I haven't been able to fix the House. So I'm damn sure not going to be able to fix the Senate.
But do you, it's just interesting. Okay. Taking McConnell out of it and, and even the Senate out of it. But some of the committee chairman in the House, for example, seem like Ukraine is all that matters to them. And there's of course the questions you noted of donations from Lockheed, et cetera, the military industrial complex.
But it, it almost seems messianic to me. It seems heartfelt to me. It seems sincere that they think that this is all that matters. winning this war against Russia. What, do you have any sense of?
why they feel that way?
I don't. And, um, the hardest ones to understand are people like Mike Johnson, who used to be against the, you know, sending more money to Ukraine, but now that he's the speaker, he's like you said, he seems strongly convicted that, um, we should be sending money there.
Almost like it's a religious calling or something. I mean, it seems totally real to me. It doesn't seem fake.
I've heard the argument. I think it's immoral, but I've heard the argument that, oh, this is a great deal. We just spend money and we're grinding up Russia's, uh, capacity to wage war, particularly, lots of Russians are dying. And so we're told, that's, that's a good thing, you know, for since the cold war began, we've been taught that it would be good for Russia to be diminished, but they've gone so far as to say Russians dying, you know, to the tune of 300,000 casualties, they say, is just such a great thing that we need to keep this, this thing, going. And my answer to that is why don't you tell us the Ukrainian casualties?
They, you know, I have been in classified settings with CIA, uh, the secretary of state, secretary of defense, not, not their assistants, but those people in the room, and they're bragging about how many Russians have died and been injured. And I asked them how many Ukrainians have died and been injured. And they claimed they didn't know. I mean, that's just a flat out lie. And they said they would get back to me and they've never gotten back to me.
Like, not only is our Americans being fed propaganda about this war, Congress is being fed propaganda by our state department and our secretary of defense and our intelligence agencies. And you can just ask a few questions in these classified hearings. If nothing else, my colleagues should be convicted of a lack of curiosity. Like they, they sit there and they believe everything they're told, because these are supposed to be the authorities and they know things we don't, but you can expose them with two or three questions. Like how many Ukrainians have died?
And they refuse to answer.
I've asked that very same question to Mike Johnson, actually directly.
Hey, guys, Josh Hammer here, the host of America on Trial with Josh Hammer, a podcast for the First Podcast Network. Look, there are a lot of shows out there that are explaining the political news cycle, what's happening on the Hill, to this, to that. There are no other shows that are cutting straight to the point when it comes to the unprecedented lawfare debilitating and affecting the 2024 presidential election. We do all of that every single day, right here on America on Trial with Josh Hammer. Subscribe and download your episodes wherever you get your podcast.
It's America on Trial with Josh Hammer.
But I've also asked him and a number of committee chairmen, just in personal conversations, do you believe your intel briefings? Because only a child would believe an intel briefing. Take it at face value. There may be truth in there. It may be largely true, but you're being spun.
You're being manipulated. And if you don't know that, then you're a moron. But they seem to believe them.
They, um, because they have no other reference. And then here's what else happens, Tucker. When you go into a classified setting, like a skiff, you lock up your phone, you take off your Fitbit, you take every electronic device. They even make me take off my debt badge. What?
Yeah, I know. Do you feel naked?
I feel exposed. I mean, I do feel naked if I'm not wearing this. I've been wearing it for a year, every day of my life. Okay. Um, but they make you, they strip you of every outside reference.
Okay. And now your staff is not allowed in that meeting either. Remember, congressmen, our primary roles are like raising money, being friendly to constituents, you know, putting on a good face, campaigning. And then, then, you know, once a day, or maybe twice a day, we roll in there and press the vote buttons based on what staff advises you. Well, when you go into a skiff, you don't have your smartphone.
So you're not very smart. They start using acronyms that you don't know, remember what the acronym stands for. You can't just like, okay, what are, what's the IDGFBZ? I don't know, man, I must be stupid. Like, but you know, if you were in a regular setting, you just pull your phone out and like, oh, okay, that's what that is.
I know what that is. And then you also can't ask your staff a question while you're in that setting. You know, we have legislative staffers who handle certain specific areas. You can't bring them in. And then, when you go back to the office, you can't tell them what you heard.
So it's really quite an experience. It's sort of, it's, you know, it's a deprivation experience of any outside reference.
So it's designed to produce Stockholm syndrome, it sounds like.
Yes. And when you get in there, they really don't give you classified information. I say there's three levels of classification in the SCIF. There's Facebook level, there's a Twitter level, and there's New York Times level. Like, and the New York Times level is the highest level of classification.
I mean, it's, you're getting to the good stuff when they're telling you what's in the New York Times that week.
Have you ever heard anything? you thought was genuinely secret?
Occasionally, just a few times. And obviously I can't say what that is. But they slip up and commit candor occasionally in there. And you're like, whoa, I didn't know that. You know, nothing like what's at Area 51..
Right.
But occasionally you're just like, what do people think is at Area 51, by the way?
I don't know. I'm not a, no.
You guys passed this law, the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023, and then they never disclosed anything. Yeah. What is that?
Not my area of expertise. Yes. Don't know.
But do members of Congress ever say, wait a second, we're a co-equal branch, we're a legislative branch. We have as much power as the president collectively. And you can't keep this stuff secret from us. You're not allowed to do that.
But see, like I have this in hearings all the time. They'll say, I'll ask the ATF director. This just, this happened just last week. Uh, Dettelbach or I'll ask Merrick Garland something or Christopher Wray. Like.
