2023-11-14 00:58:08
Listening to America aims to “light out for the territories,” traveling less visited byways and taking time to see this immense, extraordinary country with fresh eyes while listening to the many voices of America’s past, present, and future. Led by noted historian and humanities scholar Clay Jenkinson, Listening to America travels the country’s less visited byways, from national parks and forests to historic sites to countless under-recognized rural and urban places. Through this exploration, Clay and team find and tell the overlooked historical and contemporary stories that shape America’s people and places. Visit our website at ltamerica.org.
Welcome everybody to this podcast introduction. The first meeting of Lindsay Trevinsky and David McCandry, talking about the most over and the most underrated presidents. It was a spirited conversation. Of course, Jefferson took it in the shorts, as he always seems to do around here, but that's fine. Um, you know, David McCandry doesn't pretend to be a presidential historian, but he does, um uh, tell you several times that he is enamored of Mad dog. Russo. The Sports um Raver, uh, on on which? on whose program he's a frequent guest.
Uh, and he had a lot of interesting things to say. Um, you know, uh, Lindsay, uh, resisted analysis of of the most recent presidents, which I think is good historical practice. Uh, David was willing to make the case that Biden will be remembered as a as a, as a good. This may be a great president. I think it's too early for all of that. But we we ranged widely and we talked about a whole number of presidencies, so we gave quite a bit of time to Woodrow. Wilson Um, he was not well regarded here.
Um, John Adams, of course, got some high praise from Lindsay U.h. Bush, 41.
We were out of time. But um, some high praise there, too. David McCandry made the case for James, Polk said What he's going to do, did it and then retired after a single term. Uh, there was a considerable debate about JFK. I'm on both sides of that question.
Uh, David McCandry thinks he is underrated. Um, I think Lindsay thinks I'm really overrated. We talked about Barack Obama, um, we did not really get enough time on LBJ, but we touched upon it. Uh, it was really, very interesting, and we didn't get to talk about Truman.
I, I'm in a big, hairy ass truman mood. I recently read this relatively recent book.
About, uh, Truman, the accidental president, about the four months, um, of of his first term as president, when he learned that, uh, FDR had died down in warm springs. On the 12th of April, that same day, he took the oath of office. And on that same day learned for the first time of the existence of the atomic project, the Manhattan Project. And within weeks, he had to decide whether to use it, how to use it, um, how to target it. Whether to warn the Japanese people, whether to warn the world community, whether to warn the Russians. And, um, when one can debate forever, um, his decisions in that moment. But, uh, it was powerful, you know? Nobody thought that he would be able to be the president of the United States after the extraordinary achievement of FDR. Uh, he, he had very little previous experience, he'd been a good but not great United States senator.
He came from very humble beginnings, what I love about him is his humility. And and one of the things he said is just stuck with me, um, for days now, he said. You know, I'm. I'm going to be the advocate for the millions and millions of Americans who do not have a lobbyist in Washington, D.C. And I'm going to be their guy. I'm going to, I'm going to be the advocate for the average American. I am an average American, and I'm going to be their champion.
And he was, but not in the kind of Jacksonian and Trumpian populist approach, but more like genuine respect and regard for the average citizens who live in places like Wadena, Minnesota, or Broken Bow, Nebraska, or Bend, Oregon, or Salinas, California. So anyway, uh, fascinating. I'd be interested in your views of this almost over and underrated presidencies. Uh, if you'd like to send in, uh, go to ltamerica..org. Also, uh, having conversations almost um, three a week now with, um, my, um, closest colleagues about the great travels with Charlie Tour. Uh, that I'm beginning, uh, next spring.
I, I, I, uh, winterized my airstream yesterday. It was a sad thing, you know, because snow was coming tomorrow. It's a this is the almost the first week in November, um, in 2023 in North Dakota. Snow, and once snow comes, once, once winter comes.
It's what Theodore Roosevelt said, the the season of iron desolation on the Northern Great Plains. So you can't just leave an RV sitting around, it's in storage, uh, it's been pumped dry.
And then we put in this sort of a pinkish, uh de-icer so that nothing can freeze in any of the pipes. We had to pull the batteries, which is no fun. Um, they're heavy and they're hard to pull, but we got those out and everything's locked up now. Um, we put in bounce, you know, the the fabric softener that you put in the in the dryer, because bounce is is has a smell that's repellent to mice and other rodents.
Um, and so that's probably going to keep the thing safe through the winter. I'll go check on it a number of times, of course, just to make sure, but it's put away, so I know season's end, uh, the leaves are falling. I have three really huge cottonwood trees in my yard, two of which I planted and which are 60 feet high.
Now, uh, they're shedding the last of their golden cottonwood leaves. At this moment, I'm home finally, after months and months and months of travel.
Got one more trip to Chicago coming next week and then I'm really home through the holidays. And oh my, how much work I have to do, how much reading I'm. I'm reading both um versions of On the Road, the original scroll, which is pretty raw at times, and then the final published version, which, um, he, he, um, he reworked it. Uh, in ways much more significant than he's willing to admit.
Is that the myth that it was written in, Uh, on Benadryne? Over, you know? A two week period without pause, without paragraphs, and so on? is partly true, but mostly not. So, I'm reading that, I'm, I'm reading books about Steinbeck, I'm working on a chapter for another book on J.F.K, Camelot and John Steinbeck, and so on, and on and on. This is a great, busy, wonderful, crazy, uh, hectic, demanding, uh, and deeply, deeply satisfying time in my life. I've been telling people we got our airstream, now we need the Ford F-150. So if you got a Ford F-150, um, that's almost new, that you want to donate to the project.
