2024-07-09 00:14:52
NPR's Up First is the news you need to start your day. The three biggest stories of the day, with reporting and analysis from NPR News — in 10 minutes. Available weekdays at 6:30 a.m. ET, with hosts Leila Fadel, Steve Inskeep, Michel Martin and A Martinez. Also available on Saturdays at 9 a.m. ET, with Ayesha Rascoe and Scott Simon. On Sundays, hear a longer exploration behind the headlines with Ayesha Rascoe on "The Sunday Story," available by 8 a.m. ET. Subscribe and listen, then support your local NPR station at donate.npr.org.<br><br><em>Support NPR's reporting by subscribing to Up First+ and unlock sponsor-free listening. Learn more at plus.npr.org/upfirst</em>
The Republican Party platform for 2024 is now public.
The document promises a mass deportation, tax cuts, and speaks very carefully about
abortion.
How does it appeal to the voters former President Trump needs in the fall?
I'm Steve Inskeep with Laila Fadl, and this is Up First from NPR News.
President Biden is hosting European leaders at the NATO summit in Washington today.
The alliance is focused on supporting Ukraine in its war against Russia, and leaders are
also thinking about the election in the United States.
And doctors have a new way to perform organ transplants for people in need of a liver,
kidney, or heart.
That would have been science fiction just a few years ago.
The procedure is saving lives, but it's also raising major legal and ethical issues.
Stay with us.
We'll give you the news you need to start your day.
New from the Embedded podcast, elite female runners are being told they can't compete
because of their biology.
Not only can you not compete, you're not actually female.
Hear about the 100-year history of sex testing in women's sports and the hard choices these
athletes are facing now.
Listen to Tested, a new series from CBC and NPR's Embedded podcast.
Hey, I'm Robert Smith from Planet Money, and this summer we are bringing you the entire
history of the world, at least the economics part.
It's Planet Money Summer School.
Every week, we'll invite in a brilliant professor and play classic episodes about the birth
of money, banks, and finance.
There will be rogues and revolutionaries and a lot of panics.
Summer School, every Wednesday till Labor Day on the Planet Money podcast from NPR.
On the TED Radio Hour, legendary soccer player Abby Wambach remembers exactly what was going
on in her mind at a crucial moment during the 2011 World Cup.
As soon as the ball came off of her foot, I knew that that ball was coming to my head.
The only thing in my mind was, don't screw this up.
How to apply sports psychology to everyday life on the TED Radio Hour podcast from NPR.
The Republican Party has published its platform, the principles it will run on for this fall's campaign.
At the urging of former President Trump, the document is very short compared with the documents
that both parties have put out in past elections.
It is revealing for what it says and what it leaves out.
NPR's Stephen Fowler has been reading, and he joins me now.
Hi, Stephen.
Hey there.
So, what's your impression?
On the surface, Layla, yeah, it's brief.
In 2016, Republicans had more than 66 pages of dense text that sketched out numerous policy
goals if they took power.
Now, just 16 pages that sounds a lot like a rally speech and reads more like a post
on Trump's Truth Social website.
There's short bullet points about plans to make America great again, plus 20 promises
typed in all caps vowing to do things like seal the border and stop the migrant invasion.
Okay, so a lot of slogans and that term, migrant invasion, to describe people crossing the
border, jumps out at me.
It's language that was also thrown around a lot during the Trump administration and
then echoed in the racist screed of the shooter in El Paso back in 2019 who carried out that
deadly attack on Latinos in a Walmart.
So, other than these slogans, do we learn much?
You can if you also combine that with what Trump did his first four years in office before
and what he said on the campaign trail this year.
I mean, there's the pledge to enact the largest ever deportation operation in American history
that's central to his stump speeches.
He said that would require help from local police and the National Guard.
There's also the suggestion to bring back a travel ban for Muslim-majority countries
he pushed during his first year in office about a bring back extreme vetting of immigrants
and their backgrounds as they seek to come into the country and an aggressive plan to
use the military to secure the US-Mexico border.
Okay, a theme there.
What else?
Well, there's a call for same-day voting, even though the GOP is pushing its voters
to, quote, swamp the vote and cast ballots early this year.
Calls to make America the dominant energy producer in the world come as the US is already
the world's leading oil producer, while also including shout outs to artificial intelligence
and cryptocurrency, two things that are heavy energy consumers.
And Trump's economic proposals, Layla, include more tax cuts and new tariffs on foreign goods
that some experts say could lead to more inflation.