I've asked all them this and they give you the same answer. It's longstanding DOJ policy not to comment on ongoing investigations. And you know what? That's fine to tell a reporter, but you can't tell the branch of government that created you that, that funded you. You can't tell them that.
That's why the, um, omnibus was so disappointing to me. is the only way these three-letter agencies are going to come to heal is if we cut their funding in some specific area. I've joked, we could just withhold one toner cartridge for one printer at the FBI and they would come over with a whole binder full of information, but we can't even bring ourselves to deprive them of a toner cartridge. So we put $200 million for new FBI building in the omnibus bill. And, you know, to their credit, Jim Jordan and Jamie Comer wouldn't, didn't vote for that.
And they're chairman of committees, but they are completely frustrated with the fact that the FBI just thumbs their nose.
So is that the speaker who allowed that to happen?
Oh, he absolutely allowed it to happen.
So to what extent are members of Congress committee chairman leadership controlled by blackmail?
I really don't think there's much blackmail. Like. if there is, I'm not aware of it. I have people come up to me, you know, I travel around the country, Texas, and, you know, other states and speak to groups, food freedom groups, you know, first amendment, second amendment groups. Uh, and they come to me and they say, why did my congressman sell out?
Like, I'll just, Bob was such a great guy and I campaigned for him. I made phone calls. I put up signs and then we sent Bob to Congress and he, he votes the wrong way every time. Why is it? What, do they have his kids in a basement somewhere?
Does he have kiddie porn on him? Like, what is it? Why did Bob go bad? And I have to look him in the eye and say, Bob just wanted to be liked. Yeah.
Like, there is a gene inside of, um, congressmen. I think they, if you look for a common denominator, uh, they, they like people and they want to be liked for the most part. And if, and they're likable, if they're not likable, it's hard to get elected. Okay. So this self selects for likable people, but likable people want to be liked.
And they're not surrounded by their wives and children, who usually give them plenty of like, right. When they're in DC, it's like, who am I going to go to dinner with tonight? Well, I want to eat food with somebody that likes me. Right. So if you're not going to eat alone and you have to be liked, and you generally have to be liked to get elected to Congress, you, you, um, better be liked.
And, uh, and so it's literally, it's almost like kindergarten when somebody says, I won't be your friend anymore. If you don't, you know, give me your lunch, uh, congressmen fall for that. You know, they're in their thirties, forties, fifties, and they fall for that.
How do you have, it's interesting. You, like people I've asked around. You don't seem to have any real enemies in the Congress. I don't even think AIPAC hates you. They just want you to obey, but it's not, it doesn't seem personal, right?
You don't seem to be a personal war with anybody. Uh, that's my take on it.
I have a mutation.
So you like people. Okay. Obviously, you're not some weird autist who doesn't care about other people. You like other people.
I love people.
I can tell, and your colleagues say that, but you also don't feel like you need to fit in right at the same time. Like, what is that?
It's a mutation, that chromosome, the like, the liking people and likeability chromosome usually has another gene on it right next to it, which is the need to be liked. And I'm missing the need to be like gene. I don't know what happened. I can go like on the cares act. Okay.
This was under president Trump, the 11th day to slow the spread of 15.
. Right. Uh, they said, we're going to pass a $2.2 trillion package and you all just stay home. It's dangerous. Like, we'll just do it by unanimous consent.
And it was 11 PM. I'm sitting in my living room and they send us this message and I'm like, WTF, like, this is, this is twice the size of the omnibus bill, right? This is going to cause massive inflation. The policies in it are going to cause shortages. And if we don't show up to vote, we're sending a message to all 50 States that you don't have to show up to vote in this election.
So it was like, wait, I got to do so. I got in my car and I drove eight hours. I slept one hour in a rest stop because I knew I had to be there by 9 AM. And this was March 27th, 2020.. Actually, the 25th is the day I got to Congress to stop it.
And, um, I got there and I said, it's not going by unanimous consent. And I was literally sleeping in my wife's SUV, eating those, uh, peanut butter filled pretzels. Like I had a big jug of those. Yeah. For my three days of nourishment, I'm sitting in the SUV, eating that big tub of pretzels with peanut butter in the middle, like waiting, just waiting for them to try to call it in session and sneak this bill passed.
and they're like, shit, Massey's going to do it. So they, they loaded up congressmen, you know, the airports were shut down for the most part. There were some planes coming from California. They only had two passengers and they were both congressmen. So they, they roll them all back to Congress.
It takes them two days to assemble a quorum. because I like, they went to the parliamentarian and they're like, is there any way around this? And he's like, nope, Massey's right. The constitution requires a quorum. If one, you know, he didn't call me an asshole, but if one asshole just shows up, objects and says, there's no quorum here.
So they brought every back. I go to the floor, uh, actually got a, everybody was hating me. I mean, everybody, did you know what it's like to be in a room of 434 people? And they're all staring at you. Like there, I had maybe 10 friends who were like looking at me.
Like that guy is dead. Like we've never seen Harry Caray like this. They were worried for me, but the rest of them hated me. They're, they would come up to me and say, I live with my mother. And when I go back home, you're going to cause me to take COVID to her.
And she's going to die. And I'm blaming you for this.
And I said, that's your face. Yeah.
Oh yeah. Well, like, no, it wasn't just one. It was like when he was done, there was a line of people. I was like stood there and they're all coming to hate on me. And, um, I was like, but what about the guy that's going to the grocery store and bagging your groceries and carrying them out to the car?
Does he live with his mother too? Like, what about the trucker who's out there driving and interacting with people in order to get the goods to where you need to be? What about the nurse who's going to work every single day taking care of people? Is she going to kill her parents? Like, where, why are you special?