It'd be so honored, um, and and we will feel so grateful to that. Or the ranch, you know, some people still have the ranch they might give to us. We've. We've got a poll now, we're starting to do some polling with simple online polling about what this country is and what this country needs.
And, and, and, and. Are we circling the drain, or are we on the whole just fine? And so on, and so forth? So please follow along at ltamerica..org. And, finally, the Edward S. Curtis project. We had a meeting today and we looked over several of the of the interviews I did with elders, with Native Elders for UM, our initiative on on Edward Curtis.
And it's just heartbreakingly wonderful, uh, just wonderful. Native American commentators and elders discussing the individual photographs of Edward S. Curtis and the overall work and achievement of Curtis. And we'll be posting some of that. And when you see it, I think you're going to really understand why this project is so very important.
So all sorts of things going on. I'm a little exhausted, but mostly just thrilled and thrilled that you are following us now at Listening to America and LtAmerica..org. So thank you.
Hello everyone and welcome to this special edition of Listening to America with Clay Jenkinson today, a really interesting program. The most overrated and the most underrated presidents in American life. I have two guests today David McCandry of the West Coast, our Enlightenment correspondent, and Dr. Lindsay Chervinsky on the East Coast, a presidential historian, among other things.
The two of you have never met, so welcome both of you, Dave. you've never had a chance to encounter Lindsay before.
No, and I've enjoyed your many podcasts with her, and it's a pleasure to be with you both today.
And Lindsay McCandry and I have been friends for 25 years now and we try to speak as often as we can. But you're having your first chance to have an actual encounter with him.
Yes, it's very exciting to finally put a face with the voice and the name.
So welcome both of you. I'm going to admonish all of us to speak as briefly as we can on all these subjects. Because it's a fairly complicated set of things we're going to try to talk about here. But, Dave, this was your idea to have a discussion with Lindsay about over and underrated presidents? What was the source of this?
Well, as you know, Clay, I'm an aficionado of sports, talk, radio.
Oh, that explains it, that explains it.
One of my favorites is Christopher Russo.
Matt, I think Mad dog is his moniker.
Yeah, right, right, that's his moniker. But one of his favorite idioms is the Mount Rushmore. In other words, if you were to have a Mount Rushmore of the four best Green Bay packers of all time, who would that Mount Rushmore quartet be?
So, I've greatly enjoyed your continuous serial dialogue with Lindsay regarding presidential history. And although I don't pretend to be an expert at all, I thought that why not meld the two? Which is to continue the presidential discussion. But to borrow from the sports talk radio idiom most overrated, most underrated. And so that was the idea. I'm just delighted to share a platform with you and Lindsay.
Let me ask Lindsay a quick question before we start. If Mount Rushmore were being done again, and I'm guessing, you wouldn't even want it to be done at all. Of the four who are there, the four we should have, besides Jefferson, who do you want off? He bought South Dakota, for goodness sake.
Well, that's nice for him. We're going to tackle that in the Louisiana. 10 things. Well, I actually think two of them are probably right, so I think Washington and Lincoln definitely belong there. I would put probably FDR, and actually I'm okay with TR.
So, really, it's just Jefferson that I have a problem with.
Wow, so Jefferson, the man who doubled the size of our republic with a single stroke of his pen. Who sent the Lewis and Clark expedition to the West and who wrote the Declaration of Independence? Does not qualify, in your mind? For Mount Rushmore, that's really generous of you. Let's go to our theme for today Lindsay's five nominees for Overrated Woodrow, Wilson, John, F.
Kennedy, Andrew Jackson, James Madison, James Monroe. David DeCandre's list of overrated Woodrow, Wilson, So you agree? there LBJ. Lyndon, Baines, Johnson and Barack Obama. and my list of overrated also just three Ronald Reagan JFK, William Jefferson Clinton. So you two agree on Wilson as overrated?
So, David Decandre, why? Give us your rationale?
I listed them first because I think it's vastly overrated, and I'll give you just a few examples. You and Lindsay and Joe Ellis have often talked about the Alien. Sedition Act of 1798. I believe it is, but Wilson is certainly complicit with the Sedition Act of 1918. An aspect of which statute made it illegal to oppose the cause of the United States. Which I think is the context within which Eugene V. Debs ended up in prison.
So we add into this Wilson a legacy, the Espionage Act of 1917, where the Post Office censored the newspapers and magazines, all of which led to the red scare. Then there's the whole race side of Wilson's tenure. The most lynchings of African-Americans happened while he was president, kind of associated with elements of the KKK. Famously, Birth of the Nation had its premiere, I think, at the White House. But now I'll only typify this just to give Lindsay a chance to quickly respond, because I want to go into greater depth without dominating the conversation. I think Wilsonianism, foreign interventionism, making the world safer, democracy, nation building, all of that is a consequence of the Wilson administration and Wilson's administration, I would argue. And this is my concluding comment here, not McKinley's.
Foreign adventurism is the true break with the founding generation's notion of how the nation ought to comport itself internationally.
So thank you, David, just quickly, Lindsay, before I turn to you. Birth of the Nation is an early film by D..W. Griffiths, which is admiring of the KKK and Southern segregation and white supremacy. And Wilson embraced it in a way that is shocking to think about, even to this day. So you heard Necandery, what's your view?
I would agree with a lot of that. I had similar reasons on the domestic plane for my dislike of Wilson, the Red Scare. The Palmer raids were very extreme, especially in comparison to what we think of as the alien Sedition Acts of 1798. And, of course, his encouragement of segregation in the federal workforce, I would add to that list. I mean, I disagree slightly on the intervention piece, but I do have a foreign policy element of it, which is if you believe that the concept of the League of Nations is a good one. If you believe that there should be some form of international community, if there should be some sort of collective effort to avoid war, then you should really like FDR. Because Wilson has these ideas, but he didn't accomplish any of them.