So, I didn't hear you mention abortion, though, which is a big issue this election.
Trump has been evasive at times on what he would sign into law.
Anything on that?
Here's where we see both the political impact of the platform as well as its limitations.
After 35 mentions of the word abortion in 2016's platform, the current platform only
has one.
Because of Trump, the official stance now is that states can decide what level of restrictions
to enact.
I mean, Republicans have been consistently on the losing side of this issue at the ballot
box ever since that Dobbs Supreme Court decision.
While Republicans do not commit here to a national abortion ban, this platform's not
binding in any way, and it doesn't change the views of many of his allies and advocacy
groups who still want that type of restriction and will likely still push for it if Trump
wins, especially given language in the platform about the 14th Amendment's guarantee to life
that leaves the door open for more.
And what's been the reaction to the policy paper?
Well, even though some anti-abortion groups are upset at the softening of the language
there, there's still Republican unity behind Trump heading into the convention next week.
Democrats are tying it to the larger Project 2025 proposed by Trump allies to go even further
with its proposals to reshape the government.
And everyone seems to agree a second term Trump could get more of this done thanks to
more allies in Congress and the courts.
That's NPR's Stephen Fowler in Atlanta.
Thank you, Stephen.
Thank you.
NATO allies are gathering for a summit in Washington on the 75th anniversary of the
alliance's founding in the city where it all began.
The alliance faces some of its biggest challenges as it looks ahead to political uncertainty
in a number of countries, including the United States.
Terri Schultz has covered NATO for many years and joins me now.
Hi, Terri.
Good morning, Leila.
Good morning.
So just yesterday, Russia launched one of its most brutal attacks on Ukraine to date,
destroying the largest children's hospital in the country.
Will this impact decisions being made at the summit?
Well, Leila, NATO's actually come to expect that Russian President Vladimir Putin will
do something to draw attention to himself ahead of big events like the summit.
But I think in this case, this horrible hospital attack will actually reinforce support for
Ukraine and its longstanding plea for more air defense to block these Russian missiles
and save civilian lives.
So we're likely to see announcements on that at this meeting.
Yeah, I was really shocked to see that hospital destroyed.
I was there at the beginning of the war talking to kids being treated.
We know Ukraine will not be offered membership at the summit, but what is teed up in terms
of other kinds of support?
That's right.
No membership.
But there are a few items they'll get in this summit declaration.
Leaders are expected to approve, for example, handing over to NATO the coordination of training
Ukrainian soldiers and the logistics of getting weapons delivered to Ukraine.
Those are things the U.S. has largely headed up till now out of Wiesbaden, Germany.
And the idea is that it would be NATO-ized or institutionalized.
The final declaration will also pledge to keep NATO-wide military contributions to Ukraine
at the level of 40 billion euros collectively for at least the next year.
Now, Leila, these are things Secretary General Stoltenberg proposed in part specifically
because he was worried about what might happen if Donald Trump is elected and follows through
on those promises to cut off U.S. participation in NATO and cut off aid to Ukraine.
Would this declaration really compel a potential Trump administration to support it?
That's a question I also have because the declaration isn't binding and NATO doesn't
have any enforcement mechanisms.
So if Trump wins another term, I don't see how you hold him to these pledges.
He's even indicated, of course, that he doesn't even feel bounded by NATO's most sacred principle
of collective security, the all for one, one for all pledge, which, by the way, as we recall,
has only been ever used to help the U.S. after 9-11.
And Trump has also tied U.S. solidarity to how much NATO allies, other NATO allies, spend
on defense, believing that the U.S. is carrying everyone else.
He definitely does, and that's been very unsettling to the alliance, and it got only more so in
this campaign cycle when, as you probably remember, Trump said Russia should just do
whatever the hell it wants to NATO allies under spending on defense.
And that's, of course, according to this NATO goal of 2 percent of GDP.
Now, 23 of the 32 allies are spending that 2 percent, but it's still true that there
are too many military capabilities that NATO without the U.S. wouldn't have.
And so allies urgently need to fill those gaps in any case.
So it sounds like the allies were trying to Trump-proof NATO.
Did they succeed?
It's too early to know, of course, but I'm surprised by one thing.
They're not going to set a new higher target for defense spending.
They all know that 2 percent of GDP is too low now and more ambition might be seen positively
by Trump, but they're not going to do it.
There's of course a lot of concern about how admiringly Trump seems to view Vladimir Putin,
but I think people are quietly optimistic that he wouldn't actually cut off all U.S.
involvement in NATO.