Like you're supposed to, you know, they, they carved a hole in the side of a mountain in West Virginia for us in the case of emergency. that, well, the sad, but, but realistic thing is now they don't have a place for us. We're so useless, right? They just like, well, here's where we were going to keep them if shit hit the fan. But now we've realized they're like useless.
We can declare war without them in the event of a nuclear strike. So, you know, they're just a rounding error in the three branches we can operate with too.
Yes. I've noticed.
So, anyways, these are the kinds of people who are supposed to respond in an emergency and they all wanted to stay home. They all hated me for, for recognize our constitutional duty. And, and Trump called me three times on the floor of the house while I was getting ready to make the motion to object. And I let it go to voicemail three times in a row, which is probably not good, but I couldn't leave the microphone because I was asking people, would you make this motion if I go to the restroom? And they're like, Oh, no, not me.
So I, uh, I sat there. I, I. finally, they yielded time for debate. I go off the floor and called the white house switchboard back. And, and, um, you know, I didn't have his number.
I just like, if you want a tour of the white house, you call the number I called, right. And the intern is like, Oh, is this Congress? and Massey? I'm putting you through to Trump right now. And so he comes off, he goes, I'm coming at you like you've never seen, never in your life before.
Have you seen the way in which I will come at you? I'm more popular than you in Kentucky. And you know, it. I'm back in your primary opponent and you're going to lose.
And I'm like, Oh crap. I probably will lose. I mean, he had 95% popularity in among my Republican electorate, who I had to face in about eight weeks in my primary. And I had a well-funded opponent in here. Now Trump was mad at me.
So he screamed at me for two or three minutes. I kept trying to talk and he just screamed louder. Then he repeated it all. He goes, no, this is the second time you've done something like this. And they talked me out of it before, but not this time.
And then you're going to lose. And he hangs up. And like, the thing is like, I had, he said he thought it was the second time. I'd done that, like eight times since he was president. He just started realizing it's the same guy.
The time before that was on war with Iran. The Democrats were in the majority and, you know, he had just vaporized Soleimani. And we were worried that he would attack mainland Iran without a vote of Congress. So the Democrats, actually insincerely, there aren't too many anti-war Democrats left.
I've noticed.
But they realized this was a chance to make a statement. So they put a bill on the floor saying, Trump, you can't go to war with Iran without a vote of Congress, which is constitutionally obvious. So I had to vote for it. But I was only one of three Republicans to do it. So he remembered that time, but he didn't remember the fake Obamacare repeal and some of the other things that I was kind of, you know, deterred in the punch bowl on.
Did it change your views at all?
No, the president tweeted that I was a third rate grandstander. And this is before I got back to my seat. I go back from the speaker's lobby to go to my seat to get ready to make the motion. And one of the Congress was like, you better look at your phone, Massey. Look at your Twitter.
And I turn it on. He's like tweeting hard and heavy against me, said I should be thrown out of the party. Then the best one is I'm chairman of the Second Amendment Caucus. So his third tweet was he's terrible on guns.
It's like, what?
Where did that come from? Have you seen my Christmas card picture?
What's your Christmas card picture?
Oh, well, it's a little infamous. No, I've actually seen it.
But I think it's the benefit of those who have not.
So, you know, I got my family together for Christmas and we got bluegrass instruments out. We play music together and we took a Christmas card picture with bluegrass instruments. And I said, hey, wouldn't it be kind of neat if we just like change these all out for machine guns and took a picture? And that was supposed to stay on my phone for eternity. But I had had a couple of medical margaritas one night.
I don't do medical marijuana, but I had a few medical margaritas. And I looked at that picture and I thought, well, that's pretty good picture. It'd be a shame if nobody ever saw it. And I tweeted it. And, oh, I caught all kinds of hate for that.
The arch. It's a great picture.
The Archbishop of Canterbury condemned it. This is the head of the Church of England condemned my tweet. I'm like, oh, my God.
Are you an Episcopalian?
I'm Methodist. Good.
So you can ignore him. Yes. Yeah. He's a disgrace.
So so anyways, I you know, the press asked me, as I'm we're talking about the need to be like to Jane, right? If I had that, I would have been devastated that day. If I had needed to be liked, I couldn't have carried that through. And I walked out of that chamber. Everybody's hate me in the chamber.
Nancy Pelosi called me a dangerous nuisance. CNN called me the most hated person in D.C. John Kerry called me an asshole or something. And President Trump called me a third rate grandstander. This is all in the course of a few minutes, right?
I walk out of the chamber of the house and the reporters like swarm me, you know, like they do. And I'm just trying to run back to the SUV with the pretzels with peanut butter in them and get out of there. And the the press said, what do you have to say for yourself? Your own president just called you a third rate grandstander. And I paused for a second and I said, I was offended.
I'm at least second rate.
So what happened to your relationship with Trump?
It. you know, I think he respects people that stand up.
Yeah. Even if I think you're absolutely right.
Disagrees with you. That's correct. And two years later, he did endorse me. No way. Yep.
Do you get along with him? OK, now? Yeah.
I mean, I did endorse Ron DeSantis, not out of spite or animosity, because we had already patched things up. just because I served with Ron DeSantis for six years. And he and I were really good friends. We talked about bills when he was in Congress. You know, he, he and I fought over who was going to introduce the bill to eliminate congressional pensions.
And he won and I co-sponsored it. Now I'm the sponsor now that he's a governor. But I knew he was a good person and he thinks things through and he was smart. So I endorsed him. But, you know, because I have I call it natural immunity.
