2024-06-27 02:35:25
The official podcast of comedian Joe Rogan.
Joe Rogan Podcast Check it out the Joe Rogan Experience Stream by day. Joe Rogan Podcast by night, all day.
What's up, Max? How are you?
So good to see you, I know.
What's cracking?
Oh man, just first of all, honored to be here.
Thank you.
Love you and your work. And yeah, I mean, just a national treasure.
That's very nice of you.
Go out on a limb and say it, but no. I'm super, super excited because I've been working on this documentary for the last 10 years of my life and it's finally out today, which I'm super pumped for. It's called Little Empty Boxes, and we talked about it the last time I was here.
And it's a project that means the world to me. I think it's the most important thing I've ever done. And it's the first ever dementia prevention documentary about the science of dementia prevention. But it focuses. It's a very emotional and personal film for me because it follows my mom, who for many years suffered from a rare form of dementia called lewy body dementia. Which is akin to having both Parkinson's disease and Alzheimer's disease at the same time.
That's what Robin Williams had.
That's what Robin Williams had, yeah, and it's a rare condition. It affects about 1 million people in the United States. But it's a it's a dementia, and dementia is now a soaring public health problem.
And there's a lot of controversy within the field. The last time I was here, we talked about, you know, fraud in the in the research space. With regard to the prevailing hypothesis as to what causes Alzheimer's disease, which is the most common form of dementia? And actually, finally, over the past month, that paper was finally retracted. It took two years, but.
Could you explain to everybody what the fraud was?
Yeah, so basically. Among the dementias, Alzheimer's disease is the most common form of it, and that affects about 6 million people in the United States. And since it was first named in 1906 by physician Aloise Alzheimer, the prevailing hypothesis as to what causes Alzheimer's disease, dubbed the amyloid hypothesis, has been that this plaque, formed by a precursor protein called amyloid beta, accumulates in the brain. And by finding a drug that can potentially remove, extract that that those plaques from the brain, from the extracellular space around neurons. That we could essentially cure the disease. That the causal factor in the condition was.
This was ultimately this amyloid beta protein, which forms the plaque, and.
Trial after trial has been a dismal, had been a dismal failure, and it wasn't looking good. Until in 2006, a paper was published in Nature, which for any scientist publishing in Nature, it's like winning an academy award, and that paper, essentially what that did, was it? It allegedly identified this variant of amyloid beta that connected the plaque to the cognitive dysfunction, so the most important clinical feature of Alzheimer's disease. Because for a long time, it was known that cognitively healthy people accumulate plaque in their brains, and that plaque doesn't seem to correlate with cognitive impairment or anything like that. And so that was very deflating for researchers in the field until this 2006 paper came out. And what it did was it renewed faith in this, in this hypothesis, which was always a hypothesis. And continued to send billions and billions of dollars worth of funding down this path.
And what turned out to be the case just two years ago was that that paper was essentially fraudulent. And it represented about 16 years worth of wasted time, wasted money. Which was hugely deflating for not just the research community, but also for any patient who's ever suffered from Alzheimer's disease.
And you know, the way that the field is now slowly starting to turn. But this is a drum that I've been beating for the past 10 years. Is that we really need to start talking about these conditions in terms of prevention? And that's what inspired me to set down this path of creating this documentary. Little empty boxes.
What was the fraud? How did they do it?
So basically.
In the paper, they identify these proteins that they isolated in rat models of the condition mouse models of the condition called A-beta-Star-56.
Again, Amyloid is there at the scene of the crime, so to speak. So when you have Alzheimer's disease, somebody who's died of Alzheimer's disease. What they find, inevitably in the brains of cadavers who've died from Alzheimer's disease are two features. They see this aggregation of these plaques, amyloid beta plaques and tangled proteins called TAU. And so it was a very seductive narrative that this plaque causes the condition, right? For years. The problem is, they've succeeded at reducing the plaque in the brains of people with Alzheimer's disease. But that hasn't led to any improvement in the clinically meaningful features of the disease that we aspire to improve for sufferers of Alzheimer's disease.
The cognitive function.
And in tandem with that, we see that amyloid is produced naturally in all brains, and people who are cognitively healthy have amyloid in their brains. There's a degree of amyloid burden that seems to be inevitable as a general phenomena due to aging. And so it was becoming very clear that amyloid is not the causative feature here, that there is some other factor or factors at play which lead to cognitive degeneration. Until 2006 and in 2006, what happened? This paper basically found this subtype that, when injected into a mouse, caused profound cognitive dysfunction.
And what they did was they illustrated these proteins in what's called a Western blot analysis, which is basically a graphical depiction of proteins.
And the peer review process for papers? I mean, people go in and they crunch the numbers and stuff. But they don't look at like imagery, and they don't go through the imagery. With a fine tooth comb to make sure that it hasn't been photoshopped essentially, but one sleuth, who is a scientist himself? This researcher from Vanderbilt, named Matthew Schrag, actually identified that a lot of these images had artifacts that made it very clear that they were faked.
So, full on fraud.
Full on fraud. And by the way, it's been two years, it took two years for that paper finally to be retracted.
Are there any consequences towards people that publish that paper?
I mean, it's obviously they have a lot of egg on their face so to speak. I mean, it's hugely humiliating.
But no, I don't think that there's.
They're still employed.
They're, yeah, the lead researcher still employed. I mean, they're investigating. Sylvain Lesny, who's a university of. He is a. I want to say Michigan, not Michigan. It'll come to me, but the primary researcher is being investigated.
As far as I know.
So the primary researcher they're connecting to the Photoshop, yeah, they're saying this person might have been the one that produced it.
It was very clear, it was very clear, and that, you know, that's....
God, it's so dirty.
It's so dirty.
It's so evil for all the people that are looking for some sort of relief.
Yeah.
And that, you know, you have this scientific paper you publish, and you knowingly release these photoshopped images in order to validate your paper.
There's a ton of fraud and.
God, yeah.
It's so evil when you think about how many people suffer from this.
So many people.
I mean, you're giving them this false hope just to boost up your academic career.
Yeah, it's awful, the lost time. And, by the way, that paper has been subsequently referenced thousands of times in the medical literature, basically, you know, negating a ton of research.
I mean, like countless papers that have been since published that have referenced that paper in 2006, that Nature paper that was finally retracted. I mean, think about the lost time, think about the needless suffering. Yeah, and it's my view that dementia, essentially, by the time you are diagnosed with dementia, we'll say Alzheimer's disease, you are in late stage Alzheimer's disease.
Whether it's mild, whether you were just diagnosed yesterday, it's this is a disease of midlife, with symptoms that appear in late life. And so that's why the field is now slowly, hopefully, I hope, pivoting more towards prevention.
And where the money I think needs to go is into identifying that golden biomarker that's associated with the onset of the condition, so that clinicians can intervene earlier. Because right now, when you catch it, it's sort of like pancreatic cancer, which incidentally, my mom passed from in 2018. But it's, you know, pancreatic cancer. Most of the time it's diagnosed and it's too late. The tumor is already metastasized, and so this is kind of similar with Alzheimer's disease.
By the time it's diagnosed, it's already. You're already very late in the game. There's widespread neuronal dysfunction. Glucose metabolism in the brain is diminished by 50. So it's again you're catching it in its latest stages, ultimately.
And that's why I think Alzheimer's drug trials have a 99 99.
6. Fail rate. Because by the time you catch it, I think reversing it is, you know, impossible. It's slowed with exercise, with a multimodal dietary and lifestyle intervention. But yeah, it's really sad. And so that's why. 10 years ago, when I saw this developing in my mom and I stumbled upon all this research and I began really diving in. It became very clear to me that this is something that anybody with a brain needs to be aware of and talking about.
And what's the factors when it comes to someone eventually getting Alzheimer's? Is it purely genetic, is it lifestyle, is it diet? is it risk factors and toxins?
Like, what is it?
Yeah, so there are what are called risk factors. So the heritability of Alzheimer's disease is very low, it's like 2 to 3, and the variant that is hereditary is early onset familial.
But that affects that makes up a very tiny proportion of overall Alzheimer's incidence, and similarly with Parkinson's disease, the heritability of Parkinson's disease is very low. I mean, and I definitely want to talk about Parkinson's disease because there's a lot of really interesting new research in that field.
But by and large, with regard to Alzheimer's disease, you have what are called your non-modifiable risk factors, which are your age. You can't change your age, your gender, you can't change your gender and your genes. You can't change your genes, although you can affect how your genes express themselves, which is known as epigenetics. But then you have your modifiable risk factors, which I think is so exciting, because these are the risk factors that you have agency over. You can control obesity, hypertension, type 2 diabetes.
I mean, these are all nutritionally mediated, obviously, which I love talking about nutrition and nutrition insofar as it can prevent or reverse obesity. I think that's incredibly empowering. Type 2 diabetes If you have Type 2 diabetes, your risk for developing Alzheimer's disease increases between two and fourfold. They're actually now we interviewed in my documentary, the researcher who coined the term type 3 diabetes.
Have you heard that? Are you familiar with that concept? No, I haven't, so it's looking a lot like. Alzheimer's disease might in fact be a form of diabetes of the brain, which is a mind-blowing way to think about this condition.
And in fact, we see that peripheral insulin resistance, so the hallmark of type 2 diabetes is insulin resistance. And we see that. The more insulin resistant a person is, the more difficulty their brains seem to have with regard to creating ATP, which is the primary energy currency of our cells. And the researcher who coined Type 3 diabetes? Her name is Suzanne Delamonte. She's a Brown University researcher, and she is in no way in the public sphere. She's a, you know, purely a bench researcher.
She's actually in my documentary, it was like, incredible to get to interview her and speak to her. But it seems that insulin resistance causes the brain to suffer in many ways. It damages the blood vessels. Ultimately, when you have type 2 diabetes, it damages the blood vessels that supply the brain with oxygen, nutrients, energy.
But it also seems to impair. There also seems to be an aspect of insulin resistance that reduces the brain's ability to generate energy.