And I think, Leila, their best Trump-proofing plan is having chosen former Dutch Prime Minister
Mark Rutte to take over as the next secretary general October 1st.
Trump knows him.
He's even described him as a friend.
And Rutte obviously knew a Trump reelection was a possibility, so he must feel up to it.
That's Terry Schultz reporting from Brussels.
Thanks, Terry.
Thanks, Leila.
Thank you.
Next we have news of a new approach to organ donation.
It's a technique to retrieve livers, kidneys, or hearts for those in need.
The overall process is well-established.
People put right on their driver's licenses that they're willing to be organ donors.
Their organs may save a life through a transplant.
What's new here is the technique for retrieving those organs.
NPR Health correspondent Rob Stein got an exclusive chance to watch this happen.
And I'll warn you right now that some people may feel uncomfortable with this story.
Hi there, Rob.
Hey there, Steve.
What is the new technique?
It's called NRP, which stands for normothermic regional perfusion.
And it involves hooking up a special external pump to the organ donor to restart circulation
and sometimes the heartbeat right after the donor has been declared dead.
The idea is to keep the livers, kidneys, and hearts from getting damaged.
Dr. Marty Sellers is a surgeon with Tennessee Donor Services in Nashville who let me shadow
him on two recent attempts to perform the NRP procedure.
It's hard to overstate the importance of it.
It's revolutionized the number of organs that we are able to get for transplant.
And it's also improved the function that they have when they get transplanted.
We are saving lives.
That would have been science fiction just a few years ago.
But, you know, Steve, this new way of getting organs is hugely controversial.
I can imagine, but what is the issue here?
Critics say restarting circulation and sometimes the heartbeat is essentially reversing the
very conditions upon which the donor has just been declared dead, and that's permanent cessation
of circulation.
And, you know, Steve, the surgeon also cuts off blood flow to the brain to make sure any
brain activity doesn't resume.
And that's controversial, too.
Alexander Capron is a lawyer and bioethicist at the University of Southern California I
talked to about this.
I believe the procedure raises very major ethical and legal issues.
And yes, I find it disturbing.
So what was it like when you witnessed this process that must feel to some people like
taking the dead and briefly making them undead?
It was incredibly intense, Steve, I have to say.
You know, the first time I hopped on a jet in Nashville with Dr. Sellers and his team
to try to retrieve a liver and two kidneys from a donor in Chattanooga, and after spending
a long day and very tense night in the operating room, the procedure was canceled in the wee
hours of the morning because the donor continued to breathe on her own, even after life support
was withdrawn.
So I flew back to Tennessee about a week later to see another attempt, this time in eastern
Tennessee.
Again, it was quite dramatic.
There were a lot of complications again, but this time I watched for hours as Sellers was
finally able to retrieve two kidneys from that donor using a modified version of NRP.
It was pretty powerful and eye-opening watching all this unfold in the operating room.
Here's Dr. Sellers again.
I don't want to oversimplify it, but it's life or death.
And while people are discussing the pros and cons of it, people are dying.
During that second procedure, a surgeon from another state joined Sellers to learn how
he could start doing NRP too.
So you know, Steve, it's clear this debate won't end any time soon.
Rob, thanks for creeping me out.
I really appreciate it.
Sure.
Any time, Steve.
That's NPR Health correspondent Rob Stein.
And that's a first for Tuesday, July 9th.
I'm Layla Falden.
And I'm Steve Inskeep.
Your next listen is Consider This from NPR News.
Up First brings you the news of the day.
Consider This goes deep on one story.
Today's episode of Up First was edited by Nick Spicer, Will Stone, John Helton, Jenea
Williams, and Alice Wolfley.
It was produced by Ziad Butch, Ben Abrams, and Katie Klein.
We get engineering support from Arthur Laurent, and our technical director is Stacey Abbott.
Join us again tomorrow.
New from the Embedded podcast, female athletes have always needed grit and talent.
But for decades, they've also needed a certificate.
There was chit-chat about, is that really a woman?
And even now, they're still being checked and questioned.
Their story is the newest series from CBC and NPR's Embedded.
It's called Tested.
Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
For a while now, you've probably been hearing about book bans, how they're gaining momentum
everywhere in Texas, in Missouri, Florida, and Pennsylvania.
On the Code Switch podcast, we're taking a look at why.
Why are so many books suddenly considered so dangerous to kids?
Listen to our new series on the Code Switch podcast from NPR.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os