I have Trump antibodies at this point. They may wear off at some point.
Do you think, if you did run for, say, just pulling us out of a hat, but governor of Kentucky, do you think Trump would endorse you?
I don't know. You'd probably do some polling and see who was winning.
Fair, fair, totally fair.
I wouldn't turn down an endorsement.
Yeah. Yeah. So it's, it's not. Are you at war with anybody in the Congress?
No, I get along with everybody. I mean, and people try to use this against me. You know, when AIPAC was running those ads that say I always vote with AOC and Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar, you know. So I introduced an amendment and forced a vote on eliminating the kill switch in automobiles. that's mandated.
Thank you. Yeah. Well, I was losing Republicans on that. I lost like 20 Republicans. So I knew I needed some, just to be clear for the people.
who don't know what you're talking about. New in new vehicles. This has been the case for years. They can be turned off remotely by the authorities, which is like the most North Korean thing ever to happen. That's what you're talking about.
Yeah. By 2026, every new automobile sold has to be able to turn itself off if it doesn't like you're driving.
So I'm like, how do you appeal this conviction at the roadside? Right. Maybe you swerve to miss a deer and pulled over for an ambulance and you got your kids in the car and it stops.
How could anyone vote for something that evil? I don't understand.
Because again, they know it's that I'm right, but they're worried about, for instance, mothers against drunk driving or they don't have the bravery.
Wait, we just let in millions of illegal aliens who are allowed to drunk drive. Right. And Biden has told us that drunk driving is not a big deal. It's not grounds for deportation. Yeah.
Yeah. So mothers against drunk driving, as far as I know, has said nothing about this. Like who cares what they think?
I know. And but there may be, let's say, one constituent in your district who gets a hold of you and they lost a child to drunk driving, which is terrible. And they say, you know, you don't care about me if you vote for Massey's amendment. And, you know, they make that personal phone call. That congressman doesn't have the fortitude to say or knowledge to say, look, this technology can't work.
I really care about your child. I think drunk driving is a scourge and I want to fix it. But this is a false promise. And it's only going to increase the price of automobiles and give the government more control. So I'm going to vote with Massey.
They don't have the courage to say that. So long. story short, I lost 20 Republicans. I needed some Democrats. So I went over to AOC, who I get along with.
just fine. Don't hate me for saying that. I don't. And I said, AOC, they're running ads right now that say you always vote or that I always vote with you. just once.
Could you vote with me? Could you vote for my kill switch amendment, since they're running ads the other way? And she did. She voted to defund the automobile kill switch for her.
So she ran. It's interesting. I mean, obviously I don't like her, but I think she's talented. She, she is definitely talented, but she ran as a radical, as someone from the outside, which I'm, of course, very sympathetic to. But she doesn't seem to actually be that person.
So, like, for example, on the foreign aid stuff, how often does she vote with you on?
Quite, quite frequently. But I had a funny moment. You know, this 15 or 16 votes we had on Israel in April. Well, the squad and I, I know this is going to be used in the next ad against me, this clip from Tucker. But I was the only no.
sometimes. Sometimes the most of the squad voted with me. But I noticed AOC wasn't always there with me. So I went over to the squad on the Democrat side of the aisle.
They literally sit together.
They hang out together. Yeah, they kind of it's really cliquish. Even, you know, the Freedom Caucus sits together. The Texas delegation sits together. There are different cliques.
The appropriators sit together. It's the military guys. The intel guys sit together. You know, sometimes it's by state. Sometimes it's by clique.
A lot of the Congressional Black Caucus sits together. I can't get the Second Amendment Caucus to sit together. That's my caucus.
They're too independent minded.
But so I go over to their.
This is just high school cafeteria.
It's high school cafeteria. That's what it is. And why would you again? They need to be liked, right? They don't want to sit next to people they don't like or who don't like them.
So I go over. I went over to the squad a few weeks ago and I said, I told AOC for the squad, I said, we're going to kick you out if you don't keep voting with this more consistently.
What did she say?
She laughed. She thought it was funny. I mean, she has a sense of humor. These people are humans. There are 435..
I call them goldfish. in the aquarium. You have to get 218 of them to pass a bill. So it doesn't benefit me to hate on any of them. Someday, you know, on some days they may vote with.
Well, they're also people. And if you can help it, you shouldn't hate people, period.
We've, we've formed coalitions on the First Amendment, on the Fourth Amendment, on war, sometimes like to eliminate cluster bombs, delivering cluster bombs, even though the Democrats almost to a person, actually to a person, want to give Ukraine more aid. Some of them are like, well, the cluster bombs, maybe we shouldn't do that. OK. And so you can form coalitions. So I try to do that when I can.
But why aren't there anti-war Democrats, since it was the anti-war party for like 40 years?
I don't know. And we've lost a lot of them on privacy and free speech as well. I think with Russia, you asked this before. There's. there's this element that I didn't answer.
It's sort of a proxy against Trump for them. now. They in their, in their file folders, in their brain, Trump and Russia are in the same file folder. Yes. Even though that's a false narrative that's been dispelled long ago.
It's still in their same file folder. So when they see Ukraine is fighting Russia, they use that as a proxy for their hate for Trump. And so they'll. they'll vote for that. And they did.
They waved. I don't know if you saw this. They were waving Ukrainian flags after Mike Johnson put the bill on the floor. And every Democrat voted for it. This was premeditated.