Okay, so when you first started becoming aware of this, when your mother develops this condition, you first start being aware of it. What were the first things that you noticed that started to get you to question whether or not the conventional applications of drugs are on the right path?
Yeah, I mean, you know, I grew up in New York City and when my mom first started to show these symptoms,....
And how did you notice it? What were the symptoms?
She would, I mean, we would have. I was living in L..A. at the time and so we would touch base every other day via phone. And she started to complain to me about brain fog. And there was some aspect of what she was sharing with me that I thought was just a natural part of getting older.
But ultimately, she revealed to me and the rest of my family that she had sought the help of a neurologist. And that seemed odd. You know, why would my mom? I hadn't had any prior family incidents of dementia, anything like that. Why was my mom suddenly going to see a neurologist?
And but, you know, like I was still in L..A. living my life. I was in my late 20s at the time, but it wasn't until a trip to Miami....
My family went down to Miami to hang out with my dad because my parents had been separated and my mom was in the kitchen. And she confessed to the family that she'd been having memory problems at this point, so it had been described as brain fog, but she revealed that she had sought the help of a neurologist. And, you know, me and my brothers and my dad. We were in total disbelief. That my mom was having anything outside of the could possibly be having anything outside of the realm of ordinary. And so we were kind of mocking her in a way.
And we said, Well, if you're really having such profound problems, what month is it? Or I think it was like, what year is it? or something like that? And she couldn't recall. she couldn't recall what the month was.
And she started to cry. And at that point, for me, that's when I knew that something was really wrong, that I needed to step in. Because, you know, when you're sick, it is a really, that's a really scary place to be.
It could be frustrating, it could be confusing. And you know, when you're in these doctor's offices and they're, you know, oftentimes they don't have the best bedside manner, and they run a battery of esoteric tests.
It can be incredibly overwhelming and it becomes really hard to advocate for yourself. I've learned as somebody with a chronic illness, not least of which a chronic illness that's affecting your cognition. And so I decided at that point....
Essentially that I had to pack up my l.
A life. I moved back to New York, and I started going with my mom from doctor's visit to doctor's visit. And again, you know, I'm pretty privileged. Grew up in New York City.
My mom had health insurance resources. We started going, you know, to all of these different cathedrals, to Western medicine, academic medical insight. And in every instance, I experienced what I've come to call over time. Adios diagnose and Adios. A physician, would, you know, run. These tests titrate up the dose of a medication that she was already on.
One physician actually thought that all of her symptoms were due to depression. There's this idea of the hysterical woman. Today. One in four women over the age of 40 are on an antidepressant drug, you know, one in four, yeah, over the age of 40..
Jesus Christ, yeah.
I mean, I'm not saying there's no use for them, those kinds of drugs, but they're very over-prescribed. I don't think that's controversial. And so my mom was given one of these drugs without full informed consent. I don't think I mean. Ultimately, we tried to get her off of them, which we found out was incredibly difficult to do. Titrating off one of these SSris is really, really hard, actually.
And it turned out obviously to be the case that my mom that these symptoms were not due to depression, they were due to degeneration in her brain. And we went from doctor's office to doctor's office, ultimately culminating in a trip to the Cleveland clinic. So just imagine like, we're in New York City, right? We have, like, multiple hospitals at our disposal.
We had to book a trip to the Cleveland Clinic and it was there that, for the first time. My mom was diagnosed with a neurodegenerative condition. So she was prescribed drugs for both Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease at that time. And that, to me, was I'd never. I've always been a pretty chill guy, but that was the first time in my life I'd ever....
I've ever had a panic attack just googling the drugs, you know, like a scared, like any scared kid would do when their mom receives a life-changing diagnosis. And that was the moment for me that I realized that my life had to pivot. And I had no choice but to dedicate myself to learning all that I could about these conditions.
And so you find out about the fraud, and how long into your research did you find out that most of what people understood about the condition was based on this fraudulent study?
Well, it's not even just the study, it's the fact that these conditions begin decades before the emergence of symptoms. So, you know again, it's a disease of midlife. Essentially, Alzheimer's disease begins 20 to 30 years, if not more, before the first symptom. And so, to me, it became very clear that we were approaching these conditions in the wrong way.
You know, trying to acting in a reactionary way to something that had taken decades to manifest to me just seemed wrong.
And I stumbled upon the work of a neurologist at Weill Cornell, New York Presbyterian, who was talking about Alzheimer's disease as a preventable condition. Which is not something that I'd heard prior to coming across his work. And I realized at that time that this was like, considered 10 years ago a fringe idea, dementia prevention was like a fringe idea. Except for through the lens of this neurologist who was working within the confines of, you know, rigorous randomized research, and, you know, and checking all the boxes for scientific credibility.
And so, to me, it became really clear that this is a topic that I needed to help amplify. Using my skill set as a non-medical doctor, as a non-academic scientist. And I also learned really early on that it's not a genetic condition, that we have genetic risk factors, but that we have a say when it comes to our cognitive destiny. That this is not a natural part of aging. I mean, you know, everything in the body as you get older tends to falter in its functionality, you know, like our joints don't work as well. And you know, there is a degree of forgetfulness that I think is in a way a natural aspect of getting older. But cognitive impairment, that's not natural degeneration of our neurons, of, you know of, for example, the portion of the brain that drives movement, the substantia nigra, which occurs in Parkinson's disease. That's not normal.
And so it began this investigation. For me, trying to understand, because I was seeing the person who meant the most to me of anybody in life. You know, degenerating every day in front of my face, getting worse and worse and worse. It instilled this burning desire in me to understand all that I could, and to share. In the hopes that it might prevent it from happening to others.
And yeah, it was also very odd because my maternal grandmother did not have dementia, so it was really sad and surreal. In fact, that my mom was increasingly requiring around-the-clock care. While her mother, who lived in the same home and was 30 years older, was cognitively totally healthy, it was just the oddest thing. My grandmother, my mom's mom, was in her 90s and totally cognitively healthy, able to form cogent senses. And my mom was struggling to express an idea to get out of a bathroom.
And it just to me, it was so shocking that I, you know, it was traumatic. I mean, I still have PTSD, I think from those days, but it's, yeah. It's motivated me to do what I can to help. And I saw all in every, you know, by the end of my mom's life, she was on 14 different pharmaceuticals. And I'm not anti-pharma. Like, if there was a drug that would have actually helped my mom, I would have been first in line at the pharmacy to fill that prescription for her.
But the drugs don't work at all, and physicians are very quick to, you know, to write a prescription to, like, add a new drug to the arsenal. They're very reluctant to deprescribe. I have never seen a prescription deprescribe to my mom. And by the end of her life, she was on 14 different pharmaceuticals.
And there's nobody on earth that understands how all of those different drugs are interacting in a system that's growing increasingly frail. It was just really sad.
And, you know, so I started to investigate these modifiable risk factors, you know whether it's dietary, diet related, which it, you know, in my mom's case. It may have had something to do with her diet over the years, it might have had nothing to do with her diet over the years. I'll never know. But also now we're starting to see that air pollution is a major contributor to neurodegeneration. We're starting to see now that well. As of 2020, it was acknowledged that exposure to air pollution is actually one of these newly identified model modifiable risk factors for Alzheimer's disease.
So, exposure to fine particulate matter PM 2.
5 actually might cause Alzheimer's disease for some patients. And then, most interestingly, and this is one of the things that I want to talk about with you, which I came across. The work of a neurologist named Dr. Ray Dorsey, who's over at University of Rochester, who's done a lot of work. Publishing. On the link between environmental toxicants and Parkinson's disease Parkinson's disease is now the fastest growing brain disease, and my mom's condition actually had more in common with Parkinson's disease than it did Alzheimer's disease.
She had lewy body dementia, which has more in common with Parkinson's, even though they're both dementia, Lewy body and Alzheimer's. But there's data now linking exposure to certain herbicides and pesticides to Parkinson's disease. Dramatically increased risk, anywhere between two and a half to six fold increased risk.
Which herbicides and pesticides?
So there's a pesticide called paraquat, that there's a great article written in The Guardian by a journalist named Carrie Gilliam. And I got to speak on a panel with her recently at a scientific conference in D.C. called Brain and Environment. And Paraquat is this compound that? It's an herbicide that's produced in China, but its use is banned in China, we import it here.
Yeah, it's crazy.
We use it here. And occupational exposure to this compound is associated with between two and a half to three times a risk for the development of Parkinson's disease. Related compounds are literally used in mouse models to create Parkinson's disease.
And the company that creates it has been under investigation for years. And what has now come to light is that they knew about the fact that. These chemicals accumulate in the brain, in brain tissue, and they seem to selectively target the region of the brain associated with Parkinson's disease, the substantia nigra.
Wow.
It's very scary.
What crops are these used on? is it specific crops, is it specific foods to avoid? or how do you know if those pesticides or herbicides are being used?
Well, it's the residues and the exposures that you get from eating them is very low. But we don't know what long term exposure to those low levels is doing to us. I mean, my mother is somebody who never believed in organic produce, and organic is not perfect. And natural compounds, some of them, are the most dangerous compounds on Earth.
So I know some people listening might say, Oh, here we go with the appeal to nature fallacy. But it's very clear that occupational exposure is very hazardous. You have to be licensed, you have to use this stuff very carefully. But some people actually use it to off themselves.
I mean, it's a really toxic compound. And we now have data suggesting that it creates this condition, that it selectively targets and destroys dopamine, producing neurons that mediate movement. And it's used in cereal grains, things like that.
Why does cannabis oil have a profound effect on Parkinson's patients?
You know, I don't know about cannabis oil, but I can tell you about nicotine, and nicotine is a very interesting compound from the vantage point of parkinsonism.
And I know a lot of people love nicotine, obviously for its cognitive boosting effects. I'm not going to say that it's a healthy compound. I mean, I think that it has cardiovascular repercussions and the like, but there seems to be a. And, of course, smoking is terrible for you.