And in fact, he was so in his own head that he couldn't be bothered to try and engage Congress in any way. To get support for the League of Nations Treaty, so it failed. So here you have this new international community in the United States, which is widely accepted to be as one of the most powerful nations in the world, has nothing to do with it. And so if you're going to give credit to him for ideas, that's nice. But he has to then have a massive deduction for a failure to actually enforce or get those ideas put into action in any way.
Fair enough, I'll go back to you, Dave for a very brief comment. But first, it's not just that Wilson was a racist, but he was a deep Southern racist. And he resegregated the federal bureaucracy by casting out of offices such few African-Americans as were in them. You know, history is not about judgment, necessarily, but I think that's an unforgivable deficit in the character, the basic character of Woodrow Wilson.
Dave.
Well, I don't have much really to add clay. Maybe I can just expand a little bit on the foreign interventionism and my quick allusion to McKinley Wilson's foreign interventionism making the world safe for democracy. That kind of thing has less to do with the fact that the world has seen American democratic ideals as the reason for the United States having sway over these things. The United States has been a very powerful country from the last decade of the 19th century to the present. And that is what's cut sway around the world, not the international community buying into American idealism.
Thank you so Lindsay. On your list, second up as overrated was John Fitzgerald Kennedy. I have him as overrated too. What's your logic there?
I think a lot of the things that Kennedy gets credit for are more appropriately attributed to LBJ. Much of the civil rights success that we typically attribute to Kennedy, actually, that that legislation was going nowhere under his presidency. It's not until he was assassinated that LBJ was able to use his truly incredible congressional influence and abilities to sort of rely upon the memory of Kennedy to get that done. And you know, a lot of people say, well, he gave this very important speech and it really started to sort of make a symbolic difference and therefore put the the issue on the national agenda. But that's not quite right either, in my opinion, because Eisenhower had given a number of speeches.
Eisenhower had testified as commander in chief about the importance of Black soldiers Eisenhower had gotten, albeit a more limited civil rights bill, passed with LBJ's assistance. So this issue was very much already, I think, at the front of national imagination or consciousness. And so to suggest that Kennedy somehow did this great thing, I think is is not quite accurate.
You know, there's a huge debate, as you know, about whether John F. Kennedy would have wound down our commitment to Vietnam. Or, like, LBJ, wound up. What's your view of that?
I think there's almost no way to know, I think, that he had expressed. There. You can find you can cherry pick sentiments in his letters and statements in both directions. He had expressed concern about it, but he also had expressed concern about appearing weak on foreign policy. Coming after Eisenhower, It's not to say that I think he was weak, I want to make very explicit.
That's not what I'm saying. But he was concerned about appearing to be soft or squishy. Coming after Eisenhower, given their different ages and Eisenhower's success. And so I think it's almost impossible to know. But we cannot say decisively that he wouldn't have engaged because I think there's really no evidence to make that sort of declarative statement.
I agree 100 percent with everything that you've said. In fact, overrated on civil rights, no LBJ, no Civil Rights Act of 1965, it seems to be. And I also think that it's impossible to know what Kennedy would have done on Vietnam. And frankly, I think that it's a liberal fantasy to argue that he was going to wind this down and he never would have done what LBJ did. Weighing of the evidence is driven by hope.
But I also think Kennedy almost belongs on my underrated, too. Because the glamour, the appeal to youth, the sense of hope around the world, the belief that the torch had been passed to a new generation, the space program, the peace Corps, the wit. There was a certain quality of new possibility that he represented, particularly coming after Dwight Eisenhower. And I think that that stirred the world, and it continues to stir the world quickly. Your view of this?
Tremendously overrated. Now, I think, with the passage of time, particularly the dispiriting nature of the last few years. Perhaps Lindsay has a closing comment before we go to break here.
Well, I think there are certainly elements of his legacy that are underrated NASA, the Peace Corps, all of those kinds of things. I think. A lot of the glamour. And that memory was crafted after his death, largely by his wife. But the one thing that I wanted to push back on was the end of the Cold War. Kennedy was almost as responsible for the ongoing increase of the military industrial complex as anyone, because he made the supposed missile gap one of his key campaign elements in 1960.
And Nixon and Eisenhower couldn't say anything about it because they didn't want to release classified information, and they would have said had they been able to. The United States is way ahead. There is no missile gap at all. But they were doing the responsible thing. And so I do think that he deserves some condemnation for making this issue a political one, rather than a diplomatic one.
Thanks, you see how historians don't necessarily agree, but there's lots of fun talking about it. I'm having a conversation today with Dr. Lindsay Czerwinski and Dave McCandry, one on the East and one on the West Coast, about overrated and underrated presidents. I want to come back to JFK for just a moment when we return.
This is a special issue of listening to America. We'll be back in just a minute.
Welcome back to Listening to America. I'm Clay Jenkinson across from me, virtually at least. Dave McCandry and Lindsay Czerwinski. We were talking about John Kennedy, I said, he's both under and overrated. Lindsay sort of agrees with that.
She pushed back a little on his desire to end the Cold War. Dave, he's on your underrated list. We've mentioned some of the great things about Kennedy, and you said that it's periodical. That for a long time, there was a sort of a revisionist that wanted to put him lower on the scale. But more recently, given the craziness of our current political scene, you think he is underrated?
That ebb and flow Clay and Lindsay is actually a function of a larger historiographical phenomenon. Which is, it's only the passage of time that provides insight and elucidates what in the past was either valuable or significant, or insignificant. And Kennedy is just a classic example of how that dynamic plays out. I remember the Kennedy years from my youth. The sense of idealism, sense of national purpose. There's just simply no hint of that in the contemporary civic culture. The management of the Cuban missile crisis, I agree, it's a classic example of crisis management.