Somebody had to go buy, you know, 200 Ukrainian flags and hand them out. And I filmed it, which you're not supposed to do, but you're also not supposed to wave flags of other countries on the floor of the house. So I'm like, all right, I'm going to expose this. So I filmed it and I put it on Twitter to show what like the humiliation that Mike Johnson brought upon us by bringing the Democrat bill to the floor without any, and it was leveraged to. even if you're a Republican and you're OK with sending money to Ukraine, that's a leverage point.
Do something for our country and require that as a condition of doing whatever that is. But he gave up all the leverage. I put that video on Twitter. Three days later, the sergeant at arms tracks down one of my staffers in Kentucky because we're no longer in session and says he needs to delete that video from Twitter or we're going to take a fine out of his salary, out of his congressional salary. So, my staffers, he knew what I was going to do.
He told me what they had just said. I said, all right, I'm retweeting it.
Did you? Oh, yeah. And it got like eight million views. It went from four million to eight million. And then, you know, sometimes you just got to double down.
And the speaker had to announce on Twitter that I wouldn't be fined for that.
But there but no one was considering finding any member who waved the flag of a foreign nation on the floor of the House of Representatives.
Right. And they were taking selfies of them with their foreign flags, too. And no, none of them got a phone call. Only I got a phone call because I exposed the humiliation. It wasn't just a humiliation of those of us in Congress.
It was a humiliation of our country. I mean, it's one of the most corrupt countries in the world, and they got everything they wanted for them. And the Democrats are waving the flag, even though the Ukrainian flag, even though they're in the majority. And we just have to, like, sit there and take that. It was.
it was horrible.
Do you think any? I mean, the leader of Ukraine is not elected anymore. He, his term has ended. He's not having a new election. He's the unelected maximum power.
in some places. We call that a dictator. And yet they're still hitting us with a democracy, pro-democracy talking points. Do you think I mean, have they thought this through at all? Do they?
are they just lying? Like, what is that?
They're lying. Yeah, I mean, they know it. And the good news is some Republicans are waking up to it. Remember, when we started voting on these Ukraine resolutions, that even, you know, as soon as the war started, I was the only no. There was like this open ended promise in a non-binding resolution that said, well, give them whatever they need.
And there were only like two other Republicans that joined me on this. But now we've got a majority of Republicans in Congress. You're saying, wait, this is, they aren't using this money like we thought they were. And we're giving them money to fund pensions of retired politicians in Ukraine who were most certainly corrupt. And we're paying their pensions with this money.
But most Republicans don't support it. So that means that your speaker, the Republican speaker, the House, Mike Johnson, is working for the Democrats.
Yeah, it's that simple. I mean, and that's one of the reasons we went through with the motion to vacate. Paul Gosar and I co-sponsored Marjorie's motion to vacate. There were ultimately 11 of us who voted for it.
Motion to vacate would be to fire him.
To fire Speaker Johnson, just like they had done Kevin McCarthy. Although I thought inappropriately and at the wrong time and for the wrong reasons, they did that to McCarthy. But here we had Speaker Johnson, who is doing all the things people were afraid McCarthy might do. They pre-convicted McCarthy for things they thought he would do. And here Mike Johnson came and did all these things.
He put an omnibus on the floor. He passed the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, re-upped that without warrants, built the FBI a new building and gave Ukraine all this money. So what happened, what Marjorie and I and Paul decided ultimately? is we needed to expose the Uniparty. And never before have you had Democrats vote for a Republican speaker.
And that's why we forced the question. Nancy Pelosi voted for him. Hakeem Jeffries went on national TV and said, why would we want to get rid of him? He's given us everything we want. I mean, the Uniparty has never been so exposed as it was when we called that motion to vacate.
I know some people got mad at us, said we shouldn't have done it. But it's a long game, which we certainly hope that he doesn't become Speaker next January. And hopefully people have seen, with Nancy Pelosi rushing to Speaker Johnson's aid, that he's not the speaker you want when Trump wins the White House and we keep the majority.
Do you think he will be?
A lot of this depends on what the people want and if they can see it. Hopefully also Trump sees it, that Mike Johnson would be even worse than Paul Ryan. Paul Ryan put, while he was still in the, while we were still in the majority, Paul Ryan sent like a dozen CRs or omnibus bills to President Trump's desk because he didn't have any money for a wall in it. Like he had no intention of ever funding a wall. Paul Ryan did it, you know?
And so I think Mike Johnson is going to be similarly the same way. He's basically working for the deep state at this point in the Uniparty.
How did that happen? Do you have any idea?
The, uh, the Paul Ryan bit or?
No, well, Paul Ryan is a, you know, is a sinister person. I happen to know, but also, you know, not just kind of, not a genius and an ideologue at the same time, which is like a bad combination, dumb ideologues are the scariest. But Mike Johnson seemed like kind of a moderately conservative, kind of sincere, decent guy. You know, maybe he would babysit your kids and do an okay job. Unlike Paul Ryan.
And, but he just, and then he immediately just becomes a tool of CIA and Jake Sullivan and the Biden administration. Like, well, how did that happen so fast?
Well, one of the things he claims, which I don't believe is true. And I have reason to say this is that he says he went in a skiff. Like he's had some 180 degree turns on, some things, like, for instance, whether you need a warrant to spy on Americans using the foreign intelligence surveillance act, 702 program, where he used to be on judiciary committee with me and Jim Jordan, trying to reform that, trying to get, he understood what it was. He knew completely what we were talking about. He's an attorney, too.
Right. And he knows the constitution. He knows this is required, but he claims he spent time in a skiff and he learned things, skiff, that's secure compartmentalized information facility or something. Um, it's where we go. We have to leave our phones locked up, you know, no staff in there.