Cardiovascular with a delivery method or just across the board.
Nicotine by itself raises heart rate, and it raises blood pressure acutely, not by much, but presumably, and it's vasoconstrictive as well, so there's some evidence suggesting it impedes wound healing.
I will occasionally use nicotine as a cognitive enhancer, but I also have chronic low back issues. And I think that, you know, for people with disc issues, this is just a speculation. But I think that it's probably not a good idea to chronically use nicotine. If you have disc issues, which are already, your discs in your back are already poorly vascularized.
And nicotine is a vasoconstrictor, and smoking, you know, increases your risk for Alzheimer's disease. I don't think that we've identified a relationship between pure nicotine and, well, pretty much anything. The research on pure nicotine, by itself, is pretty sparse. Most of the research on the health effects of nicotine is confounded by smoking, which is obviously not good for you.
But interestingly, there does seem to be an inverse relationship between nicotine use, even via smoking, and parkinsonism. So people who smoke cigarettes seem to be protected to some degree against Parkinson's disease. Which is very odd. And they've shown in mouse models that nicotine actually when they use some of these mitochondrial toxins, some of these poisons, like paraquat, right? Or another one called MPTP, which has been used as a street party drug, but it's actually profoundly neurotoxic.
It's been shown to create chronic parkinsonism with just acute use. Nicotine actually prevents that in those models, so it's been shown to somehow protect the brain from, in some regards, against Parkinson's disease. So I wouldn't recommend using nicotine unless somebody. And this is again a speculation. But my hypothesis is that if you were exposed occupationally to some of these compounds, like paraquat or rodanone. Or there are other compounds that are being directly connected to Parkinson's disease, too, like trichloroethylene, I would say, maybe nicotine is a potentially disease-modifying intervention in those contexts.
So in these, when they've studied patients, was there a noticeably smaller instance of people who develop Parkinson's who are smokers, or was it non-existent?
They're just, I'm not sure, the relative risk decrease. But it's one of these odd things that seems pretty consistent in the literature that smokers are less likely to develop Parkinson's disease.
Is that a factor?
I'm not sure, I'm not sure the factor, but it's significant, it's significant. But smokers are more likely to develop a whole host of other. Oh yeah.
It's terrible for you, yeah, but that's the interesting thing is that nicotine. It's thought that nicotine protects this one region of the brain in a significant way.
Have they looked at people that are taking nicotine in different ways, like cigars, gum patches, things along those lines?
Not a lot of the research on nicotine is in animal models, unfortunately.
But it is, I mean, it does seem to do if you set the vascular effects aside, which might play a role in neurodegeneration. Because, you know, the brain relies on its vascular network, the brain, you know, is a very hungry organ. And vascular dementia is the second most common form of dementia, actually. But nicotine does seem to have some really protective effects on the brain. It seems to reduce neuroinflammation.
It might act in a way as an antioxidant in the brain. I'm not recommending it because there are risks, of course, but they've shown that. It seems to be protective in these animal models against these poisons that would otherwise cause parkinsonism.
And some other cool facts about nicotine. Actually, because I did do a little bit of a deep dive recently into it because I do notice a cognitive benefit when I use it. How do you use it? I just use it, I use it like before.
But what, in what form?
A lozenge like, a little like, you know, lozenge.
And I don't have an addictive personality, so for me, I'm not like, you know, it's not something that I feel compelled to do every day, but I do it before. Like, I have to go on like a TV show or do a big podcast or something. And and I do see, you know, I do definitely see, like a cognitive like, you know, it's a stimulant, that's that's pretty well known.
But um, but yeah, nicotine also. It has a very short half-life, so it's half-life is only about two hours. I mean, you compare that to coffee, coffee is like eight hours, so it's it's relatively transient in your system.
But then I think the more interesting compound is is its primary metabolite, which is called cotinine, which it's. Cotinine's half-life is 20 hours long. And it seems to also boost cognitive function, mental health, insofar as animal models can show us that these compounds boost mental health. Might even enhance what's called fear extinction. So for people with PTSD, it might play a role. So it's a it's a really interesting compound, but you know again, it's it's highly addictive.
And um, what is cotinine? It's nicotine's primary metabolite in the body, so when you ingest nicotine, nicotine lasts in the body. Only about the half-life is two hours, so it lasts presumably about four hours, um, but it converts to this compound called called cotinine in the body.
And the half-life of that compound is about 20 hours, so it's in your system for a long time. And that compound doesn't have any of the negative side effects of nicotine. It just seems to do all these interesting, cool.
So it has all the positives and none of the negatives.
It seems to, I mean, it's not a stimulant.
Short and long-term effects of Oh, that's Codeine, bro.
It's, uh, c-o-t. I was trying to spell it and it distracted me and I fell down the path. Different compound.
Yeah, that stuff will fuck you up.
That's in cough syrup.
Yeah.
Cotinine Yeah, how do you spell it?
C-o-t-i-n-i-n-e, I believe, yeah, it's super interesting stuff.
And do people take this as a supplement?
No, but your body readily will create it from. I don't know if it, it doesn't have the UM.
Cotinine, Yeah, there we go. Produced by the body after exposure to nicotine, the main metabolite of nicotine, 70-80 of nicotine is converted to cotinine. Cotinine is often used as a biomarker for exposure to tobacco smoke.
It can be detected in urine. Cotinine can remain in the body a day or more, nicotine disappears within a few hours.
Yeah, but you can google like Cotinine fear, extinction or Cotinine cognition.
Which is probably why people say that cigarettes relax them.
Yeah, definitely. I mean, it's an anxiolytic, it reduces anxiety.
Interesting.
Yeah, see, I mean, it does seem to be this. It's like this really interesting compound where it does all these, you know, it has all these effects in the body that many of which, I'm sure, are negative. But it does seem to do some good stuff for the brain, which is fascinating, you know? So I think, again, I'm not promoting it. But if you're able to forge as an adult a responsible relationship with it, you know, then maybe it's worth experimenting with. If you know, particularly because of its, you know, its potential to. I don't want this to come off as an endorsement for nicotine, but its ability potentially to protect against parkinsonism is very interesting.
And so when a person you're saying, so, this is something that starts to happen in midlife, and then it really expresses itself in dramatic ways years later.
What are other than the environmental factors, what dietary factors contribute? Except obviously pesticides and herbicides that are unfortunately a part of our food system now.
Yeah, I mean, here's the thing. Like organic is, as I mentioned, it's not a panacea. And today on social media, if you, even if you in so much as mention organic and that debate organic versus conventional, I mean, there's. There's so much controversy. But you know, I think the as we've seen, right with Paraquat and this Chinese company that has shrouded the data. And in fact, they they've assembled internally a SWAT team to basically to essentially suppress data suggesting harm due to exposure to this to this herbicide.
Even though it's banned.
Even though it's banned in China, yeah.
Wow, just so they can keep selling it.
Just so they could keep selling it. But there was, there was another, there was another article that came out recently in the publication ProPublica, written by. I believe. Her name was Sharon Lerner, another journalist who I connected with at this D.C. event that I was at recently. Who it was? This crazy? 3M has been hiding the health harms, shrouding the health harms, suppressing the health harms due to exposure to these PFAS PFAS compounds that are forever, forever chemicals, known endocrine disruptors.
In band-aids, yeah.
So there's, there's, like, all this corporate collusion and shrouding of the truth. And I'm just like, I think in so far as you can reduce your exposures to these kinds of things. And and, and, and selectively, you know, if if money is is is scarce, you know, selectively buy certain things organic. I think that makes sense.
Do they have organic band-aids?
That's a good question, I don't know, but they recently identified these compounds, and yeah.
Yeah, I read the study about the band-aid thing and I was like, Jesus Christ is anything safe? it's not fucking band-aids.
We've all got microplastics in our balls these days, microplastics in our atheromas, right, like they found in our in our arteries. That the presence of microplastics was associated with two to three, two to three fold increased risk of cardiovascular death.
So here it is, UH. Partnering with environmental health, news and consumer watchdogs sent 40 bandages of different brands to U.
S Environmental Protection Agency certified Lab, The lab found that 65 of the bandages contained detectable levels of synthetic forever chemicals, or PFAS.
Yeah.
Wow.
Yeah, and look.
That is so crazy because that's an open wound, it's like literally mainlining right into your bloodstream.
It's nuts and you talk about this stuff today on social media, and you're accused of fear mongering, of being alarmist. You're not, it's.
Yeah, what is that, though, is that trolls from pharmaceutical companies? I mean, they're, they're. That's something that I guarantee you corporations use, if if nations use it, and we know they do, and we know we do, we know that there's troll farms in Russia.
We know this is a real thing. Why wouldn't corporations use that, too, especially if they could farm that off and be removed from it? As far as like being able to trace back the paperwork?
I mean, we see it all, I mean, even within our own, you know, within our own government, the USDA, the dietary guidelines for Americans. 95 of people on that committee have had, have, or have had conflicts of interest with the pharmaceutical industry and the food industry.
Yeah.
95 that I'm aware of today, you know, working on the 2020, 2020, 2025 issue. Um, we see all the time there's been a number of, uh, great, um, journalism done by done in the Washington Post. Um. Exposing how the food industry pays dietitians to promote, you know, certain, a certain ideology around food. That all foods are cool, you know? You just have to eat less and move more. All foods fit, there are no good or bad foods which?
Yeah, it's hilarious, it's hilarious, it's crazy, yeah.
I mean, these companies, they, they pay, these people that are body positive influencers as well, you know, so they're, they're basically paying people that are ill. Because of eating these things, to tell other people it's okay to eat these things. And that it's somehow or another phobic, whether it's fat phobic or whatever it is, to not encourage body positivity, and it's stupid, it's just stupid.
It's stupid for the people that are getting it, it's stupid for the people that are promoting it. It's stupid for our culture to be inundated with this nonsense and misinformation. Where we have to sort through it and try to do deeper research and conduct, you know, consult people who actually understand what's going on. It's so disheartening that we live in this world. It's so compromised by money that information about key things like your own health is so distorted that it's hard.