Well, there are very few things like it in American history, and regarding the ending of the Cold War. No, it wasn't going to have, did not happen then. But all of the prefiguration of how it would end is evident in the Kennedy years. The American University Speech Clay, in which Kennedy announced the United States was not going to do any more atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons. Which led directly to the salt talks with the Soviet Union, which Nixon consummated. What I most personally miss about the Kennedy era, and why I think he's underrated, is, I mean, the style and that kind of cosmetic, superficial Camelot stuff.
But it's the idealism, it's the national purpose. One of his favorite rhetorical tropes was always to refer to us as my fellow Americans. We don't hear much of that anymore.
I'm going to move on here in a minute, but Lindsay, I just want to push back on your thought about Camelot for a moment. It is true that one week after the assassination, Jacqueline Kennedy summoned Theodore White, the great journalist, to Hyannisport and gave the first interview. Apparently with extraordinarily gory details of what had happened on that terrible day. And as he was about to leave, because Life Magazine was holding its presses at the cost of thirty thousand dollars per hour to get this scoop. As he was leaving, she said Oh, one more thing, you know, Jack loved this record of the soundtrack of Camelot, the musical.
And he used to play this song all the time late at night, when his back was hurting and he couldn't sleep. He would put this record on, you know? The one brief, shining moment of the piece, and White called it in to life. He was a little dubious, but he called it in, and the editors at Life said No, no, that's mockish, that's sentimental, no. She got on the phone and demanded it, insisted that it stay in.
And so it did, and thus launched Camelot. But it's not just that, I mean, it's true, I mean, this was a. This was a deliberate metaphor that she created, which has had an extraordinary shelf life in American history.
Not much of a good, I think, but she wasn't the only one, there was a whole series of people, including William Manchester, after a very, very difficult relationship with Bobby and Jacqueline. Kennedy, who wrote a book in 1968 about John Kennedy. And he called it one brief, shining moment, and he talked about Kennedy as an Arthurian figure of hope and idealism.
And so the tenacity of that metaphor has been huge.
It has, and I think, you know, it was, as you said, it was put forth by a lot of people and that's because it was quite politically useful. Both for the crafting of the legacy of of the Kennedy administration that they wanted to have, but also for the political careers of his family. And there's a reason we had a Kennedy Dynasty.
And it's partly because of this legacy and this.
Memory. So those of us who are much older than you are, and I think Dave, you will agree with this. Have a romance with the Kennedys. That's inexplicable to an objective historian, wouldn't?
You say, Dave, Yeah, I think that's fair. And that's why it's good not only to mix up different gendered perspectives, but chronological ones. That's, I think, one of the exciting aspects about this conversation, one aspect of the fact pattern. The Moon program, Apollo. That's also part of that common sense of purpose.
It's not so much Camelot. The sense of national ideals being in it together, we don't have, as I said earlier, we don't have much of that today. If I might just push back a little bit on Lindsey's characterization that actually the civil rights agenda, I would argue Lindsey. That LBJ only got it through because JFK had been martyred, and actually, it was the liberal Republicans. They deserve a lot of credit for the delivery of that. Because, as you know, don't need me to tell you. LBJ had a lot of allies with that segregationist bloc, with the Senate Democrats, and very few of them, if any, turned around on it.
But it was the combination of the martyrdom of JFK and Republican leadership that resulted in the passage of the Civil Rights and Voting Rights Acts. It was LBJ who turbocharged the Vietnam commitment that ended up so disastrously. Which is why he's on my list of very overrated presidents.
I'm in the middle of the two of you. The martyrdom, of course, of J.F.K was a factor in the passage of those laws. Of course, it was. There was a sense of a kind of a moral duty to the legacy, which maybe overrates John Kennedy's commitment to this. No. LBJ, you still don't get the civil rights acts.
I mean his capacity as a legislative manager. To push people to take them by the lapels, to horse trade with them, to threaten them, to cajole them, to seduce them. I mean, he was one of the great masters of the political game. And so it takes both the moment. Let's give some credit to the civil rights workers themselves and Martin Luther King and the Black activists. But the moment itself, JFK's sort of reluctant, signing on and giving a great speech about introducing the legislation, the death of JFK and then the absolute political mastery of LBJ that got it through. What do you say?
Well, I agree with most of that. I think there's one piece that you guys have talked about, you know, in terms of the martyrdom of JFK. There's no evidence actually that he was killed because of civil rights. The person who killed him left no evidence that that was in any way a factor, but LBJ made it a factor.
He said it was martyrdom, he was the one that sort of coined that terminology, and to be sure, many Black Americans actually fervently believe that he had been martyred. That was a sentiment that was then, and still holds, quite true, and so JFK is among the most popular presidents among African Americans.
But the reason that became a national sort of calling card on behalf of JFK's legacy is because LBJ made it so. Because he went to Congress and he said on national television, he was killed for this. We cannot let that stand.
Martin Luther King's I Have a Dream Speech on the Mall in Washington, one of the most extraordinary public addresses in human history, not just American history. Lindsay, On your list, you also have Andrew Jackson as overrated, James Madison is overrated, James Monroe is overrated. I think we can agree on Monroe.
I didn't know that he was overrated, I thought he was mostly just forgotten. How could you attack James Madison as overrated? What, what is wrong with you?
Okay, so here is, and maybe this is an important expose of how we approach this. I was going.
James Madison is among the most brilliant thinkers we've ever had. I think we owe him a great deal, but his presidency was ridiculous. Madison. His presidency resulted in the burning of Washington, D.C. and the utter calamity of the war of 1812.