He claims he spent time in skiff and learned things that changed his mind. Here's the problem, Tucker. I was in skiff with him. Like we, we had, we had DNI, not just the current DNI, but the former DNI, John Radcliffe, Trump's DNI. We had CIA, we had FBI.
We even had a FISA judge in there and we spent three and a half hours. It was a four hour meeting. And after three and a half hours, it's basically a PSYOP where they're just trying to beat you down and do the things. And I was like, this is ridiculous. You haven't given, they didn't give us one example of any time, ever since FISA was created, that getting a warrant would have kept them from solving or preventing an act of terrorism.
They gave hypotheticals, but they had no specific.
And I think FISA has been in place since 1978, since the seventies. So almost 50 years. And they couldn't give you one example?
Not one example. Now they also expanded it after 9-11 and to do the, the program to go against civilians, to spy on civilians. And, and actually that product came out of the judiciary committee. Here's another place where the speaker betrayed us. FISA 702 was created by John Conyers and Jim Sensenbrenner.
Conyers was the chairman and Sensenbrenner was the ranking member. And what Mike Johnson said this year was, well, even though the judiciary committee created this and is responsible for overseeing it, I'm going to let the intel committee bring the bill to the floor without warrants in it. It wasn't even their jurisdiction. They have jurisdiction over FISA, as long as it's for the CIA, but not for the FBI. So that was frustrating.
And, but it's shocking.
It's, it's shocking.
It is shocking.
So he said, you know, like end of civil liberties level stuff. So yes, yes, but it's not like he learned new information. The skiff.
No, he did not. I was there.
So what, so that's, so. that's the problem, right?
The fact that I was there, right. So that telling people on your show that I was there for three and a half hours and Mike, go, ask Mike Johnson. He'll say, yep, he was there three and a half hours.
So what is the truth? What do you think changed?
I think he's kind of a lost ball in tall weeds. They think he's in a position of power. He never imagined he would get to at this point in his life. He's not done anything in private practice or political arena that's prepared him for this. He took the job with a very small staff.
He didn't have people to put in all positions on the field. And he had to accept a lot of suggestions in areas. He didn't know a whole lot about, although he gets no pass on FISA. Yes. He gets no pass on Ukraine because he does, as you pointed out, he doesn't even know how many casualties have been incurred on the Ukrainian side.
I mean, he's the second person in line for president after Kamala Harris. This is, this is scary to me. He's, he's basically getting moved around.
It's crazy. You said nothing he did in his life before this prepared him for it. Um, but that itself may be kind of a more charitable explanation, because I'm trying to be terrible.
I mean, I've got to go back to work with you for this.
So, just for those who don't know, you went to MIT, your high school girlfriend joined you at MIT. You married her whilst, while she was still there. And then together you started a company based on a very sophisticated invention that you came up with. Maybe the first of about 30 patents that you now have, you ran this company for a long time, then you moved back to Kentucky and a lot of things happened and you wound up running for Congress. So like, that's not the background.
Well, um, so nothing in the political arena, but in my private life, you know, I raised $32 million of venture capital and I swam with the sharks. Like I had lots of moral dilemmas in the course of creating that company. I could have taken money off the table and gone and done other things. But instead I felt a commitment to my staff and to other investors. I had investors who said, if you'll just shit can that guy you hired as president, we'll double our investment.
And I'm like, no, he's my partner. I'm not like, he helped me get to this point. I'm not going to abandon him. And so, um, you know, I had experiences in life that, and then also just put my hands in the dirt on my farm.
Like, so tell me about that. So you tell us about how you live and where you live. Cause, I think it's one of the most unusual things about you.
So I spent, um, you know, I grew up as a hillbilly in Eastern Kentucky.
What county?
Lewis County.
Lewis County. How many people in your town?
13,000 people, 13,000 cattle. It's a huge land mass. Um, and it's a great County. There's. it's one of the 21 counties that I represent.
It's actually the poorest County per capita income that I represent, but it's the one I grew up in. So it's very unlikely that the Congressman for the district would come from the poorest County. So I grew up as a little nerd. I love taking stuff apart because I was bored. There were no malls.
You couldn't ride your bicycle to any, you know, store of, and if you did, you didn't have any money. So I had to find things to do at home. I took apart things, built things, entered science fairs, built robots, made it to the international science fair as a, as a little, you know, hillbilly, um, won an award from NASA there and at the age 15, like I, won the high school level awards, um, and got into MIT, never visited the campus, didn't really have the money to go visit it. Um, but I read about it. There was no internet, seemed like a good place.
I got there. I'd, I'd lived in a town of 1900 people all my life. Um, and I, I was there for six hours in Cambridge, Massachusetts. I cross, uh, Massachusetts Avenue. They had a crosswalk and a stoplight, you know, never really seen two of those things together.
I'd seen crosswalks and stoplights, but so I walked through the crosswalk and a car honked like that short little Boston, meep, meep, and I thought, Oh my gosh, I've been here six hours and already run into somebody from Kentucky, and I turned around and waved at the car as big as I could.
Was it people from Kentucky?
I don't think so. I think they had one finger up and waving back.
So, uh, and people are like, that's not a true story. I said, not only is it true, it took me a month to quit waving at cars that beeped. Like it was just 18 years of conditioning.
You thought beeping was, Hey, Hey, there.
I mean, that's what we thought that little thing in the middle of your steering wheel was for. If you saw somebody and they couldn't see you through the windshield, just toot the horn. And then you'd throw your hand up and wave and they roll down the window. That's Bob. Uh, and if you didn't wave, I mean, you were pariah.