Like, you know, you talk to people and so many people have like a basic misunderstanding of what is good and not good for you. And all of it is because of this kind of thing that it's just so prevalent and it's so confusing. And you're getting expert advice from people, which is one of the wildest ones for me when you look at.
Oh, thank you.
Cheers, sir.
Cheers, good to see you.
One of the things is crazy to me is that we get expert advice from people that are clearly sick. How many times have you had nutrition or dietary advice from someone who is obese?
Yeah.
You're fat, you're, you have no muscle, your body looks like it's just in decay, and you're the person giving advice.
Yeah, I mean, most of the social media, you know, personas that I've observed that purport to be experts, or that, you know, that that seem to have. I don't know whether it's through credentialism, a degree of authority. I mean, I wouldn't send a loved one to. You know, it's just gaslighting on a on a mass scale, because, you know, your. Your average person today comes across this ideology that all foods are fine, it's all good, and they try to reduce their consumption of the crap that they're already eating.
And they end up failing at that. Because it's really hard to moderate your consumption of these foods, which have been engineered to be consumed quickly and regularly.
And then they feel as though they're, you know, they feel, they feel moral failure. And and then it just creates this vicious cycle of yo-yo dieting. We're not being honest about the way that these foods impact behavior. And today, 60 of the calories that your average person consumes comes from ultra processed foods, which are foods that are highly calorie dense. They are nutrient poor.
They are minimally satiating, they're uber delicious. I mean, they push your brain to a bliss point beyond which self controls is seemingly impossible. And by the way, it's these ultra processed foods that are a major route of ingestion for these kinds of chemicals that we're talking about. These industrial chemicals, forever chemicals. You know, ultra processed foods are, you know? If you want more phthalates in your body, consume more ultra processed foods. There was a study that recently was published that found that for every 10 increment in ultra processed food consumption, pregnant women were ingesting about 14 higher levels of these phthalates. Right?
I mean, you had, you did such an amazing episode with Shauna Swan a couple years ago. Talking about the fact that our exposure to these chemicals are reducing the anal genital distance in boys, right? Which is a very easy, I don't know if easy is the right term. But it's a very simple proxy to use to identify how these compounds might be affecting us, right? But that's only what you can observe, like, how are these chemicals affecting us in other ways?
And um, and so it's crazy. And and these are the kinds of, these are the kinds of foods that we're just eating and mass, day in and day out. And 60 is the average. Children consume about 70 ultra processed foods today. On average, Black Americans, unfortunately, consume 80 ultra processed foods.
And there's obviously this. This is not all choice, there are systemic issues. Many people today still live in food deserts. Accessibility is an issue, cost is an issue.
I know all that, but the messaging that we're getting from our most trusted sources is essentially that everything's fine. Just eat less, move more.
Yeah, and it's so difficult for the average American to access information from people that they can trust or to figure out who to trust. You know, you get experts that tell you, oh, you don't need to take supplements. You just need a well balanced diet, and you go, Oh, vitamins are bullshit.
And you have people expressing that. How could someone say that when there's so much data on the efficacy of vitamins and the benefit of vitamin supplementation?
Of course, and vitamins, I mean, we need vitamins. Supplements can be really helpful. And I get asked this a lot like, who do you know who to trust on social media? I think a really good heuristic is, you know, somebody, actually, I was giving a talk recently and somebody highlighted that. One good indicator of somebody who is likely trustworthy is somebody who is willing to present the opposing viewpoint.
And not Strawman, the opposing viewpoint, but actually Steelman the opposing viewpoint like to actually make clear what the opposing viewpoint is, and then to refute that viewpoint.
So they're not ideologically connected to the result.
Exactly so I try to do that. I try to, you know, share where I've changed my mind in the past, or where I've evolved my viewpoint. I try to be clear about the things that I don't know, I don't know, you know, I'm also not trying to be one of these people on social media. That, like, purports to know everything, to have the magic routine or protocol you know for everything you know, as like some kind of, you know, all knowing arbiter of health information. Because I feel like there are still so many unknowns and I could easily one day develop what it is that my mom developed.
I hope I don't. I had a health scare in 2022. That, um, you know, just proved to me that. You know, there is a lot of like luck that goes into this, you know, into this equation as well. My back hurts, I don't know how to fix that.
Like, you know.
What have you been doing for your back?
Um, well, I try.
Bulging discs What do you have?
Oh man, I have um, like, mild, or it's probably progressed, but it's like disc desiccation between L5 and S1.
And then, um, so it's like, basically a dehydrated disc. And uh, which I got from just squatting improperly 10 years ago and my back's like never been the same since.
Um, have you ever used a reverse hyper? No, you don't know about that.
No.
Uh, it was, uh, a piece of machinery that was, uh, designed by, um, uh. Westside Barbell, Louie Roberts Simmons, Louie Simmons. Sorry, Louie Simmons from Westside. Barbell developed this machine that strengthens the back and actively decompresses the back. And, uh, what it is is your body weight, with your chest down, sits on this bench and underneath it. You hook your legs to this thing that's like a leg curl, and you lift up, which strengthens your back. And on the D cell, when it brings it down, it's actively pulling your back.
Hmm, and it's phenomenal.
Whoa?
It's really good, it's really good at decompressing your back. It's really good at strengthening all the muscles around your back to keep your back stable. This is the machine right here, we have one.
Yeah, we have the rogue version of it out there in the studio. I could show it to you after we're done here, but I love it. It's phenomenal and it's. It's great for developing leg strength and hamstring strength and glute strength, but really, I use it for lower back, for decompression. Show a video, Jamie, if you would, so you could, we could see how it worked.
This is Louie, Uh, he was on the podcast back in the day. He was an amazing guy and very innovative, so he was a power lifter and developed some back problems himself. But you see how on the downswing, it's it's actually pulling your back and you can feel it pull your back.
So you can feel it like separate everything, you feel like little things pop in there and it provides relief. And for him, they were telling them he had to get his disc fused because he had too much compression. He said. Well, what about decompression? And they were reluctant to consider that.
And so he's a genius, a fitness genius. And so he designed a machine that would actively decompress the spine while strengthening the muscles around it. Whoa, that sounds awesome, yeah.
Have you done any decompression stuff? I bought this thing that you like, hang upside down on it that, uh, you know, I mean, this was like a couple of years ago. Um, I don't know if it helped that much, you know, it actually has helped me a lot.
What I took up, uh, during the pandemic, boxing, really, yeah.
Okay, so what's going on is it's strengthening your lower back, which is helping you. That's helped. Yeah, yeah.
You need to strengthen it, for sure, this is better. Um, another thing, when you're talking about the hanging, you're talking about a teeter, right? Which teeter? I'd like, that, that unit, but Teeter makes what I think is a far better unit, which is the decks whoa.
And so we have that outside, too. And what that does is instead of hanging from your ankles, so your legs tense up and your legs resist the weight of your body. Instead of that, everything hinges down from your hips, and you will like and immediately feel. When you get on there, you're back popping and decompressing. I use that every day.
It's called the Decks D e X Two, and, uh, you know, just buy it off Amazon, it's not expensive. You also could do back extension exercises on it. It's very versatile machine, but, man, for decompressing the back, I've never found anything better.
That's awesome, and I also use those kinds of things with weight. So, uh, what I'll do is I'll hold a two 20 pound dumbbells in my hands and I'll do back extensions. So I'm developing strength around all those lower back issues, I've had a lot of back issues from distant generation, from jujitsu, you know, 20 years of wrestling with men and getting your neck strangled.
And it's like, it does a lot of stuff to your, to your back, that's not good.
And you've never had surgery, right?
No, everyone that I know has had problems, I do not know anyone that has had back surgery. That's like, That's the best thing I ever did. Everyone like Daniel Cormier, UFC champion, you know, he's like, I was never the same.
Once they cut my back open, it was never the same. There's ways to also deal with it with stem cells, and one of the things they're doing now, because the F.D.A. has such restrictive rules on stem cells. People are going overseas and other countries to do it. And, uh, I have some friends that run a clinic down in Tijuana, the Cellular Performance Institute. And I know many people, including a good friend of mine, my friend Shane Dorian, who is a world champion surfer who's had pretty severe back problems.
He went there and they they're injecting directly into the discs, and there's a very strict protocol of recovery. You're not doing anything physical for, like, a couple of months, after that, you can walk. Essentially, they don't want any stress on the back, anything that's going to impede the healing process.
He said Within six months after that, all of the issues that he had went away. Wow, getting up in the morning, it was always like, Oh, just stiff, no stiff. Like a new back now.
Wow, wild.
Yeah, wild. And you could do that again, and you could do it again, and you could do it again. Like, it's not like a thing you could only do once, right? It's not like a surgery that they're going to go in and remove part of your disc.
So they do that, the discectomy, they'll take a chunk of your disc out, that's pressing against the nerve. But now, guess what? Now you have less disc tissue, you have less cushioning in between your spinal column, which is not good. And this is a way that they're doing.
Now that seems to work, and it's certainly at least worth a try, you know, for people that are considering something that can have life changing effects.
Yeah, I mean, whenever I sneeze, I have back pain, tilting over a sink, putting on my underwear. It's, it's, uh. But I live with it like, I mean, I'm strong, I'm, you know, the strongest I've ever been.
I mean, you know, good shape, but it is my, it is sort of my Achilles heel.
Do you ever do windmills like kettlebell windmills?
No.
Another phenomenal lower back exercise, great for the entire core, but it's you. You clean and press a kettlebell and then you turn to the side with like, So, if I'm holding the kettlebell up with my right arm, my left foot would be pointed that way. Uh, with your knee bent and you drop down like this all the way up, like that, and so it's on both sides. It's strengthening all those supporting muscles around your spine, and it just gives you much better range of motion. I could feel things sort of pop and move and twist around when I do it, it's great.
Whoa, love it. yeah, phenomenal. I'm gonna do that.