And the only reason we got sort of lucky is because the British were super distracted and didn't really want to do it because they had other things on their minds. He was not really cut out to be a president.
Quickly, then, who would have been better at that moment? And don't just say anybody.
So I actually think Monroe would have been better at that moment. Monroe had a lot of military experience and he did sort of have the the executive mindset. And there's some evidence to suggest that. Once he was able to sort of take over the war effort, things did start to turn around a little bit. I think someone with military experience who understood what it would mean to be a president in time of war would have been more comfortable using that authority.
Because the problem really was that Madison was not comfortable with that authority. He felt that he should really be very sort of sitting back and very limited in his power. And maybe that's your view of the presidency? But when there is literally an invasion force marching towards the Capitol, you cannot sit back and just be like, Well, other people will take care of it, it's fine.
Well, one of Madison's problems was he was a small R. Jeffersonian ideologue, and that meant that he was unsuited for that moment. Really. Because he limited executive power deference to Congress, deference to states, peace as his passion. We survived it, I guess that's all we can say about it.
So go ahead and dump on Jackson for 30 or 40 seconds.
So I just don't know really what positive there is to say about Jackson. I mean, I guess the one thing I would say is that he stood up to the nullification crisis. He stood up to John C. Calhoun. He articulated a strong vision of the union.
But he caused tremendous economic damage by tanking the Bank of the United States for purely personal and ideological reasons. He was horrific when it comes to Native Americans, he bought and sold enslaved people while in the White House. He was personally a total jerk face. I know I'm not allowed to swear, so that's as close as I'll get.
Is that a technical, historiographical term? A total jerk face.
Yes, it is. It's, you know, these are the tricks of the trade, the secrets that they tell you when you get your P.h.D. You know, was also a calamitous president when it came to overseeing the executive branch. He went through three entire cabinets until he could find a group of Yes men who would agree with him. He also exacerbated partisan tensions.
He really was responsible for engaging the newspaper partisan war. So, I mean, like, I just the list can go on and on.
We've actually gotten through your list. I know we haven't given it all the time it deserves. But overrated Woodrow Wilson, overrated JFK, overrated Andrew Jackson, overrated The Father of the Constitution, James Madison, overrated James Monroe. And as you say, we're talking about their presidencies, the four or eight years they were president, not about the overall whole man theory of their greatness, and so on. We get it that covers your list.
Dave McHenry you overrated Woodrow Wilson. We've been through that. Give us just a minute and a half on Barack Obama, the third on your list.
Well, so to Obama, this is probably the most controversial one. And this is straight out of the idiom of sports talk radio, which you just kind of, you just throw things out there to engender a response.
Mad dog McHenry, Here he is.
So, but let me just preface it with this, because I think it's important in these highly ideological and polarized times. People hearing what I'm about to say, I just want them to get this little prologue. First. I was a delegate to our county's Democratic Convention. I was an Obama delegate to the Thurston County Democratic Convention in 2008. I thought this was our best shot at the second coming of J.F.K. style idealism.
And in the end, I was disappointed. But by just to give it some dimension, I would encourage people to compare. Barack Obama's keynote address at the 2004, I think it was Democratic Convention. We're not a Red State of America, we're not a Blue State of America or a United States of America.
I'd conjoined that with his Father's Day speech from June of 2008, which was delivered in a church and these kind of common endeavor.
Let's, let's, let's solve our national problems. I'd compare that with the way he actually governed the nation. In the end, I think the most distressing aspect to me. The greatest disappointment was his frustration with Congress. Which, for the most part, maybe Lindsey, or you would have a better command of this. For much of his tenure was, I think, he had some Democratic control of the House and Senate. That guy, as I said, this is not a specialty of mine. If I want to go back to Wilkes, I'm on my home ground.
In the end, he said, he wanted to govern with a pen and a phone. And we have reverted to a quasi-monarchial system where it's only the chief executive who legislates by executive order. And I think Obama is a significant. Obama accelerated Congress's self-inflicted tendency not to do its job by just simply governing with a phone, with a phone and a pen. And lastly, I would say this.
This will be problematic in many listeners. He was, after all, the predecessor to Donald Trump. His lack of bringing the country together, diffusing the polarization trend that the nation had been on in the Clinton Bush years. He only accelerated that. And I think I think to some extent, his failure sets the stage for, I'm not making him responsible for, but it sets the stage for someone like Trump coming in and flipping. Many of the same counties Obama carried, and he carried them to victory in 2016, and so that's why I think he is.
An overrated president, I disagree so sharply with so much of that. He didn't say he wanted to govern with a pen and a phone, he said he was willing to because Congress wasn't doing the things that it needed to do. That great nations need to do things that there was urgent business to be done, and Congress was failing to do it. And therefore, because of that, he was willing to govern with his pen and his phone.
That's a very different thing. There was not a will to power there. I don't think there was a sense of this country is in a slow motion collapse and something has to be done. But Lindsay, what's your?
Response Yeah, I think I have a couple of things, I think the first and the primary. And this actually goes back to David's point originally about Kennedy. I think it's way too soon to measure Obama's true legacy and impact. Because so much of how we view George W. Bush has changed based on the last eight years.
So surely that will be true for Obama as well? I do think, in some ways, his presidency might turn out to be one of the most pivotal because of who came after him. But I think that that is a different story. So then my second point would be so. If we look at executive orders in terms of the number of executive orders that he issued, he issued on average 35 per year, or a total of 276. George Bush issued 291..
Clinton issued 364.