You were probably an ax murderer who was in our town, right? Or you were just an a-hole. I wasn't, so I didn't want to be either. So I waved at that car in Massachusetts. And, and kept waving for about a month.
But anyways, long story short, as you said, I invented a virtual reality device that lets you touch three-dimensional objects, started a company, raised venture capital, did that for 10 years, moved to the live free or die state. New Hampshire, New Hampshire. My company was in Massachusetts. I couldn't move the center of gravity too far out of Cambridge. I got it up to one, 28 on Woburn, and then I commuted 40 miles every day.
So I could live in a state that lets you have machine guns and old cars, and you know, cool stuff. Redneck sports. The best. The best sports.
So, uh, why'd you move back to Kentucky?
After 10 years, you know, of, of doing it, it was, you know, we had three kids and we wanted to raise them like we were raised in Kentucky, and we wanted to be near their grandparents. Like both of my parents were still alive. Both of my wife's parents were still alive. And you learn so much from your grandparents because your parents are really busy just, you know, trying to earn a living or whatever. And if you're lucky enough to have a relationship with your grandparents, that's where I think the generational stuff carries on.
And, um, I had a great relationship with my grandparents. So we wanted our kids to live in that environment. And we came back, we bought the farm that my wife grew up on. We built a house off the grid. It runs on a wrecked model S Tesla battery.
It's been running continuously for six and a half.
So you built the house. Wait, who built the house?
I did like I, we had an ice storm and a lot of trees fell down.
How big is the property?
It's, um, 1500 acres.
And it's wooded.
It's all, almost all woods. Like, and it's too steep. I don't want you to think this is like valuable Iowa. No, no, no, no.
I know the part of the state.
Yeah. Pack your lunch. If you're on the ridge and you fall off the ridge, cause you're going to be hungry by the time you get to the bottom, you're gonna be grabbing like tree roots and stuff to keep from sliding, but it grows trees and some of it is flat.
And, you know, in the bottom, but this is not plantation land.
No, these are hollers. Yeah. So, uh, in fact, interestingly enough, it's been a Republican County since the civil war, even though all the counties around it have been Democrats since the civil war, because the geography, because the geography, the topography, did not allow for consolidation of farms. Right. So there was no scale at which slavery made sense.
You could basically, in your holler, you only had enough land that your family, if you had enough kids, could farm.
Yes.
And so that's the way people grew up. And, by the way, it's kind of libertarian. You know, I'll do my thing in my holler. You do your thing in your holler. That's right.
If you need some help, let me know. I'll come over and help you.
But Southwest Virginia is like this. West Virginia is like this. Yeah. Because the topography.
Right. It's the reason West Virginia was Republican and seceded from Virginia. So, by the way, half my family's from West Virginia and half my family's from Kentucky. My mamaw's, who's 97 right now, is still alive. Her grandfather was a union soldier.
Amazing. Isn't that crazy?
From West Virginia.
From West Virginia. Yeah. She's still lives in West Virginia, but like we're not that far away from the civil war.
Oh, I know. I know.
You can talk to people who were alive when people who fought in the civil war.
I worked with a guy when I was at the newspaper in Arkansas, the guy I shared a desk with, Bob Salih from Texarkana, Arkansas. He said, I knew Confederate veterans. It's in my lifetime. I knew a man who knew Confederate veterans or civil war veterans. That's just absolutely crazy.
But my whole point of that was she's a Republican. She's been a Republican, my mamaw, since the civil war. And, like nobody marries into our family. If you're a Democrat, you got to go see mamaw and she'll either approve or disapprove. And she's been, had pretty good luck at sniffing out the Democrats.
Yeah. The liberals.
So, so you had an ice store. There was an ice storm on your property. How does that figure into your house?
So I already had a bulldozer. So I got a winch so I could drag these trees out. I got a sawmill, cut these into timbers, built a timber frame house.
What kind of wood?
It's 17 kinds of wood, because we did whatever fell down in the ice storm. We've got Oak, yellow poplar, hickory, beech.
So hardwood.
Hardwood. Yep. And, um, then we wanted it to be self-sustaining.
How did she know how to timber frame?
I found a class on eBay for $500 in Tennessee and I bought it now and I drove to Tennessee and took a one week class and we built a little shed slash cabin. And I'm, and I called my wife from a pay phone and I said, I want to do this. Like, instead of going to get a job, we had just ended, like, left our company after 10 years of working there and we'd moved back to Kentucky and I said, well, I'll just build a timber frame house.
Like full-time? Yes.
Woke up every morning, had my coffee and started chiseling away or going up in the woods and dragging more trees out that had fallen down.
So you, you built your house full-time, like as a job every day.
And this, and this is what our kids saw too. Like the flooring for our kitchen came out of the creek. We call it a creek.
Um, what do you mean? the flooring came out of the creek?
The, there are rocks in the creek that are flat, that they look like the stuff you buy at Lowe's. that's fake. And I'm like, Oh, this is what they modeled, the fake stuff after. We did this free. Let's just go pick it up.
Now we had probably have, we're paying ourselves about $3 an hour compared to if we had just gone to, you know, one of the box stores and bought it in terms of harvesting it, but our kids, I think, in addition to being with their grandparents, learned a big lesson that, wow, mom and dad are growing our food. They are, uh, collecting the materials for the house here from the environment. Um, that you don't have to rely, you know, neighbors are good, though. Right. We actually sent them to public school, which was, and we let him ride the bus.
It was only three miles away, but we figured the bus ride was important too, because when you get to school, they sort of separate you, but you've got, can be 15 terrifying minutes on the bus where you interact with everybody.