Yeah, Turkish getups, another one. Do you ever do those?
Not.
Not a very sexy exercise, but phenomenal for your core and just your overall ability to move things. You know, because it, it, it, it strengthens all of the connecting areas. Instead of strengthening different specific muscle groups, it's it really is working on strengthening all the weaknesses in your system. You know, you know, Turkish getup works. Yeah, so you're lying flat on your back.
You press this up, you sit up, you get to one knee, you post the other knee, you get up, you stand up straight, and then you lower yourself back the same way. Damn, very, very difficult exercise, difficult to do, but phenomenal for the whole thing. Wow.
And I think one of the problems that people have when it comes to weightlifting and developing problems, and you know, I've, I've certainly had plenty is that you're overloading certain muscle groups. And then all the stuff that connects things together, the lower back, the neck, all these different issues, they they happen. Because your whole system is not strong uniformly like you're, you're developing strong muscle groups like quads, you know, but you know how, what? How are the hamstrings? how are the things behind your calves? how are you know? How are your TIB muscles? how was? how's your lower back?
Like, what's what's going on? What exercises have you done to make sure that your spine is protected?
I find that unilateral movements are really helpful, like Bulgarian splits, split squats. Oh yeah, as painful as those are to do. Um, I find that those help a lot and they don't aggravate, aggravate my lower back at all.
Like, I can't, I can't barbell squat, I can't even really, cause my range of motion is now so limited. Do like leg presses, like on the machine.
Your range of motion for your back when you do leg presses.
It's just limited in the sense that, like, my, I don't know what I don't, I don't know the terminology, but it's like hip mobility or something like. My legs only get to a certain point where I get that butt wink thing, you know, like my lower back starts curving up.
Okay.
Words on the leg press, and that's like strain.
Do you um do slant board exercises?
No, I don't know what is that, okay?
There's a guy called the Slant Board Guy that made this dope product and one of the things I love about his go to Slant Board Guys page. One thing that I love about his is his has these little hooks on the side where you can add bands to it as well. Whoa, and so what a Slant board is is a board that you do squats on, where the back of it is raised.
So your toes are pointing down, your heels are pointing up. And what this allows you to do is get a very deep bend of the knees. And you get your knees that push out over your toes and you really lower, you know, ass to heels. And what I do with those, that's it right there, that's I have that one at home. He made me one of those.
So you can do this. He's. They're doing it with different exercises here. These are just calf strengthening exercises. I do them with a body weight, squats, and one of the things I do them with is goblet squats.
Um, I have very strong legs, but I never do deadlifts and I never do. Like regular squats, the heaviest thing I squat with is a 100 pound kettlebell, so I hold a 100 pound kettlebell in front of me and then I do goblet squats on that. And what that does is it strengthens. When you have a heavy weight, like a hundred pound kettlebell and you're holding it in this position just to hold it there.
Your whole body wants to go forward, right? Cause it's like, it's all this weight out in front of you. So you're stabilizing it with your lower back, you're stabilizing with your abs. And then you're dropping down very deep into this body weight. Squat and then up for this goblet squat, and I do it on that, on the slant board.
Phenomenal, and it doesn't put a lot of strain on your back.
That's awesome. I've noticed that front squats, or, yeah, maybe I guess I've used, um, dumbbells to do goblet squats.
Those are great, too. Yeah, yeah.
A lot less load on the spine, so that's that's helped me a lot, too.
And really hard to do. Yeah, so this is it right? This gentleman's doing it right here perfectly.
So he's doing a bunch of different variations of it, so he's doing, you know, oh, look, yeah, oh, he's going side lunges, so the goblet squat is there, so he's got this is a pro.
Who's this guy right here?
Oh, it's on the Slant Board Guys channel, so Slant Board guy, like I said, he sent me that and he's he's been doing this. He made these quite a while, a long time ago. And I think it's just a phenomenal piece of exercise equipment that I don't. I have in every gym I have here, I have at my house.
That's freaking awesome.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, fitness is a huge part of my life, but it's, uh, I've been limited for the past decade.
Because of the back.
Because of the back, yeah.
After this podcast, I'm gonna take you next door and show you that reverse hyper and you get to experience that dex.
Yeah.
Just those two things alone, I think, will provide you tremendous relief.
So excited.
And the dex you just have in your house, it's like, simple, easy to set up.
I'm so down.
Yeah.
Yeah, I mean, you know, there's a lot that I, you know, obviously don't know, but uh, but I know what I know, and I know that. From a from a nutritional standpoint, from an environmental exposure standpoint, your average American today is inflicting self-harm, unwittingly, on a daily basis, via the foods, via the exposures.
Yeah, we're just constantly taking in things that give us inflammation.
Yeah, and you know, we're our circadian rhythms are all dysregulated, we're more sedentary than we've ever been, we're exposed to. I mean, the I believe it was. The environmental working group identified 217 industrial chemicals in cord blood. You know of pregnant women were just were being exposed, you know, from from every which way. And it's not necessarily that it's like one compound that's causing all of our problems, you know, but it's it's cumulative injury.
It's like we, our bodies are resilient, but they can only contend with so much. So you, you throw all these exposures against the backdrop of widespread nutrient deficiencies, you know, unprecedented sedentary behavior, chronic stress, poor sleep. And it's a it's a recipe for chronic disease. I mean, it's not to me, it's. It's very clear as to why so many of us seem to be suffering.
And it's very difficult for someone who's swimming in a sea of that to figure out how to course correct.
Yeah, and I, you know, to, to, to. To quote, unquote detoxify, which has become one of these contentious words now on social media. Granted, maybe possibly for good reason, because it's used to sell detox supplements and things like that. But I mean, our bodies can detox, we just have to make sure that we're giving our bodies the right, the right raw materials to to do that. And that's actually one reason why I think, you know, I'm not a carnivore dieter.
I'm, I'm. I'm a big advocate of consuming grass-fed, grass-finished meat. I'm a, you know, huge protein guy. But I do think dietary fiber plays an important role in terms of helping us. You know, detoxify, release some of these compounds when we go to the.
Bathroom. How does dietary fiber play a role in detoxifying?
So, the three primary means in which a body detoxifies is via peeing, pooping and sweating. And when you release bile acids into the lumen of the gut, with those bile acids come compounds of the liver. Has has essentially deemed has has marked for removal from the body. And fiber dietary fiber soluble fiber, Um, specifically sequesters these bile acids, and they they're because they're absorbed by the soluble fiber, they disallow reabsorption, and so you poop them out.
That's one of the reasons, that's. That's actually the mechanism by which soluble fiber reduces can reduce LDL cholesterol APOB, because it sequesters bile acids which your liver creates using cholesterol. And um, so you, you essentially like, poop out lipids, toxins. I mean, if you're not pooping on a regular basis, you're harboring, you know, toxins. That's why I think that that's probably one of the mechanisms by which fiber seems to be so consistently associated with healthspan lifespan. Um, you know. And those observations are not necessarily causal, like there's healthy user bias there.
I think, you know, obviously, people who eat more fruits and vegetables today, they likely have other healthy dietary and lifestyle habits. Like that's, that's clear, right? But I do think there's a mechanism for fiber to help, um, remove some of these toxins and and the like.
And is the idea behind that mechanism that fiber encourages defecation?
Fiber, the soluble fiber like traps it. Basically, bile acids get released into the lumen of the gut, which help break down fats. Right? You need these, you need these compounds to break down and assimilate fats from your diet, right? But there's a very small, I believe. It's at the end of the small intestine, where these acids essentially would otherwise get reabsorbed. But because they're trapped by the soluble, gel forming fiber, they get passed.
And so how is that different than what would happen if you just ate meat and you have these compounds?
That's a big question mark, but I think that that's, uh, something that is not often discussed and should be discussed. One of the potential benefits of fiber is the fact that it helps trap toxins in the gut.
And meat does not.
No, meat is. meat is a low residue food. food meat is largely absorbed in the small intestine. I mean, when people, you know. The bulk of stool is made up of fiber and dead bacteria and cells that have been sloughed off the, you know, epithelial layer of the UM. Large intestine. Small intestine, Um. But yeah, fiber is generally what makes up, you know, the majority of a of stool.
And if you just eat meat, then what is your stool?
Well, I've never personally done a carnivore diet and I'm not a gastroenterologist, but um, you know, carnivore dieters say that they poop fine, but um. But I think it's a missed opportunity to not be getting fiber in your diet. I, I don't think that the carnivore diet long term is is optimal short term. And also, I will say that people that that see reprieve from awful conditions, like, you know Crohn's or I, you know, IBS, or whatever. These autoimmune conditions are that people who adopt carnivore diets like, I would never, I would never say, stop doing this diet that seems to be helping you, like I would never say that.
So, the primary function of fiber that you think is beneficial versus having a carnivore diet is the fact that it can absorb these compounds inside the gut. Whereas if you're just eating meat, that's not going to happen.
Correct, I think that's one of the benefits of fiber. I think fiber fiber has a few benefits. So, for one, fiber is satiating. It's not as satiating as protein. But it does mechanically stretch out the stomach, which, you know, turns off the hunger hormone ghrelin.
So fiber is is fiber containing foods are satiating because it's, you know, are beneficial because they're satiating. Two for this lipid regulation, hormone regulation, toxin removal function that fiber plays, but then three, fiber seems to promote.
Gut bacterial diversity There are some studies that suggest otherwise, that it's not necessarily the fiber, it's fermented foods that play a larger role in promoting gut bacterial diversity. Um, but we know that fiber feeds gut bacteria, and as a result, we get beneficial. Postbiotic compounds like sodium butyrate, which is anti-inflammatory, feeds cells in the gut. Um, that use it as a as a fuel source.
So I think there, I think there are a few benefits to fiber consumption.
Um, you know, I, I, I'm not like one of these. Like, you know, I don't think that fiber is the primary thing that we should be looking for in the diet. Necessarily. I'm, I'm. I prioritize protein. I think eating, you know, a protein rich diet. There seems to be many benefits of that. Um, and fiber is not a it's not an essential nutrient, um, but it does. It does seem to do good things in the body.