Reagan issued 381. So, over the course of the last several decades, we've actually seen a fairly steady decrease until Donald Trump, which has spiked to 55 per year. And I think that's a very common misnomer is that people think executive orders are becoming more and more prevalent. And really, actually, the apex of their use was under FDR. The third piece I would say is so much of what happened in response to his presidency, both in terms of the gridlock in Congress.
That was quite intentionally forged by Mitch McConnell and some of the Republican leaders, was an intentional effort to gridlock everything. To make no, to make no progress. But also was a response to having the first Black president. I think we cannot separate the rise of Donald Trump with having the first Black president. And how much of that is economic grievance, class grievance, race grievance? I don't know how much of it was, just genuine affection for what is a very popular demagogue, hard to say.
I think it will take us time to separate that. I refuse to make that his fault because the American people have a lot of issues with the first Black president. But it's not his fault for being that person. It's not to say he couldn't have done things better. I'm in no way saying that he should be treated as one of the best presidents, but that one, I will not lay at his feet.
Just a couple of quick thoughts as we go to break here. First of all, there are executive orders in their executive orders, I mean, most executive orders are relatively minor in their scope. Some of the more recent executive orders by recent presidents have been essentially the work of legislatures. And I think that does raise serious constitutional questions, particularly since executive orders are not mentioned at all in the 4,000 word constitution of the United States.
But as to President Obama, I'm not a great President Obama admirer. I remember what David Swensen said when he was elected. On the Jefferson Hour, he said He's going to break a lot of hearts, and in a certain sense, he did break a lot of hearts. But I want to just say this much to both of you, and I know you agree.
Think of the tide against which he tried to operate. Rush Limbaugh and Mitch McConnell both said that their duty, their program, was to make him a one term president and to make him an ineffective president. And what the Birthers did? Led by Donald Trump. Saying that he was not an American, that he was not born in America, he was ineligible to be an American president, that he might be an Islamic spy or provocateur. One of the most heartless, cruel and appalling things that has ever happened.
A president, under any circumstances, needs all the help he or she can get to govern this country. And to undermine that person by saying they're not really one of us and have millions of people hearken to. That is it's almost incalculably cruel. And it's not only cruel to Barack Obama and to African Americans, but it's cruel to the very constitution of the United States. That needs more support for the transition of power than that. So I think, Lindsay, you're right, it's too soon to really know.
But I do agree with David Nikandari that if things stand as they are somewhat overrated and something of a disappointment, we'll take a break when we come back. We have lots more to talk about here as we speak to overrated and underrated presidents of the United States. We'll be back in just a moment.
Welcome back to listening to America. And we were talking about whether it's too soon to rate Donald Trump or Joe Biden, or Barack Obama, or even G..W. Bush. I remember when you know, the famous moment when Henry Kissinger was talking to Joe and lie and saying, Do you think the French Revolution was a success? And Joe and I said, It's too soon to see.
It's too soon to know, you know? So we've got to take the long view of such things. So we're talking about over and underrated presidents. Lindsay's overrated were Wilson Kennedy, Jackson, Madison and Monroe. David Nikandari's overrated were Woodrow, Wilson, LBJ and Barack Obama. We'll come back to LBJ if we have time.
And my overrated presidents were Ronald Reagan JFK and Bill Clinton. Again, it might be too soon on Bill Clinton, but I'll say this the most disappointing president of my lifetime was William Jefferson Clinton. All those gifts, all that capacity to articulate, all that empathy, all that mastery of the world situation, of geopolitics, of of the geography of the world, of the geopolitical background to the world. His deep reading. And then to squander so much of it, not just because of his sexual life, but to squander it also because he was, in many respects, a temporizer and an overcompromiser. I think this will go down in history as one of the near misses. A person who might have been a great president, who turned out to be a disappointing president, and his wounds, like those of the most recent president, were self inflicted, largely self inflicted.
And he also presided over one of the great economic booms of all time, the dot com boom. And so he gets a lot of credit for an economy that, you know, no president really has much influence on the economy, at least in the short term. So I just leave that unless one of you wants to weigh in at all on Clinton.
I would just say I think his tendency to move to the center is a salutary feature. That might be the very same thing, however, clay that you were disappointed in. I'm not sure I think he rightly.
Understood that if you want to govern this country, you need to hew to the center, unless the country's at the beginning of World War Two. Or in a dust bowl. But I also think his character was to give up too soon on many questions. What do you say, Lindsay? Yeah, this is actually one.
Of my weak spots in history, because it's not far enough back that. I've done a lot of reading on it, but it's not in my sharp memory. But I do think one element of the Clinton administration that has started to undergo some revision to our points about how long it takes for us to think about these things is his crime bill. You know, that was something that was generally lauded at the time, and there's been a lot of sort of backtracking on the harmful effects of the bill. The incarceration, the unfair, disparate treatment towards different types of drugs, things like that. And so I think there are elements that sometimes are seen as successes in the current moment.
But, as you said, it takes a while for us to see their actual impact. But I agree with you about self-inflicted wounds. From everything that I've heard about everyone who ever knew him, he was the best politician that anyone had ever met. To a certain extent, he certainly squandered.
That so Ronald Reagan just quickly, he's on my overrated list. I'm ambivalent about that because obviously he's he's at an inflection point, so his importance, historically, is high. If I use Lindsay's methodology of, Well, what kind of president was he?
I think he's overrated and now what's so interesting about this is that he's being undone by the Republicans the Republicans used to be. They would all invoke Reagan all the time. Oh, you know, I'm a Reagan Republican.
He's the greatest thing today. He's being distanced by the right wing Republicans as as too nice, too centrist, too soft, too agreeable, and too much of a. Of a Cold Warrior. You know, the Evil Empire, and so on. It's fascinating, Lindsay, to watch the Republican, right, detach themselves from the Great.