Right.
I remember my son, he was like 10 years old. He'd traded some Yu-Gi-Oh cards. On the bus. And, uh, for this like, awesome, the best Yu-Gi-Oh card ever. And he showed it to us and was a little plastic thing.
And we're like, well, did you want to take it out of plastic? No, no. He told me to leave it in here and we take it out and it was a fake. And he was so mad, but it turns out his dad had sold me a leaky bulldozer and said there was no leaks in it. So it ran in the family, the same kid who stiffed my son and stiffed me on this dozer.
I mean, but you learn these, these are life lessons, right? They didn't lead a sheltered life. And so we grew up, you know, they grew up there.
Uh, wait, what percent of the timbers in the timber frame came from your property?
All of it. In fact, they never left the farm. Really? So? you milled it there, milled it there, chiseled it, there, made the mortise and tenons and the dovetails.
It was a lot of work, personally.
Yes.
How did you, you know, cutting a mortise and tenon, cutting a dovetail joint, these are, having done it, very difficult. How did you learn to do that?
I kept telling myself, look, farmers without calculators pulled this off 200 years ago. And so surely if I've got a computer and some, you know, electricity, I should be able to do this as well. Um, just dent of will.
But she'd been like a MIT educated, electrical engineer, software programmer, but not, uh, nothing, that scale.
Yeah. Nothing. I mean, the, the only thing I had built before, that was a tree house. Right. And even that didn't get finished.
So, but I mean, some of that stuff is very complex, like actually complex timber framing, some, some of the joints are difficult to cut and the design itself is, is complicated.
Yeah. You don't like, you have to plan it all ahead. You don't like hold the timber up there. Like you would, a two by four. Oh, we need a saw.
It's not balloon framing. Yeah. Totally right.
Or, oh, that 45 needs to be a 42 degree angle. Let's, you know, saw off a little bit more. You can't do that while it's, you know, you're up in the middle of the air on scaffolding, trying to get two pieces to fit together, it's actually, it's a fun math problem. So I enjoyed it, but there's something honest about it, because all the fasteners are wooden too. So it's one medium that you learn.
There's no. like bolts, nails, all pegs.
And once you realize that, and there are no metal fasteners in the frame.
Correct.
None.
I mean, we had to nail the floor to the frame and the walls on it, but the frame itself, no metal fasteners, and it's 46 feet tall.
It's 46 feet tall. Yes.
From the basement slab, which I timber framed the basement too. I still don't even know how to stick frame. Like, I'm like, well, I'm going to build one house. I'm going to learn one technology.
Which is the framing that your house is, if you're watching this. It's a stick frame.
It's stick frame. So I was like, well, let's build the basement timber frame too. And the dormers, like if you paid a company to build timber frame, they would stick frame the dormers.
Well, of course, or buy them and just bolt them on. Yeah.
Um, I, I timber framed. that. I'm just like, let's just be pure of the whole way. And there's, as an engineer, I thought, well, I want to build a house with timbers. I like how timbers look, but, but, you know, um, we'll just bolt them together.
We'll use iron brackets. That's the best way to do it. But in the course of this one week class, I came to realize, wow, if you just let go and make everything out of wood, it solves problems that you would create. when you start using metal fasteners, like, wood shrinks, right? It takes like six or eight years for a big timber to fully dry out.
So how do you deal with metal fasteners and shrinking wood? Well, the metal fasteners can rip out, but if you build your fasteners out of wood, like, it can all work, it moves together. And there's, you know, if you go to Germany and there's homes that are four or 500 years old to show that it can work.
So, so all the timbers came from the property. What about the stone? There's a lot of stone in the house. Yep.
We, we got some of it out of the Creek. We dug some of it out of the ground. All of the stone is from the property.
How did you dig it out of the ground? What does that mean? You started a stone quarry on your, on your own property?
In my front yard. It's now a pond. Uh, but I, there was an old logging road and the erosion had exposed this layer of rock and I thought, well, that layer of rock must go pretty far. So I started digging using a backhoe. I started digging the dirt off of that layer of rock.
And I'm like, wow, there are lots of rocks here. And I just, I almost giggled out loud when I shoved on that layer of rock with my backhoe and all these rocks started rolling out in front of the blade and they looked like rocks you could buy at the store, you know, like, well, why would I go buy them? Like, I can just like, shove three tons of them out of here, and, you know, a few minutes. Um, and then I had people coming and visiting, obviously, we looked like a bunch of weirdos building this timber frame house up on the hill and people would come up.
And where were you living at this point?
We lived in a mobile home. Like we just pulled in a mobile home and we, I told my wife, we don't want to live in it for six months. We ended up two years in a 900 square foot mobile home with four kids.
No way.
It's, but I mean, it's actually not that bad. You get to know your family really well.
You can hear, it's like being on a boat.
Yeah. You try to go to the bathroom and if you're gone for more than five minutes, like the wall between the kitchen and the bathroom is so thin, you're just enjoying private moment there on the throne, trying to read a magazine about timber framing or something. Right. And you can hear the kids at the dinner table saying, where'd daddy go? Where's daddy?
Where's daddy?
And then they'd start trying to find daddy. Anyways, it was a good, comfy experience. And now we actually kept the mobile home and we leased it to deer hunters. Really? Yeah.
It's a double wide. It's so it's full of deer heads and bunk beds now. And the hunters call it the lodge, which we find amusing. My wife calls it the double lodge, since it's a double wide.
Do you have a lot of deer on your land?
We have, yeah. Trophy deer all over.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os