So I mean, I'm, I'm not anti-fiber.
Yeah, it's. One of the weird arguments from the carnivore diet side is that fiber is not necessary. And you know, when you see these people that have been eating nothing but meat for five, 10 years. And show an alleviation of all sorts of symptoms of different autoimmune conditions and different issues that they've had, it's it's interesting.
Totally well. First of all, there's no such thing as a one size fits all diet, and plants people have different, um, tolerances to different plants, you know, it's. Red meat, for example, is much more well tolerated by the vast, vast majority of people. I mean, there's a complication of Lyme disease, known as Alpha-Gal syndrome, where people develop a sensitivity to red meat. But by and large, red meat. Like you, provided you're producing enough stomach acid, you should be.
Able to. Is that officially a Lyme disease? Or I thought it was from Lone Star Tick? It's a different.
That yes.
Yeah, yeah.
I believe you're right, I believe you're right. Um, I'm not a hundred percent sure, but it's, uh, it's associated with, it's one of these tick-borne.
I had a buddy of mine got it. Yeah, my friend Evan had it for a year and it actually went away and then came back again. Crazy, yeah.
For a year, he couldn't eat red meat, He was allergic to red meat.
I feel for those people.
Yeah, it was rough. He's a hunter, too. Wow, crazy.
So he's eating chicken.
Yeah, I mean, I love, I love my steak, but um, um, yeah, so you know, like red meat generally very, very well tolerated, chicken very well tolerated. Um. But it's these plant products, these these plant items that seem to, you know, very people have different sensitivities to them. So I wouldn't say like you have to eat broccoli or you have to eat spinach, like people have different, you know? And we're also today.
There's widespread gut dysbiosis, so people have problems with their guts, they have immune systems that are not fully competent. As evidenced by the the soaring prevalence of autoimmune conditions and allergies and the like today, which I think is attributed to, there are many factors that that play a role. You know, it could be over use of antibiotics, it could be the hygiene hypothesis.
We've just become so sterile as a culture. Fewer people today are being our kids are being breastfed or being born via C-section. Travel can play a role, you know, you travel to some foreign country, you get an infection that changes the microbiome. Um, and so I think, like, we have these sensitivities that are not. That are not surprising, but I think, by and large, for most people, these plant plant foods have a lot of good to offer. You know that the benefits, generally speaking, outweigh, outweigh risks.
I'm glad you brought up the, uh, overuse of antibiotics, because there's a very interesting case. Uh, that belt on the wall up there, the the Abu Dhabi Combat Club. That's, uh. The most prestigious grappling UM competition in the world, and the guy who won that is the greatest grappler of all time. His name is Gordon Ryan, and he's a guy who's he's only 28 years old, which is really wild.
And he's hasn't been beaten in, like forever. And it's not whether or not he beats people, it's how he beats them. It's he's that good, he's that he's one of the most dominant athletes of any sport of all time.
But he had staph infection, which is very common amongst grapplers. It's very common people get a lot of staph infections. Well, he was getting it so often that he was essentially on antibiotics for a whole year. And his gut is fucked up. Real bad, to the point where he's, like, constantly nauseous.
He's seen a bunch of different doctors, they've tried to fix it in a bunch of different ways, and no one can really figure it out. Like, when someone has developed a really destroyed gut biome because of antibiotics, and long-term, like, really irresponsible long-term use of antibiotics, what can someone do to try to come back from that?
Yeah, I mean, most most people would reach for a probiotic, but there was actually a study that came out a couple of years ago that found that probiotics. After a course of antibiotics, I believe the antibiotic was Cipro Um, actually delayed recolonization of the gut by healthy bacteria.
How so?
You know, I don't know, but it's just, uh, the microbiome is a big buzz term, and there are still so many more unanswered questions. And there are answers I think based on based on my assessment of the literature, and I've I've written about it in my in my books. I think that the best thing to do would probably be just to, you know, to to. To slowly get back to a diet that contains it's, you know, that, that contains fermented foods. I think fermented foods have been shown to be really supportive of gut bacterial.
Diversity like kimchi and things like that.
Yeah.
That's what I like, I love kimchi.
More so than than probiotic supplements, I think fermented foods are really, what's up? Um, kimchi. I'm a huge fan of natto, raw sauerkraut, raw pickles. you have to make sure that they're raw, you know, not pasteurized. Um, but yeah, that that seems to be really helpful. And then essentially just feeding, eating, because what you feed you breed, you know, so eating, um.
We have a hard time even keeping food down. Yeah, he's in this position where he's like, constantly nauseous and he tries to train, but he gets nauseous while he's training sometimes, hmm.
That's rough.
What would you recommend to someone like that?
Yeah, I would say, I mean, it depends, you know, some people do really well on low FODMAP diets. So, like, you know, these fermentable carbohydrates that are that include fiber, but also include other specific carbohydrates that are that are easily. For those you know, like, there's. There are certain prebiotic carbohydrates that are found just across the um, you know, like throughout the the the produce section of the supermarket. That are, uh, usually eliminated when attacking SIbo bacterial overgrowth in the small intestine.
Um, there's a people can google like, there's a whole list of like, it's, it's a low FODMAP diet.
Um, cause Gordon has been doing this, trying to deal with this for, like, a couple of years now. Here it is low FODMAP diet, so vegetables, fruits, uh, dairy alternatives are all high, high FODMAP groups. And the low stuff is vegetables like eggplants, green beans, bok choy, bell peppers, fruits, cantaloupe, capes.
Okay, so all sorts of different things that you can eat that can potentially help you.
But yeah, so I would, I was on a bunch of.
Medications. It's like, nothing's happening.
I mean, I would, I would probably adopt a low FODMAP diet. And at a certain point, you know again, this, I'm just speculating. But um, so, I mean, this could be the worst advice, so don't take take with a grain of salt. But I would probably adopt one of those diets, and then, you know, first, maybe even like an elimination diet. Like a really aggressive one. Um, cause people with with with serious gut issues. I mean, again, I'm not like a carnivore advocate, but seem to do really well, at least in the short term, on these carnivore diets.
So I would say, maybe try something like that, um, if that is too restrictive, then I would try maybe a low FODMAP diet, um, but.
Have you ever thought about trying a carnivore diet just to see what's up?
I've thought about it, uh, I would do it, I have nothing against it, I would do it. I just, you know, I think I. I enjoy dark, leafy greens.
I think there's benefit in them. Um, but just to see how I felt on it, I would.
Try it, but, uh, it's very interesting, yeah, one of the one of the interesting things.
You do it every year, right?
Yeah, I pretty much do it most of the time now. Um, I, I, but I'm not strict. I, I'll eat fruit. Uh, I certainly like kimchi.
I like to eat kimchi and steak together, that's like a nice combination.
I love that.
But, uh, most of my meals are meat and eggs. like the vast majority, 85 90 of my meals are meat and eggs. And it's like, the regulation of my energy levels is incredible, it's just changed everything. Like I used to get tired in the afternoon, you know, used to be like the afternoon. I'd be like, Oh, then I have to power through, get a cup of coffee, wake up, figure out what to and then go to a show.
Um, that's not the case anymore. Like, I'm wide awake all day long, it's very different, it's very different. And when you eliminate, uh, essentially most carbohydrates from your diet, and then your body starts to produce glucose via gluconeogenesis, through absorption of protein and meat, the whole thing changes.
Like, you have, like a steady, manageable level of energy throughout the entire day. And cognitively, it's been one of the best things I've ever done. When I first started doing it again, I'd gotten off of it for a while, and I first started doing it again. All of a sudden, I was like, Jesus Christ. I have like a extra gear in my brain because it's like conversationally, it's like for podcasting.
For me, I found it very beneficial.
That's awesome. Yeah, you know, I'm like, I don't, but again, you.
Said, like, there's no, like, one size fits all. Yeah, for me, that seems to work.
I eat a I. I would consider myself carnivore adjacent in the sense that I am a huge fan of, I think red meats, a health food, which I know. I mean that saying that, in and of itself, is a controversial statement today. Um, I take a very protein forward approach with my diet, like I think that protein. There are many benefits to prioritizing protein. It's the most satiating macronutrient. You've got a six fold higher thermic effect of eating protein as compared to carbs and fat.
It, obviously, your body is made of protein, it supports muscle protein synthesis. it halts muscle protein. There's so many benefits to prioritizing protein, which I do, um, but I do think that, you know? Like, dark leafy greens, for example, is known to be one of the most nutrient dense forms of produce because of its low calorie density.
And it's a great source of vitamin C, folate. But also, I think dark, leafy greens, I mean, take kale. Kale is the top source of these carotenoids, called lutein and zeaxanthin, which we know directly support eye health and brain health. And so I don't see a reason to to deprive myself of these greens that I know have. These compounds that literally migrate up to the brain, where they help to reduce oxidative stress. They might even improve, the way, you know, cognitive function and the like.
Um, I think the arguments against eating those to me always are like, some of. The silliest is that plant plants are producing these chemicals to avoid predation, and that these phytochemicals are bad for you. Like Jesus Christ, in a world today where there's so much that's bad for you. To concentrate on salad, it seems fucking crazy. I don't think anybody's dying from salad, you know, I don't think you should live off salad. And everybody that I know that tries to eat only vegetables winds up feeling like shit. And there's only a few exceptions to that.
And again, there's no one size fits all diet, but the people that I know that have gone into a vegan diet. Almost all of them get bad blood work and they try to figure out what's wrong, and then many of them try to supplement. And then one day they'll have a piece of salmon and feel like their body just returned on. Then they go, Oh, okay, I got to stop doing this.
I hear that all the time. Yeah, veganism is a psyop to me.
It's a, it's a. it's an ideology, it's an ideology, just like any other cult. And once you become a part of that, you lose all objectivity, and you're no longer willing to talk about these things in a rational way. You're defending your religion.