Reagan It is, you know, when I was thinking about, as you were talking about the sense of idealism in Kennedy, Reagan brought an element of that to the morning in America. That, you know, this is the American moment on the world stage, a lot of hopefulness. He was the, you know, happy warrior. There are times in the last couple of years where, you know, I think his cold warrior ness sometimes was could be quite detrimental. It went too far in some places when we think about the Iran-Contra scandal.
But I would, I would kill. For a Republican party that embraced his stalwart defense of American allies and democracy abroad. At the moment, that would be delightful. I would love to have that back. And so, on one hand, like, I think, over time, we have seen that a lot of the rhetoric around the cult of Reagan is just that it's rhetoric on the other. In some ways, the last couple of years have made him look really.
Great, yeah. Plus, you know, he was a centrist and sensible on immigration. If you took his speeches out of out of context today and read them before the United States House of Representatives, they would call these the work of a communist.
Sympathizer, he was also sensible on gun control.
And gun reform and abortion, by the way. Dave your.
View of Reagan Well, he's not on either of my lists, but I'll just say this. Reagan is only one of two 20th century American presidents who are what I would call a generational president. In other words, that their their echo, their influence lingered well past their actual presidency, FDR being the obvious one. Reagan's era, in terms of his influence on the Republican Party, ran from 1980 to 2008..
Thank you for that.
I'm going to move on to some underrated presidents here, but Lindsay, in a nutshell, Theodore Roosevelt, over or underrated, or just where he should be. Maybe just right certainly one of the most extraordinary presidencies in American history. Thank goodness, he was a benevolent person who loved this country. Because the power that he wielded in the wrong hands could have been a very, very different sort of thing.
Underrated president. So I may as well just let it happen here. Lindsay Trevinsky, your man.
JohN AdamS Yeah, he was absolutely totally underrated. Coming second after Washington was a terrible task, as we've discussed. And it was going to be horrible and everyone knew it was going to be terrible. And Jefferson didn't want to do it, he said. He didn't want to be, you know, in that situation.
And Adams knew it was going to be tough and he did it anyway. And he broke with his party. To ensure the peace and prosperity of the nation, he ensured that peace with France would be a longstanding. We have never again been at war with France. And at a time when war could have been quite fatal to the nation. He ensured peace was possible, and he helped engineer the first two peaceful transfers of power.
So highly.
Underrated. And you've just, of course, finished your book on this very subject. And when will we?
See it August 2024, so, of course, you're going.
To be in favor of John Adams because you've written a book about it and you don't like the third president of the United States very much. But why, if that's true, couldn't Adams find a way to be reelected in the year 1800 couple?
Issues one the fracture in the Federalist Party was extremely detrimental, and that that is best symbolized by, of course, Hamilton's pamphlet on John Adams. But it happened far before then and led to a lack of enthusiasm among federalist voters. Second, the federalist program of extensive taxation to pay for the new army, or the provisional army, was highly unpopular.
And that, combined with the alien sedition acts, seemed like a oppressive regime. Most voters did not blame John Adams for that policy, and in fact, although he signed some things, he really didn't want. The army. And he warned against the taxation policies for a long time about how they were going to be damaging. And in the elections, he ran in terms of the polling way ahead of other federalists.
I think the combination of those things and the fact that the news of the peace treaty didn't come until after much of the voting had already taken place. Those were the three things that defeated his reelection campaign. I love him.
Because he sent the second delegation to France when there was a lot of support for going to war with France in 1798 or 99.
So I think we could probably get into a little an interesting little conversation about this. On Lindsay's list of underrated presidents, James Earl Carter, who is still alive. Somehow, he's been on hospice since, like March.
That's the last days of your life. He made a public appearance recently. Now he's the oldest president in American history. I think he's underrated too, but make the case for this.
LiNDsay So he was really forward thinking in his environmental protection efforts. He worked really hard to start to to reduce the reliance on fossil fuels and get ahead of preservation efforts. And a lot of that is overlooked. He took some very brave economic measures that were required to start to reduce the stagflation.
And they did actually end up proving to be quite successful. Reagan tends to get credit for them because the effects of those measures are really felt. After Carter left office, he was quite instrumental in trying to move forward. Peace in the Middle East. Obviously, that is not a long term piece, as we are currently living through another eruption of horrible hostilities. But WAS was really instrumental in that regard.
He was a very honest man at a time when a lot of people had questions about corruption in the executive branch or in government. More broadly. In a lot of ways. A simple man. He was quite brilliant. He was not a good salesman, he was a very poor salesman. And a president has to be both a statesman and a salesman. And he had the poor fortune of being followed by someone, Ronald Reagan, who was a phenomenal salesman. And so, therefore, was able to claim credit for a lot of the foreign policy successes, a lot of the economic successes, and even some of the environmental successes that Carter really engineered.
Agreed, I just want to emphasize the Camp David Accords an extraordinary diplomatic achievement. And then also, you know, he stood up to the Concrete and Dam Industrial complex and said, enough. Already on the big dams in the West, we need to turn towards a more environmentally sensitive way of looking at the west. David Dicandre Your view of James Earl Carter?
Well, I don't have a pronounced one, but I would pick up on the point about moving away from fossil fuels. Because this is why, perhaps, contrary to form, Joe Biden is on my underrated list. Because the misadvertised Inflation Reduction Act, which is truly the down payment on the Green New Deal, the groundwork being laid with what has been characterized as the Green New Deal, although the legislation did not call it that. Alternative fuels, electric vehicles, et cetera. That I maintain, has the potential of being the 21st century equivalent of NASA and the Apollo project in terms of its long term ramifications.