Yeah, I think one thing that's really interesting is that, you know, even within the nutritional orthodoxy, saturated fat still continues to be demonized, right? But only 3 of the saturated fat that your average American intakes, ingests. Comes from steak comes from meat, the vast majority of saturated like.
If you were just to accept that saturated fat is the worst dietary nutrient one might ingest.
By the way, that's a psyop.
That yeah.
Literally from the sugar company.
Because saturated fat a fat isn't a fat like, are we talking about saturated fat in dairy? Cause that seems to have no negative cardiovascular impact.
Right, but 3 comes from red meat. Excluding mixed dishes, the vast majority of saturated fat that your average American ingests comes from. Desserts comes from mixed dishes like pizza, lasagna, egg rolls, things like that. That's good stuff, dairy.
Yeah, dairy makes me hungry, but it's like we've demonized steak, right? Which is like one of the most nutrient dense things a person can eat, right?
Yeah, it's. We are in a very strange position. This country at least is, uh, with regards to our understanding of what is actually good and not good for you. You know, when I tell people that I'm that I eat mostly meat, they're like, What about your cholesterol like?
It's like to try to walk them down the rabbit hole of good cholesterol, bad cholesterol, the balance of cholesterol. Cholesterol as it relates to plaque in the artery in your arteries. Like, what's really wrong and is it actual food that most people eat? Is that really what the problem is cause?
I doubt that it is, I doubt that it's meat, I doubt that it's eggs, I doubt that that's the problem. And when people are willing to readily consume this process bullshit on a daily basis, but then demonize steak. I'm like, that is one of the dumbest things that we have become accustomed to.
This idea that a steak is delicious, but it's ultimately bad for you.
Yeah.
No, it's, um, we should consume less meat, Bill Gates saying it with a big pot belly, Yeah.
Like, Jesus Christ, No, it's, it's, it's crazy. I mean, I, you know. Especially contextually today, with the you look at health statistics, right? Like one in two people are almost obese today, 40 of people are obese today.
And by the year 2030, half are going to be not just overweight, but clinically obese. Okay, half of adults today are have some degree of insulin resistance, right? We know that 90 of adults have some degree of metabolic dysregulation. If you, if you factor in things like wastes or circumference, low HDL, triglycerides and things like that.
And so for for a health expert today, to demonize any whole food, any whole food to me is just absurd and and actually really unethical. And red meat is is, you know, again and again. It comes up on these lists, on, you know, in the data as one of the most nutrient dense foods. I mean, it's the most. It provides the most bio available source of iron Heme iron, right? I mean, iron deficiency. Anemia is still a major global health problem. Last I checked and red meat is the ultimate iron supplement.
It's highly bioavailable, it provides zinc, it provides creatine, it provides carnitine, carnitine, all these really incredible and valuable micronutrients. And again, when talking about steak, that's where 3 of the saturated fat.
So what's wrong with steak? What's the big problem with it? From a health standpoint, I don't think there is any.
And yet there's people that will tell you you need to eat less.
Yeah, which is so strange. Like, well, our beef consumption actually over the past few decades has declined. Our chicken consumption has gone up, but we are eating less red meat. And look at our health is trending worse and worse and worse.
Where today, your average American is largely on a plant-based diet. It's a plant-based diet of ultra, it's not a whole foods plant-based diet. I'll concede that it's a it's a largely ultra processed plant.
Based bread and ketchup, yeah.
But I mean, but it really is a huge problem. And you know, foods like eggs, I mean, you know, there was this like thing where for a while it was like, all animal source foods are bad, right? The the the antidote to disease is to, is to, is to, um, shun all animal source foods, right? But then we started to see, Oh, wait a minute.
Fish is actually associated with better health outcomes, so let's like, eat more fish. And then the data came out showing us that, oh, wait a minute. Cholesterol, this nutrient that we've demonized for decades, actually has no negative downside, no downside. With regard to cardiovascular risk. For the vast majority of people consuming dietary cholesterol, very little impact on serum cholesterol, right? And then dairy turns out that, oh my God, wait a minute, it's not low fat and reduced fat dairy that seems to be associated with better health.
It's full fat dairy that seems to be associated with better health. What the hell, right?
Yeah.
And and so I think, I I mean, I do think it's just a matter of time before we realize that there was a lot of good to be gained from foods like red meat. Um, but you know, there's so much politicization.
Yeah, and then people, they sort of cite things like the China study, which is very flawed.
Yeah, I mean, it's just it's a narrative, it's just a narrative. And um, yeah, I mean, I think, like in so far as red, meat is, uh, is is highly nutrient dense, very satiating, it's, I mean, the perfect antidote to boxed mac and cheese.
I mean, how many people for dinner in this country are eating box mac and cheese for dinner? Noodles with butter, you know, or margarine? Worse? And um, and I just think it's a it's a huge shame. And I grew up in a household that was largely, um, you know, we my. My mother had a bias towards vegetarianism. she wasn't a vegetarian, she ate chicken.
She ate occasionally fish, but she was very concerned about heart disease, and so she, you know, growing up we were like, she never ate. I never saw her eat red meat and she never had any eggs. And when she served me my first egg when I was a child, she served me it. With a warning to to not eat these with any significant frequency because they they have the potential to clog your arteries. Wow, yeah.
She was psyoped, she bought into, you know, the advice at the time, she didn't have the internet, she wasn't, you know, online, but she. Whatever the magazines or the TV, you know, the the nightly news would share about healthy eating, and certainly whatever the marketing you know. In the supermarket, as she was pushing her shopping cart around the supermarket aisle, anything with a red Heart Healthy logo on it would end up in my shopping cart at some point. Make its way through my kitchen. And so I grew up on a diet that was largely ultra-processed. And mainly, uh, you know, I was encouraged to eat, um, low, a low cholesterol, low saturated fat diet. I mean, I grew up eating, consuming margarine.
And I remember the big tub, the big plastic tub of corn oil that we always had out by the stove. Yep, crazy, crazy, yeah.
Crazy. They trick people into taking that stuff. And that's also when you see, like incidences of Alzheimer's kick in. Like, a lot of that starts to happen right when ultra-processed foods get introduced into the American diet.
You see an uptick in Alzheimer's.
Yeah, well, we now have data. So, like, even when I wrote my first book, Genius Foods, um, this data hadn't even yet come out yet. But we now see for every 10 increment in ultra-processed food consumption, there's a 25 higher risk of of developing Alzheimer's disease. Crazy, yeah.
Crazy it's, it's like it's the craziest scam to ever get pulled off. That the commonly known foods that people have eaten for eternity, forever are the ones that are the problem. And that these ultra-processed foods that have recently been introduced, or fairly recently, recently been introduced into the American diet. Those are the things that you should gravitate towards.
And you still have these personas on social media, credentialed social media personas going to bat for them.
Yeah.
You know, acting as apologists and getting paid and getting paid.
And getting paid, which is the dark part of it. It's like, they're they are committing a crime against humans, it's an information crime against humans. And it will result in those people taking choices that are negatively going to affect their life.
There were a hundred percent, there was an um, an umbrella review just published, people can look it up. Ultra-processed food consumption linked to 32 negative health outcomes in this. In this review, they looked at all of the available research linking ultra-processed foods to poor health out to negative health outcomes. They couldn't find one single benefit of ultra-processed food consumption.
It was all bad. And um. And again, I think it goes back to the fact that these foods are, you know, we. We tend to over consume them, and they're a route of of ingestion for these, you know, for these forever chemicals and the like.
Um, they, yeah, they, they, they. yeah, it's just not. It's not good. They drive obesity, they drive insulin resistance. When consumed in mass, I'm not saying that you can't consume any. I think, you know, like, I think it's important to be a pragmatist. And and it's not like my diet is a hundred percent free of of ultra processed foods, but we consume too many today. And I think part of that has to do with the fact that we're not adequately taught.
It's never informed consent. We're not adequately, um, taught how these foods influence behavior, and, uh, yeah, it's very unfortunate.
Well, I think people are more aware of it now, fortunately because of people like you that are spreading this information. And people hear podcasts and they get like an adjusted sense of why they're been. They've been misinformed, and, uh, that's, that's a new thing, you know? And the the ability to access information from unofficial sources. Now it turns out to be real information and very beneficial, that's a new thing. And uh, so in that sense, we're lucky, but boy is it an uphill slodge.
Yup.
You know, there's there's so much shit you have to deal with, and so many people are just so they're, they're informed. Idea is so incorrect that in order to shift that, it takes so much effort. And then they have to deal with all the people around them. Like, Oh my god, cholesterol, oh my God, you're going to get this and that, and you're having a heart attack, you're gonna have a heart attack.
Like, what?
Yeah, I know there's so many competing voices and misinformation out there on social media. And fear-mongering today, I mean fear-mongering with regard to animal source foods, which I think is a is a problem. I mean, as I've said, I'm not, I'm not a carnivore dieter, I think it's just a. It's just, yeah. It's really insane that today anybody would would fear-monger, Uh, you know, any sort of whole food?
And and I think that, really, you know, like I used to be more interested in what's the appropriate, for example, ratio of carbs and fats to one's diet for optimal health? And I really do think it's, you know, for most people, the big lever dietary, dietarily speaking, is to is to reduce your consumption of of these kinds of foods. He's like, what are essentially vending machine foods? um, things that you just sit on?
The shelf forever and still be edible.
Yeah, and there are other tools, you know, I think intermittent fasting is something that a lot of people were talking about today. I think that's like, you know, there's nothing magic about it, but it can. That can be used as a tool, there are lots of tools at people's disposal. And it frustrates me sometimes on social media where you see, you know, people, especially those in the so-called evidence based community. That seem to be that that gets so down on what they're simply not up on, you know they, they tend to write these tools off as being trivial, or, you know, they'll, they'll even talk disparagingly about them. And and I think whatever, whatever tool is at your disposal that you have the ability to use today.
I mean, I think that's a that's a great, that's a great thing, you know, the more awareness we have, the better.
So for your documentary? When you're, um, discussing the causes and the um, what you can do to sort of mitigate the effects of these things, um, what? What is like, what's the primary concern, and when does some? So you say this is a disease that starts to show itself in middle age or begins. And then by the time you see the symptoms, it's already you're in late stage.
Yeah, so it's by the time you've, you've you present and you're diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease, I think that it's. It's irreversible at that point. Um, so I think the sooner you can get a handle on your risk factors, you know, some of which include nutrition, but also social isolation is a risk factor.
Um, that's interesting.
Yeah.
And what, what is it about that that causes it to become a risk factor?
Well, I mean, there's that 80 year long ongoing study at Harvard, the Study of Human Development, that found that that loneliness is a toxin. On par with smoking cigarettes or drinking alcohol. And, um, you know, I think humans are first and foremost, we're social beings. That's one of the reasons why, you know, a human neonate is born half baked. I mean, we continue our development in the presence of others, you know, they call it the fourth trimester. Relative to other animals in the animal kingdom, a human is born with with zero capacity to survive.
You know, we, we, we need those around us, and so I think that's. It's just hardwired into who we are as a species, that we are social beings. And today, whether it's attributed to, you know, living in cities and remote work or social media. It's taking a huge toll on us from a from the standpoint of of mental health. And that creates downstream biochemical consequences. I mean, this is not just a, you know, an emotional phenomenon, is something that actually has real life, a real life health, health impact.
What about exercise in terms of, like, seeing people who develop Alzheimer's or dementia? um, what? How many of those people are sedentary, and how many people develop it that are avid exercise enthusiasts?
That's a great question. I mean, exercise is is medicine when it comes to the brain, when it with regard to the, you know, the epidemiology of of exercise and dementia risk. Um, I don't think that's clear, because also as people get older, they tend to become more sedentary. Um, but we do know that exercise does have a profound impact, even just light activity.
But is there an instances, or like, a measurable decrease in instances of people that have dementia and Alzheimer's? With people that are enthusiasts that have never stopped exercising, like people that are like 70 year old marathon runners.
Yeah, I mean. People with greater cardio respiratory fitness, particularly in midlife, seem to have reduced risk in late life for an Alzheimer's diagnosis. Cause. Again, it's about being healthy in midlife. That really seems to move the needle.
So midlife obesity is associated with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease down the line. Um, being actually heavier in late life is associated with lower risk because people tend to become less well nourished as they get older. So the obesity and Alzheimer's disease connection is actually quite interesting, so midlife obesity is associated with increased risk for Alzheimer's disease. But people who are of heavier weight as opposed to more frail in late life, seem to be protected. Yeah.
So just by virtue of. Well, one of the things I've always said about heavy people is if, boy. If you can get that person to lose weight, they're going to be so strong because they've been carrying around all this weight all the time.
Yeah.
You know, like my friend Ralphie May, Ralphie was. how big do you think Ralphie was this heyday?
455.
Easy, right? Maybe 500 pounds.
Easy safeguards.
Yeah, easy, over 400 pounds.
Wow.
The guy had these massive legs and I was like, Ralphie, if you could just lose weight, you'd be kicking holes through. People like, your legs are fucking machines, they're carrying you upstairs. I couldn't walk up those stairs.
Whoa, what Ralphie may used to weigh over 800 pounds. I don't know if that's true. Ralphie might've exaggerated that.
He was a little bit of a.
He lost 350 when he did that. That's like worthy of a TLC show down to 350..
He got down to 350.
Interesting, he had a couple of gastric bypasses, he ate through them.
Whoa?
Yeah, he had a real problem. Oh my God, he's not with us anymore.
I mean, a lot of this research is done using the BMI, which we know is imperfect.
Yeah, I'm obese.
Yeah, according to the BMI. Right, yeah, but you're obviously not.
I have 10 body fat and I'm obese.
That's crazy, yeah, I mean, it's not a good. It's obviously a shitty diagnostic tool, but as a screening tool, that's how they do a lot of this research. So people with higher BMI in late life seem to have a degree of protection, yeah.
Um, but that's because frailty is like the worst thing.
Right?
Particularly, um, sarcopenic obesity. So, like, you're actually you're fat, but you're under muscled. And so this is one of the reasons why why being well muscled is so important from the standpoint of longevity. And that's where protein plays a role. Obviously, resistance training plays, plays a really important role.
So, but the key is to make sure in mid life that you're that you're healthy.
Midlife, healthy and fit, and then later in life, you just have to make sure you don't get frail.
Yeah, and at a certain point, you could. You could ride the wave of the health that you've, you know, the the, the, the robustness that you've cultivated in midlife. But that's why we should. The earlier you start with these dietary and lifestyle principles and adopting them and living them, the better.
Yeah, that's one of the craziest statistics. That significant muscle mass has a reduced impact on all cause mortality.
Having significant muscle mass.
Yeah, having like real strong muscles like, you'll notice like significant decrease in all.
Cause mortality? Oh yeah.
But it's just makes sense because you're stronger, you're healthier, your body's more vital, it's more robust. It can deal with all kinds of things because it's gone through significant stressors on a daily basis in order to achieve this muscle, right? So you're forcing your body to work, you're forcing your body to stay strong, you reduce the effects of atrophy and all the confounding effects.
Yeah, I mean, your muscles produce BDNF, which is brain derived neurotrophic factor, which is like a miracle grow protein for the brain. It helps to promote the growth of new neurons, it it encourages the survival of your existing neurons. It's a compound that's produced in your muscles and passes its way through the across the blood brain barrier.
And we also know that your muscles are the primary site of glucose disposal. um, you store sugar in your muscles. your muscles are obviously for for mobility. Super important. Improving insulin sensitivity There's no better way to to cultivate insulin sensitivity than to resistance. Train regularly.
And we see again that insulin resistance is related to glucose hypometabolism in the brain, which is one of the hallmarks of Alzheimer's disease.
Another thing they've found is that exercise training, with weights, specifically strength training, is one of the best methods to reduce anxiety.
It's great, yeah. There's lots of evidence now, meta-analyses even showing us whether it's resistance training, i mean cardiovascular, it's just it's. It's such an important tool for brain health, and that's part of the reason why I, I mean, I. I love fitness, and you know, most of it is what is due to what fitness does for my, for my brain, my brain health, my mental health.
Me too, I can't imagine. I mean, I've taken a couple of days off, just a couple of days off, which like the most I ever take. And by the end of the second day, I'm like, Jesus, I feel fucking weird, like I feel like I have to do something or my body's going to fall apart.
Like, I just feel gross, feel anxious, anxieties coming on, like, just don't feel good, and then I work out and I'm like, huh, I'm okay?
Yeah.
I'm fine.
Totally, I mean.
It's like your body telling you, like, this is, you want to exist in like a robust state. There's only one way, there's only one way you have to work out, it's the only way.
You're not going to be strong unless you work out, it's just, I mean, you have. There's certain genetic factors or people that have, like, really great genes and they, they, they're strong and they don't do fucking anything. It's crazy, yeah, but they would be better off if they worked out, they would be healthier.
Think about how crazy it is that, like older gen, cause I feel like we're now we, we obviously can appreciate this, and and younger generations. We have gyms, I think. Was it, like Arnold Schwarzenegger that helped popularize the gym, like that gym culture? Probably maybe, but like my mom's, yeah, but like my mom's generation, there was no. I mean, nobody was resistance training for fun, certainly not women.
Right, right, and then, and they were the ones they were the targets of, like they were the they were the bullseye of that of precisely that messaging. Avoid cholesterol, avoid saturated fat. You know, low fat this, low fat that. And they weren't working out. And it's. It's really sad when you, when you look around and you see that generation, you know, and their health.
Yeah, and the differences between, I mean, there's been a bunch of internet memes about this, the difference between. Like an 80 year old woman who regularly strength trains and has been doing it her whole life. And another 80 year old woman who's in a chair, you know, and she's rolling around on a scooter cause she can't walk right anymore?
Yeah, yeah, it's really sad. So I mean, I think we're, we're definitely making progress. I think that's one of the one of the upsides of the wellness industry, and the and the and I think this fervor surrounding wellness, and whether it's group workouts or gym culture, I think it's just. It's amazing that that people across the age spectrum now have embraced fitness as a lifestyle, and women are lifting weights.
And I think that's it's just incredible.
How bad is tap water?
I mean, I'll say that I grew up drinking tap water, I grew up in New York City. yeah, grew up drinking it.
Garden hoses.
Yeah, I think, yeah, same, I think you're, you'd be well-suited filtering your water. Um, cause also, I mean, so one of these compounds that, um, has been directly linked to parkinsonism that, uh, has Dr.
Ray Dorsey, from University of Rochester, has published on Um. It's called trichloroethylene, and it's still being used in dry cleaning today, but it has been used. It was used since, until the Seventies in, for certain medical applications. It was used as as an anesthetic for pregnant women. It was used to decaffeinate coffee, it was used to extract UH oil, vegetable oils. Readily infiltrates groundwater, and about 30, I believe, of groundwater in the United States is still contaminated with this compound, trichloroethylene.
And um, we know that there are traces of pharmaceuticals and various, you know, compounds in tap water that, I think, you know, the dose makes the poison to some degree. Um, so now and then I think it's probably fine, but I do think, you know, filtering your water, running it through a charcoal filter, um, maybe even a reverse osmosis purifier, is probably beneficial.
Does that get the fluoride out?
A reverse osmosis purifier does, yeah.
But not a charcoal filter.
No, there are some, there's one brand I don't remember the name, but there is. There are some pitcher filters that do claim to, uh, remove fluoride.
But um, does the reverse osmosis remove the minerals from the water as well, though?
Yeah, it removes everything.
So that's not good.
Yeah.
So you need minerals.
You do need minerals.
What is hard? When you get hard water from a well, you get that white stuff.
Too much?
Is it what is that?
Too many? yeah, too many minerals.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os