Talk about jumping the gun on historical review. He's still in office. Just one thing to say, I think he's sort of the last of the new dealers. He's operating very much in the spirit of the new deal and the Great Society and gotten away with it. I do think that the messaging from the Biden administration has been pitiful.
And that's one reason why he languishes so greatly in the polls. You know, we didn't expect to talk about the current president. But Lindsey, do you want to make any comment about this?
Yeah, I think so much of this is still to be decided, but I think that with reflection, people will be. Once they can see the list of accomplishments and they can get past their own day to day existence, they will be blown away by the amount that has been accomplished. On that list, I would add a restoration of United States place with global alliances and the importance of U.s leadership. I shudder to think what might have happened in the last really since February 20. What was it February 22 when Russia invaded Ukraine for the second time, or further invaded, I guess?
What? What might have happened in both of those cases had someone less reputable than an office.
I think the historical headline is going to be Joe Biden saved America by committing himself to norms and constitutional behavior. But we'll see, it's very, very early in all of that. All right, let's go to Polk. I was surprised, David and Kendry, that you mentioned Polk as one of the underrated president, one term president.
He didn't want a second term, you know, from a certain point of view, from a sort of a liberal point of view, he's problematic. Because he was an ardent expansionist who trumped up a war against Mexico and expanded the country. As Stephen Ambrose liked to say, from sea to shining sea, what makes him a good president?
Here's where my sports talk radio idiom, trying to be provocative comes into play, and it's difficult to sort out the policies from the practicum. But here you have a person who ran for president with a very limited agenda and accomplished it on its own terms. He accomplished it, he accomplished it all.
Lindsay made the point about Jackson's disastrous bank policy. Polk kind of righted the ship a little bit. In that regard, he lowered the tariffs. That might not be a hot button item in a lot of people's characterization. But having just learned to learn, having just listened to your most recent conversation with each other, where you are debating whether Jefferson is properly the president of the West? I think an equally good case can be made.
However, he got there and it is problematic. Polk is actually the president, the ultimate president of the West. Having settled, having seen Texas into, the union, settled the Oregon bond dispute with Great Britain and avoided conflict there. And, of course, all of the Mexican session, however it was accrued, is in fact a part of our union today. Although we all would quickly admit that that session led directly to the civil war. That's why he's one of my underrated presidents.
Lindsay.
Yeah, I guess I'm just not. Tariff policy is not necessarily one of our sexy subjects today, in the 21st century. Although he does deserve credit for saying, I want to do these five things, and I did these five things. And then hightailing it out of office, that is impressive feat. So in terms of executive authority, especially because he was a dark horse candidate. My big issue with Polk is Polk set out to get more territory, especially in the Southwest. Did pretty much anything in his power to make sure it happened, which I never want to say.
A historic event is inevitable, because I don't believe that really anything is inevitable. But if there was ever a moment when the civil war was made as inevitable as possible, where some sort of settlement couldn't be achieved outside of horrible military conflict? I do think the acquisition of territory in the South is that moment from the Mexican-American war, and a lot of contemporaries believe so as well. Both Grant and John Quincy Adams voiced similar concerns at the time. And so I do believe that. The fault, therefore, of both the acquisition of those things and what it meant for the nation, does have to rest on Polk's shoulders.
And in this, you agree, you both both have noted that point. So we got to move into some rapid fire here because we are almost out of time. So, David Kandri, you have Richard Nixon on your list as underrated presidents. I understand the logic.
Let's hear it quickly.
As much as I felt very fervently that Wilson was the most overrated, I might not have listed him exactly this way, but I think Nixon's.
Significantly underrated president. So let's just talk about foreign affairs, the China Initiative, which was the fundamental precept of American foreign policy from its inception in 1972 until the Ukraine War. In 2022, that's a 50 year regimen. That was Nixon's accomplishment.
I already referenced the Salt Treaty started by JFK, but arms control was completed under Nixon, but I think more pointedly, I look to Nixon's domestic accomplishments. I'm just going to name three statutes, then I have a fourth that I want to culminate with the Environmental Protection Act, Title IX, the Clean Water Act.
Now true, those were all congressional statutes, but he could have vetoed them, could have argued against them, but they're all fundamentally liberal propositions and foundational to our modern ecological sensibility. Lastly, I want to end on what might be, to many listeners, an obscure court decision. But it looms large in the Northwest, in fact, a place out hugely all across. What's referred to often as Indian country in the United States? And I'm referring to the Bolt decision and the famous Bolt decision regarding Indian fishing rights in the Northwest.
That's why, Richard Nix. And in Indian country today, if I can use that term, and I hear it still quite commonly. There's kind of a secret, kind of private regard for the Nixon administration amongst those tribal elders who remember when they had no other ally but the Nixon Justice Department. Thank you, Lindsay.
Give four sentences on Bush, 41, keeping the peace.
Is not a very sexy or tangible concept. But Bush, 41, held steady and solemn at the end of the Cold War and ensured that. It was a much more peaceful and much less nuclear explosion in terms of, like, the Soviet Union, exploding than it could have been. And it took someone who was incredibly experienced and knowledgeable and intelligent about foreign policy and intelligence, and someone who was willing to set aside their own ego in order to do that. And he deserves spectacular.
Credit for doing so, an internationalist and one of the most humble presidents in American history. In certain respects, this has been so interesting. I wish we had another hour to keep at it.
You're both fantastic. I hope the the people who are listening have been as interested and amused as I have been by this spirited conversation about overrated and underrated presidents of the United States. We'll do another one about who really should be on Mount Rushmore, but that's in the future. We'll see you all next week for another important edition of Listening to America.
Transcribed by https://otter.
AI.
v1.0.0.260408-1-a910ba6_os